Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[G. M.-S.]

Could this be related to
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34934
?
I also have
sage -standard | grep givaro
givaro..4.1.1 (4.1.1)

On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 18:51, Emmanuel Charpentier <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:

> ```
> charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -standard | grep givaro
> givaro..4.1.1 (4.1.1)
> ```
>
> This means that Sage's givaro is installed,.
>
> I think...
>
> Le mercredi 25 janvier 2023 à 16:51:10 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:22 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > After re-building 9.8.beta7 + #34935, running ptestlong gets me one
>> more permanent failure :
>> >
>> > ```
>> > charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long
>> 225.1 --random-seed=121252713509435388240223103279859468631
>> src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py # 1 doctest failed
>> > Running doctests with ID 2023-01-25-16-07-54-8bb572eb.
>> > Git branch: t/34935/interfaces-emacs
>> > Git ref: 9.8.beta7-1-g49d4ff78cc2
>> > Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and
>> SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
>> > Using
>> --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_jupyter,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pari_jupyter,pint,pip,pysingular,sage,sage_spkg,singular_jupyter
>>
>> > Features to be detected:
>> 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
>>
>> > Doctesting 1 file.
>> > sage -t --long --warn-long 225.1
>> --random-seed=121252713509435388240223103279859468631
>> src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py
>> > **
>> > File "src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py", line 461, in
>> sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.hom_frobenius.EllipticCurveHom_frobenius.dual
>> > Failed example:
>> > p in (2,3) or f.dual().dual() == f
>> > Exception raised:
>> > Traceback (most recent call last):
>> > File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in _run
>> > self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>> > File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in
>> compile_and_execute
>> > exec(compiled, globs)
>> > File "> sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.hom_frobenius.EllipticCurveHom_frobenius.dual[17]>",
>> line 1, in 
>> > p in (Integer(2),Integer(3)) or f.dual().dual() == f
>> > File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 2297, in
>> sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCallerNoArgs.__call__
>> > self.cache = f(self._instance)
>> > File
>> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line
>> 689, in dual
>> > return EllipticCurveHom_composite.from_factors(phis)
>> > File
>> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line
>> 364, in from_factors
>> > maps = tuple(maps)
>> > File
>> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line
>> 688, in 
>> > phis = (phi.dual() for phi in self._phis[::-1])
>> > File
>> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_curve_isogeny.py",
>> line 3076, in dual
>> > corr = find_post_isomorphism(mult, rhs)
>> > File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom.py", line
>> 856, in find_post_isomorphism
>> > isos = [iso for iso in isos if iso._eval(im_phi) == im_psi]
>> > File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom.py", line
>> 856, in 
>> > isos = [iso for iso in isos if iso._eval(im_phi) == im_psi]
>> > File
>> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/weierstrass_morphism.py",
>> line 586, in _eval
>> > return self._codomain.base_extend(k).point(Q)
>> > File
>> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py", line
>> 1352, in base_extend
>> > E = constructor.EllipticCurve([R(a) for a in self.a_invariants()])
>> > File
>> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py", line
>> 1352, in 
>> > E = constructor.EllipticCurve([R(a) for a in self.a_invariants()])
>> > File "sage/rings/finite_rings/element_givaro.pyx", line 1355, in
>> sage.rings.finite_rings.element_givaro.FiniteField_givaroElement.__int__
>> > raise TypeError("Cannot coerce element to an integer.")
>> > TypeError: Cannot coerce element to an integer.
>>
>> Is it givaro from the system?
>> If so, can you try if building Sage's givaro helps?
>>
>> > 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

```
charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -standard | grep givaro
givaro..4.1.1 (4.1.1)
```

This means that Sage's givaro is installed,.

I think...

Le mercredi 25 janvier 2023 à 16:51:10 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :

> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:22 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
>  wrote:
> >
> > After re-building 9.8.beta7 + #34935, running ptestlong gets me one more 
> permanent failure :
> >
> > ```
> > charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 
> 225.1 --random-seed=121252713509435388240223103279859468631 
> src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py # 1 doctest failed
> > Running doctests with ID 2023-01-25-16-07-54-8bb572eb.
> > Git branch: t/34935/interfaces-emacs
> > Git ref: 9.8.beta7-1-g49d4ff78cc2
> > Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
> SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
> > Using 
> --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_jupyter,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pari_jupyter,pint,pip,pysingular,sage,sage_spkg,singular_jupyter
> > Features to be detected: 
> 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
> > Doctesting 1 file.
> > sage -t --long --warn-long 225.1 
> --random-seed=121252713509435388240223103279859468631 
> src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py
> > **
> > File "src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py", line 461, in 
> sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.hom_frobenius.EllipticCurveHom_frobenius.dual
> > Failed example:
> > p in (2,3) or f.dual().dual() == f
> > Exception raised:
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in _run
> > self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
> > File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
> compile_and_execute
> > exec(compiled, globs)
> > File " sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.hom_frobenius.EllipticCurveHom_frobenius.dual[17]>",
>  
> line 1, in 
> > p in (Integer(2),Integer(3)) or f.dual().dual() == f
> > File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 2297, in 
> sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCallerNoArgs.__call__
> > self.cache = f(self._instance)
> > File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line 
> 689, in dual
> > return EllipticCurveHom_composite.from_factors(phis)
> > File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line 
> 364, in from_factors
> > maps = tuple(maps)
> > File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line 
> 688, in 
> > phis = (phi.dual() for phi in self._phis[::-1])
> > File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_curve_isogeny.py", 
> line 3076, in dual
> > corr = find_post_isomorphism(mult, rhs)
> > File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom.py", line 
> 856, in find_post_isomorphism
> > isos = [iso for iso in isos if iso._eval(im_phi) == im_psi]
> > File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom.py", line 
> 856, in 
> > isos = [iso for iso in isos if iso._eval(im_phi) == im_psi]
> > File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/weierstrass_morphism.py", 
> line 586, in _eval
> > return self._codomain.base_extend(k).point(Q)
> > File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py", line 
> 1352, in base_extend
> > E = constructor.EllipticCurve([R(a) for a in self.a_invariants()])
> > File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py", line 
> 1352, in 
> > E = constructor.EllipticCurve([R(a) for a in self.a_invariants()])
> > File "sage/rings/finite_rings/element_givaro.pyx", line 1355, in 
> sage.rings.finite_rings.element_givaro.FiniteField_givaroElement.__int__
> > raise TypeError("Cannot coerce element to an integer.")
> > TypeError: Cannot coerce element to an integer.
>
> Is it givaro from the system?
> If so, can you try if building Sage's givaro helps?
>
> > **
> > 1 item had failures:
> > 1 of 19 in 
> sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.hom_frobenius.EllipticCurveHom_frobenius.dual
> > [117 tests, 1 failure, 0.91 s]
> > --
> > sage -t --long --warn-long 225.1 
> 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:22 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
 wrote:
>
> After re-building 9.8.beta7 + #34935, running ptestlong gets me one more 
> permanent failure :
>
> ```
> charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 225.1 
> --random-seed=121252713509435388240223103279859468631 
> src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py  # 1 doctest failed
> Running doctests with ID 2023-01-25-16-07-54-8bb572eb.
> Git branch: t/34935/interfaces-emacs
> Git ref: 9.8.beta7-1-g49d4ff78cc2
> Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
> SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
> Using 
> --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_jupyter,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pari_jupyter,pint,pip,pysingular,sage,sage_spkg,singular_jupyter
> Features to be detected: 
> 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
> Doctesting 1 file.
> sage -t --long --warn-long 225.1 
> --random-seed=121252713509435388240223103279859468631 
> src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py
> **
> File "src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py", line 461, in 
> sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.hom_frobenius.EllipticCurveHom_frobenius.dual
> Failed example:
> p in (2,3) or f.dual().dual() == f
> Exception raised:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in _run
> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
> compile_and_execute
> exec(compiled, globs)
>   File " sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.hom_frobenius.EllipticCurveHom_frobenius.dual[17]>",
>  line 1, in 
> p in (Integer(2),Integer(3)) or f.dual().dual() == f
>   File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 2297, in 
> sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCallerNoArgs.__call__
> self.cache = f(self._instance)
>   File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line 
> 689, in dual
> return EllipticCurveHom_composite.from_factors(phis)
>   File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line 
> 364, in from_factors
> maps = tuple(maps)
>   File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line 
> 688, in 
> phis = (phi.dual() for phi in self._phis[::-1])
>   File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_curve_isogeny.py", 
> line 3076, in dual
> corr = find_post_isomorphism(mult, rhs)
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom.py", line 
> 856, in find_post_isomorphism
> isos = [iso for iso in isos if iso._eval(im_phi) == im_psi]
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom.py", line 
> 856, in 
> isos = [iso for iso in isos if iso._eval(im_phi) == im_psi]
>   File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/weierstrass_morphism.py", 
> line 586, in _eval
> return self._codomain.base_extend(k).point(Q)
>   File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py", line 
> 1352, in base_extend
> E = constructor.EllipticCurve([R(a) for a in self.a_invariants()])
>   File 
> "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py", line 
> 1352, in 
> E = constructor.EllipticCurve([R(a) for a in self.a_invariants()])
>   File "sage/rings/finite_rings/element_givaro.pyx", line 1355, in 
> sage.rings.finite_rings.element_givaro.FiniteField_givaroElement.__int__
> raise TypeError("Cannot coerce element to an integer.")
> TypeError: Cannot coerce element to an integer.

Is it givaro from the system?
If so, can you try if building Sage's givaro helps?

