Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Dear Gilberto,
If I may, I would like to interject that progressive 
Revelation is not some catch-phrase that Baha'is have adopted 
to validate a belief.  The term was first used by Baha'u'llah 
in the following quote and expanded in the second quote from 
Kitab-i-Aqdas footnotes:

XXXI. Contemplate with thine inward eye the chain of 
successive Revelations that hath linked the Manifestation of 
Adam with that of the Báb. I testify before God that each one 
of these Manifestations hath been sent down through the 
operation of the Divine Will and Purpose, that each hath been 
the bearer of a specific Message, that each hath been 
entrusted with a divinely-revealed Book and been commissioned 
to unravel the mysteries of a mighty Tablet. The measure of 
the Revelation with which every one of them hath been 
identified had been definitely fore-ordained. This, verily, is 
a token of Our favor unto them, if ye be of those that 
comprehend this truth And when this process of progressive 
Revelation culminated in the stage at which His peerless, His 
most sacred, and exalted Countenance was to be unveiled to 
men's eyes, He chose to hide His own Self behind a thousand 
veils, lest profane and mortal eyes discover His glory. This 
He did at a time when the signs and tokens of a 
divinely-appointed Revelation were being showered upon Him --  
signs and tokens which none can reckon except the Lord, your 
God, the Lord of all worlds.  (Baha'u'llah, Gleanings from the 
Writings of Baha'u'llah, p. 74)

126. Various petitions have come before Our throne from the 
believers, concerning laws from God... We have, in 
consequence, revealed this Holy Tablet and arrayed it with the 
mantle of His Law that haply the people may keep the 
commandments of their Lord. # 98

For a number of years, Bahá'u'lláh states in one of His 
Tablets, petitions reached the Most Holy Presence from 
various lands begging for the laws of God, but We held back 
the Pen ere the appointed time had come. Not until twenty 
years from the birth of His Prophetic Mission in the 
Siyah-Chal of Tihran had elapsed did Bahá'u'lláh reveal the 
Kitáb-i-Aqdas, the Repository of the laws of His Dispensation. 
Even after its revelation the Aqdas was withheld by Him for 
some time before it was sent to the friends in Persia. This 
divinely purposed delay in the revelation of the basic laws of 
God for this age, and the subsequent gradual implementation of 
their provisions, illustrate the principle of progressive 
revelation which applies even within the ministry of each 
Prophet.  (Baha'u'llah, The Kitab-i-Aqdas, p. 219 [NOTES])

lovingly, Sandra 

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Clarification (I hope)

2004-12-20 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 07:43:56 -, Khazeh Fananapazir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Gilberto,

 At 07:54 PM 12/19/2004, you wrote:

Gilberto:
 So what is the difference you are making between a religion being dead
 and the divine intentionality for a particular religion being at an end?
 
Mark:
 I would never be so presumptuous to say that a divinely revealed religion,
 or branch of that religion, was dead. I know too many Christians, Muslims,
 Buddhists, Hindus, etc. who are inspired by their own respective scriptures.

 My comments about intentionality were based on my understanding of the
 Baha'i concept of Covenant (the Will of God). According to the Covenant, one
 Prophet succeeds another, and, presumably, God's intention is that people
 will follow Him.
 


Khazeh:
 My dear Mark in reply to dear Gilberto you wrote:
 ***
 I would never be so presumptuous to say that a divinely revealed religion,
 or branch of that religion, was dead.***
 
 Thank you and it is well said. Baha'u'llah says:
 ***
 
 Such a condition as this is witnessed in this day when the reins of every
 community have fallen into the grasp of foolish leaders, who lead after
 their own whims and desire. On their tongue the mention of God hath become
 an empty name; in their midst His holy Word a dead letter.  Such is the sway
 of their desires, that the lamp of conscience and reason hath been quenched
 in their hearts,  [rest of passage deleted]

Gilberto:
Khazeh, I don't know why you chose to include that section. It seems
to be saying the opposite of what Mark said. Mark was saying it would
be presumptuous to say that the previous religions were dead, but
that's exactly what your passage seems to be saying.

Why would you bother to thank Mark for his words and call them well
said. When everything else you wrote contradicts it?


Khazeh:
 And the very important reference in the Imam 'Ali's Nahjul Balagha [PEAK OF
 ELOQUENCE]
 The Brother of the Qur'an
 [Grand authorities of the Religion have named the 'Nahjul-Balagha the
 brother' of the Qur'án]

Gilberto:
So do Bahais believe Nahjul-Balagha as mostly authentic? Completely
authentic? Are there specific things in there which Bahais disagree
with?


