[digitalradio] WSPR: Automate the uploading of your log file

2008-03-24 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi all,

As you probably know there is an excellent log page 
http://www.electroblog.com/drsked/meptspots.php where to upload your logs.
There is also an example how to automate the uploading.

Here is another way to do this without installing cygwin.

Put this lines in a batch file:

:A
CLS
@ECHO ON
C:\Program Files\WSPR\curl.exe -F allmept=@C:\Program 
Files\WSPR\ALL_MEPT.TXT -F call=LA5VNA -F grid=JO59jq 
http://www.electroblog.com/drsked/meptspots.php
@ECHO OFF
ECHO %TIME%
ping -n 200 127.0.0.1 nul
goto A
-


ping -n 200 127.0.0.1 nul gives about  240 sec on my pc.

NB! You still have to download the cURL Win32 binary from:
http://curl.haxx.se/download/curl-7.18.0-win32-nossl.zip

73 de LA5VNA Steinar


[digitalradio] TAPR Packet Status Register (PSR) Deadline is Near

2008-03-24 Thread Mark Thompson

-Original Message-
From: Stan Horzepa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 7:58 am
Subject: [tapr-announce] Packet Status Register (PSR) Deadline is near


Packet Status Register (PSR) is looking for a few good writers, 
particulary ham radio operators working on the digital side of our 
hobby, who would like to publicize their activities. 
 
You don’t have to be Shakespeare to contribute to PSR and you don’t have 
to use Microsoft Word to compose your thoughts. The PSR editorial staff 
can handle just about any text and graphic format, so don’t be afraid to 
submit whatever you have to wa1lou at tapr.org . 
 
The deadline for the next issue of PSR, the Dayton Hamvention issue, is 
March 31, so write early and write often. 
 
73, 
 
Stan, WA1LOU 
PSR Editor 
 
___ 
tapr-announce mailing list 
 


  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

[digitalradio] Re: WSPR: Automate the uploading of your log file

2008-03-24 Thread Steinar Aanesland

Ups...

This have to be in ONE line in the batch file:

 C:\Program Files\WSPR\curl.exe -F allmept=@C:\Program 
Files\WSPR\ALL_MEPT.TXT -F call=LA5VNA -F grid=JO59jq 
http://www.electroblog.com/drsked/meptspots.php

73 de LA5VNA Steinar






Steinar Aanesland skrev:
 Hi all,

 As you probably know there is an excellent log page 
 http://www.electroblog.com/drsked/meptspots.php where to upload your 
 logs.
 There is also an example how to automate the uploading.

 Here is another way to do this without installing cygwin.

 Put this lines in a batch file:
 
 :A
 CLS
 @ECHO ON
 C:\Program Files\WSPR\curl.exe -F allmept=@C:\Program 
 Files\WSPR\ALL_MEPT.TXT -F call=LA5VNA -F grid=JO59jq 
 http://www.electroblog.com/drsked/meptspots.php
 @ECHO OFF
 ECHO %TIME%
 ping -n 200 127.0.0.1 nul
 goto A
 -


 ping -n 200 127.0.0.1 nul gives about  240 sec on my pc.

 NB! You still have to download the cURL Win32 binary from:
 http://curl.haxx.se/download/curl-7.18.0-win32-nossl.zip

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar




[digitalradio] [Fwd: RE: [Knightsqrss] WSPR: Automate the uploading of your log file]

2008-03-24 Thread Steinar Aanesland

UPS 2.;)
---


Don't forget to change LA5VNA and JO59jq to your call and locator, though!

;-)

73,

Johan on5ex


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Steinar Aanesland
Verzonden: maandag 24 maart 2008 15:40
Aan: WSJT; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; KNIGHTSQRSS
Onderwerp: [Knightsqrss] WSPR: Automate the uploading of your log file


Hi all,

As you probably know there is an excellent log page 
http://www.electroblog.com/drsked/meptspots.php where to upload your logs.
There is also an example how to automate the uploading.

Here is another way to do this without installing cygwin.

Put this lines in a batch file:

:A
CLS
@ECHO ON
C:\Program Files\WSPR\curl.exe -F allmept=@C:\Program 
Files\WSPR\ALL_MEPT.TXT -F call=LA5VNA -F grid=JO59jq 
http://www.electroblog.com/drsked/meptspots.php
@ECHO OFF
ECHO %TIME%
ping -n 200 127.0.0.1 nul
goto A
-


ping -n 200 127.0.0.1 nul gives about  240 sec on my pc.