> **
> 1 item had failures:
>1 of  19 in 
> sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.hom_frobenius.EllipticCurveHom_frobenius.dual
> [117 tests, 1 failure, 0.91 s]
> --
> sage -t --long --warn-long 225.1 
> --random-seed=121252713509435388240223103279859468631 
> src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py  # 1 doctest failed
> --
> Total 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

After re-building 9.8.beta7 + #34935, running ptestlong gets me one more 
permanent failure :

```
charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 225.1 
--random-seed=121252713509435388240223103279859468631 
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py  # 1 doctest failed
Running doctests with ID 2023-01-25-16-07-54-8bb572eb.
Git branch: t/34935/interfaces-emacs
Git ref: 9.8.beta7-1-g49d4ff78cc2
Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
Using 
--optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_jupyter,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pari_jupyter,pint,pip,pysingular,sage,sage_spkg,singular_jupyter
Features to be detected: 
4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long --warn-long 225.1 
--random-seed=121252713509435388240223103279859468631 
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py
**
File "src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py", line 461, in 
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.hom_frobenius.EllipticCurveHom_frobenius.dual
Failed example:
p in (2,3) or f.dual().dual() == f
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in _run
self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
  File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
compile_and_execute
exec(compiled, globs)
  File "",
 
line 1, in 
p in (Integer(2),Integer(3)) or f.dual().dual() == f
  File "sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx", line 2297, in 
sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCallerNoArgs.__call__
self.cache = f(self._instance)
  File 
"/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line 
689, in dual
return EllipticCurveHom_composite.from_factors(phis)
  File 
"/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line 
364, in from_factors
maps = tuple(maps)
  File 
"/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_composite.py", line 
688, in 
phis = (phi.dual() for phi in self._phis[::-1])
  File 
"/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_curve_isogeny.py", 
line 3076, in dual
corr = find_post_isomorphism(mult, rhs)
  File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom.py", 
line 856, in find_post_isomorphism
isos = [iso for iso in isos if iso._eval(im_phi) == im_psi]
  File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom.py", 
line 856, in 
isos = [iso for iso in isos if iso._eval(im_phi) == im_psi]
  File 
"/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/weierstrass_morphism.py", 
line 586, in _eval
return self._codomain.base_extend(k).point(Q)
  File 
"/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py", line 
1352, in base_extend
E = constructor.EllipticCurve([R(a) for a in self.a_invariants()])
  File 
"/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py", line 
1352, in 
E = constructor.EllipticCurve([R(a) for a in self.a_invariants()])
  File "sage/rings/finite_rings/element_givaro.pyx", line 1355, in 
sage.rings.finite_rings.element_givaro.FiniteField_givaroElement.__int__
raise TypeError("Cannot coerce element to an integer.")
TypeError: Cannot coerce element to an integer.
**
1 item had failures:
   1 of  19 in 
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.hom_frobenius.EllipticCurveHom_frobenius.dual
[117 tests, 1 failure, 0.91 s]
--
sage -t --long --warn-long 225.1 
--random-seed=121252713509435388240223103279859468631 
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/hom_frobenius.py  # 1 doctest failed
--
Total time for all tests: 1.0 seconds
cpu time: 0.9 seconds
cumulative wall time: 0.9 seconds
Features detected for doctesting: 
pytest is not installed in the venv, skip checking tests that rely on it
```

HTH,
Le dimanche 22 janvier 2023 à 14:41:04 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :

> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs interface is 
> a big hit for me, so I 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:25 PM Enrique Artal  wrote:
>
> I guess the snappy problem is related to Fedora 37.  A tricky solution is 
> given by upstream team in https://github.com/3-manifolds/SnapPy/issues/88

