Robert,

All these issues on exploring the digital modes are and should be 
discussed. It depends upon what interests the posters who are willing to 
share that information. Be thankful that they do. Many of these 
discussions are vital to amateur radio. The decisions to come will 
affect you personally. Perhaps in ways you like and then again perhaps 
in ways you do not like. You can choose to ignore them and not 
participate, this is up to each individual.

As far as weeding, it does take work. I have to remove many posts that 
do not interest me such as on individuals making contacts through the 
group, that sort of thing, so it does sometimes take an extra minute per 
day to do this.

For specific discussion on emergency communications, there is the hfdec 
(hams for disaster and emergency communication).

There have been times I have asked a digital specific question and 
received no help. Probably because no one knows the answer. On the other 
hand, there have been many times that I have asked a question and 
received help.

What specific digital information were you looking for that you can not 
find elsewhere?

73,

Rick, KV9U



n4ijs wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am new to this forum, so please forgive me if this comes across off
> base.  But, I came here looking for information on digital modes for
> Amateur Radio - not various, multi-post messages about various peoples
> opinion (and arguments) on unrelated topics.
>
> I am sure that these discussions are important to a select group of
> folks, but are there no other places for these types of discussions to
> take place?  
>
> I belong to several Ham related Yahoo! forums and this one certainly
> produces (by far) the most emails; however, few are related to the
> topic at hand.  So, I have to weed through these other messages to get
> to the "real" ones.
>
> If this just the way of this forum, that's fine - I will just
> unsubscribe.  I hope that isn't the case, but, if it is, can anyone
> recommend a forum for exploring digital modes within Ham Radio?
>
> Thanks and 73,
> Robert - N4IJS
>   
>
>   

Reply via email to