NB! You still have to download the cURL Win32 binary from:
http://curl.haxx.se/download/curl-7.18.0-win32-nossl.zip

73 de LA5VNA Steinar

___
Knightsqrss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.cnts.be/mailman/listinfo/knightsqrss_cnts.be
Knightsqrss clipboard http://www.on5ex.be




-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.8/1340 - Release Date: 3/23/2008 6:50 
PM





[digitalradio] Re: [wsjtgroup] frequencies

2008-03-24 Thread Keith
When I looked at the suggested site, there were no post for 17 meters
and above. Hence, no frequencies were posted. Any one have a
suggestion for 6 and 2 meters ?

Keith N4ZQ




--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Hi Vic
 
 Take a look at this page and you will see a lot of alternative WSPR 
 frequency's 
 
 http://www.electroblog.com/drsked/meptspots.php
 
 73 de LA5VNA Steinar
 
 
 
 vic skrev:
 
  Any other bands in use with this program besides 30 meteters?
  Be nice to establish listening freq. besides 10.14015
  thanks
  Victor
 
  -- 
  vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:ke4lkq%40doramefa.us
 





Re: [digitalradio] RFI-Free PCs?

2008-03-24 Thread Tony
All,

I found what seems to be a good deal for the next shack PC. Dell offers 
a 200 Slim Tower with a 19 LCD monitor for around $400.

As for the RFI issues, I have my fingers crossed. Anyone using a Dell in 
the shack? Any RFI complaints?

Tony -K2MO 



Re: [digitalradio] RFI-Free PCs?

2008-03-24 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Tony 
I can't say for sure about the Dell model you picked but
I have 7 Dell's running here in the room. One running as a server 
without any problem. Wish I could say the same for my power
company.

BTW - still on 40 P1 to P3.

John, W0JAB

At 03:00 PM 3/24/2008, you wrote:
All,

I found what seems to be a good deal for the next shack PC. Dell offers 
a 200 Slim Tower with a 19 LCD monitor for around $400.

As for the RFI issues, I have my fingers crossed. Anyone using a Dell in 
the shack? Any RFI complaints?

Tony -K2MO 






[digitalradio] Vista

2008-03-24 Thread wa0elm
I'm looking at purchasing a new laptop, and I can't find anything that 
doesn't come with Vista.  Is anyone having success running digital 
software (e.g. MultiPSK and/or MMTTY) with Vista?  Last I heard, most 
digital software doesn't play nice with it.

I thought about buying a Vista machine, and loading XP, but the 
problem I've found is that some drivers may not be available for XP.

I'd like to get a little guidance before I pull out what's left of my 
hair.

Thanks in advance,

Eric
WA0ELM



Re: [digitalradio] Vista

2008-03-24 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
You can order a Dell with either XP or Vista.




At 05:28 PM 3/24/2008, you wrote:
I'm looking at purchasing a new laptop, and I can't find anything that 
doesn't come with Vista.  Is anyone having success running digital 
software (e.g. MultiPSK and/or MMTTY) with Vista?  Last I heard, most 
digital software doesn't play nice with it.

I thought about buying a Vista machine, and loading XP, but the 
problem I've found is that some drivers may not be available for XP.

I'd like to get a little guidance before I pull out what's left of my 
hair.

Thanks in advance,

Eric
WA0ELM























RE: [digitalradio] Vista

2008-03-24 Thread Dave AA6YQ
Though web sites and sales reps may tell you otherwise, XP is available. If
purchasing via a web site, use the small business section rather than the
home section; if dealing with a rep, make it clear that your purchase is
conditional on XP.

The Operating System availability shown on Lenovo's high-level laptop page
shows XP being available for all four product lines:

http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/controller/e/na/LenovoPortal/en_US/catalo
g.workflow:expandcategory?current-catalog-id=12F0696583E04D86B9B79B0FEC01C08
7current-category-id=8FA114A7D9FF4F38AE8E19B36EC665A7

Click on one of these, and the family is described with Vista as the default
choice. Click the Customize button, and you can have XP for an additional
$22.

Vista's adoption rate in the world of business is less than 5%. Companies
are not taking delivery of Vista machines and loading XP.

 73,

 Dave, AA6YQ

-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of wa0elm
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 6:28 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Vista


I'm looking at purchasing a new laptop, and I can't find anything that
doesn't come with Vista. Is anyone having success running digital
software (e.g. MultiPSK and/or MMTTY) with Vista? Last I heard, most
digital software doesn't play nice with it.