snappy ships Cython-generated C files. That's the source of trouble...
:facepalm:
>
> El jueves, 19 de enero de 2023 a las 13:01:18 UTC+1, Enrique Artal escribió:
>>
>> I tried in another computer with the system package (3.11.1) and it worked 
>> but in both cases only after make distclean.
>> I lost the logs but sagelib complained about setup.
>> Snappy fails in both cases.
>>
>> El jueves, 19 de enero de 2023 a las 12:04:24 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik escribió:
>>>
>>> What's wrong with Fedora's 37 Python3? (3.11.0, right?)
>>> What error do you see in config.log - which tells, hopefully, why it
>>> does not want system's python3 ?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:43 AM Enrique Artal  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > In Fedora 37 I needed to `make distclean` and use the sage package for 
>>> > python3 and not the system one. The optional package snappy does not 
>>> > compile. Anyway, thanks for the new version. Best, Enrique.
>>> >
>>> > El jueves, 19 de enero de 2023 a las 0:48:25 UTC+1, Volker Braun escribió:
>>> >>
>>> >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>>> >> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>>> >> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>>> >>
>>> >> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
>>> >> ready ;)
>>> >>
>>> >> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
>>> >> 9.8.beta7
>>> >> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
>>> >> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
>>> >> polyhedra
>>> >> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
>>> >> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
>>> >> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
>>> >> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
>>> >> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
>>> >> plot, numerical
>>> >> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff 
>>> >> from PATH
>>> >> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
>>> >> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: 
>>> >> Option to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
>>> >> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
>>> >> typing_extensions
>>> >> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
>>> >> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
>>> >> VirtualCharacter
>>> >> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
>>> >> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
>>> >> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
>>> >> conversion
>>> >> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
>>> >> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
>>> >> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
>>> >> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
>>> >> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open 
>>> >> source!), rename to scip
>>> >> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
>>> >> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to 
>>> >> GitHub and add links to the transition guide
>>> >> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking 
>>> >> functions
>>> >> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's 
>>> >> with relations.
>>> >> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to 
>>> >> order 664
>>> >> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element 
>>> >> functions
>>> >> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
>>> >> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
>>> >> top-level functions maxima_console etc.
>>> >> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
>>> >> 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of elliptic 
>>> >> curves
>>> >> 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
>>> >> independent from the current coloring
>>> >> 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11
>>> >> 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/
>>> >> 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency of scip)
>>> >> f84915f69d8 Trac #34726: Optional package papilo (dependency of scip)
>>> >> e5cf1c0d9f2 Trac #34694: Bug in ExteriorAlgebra interior product
>>> >> ebb9b611d02 Trac #34416: Manage pexpect logs created during doctesting
>>> >> 962177a2da1 Trac #33907: interfaces/expect.py random test failure
>>> >> 66409243991 Trac #16522: lazy_import doesn't resolve properly when 
>>> >> indirectly imported
>>> >> 2114066f877 (tag: 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Enrique Artal]

I guess the snappy problem is related to Fedora 37.  A tricky solution is 
given by upstream team in https://github.com/3-manifolds/SnapPy/issues/88

El jueves, 19 de enero de 2023 a las 13:01:18 UTC+1, Enrique Artal escribió:

> I tried in another computer with the system package (3.11.1) and it worked 
> but in both cases only after make distclean.
> I lost the logs but sagelib complained about setup.
> Snappy fails in both cases.
>
> El jueves, 19 de enero de 2023 a las 12:04:24 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik 
> escribió:
>
>> What's wrong with Fedora's 37 Python3? (3.11.0, right?) 
>> What error do you see in config.log - which tells, hopefully, why it 
>> does not want system's python3 ? 
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:43 AM Enrique Artal  
>> wrote: 
>> > 
>> > In Fedora 37 I needed to `make distclean` and use the sage package for 
>> python3 and not the system one. The optional package snappy does not 
>> compile. Anyway, thanks for the new version. Best, Enrique. 
>> > 
>> > El jueves, 19 de enero de 2023 a las 0:48:25 UTC+1, Volker Braun 
>> escribió: 
>> >> 
>> >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>> >> 
>> >> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
>> ready ;) 
>> >> 
>> >> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
>> 9.8.beta7 
>> >> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings 
>> >> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
>> polyhedra 
>> >> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend 
>> >> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
>> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies 
>> >> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for 
>> obtain_nash() 
>> >> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, 
>> modules, plot, numerical 
>> >> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c 
>> stuff from PATH 
>> >> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints 
>> >> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: 
>> Option to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints 
>> >> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
>> typing_extensions 
>> >> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9 
>> >> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
>> VirtualCharacter 
>> >> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip 
>> >> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files 
>> >> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
>> conversion 
>> >> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx 
>> >> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files 
>> >> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/ 
>> >> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp 
>> >> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open 
>> source!), rename to scip 
>> >> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4 
>> >> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to 
>> GitHub and add links to the transition guide 
>> >> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking 
>> functions 
>> >> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's 
>> with relations. 
>> >> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to 
>> order 664 
>> >> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element 
>> functions 
>> >> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular 
>> >> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
>> top-level functions maxima_console etc. 
>> >> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies 
>> >> 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of 
>> elliptic curves 
>> >> 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
>> independent from the current coloring 
>> >> 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11 
>> >> 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/ 
>> >> 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency of scip) 
>> >> f84915f69d8 Trac #34726: Optional package papilo (dependency of scip) 
>> >> e5cf1c0d9f2 Trac #34694: Bug in ExteriorAlgebra interior product 
>> >> ebb9b611d02 Trac #34416: Manage pexpect logs created during doctesting 
>> >> 962177a2da1 Trac #33907: interfaces/expect.py random test failure 
>> >> 66409243991 Trac #16522: lazy_import doesn't resolve properly when 
>> indirectly imported 
>> >> 2114066f877 (tag: 9.8.beta6) Updated SageMath version to 9.8.beta6 
>> >> 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "sage-release" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

FWIW, 9.8.beta7 + Trac#34935  runs 
under `sage-shell-mode`.

Thanks a lot !