Khazeh:
 it is part of Sermon 147
 ** On the future Sermon 147
 Certainly, a time will come upon you after me when nothing will be more
 concealed than rightfulness, nothing more apparent than wrongfulness and
 nothing more current than untruth against God and His Prophet. For the
 people of this period nothing will be more valueless than the Qur'an being
 recited as it ought to be recited, nor anything more valuable than the
 Qur'an being misplaced from its position. ...***

I think the way you highlighted the text and the context of the
discussion makes me think that you think this is describing a TOTAL
apostacy where the community has no spiritual life. But another
possible reading is that the people of the Quran (isn't that what
Muslims are called in the Bahai writings) will continue, even though
the community around them might grow corrupt and persecute them.


[begin quote]
The holders of the book will throw it away and its memorisers would
forget it. In these days the Qur'an and its people will be exiled and
expelled. They will be companions keeping together on one path, but no
one will offer them asylum. Consequently at this time the Qur'an and
its people will be among the people but not among them, will be with
them but not with them, because misguidance cannot accord with
guidance even though they may be together.

[end quote]

Peace

Gilberto


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Susan Maneck

The term was first used by Baha'u'llah
in the following quote and expanded in the second quote from
Kitab-i-Aqdas footnotes:

snip
... And when this process of progressive
Revelation culminated in the stage at which His peerless, His
most sacred, and exalted Countenance was to be unveiled to
men's eyes,

Dear Sandra,

We talked about that passage a few months ago. The phrase translated as
Progressive Revelation here is IDHA BLAGHA AL-AMR which I think more
literally would be translated as this delivery of the Cause. It was the
Guardian who first introduced the term Progressive Revelation into Baha'i
theology and he in turn, seems to have gotten it from Christian theology.

warmest, Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Not Exhausted

2004-12-20 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:27:58 -0600, Susan Maneck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 No, I don't just mean random Bahais off the street coming up with
 stuff off the top of their heads. I mean the interpretations of more
 knowledgable Bahais and people whose interpretations and readings seem
 faithful and  connected to the writings as a whole.
 
 Dear Gilberto,

 Still not a good comparison. You're not likely to find any Rumis or Ibn
 Arabis on this list, much less on SRB! The only real comparison you can 
 make is between the Qur'an itself and Baha'u'llah.

No. You don't seem to understand. 

The constant is the Quran. And what I am  comparing are Bahai
interpretations of the Quran (which will reflect the words of
Bahaullah) with Muslim interpretations of the Quran (which will
reflect the words of past saints, mystics, and philosophers) Which are
deeper? More meaningful? More plausible?


 What seems consistent [among Bahai interpretations of the Quran] is that  
 the Quran is read in ways which  deligitmize the Muslim community. And 
 that is done by spiritualizing and reading metaphorically doctrines which  
 Muslims tend to take seriously. And by uncharitable legalistic readings of  
 passages which Muslims would actually be more flexible on.
 
 Uh, Gilberto most of those legalistic readings are precisely the ones the
 *majority* of  Muslims take.

Gilberto:
I don't actually believe that is true in the cases I have in mind. And
even if it were true, Bahais generally don't care how Muslims read the
Quran so I'm not sure why that point would be relevant. (I mean if you
don't care when Muslims tell you khatam means last, why would you
choose to read daraba as beat. daraba in Arabic also can bear
multiple meanings and doesn't have to be read in gross, physical,
brutal terms.)

 A good example would be the discussion in soc.religion.bahai between
a certain Bahai and myself on the subject of retaliation. And the
Bahai was trying to argue that the Quran was saying that if a man
murders a another man's wife, the Quranic punishment would be to kill
the murder's innocent wife!! Something which I don't think any Muslim
scholar has argued.

Or again, another exchange where a different Bahai was arguing that
the Quran gives a husband a right to beat his wife, while I know of
plenty of Muslims who would argue the opposite, and base it not just
on the Quran but on the sunnah as well.

The problem is the inconsistency (or from another perspective, the
consistency) of the Bahai approach.

 
 
 Which gems did you have in mind?
 

 The gems in the Qur'an? We can start with the Surih of Rahman.;-}
 

I mean, gems in the Quran which are substantially missing from the
Bible. although personally I am more moved by the Quran and I feel it
speaks to me more clearly than the Bible and my heart finds more
satisfaction with Islam than with the Bible, I wouldn't necessarily
want to make unwarranted criticisms of the Bible. I think contentwise,
the theme of being grateful for God's many blessings is certainly
found in the Bible and in particular there is a Psalm somewhat
reminiscent of that Surah.

Peace

Gilberto


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Clarification (I hope)

2004-12-20 Thread Mark A. Foster
Gilberto,

At 06:53 AM 12/20/2004, you wrote:
Why would you bother to thank Mark for his words and call them well said. 
When everything else you wrote contradicts it? 

IMO, the passages quoted by Dr. Khazeh Fananapazir refer to issues of 
contextualization, not to the power of the Revelation. In other words, they 
relate, I believe, to the points I raised about the Will of God or Covenant.