I thought about buying a Vista machine, and loading XP, but the
problem I've found is that some drivers may not be available for XP.

I'd like to get a little guidance before I pull out what's left of my
hair.

Thanks in advance,

Eric
WA0ELM






Re: [digitalradio] Vista

2008-03-24 Thread Darrel Smith

Eric,

Buy a Mac and load XP on it if you wish and have the best of both  
worlds. What the heck, put Ubuntu Hardy Heron on it too and then maybe  
you won't even want windoze.


Darrel

On 24-Mar-08, at 3:28 PM, wa0elm wrote:


I'm looking at purchasing a new laptop, and I can't find anything that
doesn't come with Vista. Is anyone having success running digital
software (e.g. MultiPSK and/or MMTTY) with Vista? Last I heard, most
digital software doesn't play nice with it.

I thought about buying a Vista machine, and loading XP, but the
problem I've found is that some drivers may not be available for XP.

I'd like to get a little guidance before I pull out what's left of my
hair.

Thanks in advance,

Eric
WA0ELM







Re: [digitalradio] Vista

2008-03-24 Thread Les Warriner
That is what I did when the opportunity came up to get a new laptop 
but loaded with VISTA.  Wiped it totally and loaded XP w/2.  Works 
great.  Have found nothing so far that it would not do.


Les

At 03:28 PM 3/24/2008, you wrote:


I'm looking at purchasing a new laptop, and I can't find anything that
doesn't come with Vista. Is anyone having success running digital
software (e.g. MultiPSK and/or MMTTY) with Vista? Last I heard, most
digital software doesn't play nice with it.

I thought about buying a Vista machine, and loading XP, but the
problem I've found is that some drivers may not be available for XP.

I'd like to get a little guidance before I pull out what's left of my
hair.

Thanks in advance,

Eric
WA0ELM


Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.14/1247 - Release Date: 
1/28/2008 10:59 AM


[digitalradio] Re: [NBEMSham] HF FLARQ Freqs?

2008-03-24 Thread kh6ty
Perhaps the strength of the NBEMS modes needs to be put in perspective.

As the NBEMS web page clearly explains, NBEMS was designed for stable 
propatation paths up to 100 miles on HF, or 300 miles on HF using NVIS 
antennas *on both ends*.

Just as Rick experienced, two days ago, I told a new digital user, an 
accomplished radio operator and DXer, W4NL, how to download and install the 
latest version of NBEMS and we sent the same file using PSK63, PSK125 and 
PSK250. It was 4 PM and first we tried 30m, but even MFSK16, without flarq, 
could not communicate very long, so I suggested we try 40m, a band on which 
we both have NVIS antennas. We were able to transfer a 616 byte text test 
file using PSK250, and took only one hit, which was caused by a loud static 
crash that I heard and saw the corruption of the text. The static crash was 
strong, but so were signals, which were S7-S9 on both ends (we were both 
running around 25 watts), so only once was the static strong enough to wipe 
out the data transmission momentarily. There was no QSB, because we were 
using the recommended NVIS antennas, and W4NL is exactly at the fringe area 
limit from me for NVIS coverage, which is generally considered to be 300 
miles.

The previous day, I transferred the same file using PSK250 on VHF, but over 
only a 25 mile distance, with no hits at all, which would be expected. We 
were both only running a couple of watts and both using a new design for a 
horizontally-polarized 2 meter antenna, called the Jolly Roger that is 
ideal for emcomm, as it is omnidirectional, 3 dB higher gain than the famous 
Big Wheel, and costs less than $30 to make out of PVC pipe and #14 house 
wire. Anybody interested in the design can download a preliminary draft Word 
document describing the construction from 
http://home.comcast.net/~hteller/JollyRoger.zip . Four antennas have already 
been built locally from the instructions, and all four work the same, with 
low SWR at 144.2 MHz, and excellent gain.

We all must remember that NBEMS is designed *specifically* for emergency 
communications when the repeaters are out of commission or unreachable, and 
over distances up to 100 miles on VHF or 300 miles on HF. All the tests over 
larger distances, from 500 miles to 2000 miles, or even greater, are much 
appreciated and also provide valuable user information, but it takes high 
performance modes of much greater bandwidth to sucessfully operate with ARQ 
in the presence of QRM, QRN, and changing propagation with time of day, as 
well as QSB most of the time. Trying to maintain stable communications over 
such long paths is not the objective of NBEMS, but only to achieve 
dependable point-to-point communications up to 100 miles on 2 meter VHF or 
up to 300 miles on HF, but using NVIS antennas *on both ends*.

