Hi,

On 22.03.2014 00:17, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2014-03-21 17:27:09 [+0100], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Because they are only created, when PO2DEBCONF is yes, which it normally is
not. (I actually don't know, when this will be yes.)

Is there an error if it tries to remove files which aren't there?

The problem is different: These files are not created during build, so if they get removed, the build fails.

I build with the old rules file (with added faketime) and compared the
result to the packages build with the new rules file. I didn't find any
fundamental difference, only:
  * DEBIAN/control reads now 'libclamav6 (>= 0.98.1)' instead of 'libclamav6
(>= 0.98.1+dfsg)', thanks to the symbols file.
  * A few bytes in the binaries differ and I can't figure out why.

Thus I think we can switch to the new debian/rules, assuming it still builds
in oldstable/stable.

Great. I'm going to build test it on stable/oldstable on a few
architectures and see how it goes.

It builds fine with wheezy on amd64.

Best regards,
Andreas

_______________________________________________
Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list
Pkg-clamav-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel

Reply via email to