The Prophet and His Revelation function, as I see it, in a dialectical 
relationship with people and their socially and historically constructed groups 
and societies. It is a dynamic I have called prophetic ecology. When the 
previous Revelation is no longer as relevant to God's Will or Covenant. He 
sends a new Prophet to manifest His new Will. 

Ethics are a function of God's Will. For instance, absolute national 
sovereignty may have been virtuous in the past. According to Baha'u'llah's 
Revelation, national sovereignty should no longer be absolute. God's Will 
changed and so did the divine moral standards.

However, previous Revelations can still effectively inspire people.

With regards, Mark A. Foster * 15 Sites: http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger -- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Clarification (I hope)

2004-12-20 Thread Khazeh Fananapazir
Dear Gilberto
In a message
http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist/m42611.html

http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu/msg01649.html

you write in relation to two passages below that it appears as if Dr Mark
Foster's point contradicts the Utterance of the Sacred Iqan and you were
wondering why I would thank him...
***Gilberto:
Khazeh, I don't know why you chose to include that section. It seems
to be saying the opposite of what Mark said. Mark was saying it would
be presumptuous to say that the previous religions were dead, but
that's exactly what your passage seems to be saying.

WHY WOULD YOU BOTHER TO THANK MARK FOR HIS WORDS AND CALL THEM WELL
SAID. WHEN EVERYTHING ELSE YOU WROTE CONTRADICTS IT?***

The Passage in question is:
 Such a condition as this is witnessed in this day when the reins of
every community have fallen into the grasp of foolish leaders, who lead
after their own whims and desire. On their tongue the mention of God hath
become an empty name; in their midst His holy Word a dead letter.  Such is
the sway of their desires, that the lamp of conscience and reason hath been
quenched in their hearts, and this although the fingers of divine power have
unlocked the portals of the knowledge of God, and the light of divine
knowledge and heavenly grace hath illumined and inspired the essence of all
created things, in such wise that in each and every thing a door of
knowledge hath been opened, and within every atom traces of the sun hath
been made manifest.  And yet, in spite of all these manifold revelations of
divine knowledge, which have encompassed the world, they still vainly
imagine the door of knowledge to be closed, and the showers of mercy to be
stilled. Clinging unto idle fancy, they have strayed far from the
Urvatu'l-Vuthqa of divine knowledge
(Baha'u'llah:  The Kitab-i-Iqan, Pages: 29-30)

I really do not see a contradiction. I will explain respectfully if you will
be so kind as to give me your precious time.
In the Baha'I Revelation the Sacred Scriptures are kept sacred 
Please I beg you to look at this carefully
*** it should be stated that the Revelation identified with Baha'u'llah
upholds uncompromisingly the eternal verities they enshrine, recognizes
firmly and absolutely the Divine origin of their Authors, PRESERVES
INVIOLATE THE SANCTITY OF THEIR AUTHENTIC SCRIPTURES, DISCLAIMS ANY
INTENTION OF LOWERING THE STATUS OF THEIR FOUNDERS OR OF ABATING THE
SPIRITUAL IDEALS THEY INCULCATE, clarifies and correlates their functions,
reaffirms their common, their unchangeable and fundamental purpose,
reconciles their seemingly divergent claims and doctrines, readily and
gratefully recognizes their respective contributions to the gradual
Unfoldment of one Divine Revelation, unhesitatingly acknowledges itself to
be but one link in the chain of continually progressive Revelations,
supplements their teachings with such laws and ordinances as conform to the
imperative needs, and are dictated by the growing receptivity, of a fast
evolving and constantly changing society
(Shoghi Effendi:  God Passes By, Page: 100)
So the Sanctity of the Holy Qur'an is upheld but this is in agreement with
the truth that the peoples of this Day have drifted away 
And it is precisely this drifting away that the Imam 'Ali was prophesying
about
*** Not only have the peoples of the earth ignored, and some of them even
assailed, a Faith which is at once the essence, the promise, the reconciler,
and the unifier of all religions, but they have drifted away from their own
religions
(Shoghi Effendi:  The Promised Day is Come, Page: 112)***
***
From Nahjul Balaagha Sermon 146
** On the future 
Certainly, a time will come upon you after me when nothing will be more
concealed than rightfulness, nothing more apparent than wrongfulness and
nothing more current than untruth against God and His Prophet. FOR THE
PEOPLE OF THIS PERIOD NOTHING WILL BE MORE VALUELESS THAN THE QUR’ÁN BEING
RECITED AS IT OUGHT TO BE RECITED, NOR ANYTHING MORE VALUABLE THAN THE
QUR’ÁN BEING MISPLACED FROM ITS POSITION. And in the towns nothing will be
more hated than virtue, nor anything more acceptable than vice. The
holders of the book will throw it away and its memorizers would forget it.
In these days the Qur’án and its people will be exiled and expelled. They
will be companions keeping together on one path, but no one will offer them
asylum. CONSEQUENTLY AT THIS TIME THE QUR’ÁN AND ITS PEOPLE WILL BE AMONG
THE PEOPLE BUT NOT AMONG THEM, WILL BE WITH THEM BUT NOT WITH THEM, BECAUSE
MISGUIDANCE CANNOT ACCORD WITH GUIDANCE EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY BE TOGETHER.
The people will have united on division and will therefore have cut away
from the community, as though they were the leaders of the Qur’án and not
the Qur’án their leader. Nothing of it will be left with them except its
name, and they will know nothing save its writing and its words.