Before passing judgement on the modes included at present in NBEMS, it is 
suggested to test according to the expectations for NBEMS and then make a 
judgement.

We are continually improving NBEMS, thanks to everyone's feedback and 
testing, both on HF and VHF, and in the near future, we will definitely 
incorporate a higher performance ARQ mode for Windows with higher throughput 
than MFSK16. Until that time, for Windows users, MFSK16 is the strongest 
mode for HF we support.

Our thanks go out to everyone who is helping us to improve NBEMS. Please 
check the web page often, www.w1hkj.com/NBEMS, and be sure to use only the 
latest version for testing, as using a old version with a new one may be 
generate confusion, or even not work at all. We are incorporating changes 
daily based on the feedback we have received, and our own round the clock 
testing, as fast as reasonably possible, without stopping testing already 
being done successfully by releasing a too rapid succession of changes. We 
now display the latest version numbers at the very top of flarq and VBdigi, 
so you can easily confirm with whomever you are testing that you both have 
the same version.

The April issue of QST headlines NBEMS on page 80 and does a good job of 
putting NBEMS in the proper perspective.

73, Skip KH6TY
NBEMS Development Team



- Original Message - 
From: Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [NBEMSham] HF FLARQ Freqs?


 The suggestion has been made to be up a couple kHz from the normal PSK31
 watering holes. Some of us use the ALE/FAE400 frequencies for NBEMS as
 well, however I have been not been getting positive comments from those
 who have been attempting to use NBEMS on HF:( They consider the protocol
 too weak for practical use. I have had good luck on NVIS 80 meters
 during daytime and have run up to PSK250.

 Here are some possible frequencies: 3584, 7074, 10136, 14094, 18104,
 21094, 28124.

 Since ALE/FAE modes use 1625 Hz as the center frequency, I have been
 calling CQ on these frequencies with both ALE/FAE400 and NBEMS (mostly
 with PSK63) with a 1500 Hz offset.

 Last night 

[digitalradio] April QST page 35

2008-03-24 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
That screen shot sure looks like email over ham radio to me.
In fact the traffic looks just like what I see on the pactor systems.

I'm waiting for the outrage that some had about the pactor so call
email systems.









[digitalradio] Vista another view

2008-03-24 Thread Ross Biggar
Hi all,
Just to add another twist to the comments, I am now running all my ham programs 
digital and otherwise
on Vista machines, using both Vista Ultimate and Vista business, all with SP1. 
Which by the way went in perfectly.

I regularly use WSJT on EME, Nova, Internet access, Atomtime, VQlog all running 
at the same time on one machine,
on another machine HRD/DM780 or Mixw with an SDR1000 while using VAC and VCom.

By the way these computers are all dual core machines with good ram capacity.

I now find Vista easier to drive than XP..

Regards to all 
Ross
ZL1WN

ps the only program that I cannot get going and it will probably be a VAC 
problem is the latest GUI version of WSPR.
 I dont think Joe has set up the audio port function in WSPR as well as he 
has in the EME WSJT.



Re: [digitalradio] Vista

2008-03-24 Thread David
Hi Eric...we have the same problem here in VKwhen you buy a computer 
you have to take the o/s that they want to load..if you try and buy 
one without an o/s you get told in no uncertian terms you cant.i 
have looked into the consumer protection regulations and found that it 
may be illegal to force you to buy what you dont wantapparently 
there must be choice.try telling that to a salesman or a store 
manageryou get pointed to the door..if i bought a new PC or 
Laptop i want it with out an o/s as i would want to load Linux and if 
you tell the salesperson that you get a lot of sales tripe that is 
usually not true but is fed to them via the Gates  propaganda 
machine...you may find a store where a salesperson has tried or uses 
Linux and you then get a better hearing but you still may not able to 
buy what you want.
check the consumer regs in your State or Country before you go and buy

73 David VK4BDJ




wa0elm wrote:

 I'm looking at purchasing a new laptop, and I can't find anything that
 doesn't come with Vista. Is anyone having success running digital
 software (e.g. MultiPSK and/or MMTTY) with Vista? Last I heard, most
 digital software doesn't play nice with it.

 I thought about buying a Vista machine, and loading XP, but the
 problem I've found is that some drivers may not be available for XP.

 I'd like to get a little guidance before I pull out what's left of my
 hair.

