On 5/10/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the next significant release, I'm fine with waiting the extra week.
As mentioned elsewhere, quality votes are not meant to be a permanent judgment. If problems are found, we can recast our votes and re-qualify the quality of the release. There's no harm in calling for a vote early, but we do have to keep in mind that if we announce too quickly, and more binding votes roll in later, we might have to issue a second announcement that the quality has been downgraded. Looking over my schedule, I won't have the opportunity to review the latest build myself this month, and so I will have to abstrain for now. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