AS to the Status of Nahjul Balaagha [Peak of Eloquence] 

RE: Clarification (I hope)

2004-12-20 Thread Khazeh Fananapazir
Gilberto:
**Yes. But I think we've gone over this. Yes, Bahá'ís say the Quran is the
word of God. Yes Bahá'ís say Muhammad is a Manifestation. Yes, Bahá'ís even
say that the imams are similar to the manifestations in certain respects.
But Bahá'ís also say that the leaders of the Muslims (among other
communities) are foolish men who follow their own whims and desires and in
whose hearts the lamps of reason and conscience have been quenched. Yes,
Bahá'ís say some good things about Islam and some bad things about Muslims.
One doesn't erase the other. They just make the picture more complex.**

1] OK Dear Gilberto
Please Please let us go gently on this terrain. The Passage in the Iqan has
a specific context. The Maternal uncle of the Bab [Siyyid Muhammad] had come
to Karbalaa and Baghdad [of course wondering why his Great Nephew had been
imprisoned, castigated, bastinadoed, and suspended and martyred before 750
soldiers only 12 years previously. So His holiness Baha'u'llah is saying the
Book is from God, sacrosanct but the deeds of SOME are contrary to certain
whims.

Dear Gilberto Please see that this is not an extraordinary assertion.
The pure and sincere Ulama are so praised in the Writings:
***Au contraire, un sage au coeur pur et à l'âme pieuse est la Miséricorde
divine, la Faveur de Dieu. Il est la Lumière de la Direction et la Lampe de
la Providence, l'Eclat de la Vérité, la protection de la Loi, la Balance de
la justice, le Sultan de la fidélité, le véritable Matin, le Palmier altier,
l'Aurore brillante et l'Étoile étincelante, la Source de la Connaissance
d'où jaillit l'eau pure vivifiante, l'Educateur des âmes, le Messager des
bonnes nouvelles, le Guide des Nations, l'Annonciateur de Dieu parmi les
hommes, le Signe irréfutable, la Bannière la plus élevée, le Joyau des êtres
vivants, la Perles de l'existence, la Manifestation de pureté, l'Aurore du
Soleil de Sainteté ! Impatient de la vie dans ce monde de poussière, il est
en dehors des passions et des désirs de l'humanité. Dans les assemblées, on
le trouve intoxiqué par le Vin de la louange et de la Glorification du Bien
Aimé : dans l'absence comme dans la présence de Dieu, il s'incline et
s'agenouille. C'est le solide soutien des fondements divins, la forteresse
imprenable de la Religion évidente, le doux Euphrate des assoiffés, le
chemin de Salut pour les égarés ! De pareils hommes sont des oiseaux
reconnaissants dans les jardins de l'Unité, une lumière pleine d'éclat dans
l'Assemblée céleste, des Oulémâ divins, les héritiers des prophètes, les
perceurs des mystères, les conducteurs des troupes pieuses. Sous leur
influence, les lieux retirés propices à la prière deviennent des oratoires
du Ciel, et ils considèrent le détachement absolu comme l'unique moyen
d'arriver à la Cour de Dieu !
**
Baha'u'llah also spoke about the opposition to the Prophet
***
Consider the dispensation of Him Who is the Seal of the Prophets and the
King of the Chosen Ones -- may the souls of all mankind be offered up for
His sake! After the Daystar of Truth dawned above the horizon of hijaz, how
great were the cruelties which the exponents of error inflicted upon that
incomparable Manifestation of the All-Glorious! Such was their HEEDLESSNESS
that they regarded every injury inflicted upon that sacred Being as ranking
among the greatest of all acts, and constituting a means of attainment unto
God, the Most High. FOR IN THE EARLY YEARS OF HIS MISSION THE DIVINES OF
THAT AGE, BOTH CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH, TURNED AWAY FROM THAT DAYSTAR OF THE
HEAVEN OF GLORY, WHEREUPON ALL PEOPLE, HIGH AND LOW ALIKE, BESTIRRED
THEMSELVES TO EXTINGUISH THE LIGHT OF THAT   LUMINARY OF THE HORIZON OF
INNER MEANINGS. The names of all these divines have been mentioned in the
books of old; among them are Wahb Ibn-i-Rahib, Ka'b Ibn-i-Ashraf,
'Abdu'llah-i-Ubayy, and others of their like.