 Thanks in advance,

 Eric
 WA0ELM

  



Re: [digitalradio] Vista

2008-03-24 Thread Rick
Hi Eric,

Although many companies are specifying Microsoft XP, I keep wondering 
what will happen in June when they are supposedly no longer going to 
make this available anymore. As it is they extended the OS sales.

I have been using Vista for not quite a year and have not been running 
ham programs on it because I have an XP tower along with the Vista tower 
and a KVM switch to make it handy to work on either machine with the 
same keyboard, video, and mouse.

Because of your post, I decided that tonight was the time to go ahead 
and switch over to the Vista box and see how current ham digital 
programs work. Generally, things seem OK with the programs that I 
normally run:

Multipsk
Ham Radio Deluxe/Digital Master 780
NBEMS suite with VBdigi/flarq/flLogbook and can run the Sylpheed e-mail 
program recommended for this
DXLabs suite with DX Commander (which does the interfacing to the rig 
with Multipsk), DXKeeper. Propview, DXView, etc. (not fully tested)
Airlink Express - new program just released and targeted specifically 
for Vista but runs OK on XP
Also, not fully tested but seem to work OK:
QForms emergency messaging
EasyPal for SSTV
QWIKPSK

Also can run my regular programs and some interesting ones:
AVG Anti-Virus
Open Office Suite of programs
Media Monkey
Irfanview
Celestia and Stellarium for astronomy
GIMP2 for graphics
Firefox web browser
Thunderbird e-mail

As you can see, most of my general purpose programs are Open Source or 
at least freeware and when possible I use those that are available on 
Linux or Windows. I do have a dual boot to Linux Kubuntu, which is the 
first Linux variant that works reasonably well with my hardware.

But I have not had many problems with most modern programs when using 
Vista. Dave Bernstein did discover a serious bug which may be fixed in 
SP1. However, Vista has plenty of problems with SP1 and some had trouble 
with it so they have backed off. Not sure if it is ready for prime time 
yet.

Overall, Vista is a pretty face with superior font rendering when 
compared to XP and certainly much better than any of the Linux variants 
that just can not yet compete on my equipment (22 Samsung SyncMaster 
225BW LCD Monitor). But it simply does not offer much else, other than 
some security improvements, some of which are too extreme and quite 
unnecessary and annoying.

Some call this program Windows ME2. I won't go that far, as unlike ME, 
which was truly unstable, Vista is quite stable and solid for the 
average user. Like when was the last time you had a BSOD? I have not had 
one for many years, pretty much not since XP. (Can't say that about 
Linux which can crash the X windows pretty easily with a bug in PSKmail:(

Vista is VERY easy to reload. I actually dumped Vista last year and 
attempted to install Ubuntu Linux but it was just not an adequate OS and 
of course can not run most of the high quality ham programs so it is 
just not practical to use. So I was pretty concerned when I was forced 
to reload Vista and surprisingly it was the easiest modern OS that I 
have reloaded from scratch. All the drivers were present on the 
reinstall disks you have to make up in advance. This is for an HP 
Pavilion a1730n which is a 4400+ AMD chip and 2 Gigs of RAM.

Also, when I bought a low cost USB COM adapter, the driver was already 
in Vista while XP required installation of the drivers from a disk.

This may be at least a part of why Vista is a very bloated OS. Even some 
of the MS top programmers have admitted it needs trimming. Thus, it 
needs tremendous resources to run moderately fast. That means the 
fastest possible microprocessor, video, and at least 2 Gig RAM.

MS is running scared on this because sales are terrible. The only way it 
would have been adopted is due to it being forced on the users when they 
buy the computer. But note that Mac sales are drastically higher and 
even Linux is getting some traction here in the developed world. MS is 
already talking about Windows 7, which is the replacement for Vista. Can 
you imagine that? And that OS is years away by MS's reckoning, thus it 
will probably be many years past that date!

Bottom line though: you are going to find it very difficult to buy 
anything here in the U.S. other than a Vista machine for a MS OS. It 
don't see Mac and Linux as being alternatives if you want to run MS 
Windows software as we digital hams want to do since that is the OS that 
has the best programs at this time. In some cases, the only software in 
certain categories.

73,

Rick, KV9U




wa0elm wrote:
 I'm looking at purchasing a new laptop, and I can't find anything that 
 doesn't come with Vista.  Is anyone having success running digital 
 software (e.g. MultiPSK and/or MMTTY) with Vista?  Last I heard, most 
 digital software doesn't play nice with it.

 I thought about buying a Vista machine, and loading XP, but the 
 problem I've found is that some drivers may not be available for XP.

 I'd like to get a little guidance