Le mercredi 25 janvier 2023 à 00:12:42 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :

> Patch available: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34935
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 2:47:15 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> I think Matthias found the answer in the emacs-lisp code (discussion at 
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34547#comment:56).
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 2:31:38 PM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have absolutely no idea why this change would make a difference…
>>>
>>> The explanation is probably in sahe-shell-mode emacs-lisp code, 
>>> originally written by someone wose emacs-lisp fu is widely heavier than 
>>> mine.
>>>
>>> sage-shell-mode code, as far as I know, isn’t understood by nobodu, 
>>> since its original author went to greener pas$tures… A concerted effort to 
>>> understand and *comment* it might be worthwile… 
>>> ​
>>> Le mardi 24 janvier 2023 à 23:15:40 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>>>
 For reasons I really don't understand, removing these lines from 
 sage.interfaces.all seem to have caused this:

 -interfaces = ['gap', 'gap3', 'giac', 'gp', 'mathematica', 'gnuplot', \
 -  'kash', 'magma', 'macaulay2', 'maple', 'maxima', \
 -  'mathematica', 'mwrank', 'octave', 'r', \
 -  'singular', 'sage0', 'sage']

 At least if I restore those lines, or even just add a line "interfaces 
 = []", then emacs appears to work again. I haven't tried it very much, 
 though.

 I have absolutely no idea why this change would make a difference...


 On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 12:52:29 PM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de 
 wrote:

> I tried to comment out all the changes in all_cmdline.py, but this 
> didn't help.  The diff of src/sage/interfaces/all.py is a bit unclear to 
> me, I don't see what could be a problem there. 
>
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 17:47:29 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> This was one of my guesses because that ticket could have changed 
>> global behavior of Sage by changing some imports — most of the tickets 
>> made 
>> more focused changes. Can you start with 9.8.beta6 and just apply some 
>> of 
>> the changes from #34547? In particular, do things work if you don't 
>> include 
>> the changes in all_cmdline.py?
>>
>> -- 
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:15:53 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed.  The problem 
>>> seems to be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in 
>>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
>>>  
>>> does not return.  There is only one python file involved, 
>>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py,
>>>  
>>> but I do not see what #34547 has to do with it.  Something about 
>>> lazy_import maybe?
>>>
>>> I can see that in sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output the command
>>>
>>> _emacs_sage_shell.run_cell_and_print_msg_id("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()",
>>>  
>>> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747start’, 
>>> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747end’)
>>>
>>> was sent to the process (using process-send-string), and after that,
>>>
>>> (sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete)
>>>
>>> never returns.  I don't know how to debug the python code, 
>>> unfortunately.  Most importantly, I don't see what changed - what does 
>>> #34547 have to do with it?
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 11:09:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems 
 that #16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 
 fails.
 Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?

 For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many 
 emacs users there are.

 Martin


 On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de 
 wrote:

> Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + 
> #33842.  I hope that all dependencies are in the branch.
>
> Martin
>
> On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses 
>> based on the newly merged tickets.
>>
>> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 
>> emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[John H Palmieri]

Patch available: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34935


On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 2:47:15 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:

> I think Matthias found the answer in the emacs-lisp code (discussion at 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34547#comment:56).
>
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 2:31:38 PM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> I have absolutely no idea why this change would make a difference…
>>
>> The explanation is probably in sahe-shell-mode emacs-lisp code, 
>> originally written by someone wose emacs-lisp fu is widely heavier than 
>> mine.
>>
>> sage-shell-mode code, as far as I know, isn’t understood by nobodu, 
>> since its original author went to greener pas$tures… A concerted effort to 
>> understand and *comment* it might be worthwile… 
>> ​
>> Le mardi 24 janvier 2023 à 23:15:40 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>>
>>> For reasons I really don't understand, removing these lines from 
>>> sage.interfaces.all seem to have caused this:
>>>
>>> -interfaces = ['gap', 'gap3', 'giac', 'gp', 'mathematica', 'gnuplot', \
>>> -  'kash', 'magma', 'macaulay2', 'maple', 'maxima', \
>>> -  'mathematica', 'mwrank', 'octave', 'r', \
>>> -  'singular', 'sage0', 'sage']
>>>
>>> At least if I restore those lines, or even just add a line "interfaces = 
>>> []", then emacs appears to work again. I haven't tried it very much, though.
>>>
>>> I have absolutely no idea why this change would make a difference...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 12:52:29 PM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 I tried to comment out all the changes in all_cmdline.py, but this 
 didn't help.  The diff of src/sage/interfaces/all.py is a bit unclear to 
 me, I don't see what could be a problem there. 

