Is anyone using one? If so your comments would be appreciated.
Best
Kim W4OSS
I have one here - I think it's excellent. Currently driving a TS-2000, also
use it with the K3.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: wb4lzq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone using one? If so your comments would be appreciated.
Digital modes on 160m don't seem to be important for the RAC ...
otherwise they would have recognised that - like on 40 m where it has
been considered - Region I has a different assignment for digital
modes which is exactly in the RAC CW DX window. Frequencies below
1810 khz, by the way, are
You ought to contact George Burns, W2SFD, ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from
Schenectady. He recently purchased one and the whole purchase procedure was a
disaster! From the time he ordered it to the time he finally gave up on this
unit
was probably 2 months or better. The best I know is that he
In field I use PocketDigi and PDA with acoustic coupling (PDA-mic).
How the acoustic coupling change the capability to decode signals below
the noise floor?
73 de Jaak
es1hj/qrp
Hello Tony,
Glad you did measures for Pax.
My figures are the following:
Lowest S/N : - 10 dB for PAX and - 7 dB for PAX2
It corresponds to a Gaussian noise without any ionospheric distortion (your
first case).
In my figures, I accept an error rate of 2 % (2 characters false for 98
characters
Interesting commentary regarding problems with the Navigator. I have had a
Navigator for about 18 months. I have used it with the 756P3 and now with the
7700 and no problems what so ever. I caution that RTFM is a must and the
instructions are pretty straight forward. Interestingly I helped
Interesting commentary regarding problems with the Navigator. I have had a
Navigator for about 18 months. I have used it with the 756P3 and now with the
7700 and no problems what so ever. I caution that RTFM is a must and the
instructions are pretty straight forward. Interestingly I
Hi all
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
-
http://www.w1hkj.com/
-
Fldigi, NBEMS, and fl_logbook have all be updated to newer versions on
the web site.
*fldigi/NBEMS* - fldigi version 3.02, now includes the entire hamlib rig
control suite in the Windows executable.
Patrick,
Hello Tony, Glad you did measures for Pax.
My pleasure; thanks for adding the mode to Multipsk!
My figures are the following: Lowest S/N : - 10 dB for PAX and - 7 dB for
PAX2. It corresponds to a Gaussian noise without any ionospheric
distortion (your
first case.
Just tested PAX
WONDERING IF ANYBODY IS USING A SIGNALINK SL+
FOR HIGH SPEED ARQ SOFTWARE IE RFSM2400 OR ALIKE ?
I'M CURIOUS OF PERFORMANCE BEFORE I CONSIDER PURCHASE
MATTHEW A. GREGORY
KC2PUA
SORRY I MENT SL 1+
MATTHEW A. GREGORY
KC2PUA
AAR2AN
315-759-5107 HOME
315-759-1452 CELL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNITED STATES ARMY MARS
- Original Message
From: matt gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 8:54:50
Signalink is not capable of high speed ARQ.
It uses vox, and doesn't have a real PTT with RTS.
Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, matt gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WONDERING IF ANYBODY IS USING A SIGNALINK SL+
FOR HIGH SPEED ARQ SOFTWARE IE RFSM2400 OR ALIKE ?
I'M
Skip
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:19 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: signalink sL+
Signalink is not capable of high speed ARQ.
It uses vox, and doesn't have a real PTT with RTS.
Bonnie
14 matches
Mail list logo