if i was a woman who wasn't familiar with Wikipedia, and I read this article, I would be a bit put off. #JustSaying
Maybe its my ADD creating that connection, but I obviously thought it relevant enough to post. You don't have to agree with me, but I would appreciate you don't discredit my opinion/thoughts by calling it gossip. thanks! On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Laura Hale <la...@fanhistory.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have to be honest here, I'm not really certain what this thread has to >> do with the gender gap. It just feels more like gossip than anything, >> particularly as a significant portion of the reporting either (a) has >> nothing to do with the purported subject of the articles and/or (b) is >> inaccurate. >> >> Risker/Anne >> > > This. No one has provided any solid evidence of a connection between the > limited presence of a few pornographic pictures on Wikipedia and the > gendergap. At best, the gender gap story here would be: This sort of story > discourages women from becoming involved. > > -- > twitter: purplepopple > blog: ozziesport.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > > -- *Sandra Ordonez* *Web Astronaut* (503)866-2697 @Collaboracion "Helping you rock out in the virtual, collaborative world." *www.collaborativenation.com*
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