 On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 17:47:29 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:

> This was one of my guesses because that ticket could have changed 
> global behavior of Sage by changing some imports — most of the tickets 
> made 
> more focused changes. Can you start with 9.8.beta6 and just apply some of 
> the changes from #34547? In particular, do things work if you don't 
> include 
> the changes in all_cmdline.py?
>
> -- 
> John
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:15:53 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de 
> wrote:
>
>> I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed.  The problem 
>> seems to be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in 
>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
>>  
>> does not return.  There is only one python file involved, 
>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py,
>>  
>> but I do not see what #34547 has to do with it.  Something about 
>> lazy_import maybe?
>>
>> I can see that in sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output the command
>>
>> _emacs_sage_shell.run_cell_and_print_msg_id("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()",
>>  
>> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747start’, 
>> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747end’)
>>
>> was sent to the process (using process-send-string), and after that,
>>
>> (sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete)
>>
>> never returns.  I don't know how to debug the python code, 
>> unfortunately.  Most importantly, I don't see what changed - what does 
>> #34547 have to do with it?
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 11:09:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems 
>>> that #16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
>>> Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?
>>>
>>> For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many 
>>> emacs users there are.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + 
 #33842.  I hope that all dependencies are in the branch.

 Martin

 On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:

> Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses 
> based on the newly merged tickets.
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 
> emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
>> 
>>  issue 
>> on github :
>>
>> ```
>> It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 
>> build. Apparently, if I first 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[John H Palmieri]

I think Matthias found the answer in the emacs-lisp code (discussion at 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34547#comment:56).

On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 2:31:38 PM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> I have absolutely no idea why this change would make a difference…
>
> The explanation is probably in sahe-shell-mode emacs-lisp code, 
> originally written by someone wose emacs-lisp fu is widely heavier than 
> mine.
>
> sage-shell-mode code, as far as I know, isn’t understood by nobodu, since 
> its original author went to greener pas$tures… A concerted effort to 
> understand and *comment* it might be worthwile… 
> ​
> Le mardi 24 janvier 2023 à 23:15:40 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>
>> For reasons I really don't understand, removing these lines from 
>> sage.interfaces.all seem to have caused this:
>>
>> -interfaces = ['gap', 'gap3', 'giac', 'gp', 'mathematica', 'gnuplot', \
>> -  'kash', 'magma', 'macaulay2', 'maple', 'maxima', \
>> -  'mathematica', 'mwrank', 'octave', 'r', \
>> -  'singular', 'sage0', 'sage']
>>
>> At least if I restore those lines, or even just add a line "interfaces = 
>> []", then emacs appears to work again. I haven't tried it very much, though.
>>
>> I have absolutely no idea why this change would make a difference...
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 12:52:29 PM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to comment out all the changes in all_cmdline.py, but this 
>>> didn't help.  The diff of src/sage/interfaces/all.py is a bit unclear to 
>>> me, I don't see what could be a problem there. 
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 17:47:29 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>>
 This was one of my guesses because that ticket could have changed 
 global behavior of Sage by changing some imports — most of the tickets 
 made 
 more focused changes. Can you start with 9.8.beta6 and just apply some of 
 the changes from #34547? In particular, do things work if you don't 
 include 
 the changes in all_cmdline.py?

 -- 
 John


 On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:15:53 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de 
 wrote:

> I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed.  The problem seems 
> to be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in 
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
>  
> does not return.  There is only one python file involved, 
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py,
>  
> but I do not see what #34547 has to do with it.  Something about 
> lazy_import maybe?
>
> I can see that in sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output the command
>
> _emacs_sage_shell.run_cell_and_print_msg_id("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()",
>  
> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747start’, 
> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747end’)
>
> was sent to the process (using process-send-string), and after that,
>
> (sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete)
>
> never returns.  I don't know how to debug the python code, 
> unfortunately.  Most importantly, I don't see what changed - what does 
> #34547 have to do with it?
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 11:09:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems 
>> that #16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
>> Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?
>>
>> For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many 
>> emacs users there are.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842.  
>>> I hope that all dependencies are in the branch.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>>
 Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses 
 based on the newly merged tickets.

 On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 
 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:

> From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
> 
>  issue 
> on github :
>
> ```
> It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 
> build. Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, 
> I can 
> then use beta7 in the same emacs session.
> ```
>
> I don't get it either...
>
> There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` 
> 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

 

I have absolutely no idea why this change would make a difference…

The explanation is probably in sahe-shell-mode emacs-lisp code, originally 
written by someone wose emacs-lisp fu is widely heavier than mine.

sage-shell-mode code, as far as I know, isn’t understood by nobodu, since 
its original author went to greener pas$tures… A concerted effort to 
understand and *comment* it might be worthwile… 
​
Le mardi 24 janvier 2023 à 23:15:40 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :

