Alfredo,

How are you?

Have you had some time to check out the iso image?

May I try some changes based on your distro? In that
case it may take about a week or so.

Greetings,

Lucio.

On 24 mar, 22:02, Lucio Lastra <luciolas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alfredo,
>
> I'm as glad as you to work together to achieve a better
> distro in all senses, not to mention the honor it is to me
> to have this opportunity.
>
> I think the way you went choosing the method is perfect
> and that the key to improve the LiveCD is just to choose
> which packages to keep and the ones to remove. After
> all, that's what sagelwlcd is all about (as is written in
> the README and the code to build it) although is far
> from the best choice and still has many rough edges
> among the ones already described by Rob.
>
> So my suggestion is to take your latest distro as a base
> and make a careful selection of packages in order to get
> it smaller and faster. Maybe to start with it we can pick
> the ones used by sagelwlcd and then experiment with
> others that have the same functionality but are more
> efficient and/or have less dependencies in order to work.
> For example trying Wicd instead of Network Manager, etc.
>
> We can also try what is the outcome using Arch or other
> distros if you like the idea and think they may be a better
> option than your latest distro to work as a base.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Lucio.
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Alfredo Portes <doyenatc...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Lucio,
>
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Lucio Lastra <luciolas...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > I finally got your point. Sincerely I didn't know that such thing as
> > > requesting
> > > a particular feature in the LiveCD was possible, that's why I built mine.
>
> > > I also want to make clear that my intention is not to take your place or
> > > anyone's, I just built that distro and thought it would be nice to share
> > it
> > > and
> > > that's all.
>
> > On the contrary Lucio, we have been looking for somebody like you to
> > "take my place" for a longggg time. :-). It feels always that there is not
> > much
> > demand for the LiveCD, which decreases my effort in it.
>
> > After trying various methods (and I mean a lot of methods), I settle to
> > use:
>
> >http://www.linux-live.org/
>
> > Not sure if you tried it already, a really good project. (This is what
> > SLAX uses,
> > probably after Knopixx the best LiveCD out there.)
>
> > I would love to contribute to your effort to make the LiveCD better,
> > even using your current methods if everybody find it better.
> > I really dont care what we use (Flux, Gnome, KDE) as
> > long as we achieve what you already trying: smaller and faster. But the
> > method to create/update it has to be easy, if not it becomes
> > unmaintainable.
>
> > > I have no trouble making any contribution or helping in whatever I can in
> > > the LiveCD.
> > > Rob's idea is the best but I'm not who to determine whether it's going to
> > be
> > > taken
> > > into account or not.
>
> > I would be glad to follow your lead in this direction...but the better
> > tools you
> > find the easier this becomes. Again I am very happy that somebody is
> > working
> > on the LiveCD. So on my part I will try you version and give you
> > feedback on things
> > to improve.
>
> > Thank you very much for your work,
>
> > Alfredo
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to