Hi Bruce, From your reply I can see that my statement really it home, sorry if the the hurts!
/s/ Steve, N2CKH At 07:07 PM 12/26/2007, you wrote: >You really need to view RM-11392 for what it is, the >entire thrust of RM-11392 in my opinion is an effort >at protectionism ( its an old story that dates back >ages ) of obsolete technology and practices by >an attempt to limit the advancement of new >technologies and practices, this is just the opposite >of what the Amateur Radio Service is all about in my >opinion > >HERE WE GO AGAIN " obsolete technology and practices " > >If it an't digital it an't radio ...... > >BUNK JUST BUNK ..... >How come you dont see all of this on 1 1/4 meters ? >How come you want it on HF? >When you fill up 219 mhz and above THEN say its >"protecting " obsolete technology and practices " >UNTILL THEN You have more than 20 mhz already to use >GO USE IT ....
