I’m very aware of that!

But in this specific case, we will be working with a group of women’s studies 
professors who are already closely acquainted and working together with the 
partnering organisations. Their students frequently do internships there, they 
did internet-based collaboration projects earlier and the docents/professors 
actually actively asked for follow-up projects. It sounds as if this might be a 
good fit!

Our next step is a kick-off meeting in February. If no-one seems interested 
after all, we’ll pursue different paths outside education.

And yes, I already pinged WMNL.

Thanks, everyone, for your input! Very helpful :-)

Greetings, Sandra



> On 19 Nov 2014, at 23:54, JJ Marr <jjm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree. You have to enter into a hostile environnent, which is very 
> traumatizing towards women.
> 
> On Nov 19, 2014 5:50 PM, "Kerry Raymond" <kerry.raym...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> When you work in a university, you frequently receive proposals that want
> students (and sometimes academics) to be "free labour" for some worthy (or
> not-so-worthy cause) without much regard to how the student benefits in
> terms of their program of study. As much as I am personally committed to
> Wikipedia and to feminism, if someone had approached me in my university
> with such a proposal, I would have said that it might be reasonable to
> expect a student in a writing or digital communications course to contribute
> to Wikipedia (or Facebook or ...) as part of that course, but that I would
> need to see a much stronger case for it in a course about feminism.
> 
> Would you regard it as reasonable if a driving instructor required their
> students to contribute to Wikipedia articles on road safety as a condition
> of receiving their driver's license? Or a doctor required Wikipedia articles
> before providing treatment? Why is it any different for a student to be
> required to write Wikipedia articles?
> 
> Offering students the *alternative* of writing for Wikipedia in lieu of a
> traditional essay assignment would be a far more acceptable proposal. But I
> would expect someone competent in Wikipedia would be available to provide
> those students with the skills to do so (but I assume this is the
> intention). And I would see nothing wrong with inviting students in a
> feminist course to participate in a feminist edit-a-thon or similar activity
> so long as it was clear it was independent to their studies (i.e. no
> coercion).
> 
> Kerry
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to