Finally, matters came to such a pass that these men took counsel together
and conspired to shed His pure blood, even as God -- glorified be His
mention! -- saith: And remember when the disbelievers schemed against Thee,
that they might lay hold upon Thee, or slay Thee, or cast Thee out; and so
they schemed, and God schemed, and God, verily, is the best of schemers.36
Again He saith: But if their opposition be grievous to Thee -- if Thou
canst, seek out an opening into the earth or a ladder into heaven and bring
to them a sign; yet if God wished, He could gather them unto true guidance;
be Thou not, then, of the ignorant. By God! The hearts of His favoured ones
are consumed at the purport of these two blessed verses. Such established
and undisputed facts have been forgotten, and no one hath paused to reflect,
in days past or in this day, upon the things that have prompted men to turn
away from the Revealers of the light of God at the time of their
manifestation.

(Baha'u'llah, The Summons of the Lord of Hosts, p. 123)

Re your second point dear Gilberto
***
Point 2
About Nahjul Balagha, I'm not sure if you 

RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Dear Susan,
Could you be a bit more explicit about this theory, as I'm not 
familiar with any possible source in Christian theology.

...he in turn, seems to have gotten it from Christian 
theology

While I'm open to a broader understanding of the term, I 
feel that because the passage from Baha'u'llah opens with : 
Contemplate with thine inward eye the chain of
successive Revelations that hath linked the Manifestation of 
Adam with that of the Báb.; He is indeed referring to the 
progressive (sequential  advancing) revelations of the 
Manifestations of God.  Granted, the Guardian elaborates on 
the progressive aspects of the Revelation as received by 
Baha'u'llah.

Thanks much!
lovingly,  Sandra 

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Clarification (I hope)

2004-12-20 Thread Mark A. Foster
Gilberto,

At 04:35 PM 12/20/2004, you wrote:
On the other hand, the passage you quote from the writings say that every 
community has fallen into the grasp of foolish leaders.

IMO, He refers to those leaders as foolish because they are out of touch with 
the Will of God for their age. 

With regards, Mark A. Foster * 15 Sites: http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger -- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Clarification (I hope)

2004-12-20 Thread Gilberto Simpson
Dear Khazeh, 

Could you provide that long French passage in English? Or maybe
provide a reference I could look up online?

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:02:23 -, Khazeh Fananapazir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gilberto:
 **Yes. But I think we've gone over this. Yes, Bahá'ís say the Quran is the
 word of God. Yes Bahá'ís say Muhammad is a Manifestation. Yes, Bahá'ís even
 say that the imams are similar to the manifestations in certain respects.
 But Bahá'ís also say that the leaders of the Muslims (among other
 communities) are foolish men who follow their own whims and desires and in
 whose hearts the lamps of reason and conscience have been quenched. Yes,
 Bahá'ís say some good things about Islam and some bad things about Muslims.
 One doesn't erase the other. They just make the picture more complex.**
 
 1] OK Dear Gilberto
 Please Please let us go gently on this terrain. The Passage in the Iqan has
 a specific context. The Maternal uncle of the Bab [Siyyid Muhammad] had come
 to Karbalaa and Baghdad [of course wondering why his Great Nephew had been
 imprisoned, castigated, bastinadoed, and suspended and martyred before 750
 soldiers only 12 years previously. So His holiness Baha'u'llah is saying the
 Book is from God, sacrosanct but the deeds of SOME are contrary to certain
 whims.

So could you me help to see your perspective on the passage by
actually pointing to which particular words in the passage indicate
that only some of the leaders are intended?



Peace

Gilberto

My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:09:44 -0900, Sandra Chamberlain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Susan,
 
 Could you be a bit more explicit about this theory, as I'm not
 familiar with any possible source in Christian theology.
 
 ...he in turn, seems to have gotten it from Christian
 theology
 

There is a Christian doctrine known as dispensationalism which breaks
human history into different periods (dispensations) where God deals
with human beings in a particular way. And certain events would mark
the transition points from one dispensation to another, for example,
the fall, the flood, the calling of abraham, the bringing of the law
from Sinai, the crucifixion, etc.


Peace

Gilberto
-- 


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/20/2004 7:33:30 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is 
  a Christian doctrine known as dispensationalism which breakshuman history 
  into different periods (dispensations) where God dealswith human beings in 
  a particular way

Dear Gilberto, 

This was a little different. Dispensationalism is usually associated with 
fundamentalism and is based on the premise that God's way of dealing with 
humanity changed dramatically. Ideas of Progressive Revelation in the 19th 
century were based more on the notion of God enfolding His nature to us 
overtime. 

warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Smaneck



In a message dated 12/20/2004 5:06:45 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While 
  I'm open to a "broader" understanding of the term, I feel that because the 
  passage from Baha'u'llah opens with : "Contemplate with thine inward eye 
  the chain ofsuccessive Revelations that hath linked the Manifestation of 
  Adam with that of the Báb.";
Dear Sandy, 