> For reasons I really don't understand, removing these lines from 
> sage.interfaces.all seem to have caused this:
>
> -interfaces = ['gap', 'gap3', 'giac', 'gp', 'mathematica', 'gnuplot', \
> -  'kash', 'magma', 'macaulay2', 'maple', 'maxima', \
> -  'mathematica', 'mwrank', 'octave', 'r', \
> -  'singular', 'sage0', 'sage']
>
> At least if I restore those lines, or even just add a line "interfaces = 
> []", then emacs appears to work again. I haven't tried it very much, though.
>
> I have absolutely no idea why this change would make a difference...
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 12:52:29 PM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> I tried to comment out all the changes in all_cmdline.py, but this didn't 
>> help.  The diff of src/sage/interfaces/all.py is a bit unclear to me, I 
>> don't see what could be a problem there. 
>>
>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 17:47:29 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>> This was one of my guesses because that ticket could have changed global 
>>> behavior of Sage by changing some imports — most of the tickets made more 
>>> focused changes. Can you start with 9.8.beta6 and just apply some of the 
>>> changes from #34547? In particular, do things work if you don't include the 
>>> changes in all_cmdline.py?
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:15:53 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>>
 I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed.  The problem seems 
 to be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in 
 https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
  
 does not return.  There is only one python file involved, 
 https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py,
  
 but I do not see what #34547 has to do with it.  Something about 
 lazy_import maybe?

 I can see that in sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output the command

 _emacs_sage_shell.run_cell_and_print_msg_id("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()",
  
 ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747start’, 
 ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747end’)

 was sent to the process (using process-send-string), and after that,

 (sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete)

 never returns.  I don't know how to debug the python code, 
 unfortunately.  Most importantly, I don't see what changed - what does 
 #34547 have to do with it?

 Martin



 On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 11:09:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

> Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems 
> that #16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
> Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?
>
> For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many 
> emacs users there are.
>
> Martin
>
>
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842.  
>> I hope that all dependencies are in the branch.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>> Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based 
>>> on the newly merged tickets.
>>>
>>> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 
>>> emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
 From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
 
  issue 
 on github :

 ```
 It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 
 build. Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I 
 can 
 then use beta7 in the same emacs session.
 ```

 I don't get it either...

 There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` 
 emacs package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with 
 Python 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...

 Any idea ?

 Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a 
 écrit :

> Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.
>

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:15 PM John H Palmieri  wrote:
>
> For reasons I really don't understand, removing these lines from 
> sage.interfaces.all seem to have caused this:
>
> -interfaces = ['gap', 'gap3', 'giac', 'gp', 'mathematica', 'gnuplot', \
> -  'kash', 'magma', 'macaulay2', 'maple', 'maxima', \
> -  'mathematica', 'mwrank', 'octave', 'r', \
> -  'singular', 'sage0', 'sage']
>
> At least if I restore those lines, or even just add a line "interfaces = []", 
> then emacs appears to work again. I haven't tried it very much, though.

perhaps cause it's used in emacs_sage_shell.py ?

>
> I have absolutely no idea why this change would make a difference...
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 12:52:29 PM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>> I tried to comment out all the changes in all_cmdline.py, but this didn't 
>> help.  The diff of src/sage/interfaces/all.py is a bit unclear to me, I 
>> don't see what could be a problem there.
>>
>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 17:47:29 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>>
>>> This was one of my guesses because that ticket could have changed global 
>>> behavior of Sage by changing some imports — most of the tickets made more 
>>> focused changes. Can you start with 9.8.beta6 and just apply some of the 
>>> changes from #34547? In particular, do things work if you don't include the 
>>> changes in all_cmdline.py?
>>>
>>> --
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:15:53 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

 I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed.  The problem seems to 
 be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in 
 https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
  does not return.  There is only one python file involved, 
 https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py,
  but I do not see what #34547 has to do with it.  Something about 
 lazy_import maybe?

 I can see that in sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output the command

 _emacs_sage_shell.run_cell_and_print_msg_id("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()",
  ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747start’, 
 ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747end’)

 was sent to the process (using process-send-string), and after that,

 (sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete)

 never returns.  I don't know how to debug the python code, unfortunately.  
 Most importantly, I don't see what changed - what does #34547 have to do 
 with it?

 Martin



 On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 11:09:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
> Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems that 
> #16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
> Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?
>
> For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many emacs 
> users there are.
>
> Martin
>
>
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842.  I 
>> hope that all dependencies are in the branch.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>>
>>> Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based on 
>>> the newly merged tickets.
>>>
>>> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>>> wrote:

 From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode issue on github :

 ```
 It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 build. 
 Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I can 
 then use beta7 in the same emacs session.
 ```

 I don't get it either...

 There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` 
 emacs package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with 
 Python 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...

 Any idea ?

 Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :
>
> Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.
>
> This is terrible.
>
> On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>>
>> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs 
>> interface is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>>
>> Thank you nevertheless !
>>
>> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a 
>> écrit :
>>>
>>> In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[John H Palmieri]

For reasons I really don't understand, removing these lines from 
sage.interfaces.all seem to have caused this:

-interfaces = ['gap', 'gap3', 'giac', 'gp', 'mathematica', 'gnuplot', \
-  'kash', 'magma', 'macaulay2', 'maple', 'maxima', \
-  'mathematica', 'mwrank', 'octave', 'r', \
-  'singular', 'sage0', 'sage']

At least if I restore those lines, or even just add a line "interfaces = 
[]", then emacs appears to work again. I haven't tried it very much, though.