Oh I think the concept is implicit in Baha'u'llah's Writings. It is just 
that the term itself is derived from Christianity. Khazeh posted the following 
website and Table of Contents of one 19th century work on this subject on 
Bridges some time ago. Since it wasn't exactly a personal post, I'm sure he 
won't mind if I place it below. I may have to take back what I said earlier 
about dispensationalism, but I think its ties are more with Christian 
millenarianism in general. 

warmest, Susan 
The bookTHE APPROACHING END OF THE AGEVIEWED IN THE LIGHT 
OFHISTORY, PROPHECY, AND SCIENCEbyH. GRATTAN 
GUINNESSMDCCCLXXIX (1879)IS AVAILABLE ON THE 
INTERNEThttp://www.historicism.com/Guinness/Approaching/aeota.htmPart 
I.PROGRESSIVE REVELATIONCHAPTER I.GOD'S REVELATION OF 
HIMSELF TO MAN HAS BEEN A PROGRESSIVE ONE.- TRUTH INGENERAL HAS BEEN 
REVEALED PROGRESSIVELY. PROPHECY, THE DIVINE HISTORY OF THEFUTURE, CONSISTS 
OF A SERIES OF PROGRESSIVE REVELATIONS.- PRACTICAL RESULTSOFTHE 
COMPREHENSION AND APPLICATION OF THIS PRINCIPLE.CHAPTER 
II.PROGRESSIVE REVELATIONS AS TO THE RELATIVE PERIOD OF THE SECOND 
ADVENT OFOURLORD JESUS CHRIST.CHAPTER 
III.PROGRESSIVE REVELATIONS AS TO THE MILLENNIUM, THE RESURRECTION, AND 
THEJUDGMENT.Part II.PROGRESSIVE 
INTERPRETATION.CHAPTER 1.HUMAN COMPREHENSION OF DIVINE PROPHECY 
HAS BEEN, AND WAS INTENDED TO BEPROGRESSIVE.-THREE IMPORTANT INFERENCES FROM 
DANIEL XII.9. - THERE IS ABLAMELESS AND A GUILTY IGNORANCE OF THE FULFILMENT 
OF PROPHECY. - INSTANCESOFEACH.- REASONS FOR A PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY 
OBSCURITY OF PROPHECY; AND MEANSBYWHICH PROGRESSIVE COMPREHENSION OF ITS 
SIGNIFICATION HAS BEEN GRANTED.CHAPTER II.CONSIDERATION 
OF CERTAIN BROAD PRINCIPLES, ON WHICH THE APOCALYPSE IS TO BEINTERPRETED.-IT 
IS A SYMBOLIC PROPHECY, AND MUST BE TRANSLATED INTO ORDINARYLANGUAGE BEFORE 
IT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD.CHAPTER III.THE APOCALYPSE IS A 
CONTINUING PROPHECY EXTENDING FROM ITS OWN TIME, TO THECONSUMMATION OF ALL 
THINGS.-IMPORTANCE OF HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE, IN ORDER TOITSCORRECT 
INTERPRETATION. IT IS A PROPHECY CONCERNING THE EXPERIENCES OF THECHRISTIAN 
CHURCH, IN THE WORLD, AND NOT CONCERNING THOSE OF THE 
JEWISHNATION.Part III.FORETOLD AND 
FULFILLED.CHAPTER I.THE PROPHECIES OF "BABYLON," AND "THE 
BEAST."-REASONS FOR THE EXAMINATION OFTHESE TWO PROPHECIES. -FUNDAMENTAL, 
DIVINELY INTERPRETED; PRACTICALLYIMPORTANT.-BABYLON THE GREAT REPRESENTS THE 
APOSTATE CHURCH OF ROME.CHAPTER II.THE MAN OF SIN, OR 
ANTICHRIST.A GREAT FOURFOLD PROPHECY OF FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE (DAN 
7:7-27, REV 13:1-9,REV 17, 2THESS 2).- THE ROMAN POWER.-ITS LAST FORM AS 
PREDICTED HERE.-INDIVIDUAL AND DYNASTIC USE OF THE WORD "KING."- AN 
APOSTATE, BLASPHEMOUS,ANDPERSECUTING POWER,- EXACTLY ANSWERING TO THE 
ONE HERE PREDICTED, HAS BEEN INEXISTENCE FOR MORE THAN TWELVE CENTURIES, IN 
THE SUCCESSION OF THE POPES OFROME-ORIGIN OF THIS POWER.-ITS MORAL 
CHARACTER.- ITS SELF-EXALTINGUTTERANCES.-ITS SELF- EXALTING ACTS. -ITS 
SUBTLETIES; --FALSE DOCTRINES, AND LYINGWONDERS.-ITS IDOLATRIES. -ITS 
DOMINION.-ITS PERSECUTION OF THE 
SAINTS.-ITSDURATION.-ITSDOOM.Part IV.INQUIRY 
INTO THE DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS NATURAL AND REVEALED.SECTION 
I. SOLAR AND LUNAR DOMINION CAUSAL AND CHRONOLOGICAL.CHAPTER 
I.CHRONOLOGY, BIBLICAL AND NATURAL. IS THERE HARMONY BETWEEN THE TWO? 
SOLARANDLUNAR DOMINION IN THE INORGANIC WORLD. SOLI-LUNAR CONTROL OF 
TERRESTRIALREVOLUTIONS. WINDS. RAINS, OCEAN CURRENTS. -TIDES, ELECTRIC AND 
MAGNETICVARIATIONS.CHAPTER II.SOLI-LUNAR DOMINION IN 
THE ORGANIC WORLD. EFFECTS OF LIGHT AND HEAT ON THEDEVELOPMENT AND 
DISTRIBUTION OF PLANTS AND ANIMALS AND OF THE HUMAN RACE.-DIURNAL AND 
SEASONAL CHANGES IN RELATION TO HEALTH AND DISEASE.SECTION 
II.THE LAW OF COMPLETION IN WEEKS.CHAPTER I.THE WEEK IN 
RELATION TO THE PERIODICITY OF VITAL PHENOMENA. PERIODICITY 
INTHEDEVELOPMENT OF INSECTS, FISHES, BIRDS AND MAMMALIA.-PERIODICITY IN 
THEGROWTHAND FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITY OF MANKIND IN HEALTH AND IN 
DISEASE.CHAPTER II.THE WEEK IN SCRIPTURE. THERE IS - A 
CHRONOLOGICAL SYSTEM IN SCRIPTURE.-IT ISASYSTEM OF WEEKS.- THIS SYSTEM 
IS TRACEABLE THROUGHOUT THE LAW, THE PROPHETS,AND THE GOSPEL.-THE WEEK IN 
THE MOSAIC RITUAL.-THE WEEK IN. JEWISHHISTORY.-THEWEEK IN PROPHECY.-THE 
WEEK OF DAYS -OF WEEKS-OF MONTHS-OF YEARS-OF WEEKS OFYEARS-OF YEARS OF 
YEARS-OF MILLENARIES.CHAPTER III.THE WEEK IN 
HISTORY.SCRIPTURE THE CHART OF HISTORY.-PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS AS TO 
HISTORIC ANDPROPHETIC CHRONOLOGY.- THE AGE OF THE HUMAN RACE. -OLD 
TESTAMENTCHRONOLOGY.-THE HEBREW AND THE SEPTUAGINT CHRONOLOGY COMPARED.- 
HOW ARE WE TO INTERPRETTHESYMBOLIC 

Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Gilberto,

At 10:54 PM 12/20/2004, you wrote:
If you didn't have Dispensationalism in mind, which was the Christian concept 
you were thinking of which was similar to progressive revelation?

Here is an example:

http://adams.patriot.net/~eastland/slm/ 

It isn't exactly either premillennial dispensationalism or Reformed covenant 
theology.

With regards, Mark A. Foster * 15 Sites: http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger -- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/20/2004 10:55:10 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you 
  didn't have Dispensationalism in mind, which was the Christianconcept you 
  were thinking of which was similar to 
progressiverevelation?

Dear Gilberto, 

I think progressive revelation was a much more general concept in 
Christianity than Dispensationalism which is rather specific. I was raised 
liberal Presbyterian but I heard the Bible spoken of in terms of progressive 
revelation when I was growing up. Indeed, modern Process Theology in some ways 
grows out of that. 

warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/20/2004 11:30:51 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But the 
  Bahai faith isn't completely dissimilar to those groups. Ithink about "A 
  thief in the night" and the related interpretations ofthe Millerite groups 
  who as fundamentalists literally expected thecoming of Jesus to bring 
  justice and righteous to the earth.


Yes, and it even goes further than that. The first millennial movement was 
started during the Crusades by Joachim de Fiora who probably laid the 
groundwork for dispensationalism. He held that Age of the Holy Spirit would 
begin in the year 1260 A.D. Of course 1260 in the Muslim calendar is 1844 in the 
Christian one. 

warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread dlmbrt












Susan Maneck wrote:



The first millennial movement was started
during the Crusades by Joachim de Fiora who probably laid the groundwork
for dispensationalism. He held that Age of the Holy Spirit would begin in the
year 1260 A.D. Of course 1260 in the Muslim calendar is 1844 in the Christian
one. 

[D.A.L.] I
hadnt run across this most interesting bit of information before.
Could you give a little more of this history, or perhaps point me towards some
further reading?



Many
thanks.Dave Lambert






__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu






Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/21/2004 12:44:51 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I 
  hadnt run across this most interesting bit of information before. Could 
  you give a little more of this history, or perhaps point me towards some 
  further reading?
  

Here's some websites on him: http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc06/htm/everlasting_gospel.htm
http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintj3y.htm

warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




RE: Clarification (I hope)

2004-12-20 Thread Khazeh Fananapazir

Dear Khazeh, 

Could you provide that long French passage in English? Or maybe
provide a reference I could look up online?

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:02:23 -, Khazeh Fananapazir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gilberto:
 **Yes. But I think we've gone over this. Yes, Bahá'ís say the Quran is the
 word of God. Yes Bahá'ís say Muhammad is a Manifestation. Yes, Bahá'ís
even
 say that the imams are similar to the manifestations in certain respects.
 But Bahá'ís also say that the leaders of the Muslims (among other
 communities) are foolish men who follow their own whims and desires and in
 whose hearts the lamps of reason and conscience have been quenched. Yes,
 Bahá'ís say some good things about Islam and some bad things about
Muslims.
 One doesn't erase the other. They just make the picture more complex.**
 
 1] OK Dear Gilberto
 Please Please let us go gently on this terrain. The Passage in the Iqan
has
 a specific context. The Maternal uncle of the Bab [Siyyid Muhammad] had
come
 to Karbalaa and Baghdad [of course wondering why his Great Nephew had been
 imprisoned, castigated, bastinadoed, and suspended and martyred before 750
 soldiers only 12 years previously. So His holiness Baha'u'llah is saying
the
 Book is from God, sacrosanct but the deeds of SOME are contrary to certain
 whims.

So could you me help to see your perspective on the passage by
actually pointing to which particular words in the passage indicate
that only some of the leaders are intended?



Peace

Gilberto

Dear dear Gilberto

I shall provide the English translation of the Passage of the Master
praising the good and noble divines.

The French translation is very similar to a Passage from the Writings which
is recorded in the Promised Day is Come and I will append that so that you
will see dear Gilberto most clearly the difference [ie the difference
between a divine who guideth his people from other wise

Thank you again for staying with me [with us] in our mutual discussion.

In the Holy Qur'an God says that even if a bad man brings a NEWS investigate
it, find out about it, sort it out. And you are doing this in a noble
erudite way.


Nor should it be thought for a moment that the followers of Baha'u'llah
either seek to degrade or even belittle the rank of the world's religious
leaders, whether Christian, Muslim, or of any other denomination, should
their conduct conform to their professions, and be worthy of the position
they occupy.  THOSE DIVINES, BAHA'U'LLAH HAS AFFIRMED, ...WHO ARE TRULY
ADORNED WITH THE ORNAMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND OF A GOODLY CHARACTER ARE,
VERILY, AS A HEAD TO THE BODY OF THE WORLD, AND AS EYES TO THE NATIONS.  THE
GUIDANCE OF MEN HATH, AT ALL TIMES, BEEN AND IS DEPENDENT UPON THESE BLESSED
SOULS.  And again:  The divine whose conduct is upright, and the sage who
is just, are as the spirit unto the body of the world.  Well is it with that
divine whose head is attired with the crown of justice, and whose temple is
adorned with the ornament of equity.  And yet again:  The divine who hath
seized and quaffed the most holy Wine, in the name of the sovereign
Ordainer, is as an eye unto the world.  Well is it with them who obey him,
and call him to remembrance. Great is the blessedness of that divine, He,
in another connection, has written, that hath not allowed knowledge to
become a veil between him and the One Who is the Object of all knowledge,
and who, when the Self-Subsisting appeared, hath turned with a beaming face
towards Him.  He, in truth, is numbered with the learned.  The inmates of
Paradise seek the blessing of his breath, and his lamp sheddeth its radiance
over all who are in heaven and on earth.  He, verily, is numbered with the
inheritors of the Prophets.  He that beholdeth him hath, verily, beheld the
True One, and he that turneth towards him hath, verily, turned towards God,
the Almighty, the All-Wise.  Respect ye the divines amongst you, is His
exhortation, They whose acts conform to the knowledge they possess, who
observe the statutes of God, and decree the things God hath decreed in the
Book.  Know ye that they are the lamps of guidance betwixt earth and heaven.
They that have no consideration for the position and merit of the divines
amongst them have, verily, altered the bounty of God vouchsafed unto them. 
(Shoghi Effendi:  The Promised Day is Come, Pages: 110-111)

Do you see how fair how balanced the Writings are.

Keep investigating this NEWS the way you are. I swear this is the only way
forward and I too will look at your replies with a repeated gaze with
respect.
Khazeh
049.006 
YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! If a wicked person comes to you with Any News,
ascertain the truth, lest ye harm people unwittingly, and afterwards become
full of repentance for what ye have done. 
PICKTHAL: O ye who believe! If an evil-liver bring you TIDINGS, verify it,
lest ye smite some folk in ignorance and afterward repent of what ye did. 
SHAKIR: O you who believe! if an evil-doer comes to you with A