I have absolutely no idea why this change would make a difference...


On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 12:52:29 PM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

> I tried to comment out all the changes in all_cmdline.py, but this didn't 
> help.  The diff of src/sage/interfaces/all.py is a bit unclear to me, I 
> don't see what could be a problem there. 
>
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 17:47:29 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> This was one of my guesses because that ticket could have changed global 
>> behavior of Sage by changing some imports — most of the tickets made more 
>> focused changes. Can you start with 9.8.beta6 and just apply some of the 
>> changes from #34547? In particular, do things work if you don't include the 
>> changes in all_cmdline.py?
>>
>> -- 
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:15:53 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>>> I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed.  The problem seems 
>>> to be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in 
>>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
>>>  
>>> does not return.  There is only one python file involved, 
>>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py,
>>>  
>>> but I do not see what #34547 has to do with it.  Something about 
>>> lazy_import maybe?
>>>
>>> I can see that in sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output the command
>>>
>>> _emacs_sage_shell.run_cell_and_print_msg_id("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()",
>>>  
>>> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747start’, 
>>> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747end’)
>>>
>>> was sent to the process (using process-send-string), and after that,
>>>
>>> (sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete)
>>>
>>> never returns.  I don't know how to debug the python code, 
>>> unfortunately.  Most importantly, I don't see what changed - what does 
>>> #34547 have to do with it?
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 11:09:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>>
 Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems 
 that #16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
 Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?

 For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many emacs 
 users there are.

 Martin


 On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

> Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842.  I 
> hope that all dependencies are in the branch.
>
> Martin
>
> On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based 
>> on the newly merged tickets.
>>
>> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 
>> emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
>>> 
>>>  issue 
>>> on github :
>>>
>>> ```
>>> It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 
>>> build. Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I 
>>> can 
>>> then use beta7 in the same emacs session.
>>> ```
>>>
>>> I don't get it either...
>>>
>>> There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` 
>>> emacs package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with 
>>> Python 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...
>>>
>>> Any idea ?
>>>
>>> Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a 
>>> écrit :
>>>
 Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.

 This is terrible.

 On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs 
> interface is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>
> Thank you nevertheless !
>
> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a 
> écrit :
>
>> In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[simplyelliptic]

On my Mac OS13.* with updated homebrew,and Intel Core i5,it compiled from the first build and make ptestlong all passed…. Kenji 23/01/2023 21:32、John H Palmieri のメール:Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based on the newly merged tickets.On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode issue on github :```It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 build. Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I can then use beta7 in the same emacs session.```I don't get it either...There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` emacs package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with Python 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...Any idea ?Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.This is terrible.On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs interface is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.Thank you nevertheless !Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.pyindex dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644--- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py+++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.         """         EXAMPLES:: -            sage: fricas.__reduce__()                                           # optional - fricas+            sage: FriCAS().__reduce__()                                         # optional - fricas             (, ())             sage: f, args = _                                                   # optional - fricas             sage: f(*args) On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported, I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, as well as a new one, which gives three errors :charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failedRunning doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.Git branch: developGit ref: 9.8.beta7Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'Using --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkgFeatures to be detected: 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlibDoctesting 1 file.sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py**File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 894, in sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__Failed example:    fricas.__reduce__()                                           # optional - fricasException raised:    Traceback (most recent call last):      File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in _run        self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)      File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in compile_and_execute        exec(compiled, globs)      File "", line 1, in         fricas.__reduce__()                                           # optional - fricas      File "/usr/lib/python3.10/copyreg.py", line 76, in _reduce_ex        raise TypeError(f"cannot pickle {cls.__name__!r} object")    TypeError: cannot pickle 'LazyImport' object**File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 896, in sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__Failed example:    f, args = _                                                   # optional - fricasException raised:    Traceback (most recent call last):      File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in _run        self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)      File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release]

I tried to comment out all the changes in all_cmdline.py, but this didn't 
help.  The diff of src/sage/interfaces/all.py is a bit unclear to me, I 
don't see what could be a problem there. 

On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 17:47:29 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:

> This was one of my guesses because that ticket could have changed global 
> behavior of Sage by changing some imports — most of the tickets made more 
> focused changes. Can you start with 9.8.beta6 and just apply some of the 
> changes from #34547? In particular, do things work if you don't include the 
> changes in all_cmdline.py?
>
> -- 
> John
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:15:53 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed.  The problem seems to 
>> be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in 
>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
>>  
>> does not return.  There is only one python file involved, 
>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py, 
>> but I do not see what #34547 has to do with it.  Something about 
>> lazy_import maybe?
>>
>> I can see that in sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output the command
>>
>> _emacs_sage_shell.run_cell_and_print_msg_id("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()",
>>  
>> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747start’, 
>> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747end’)
>>
>> was sent to the process (using process-send-string), and after that,
>>
>> (sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete)
>>
>> never returns.  I don't know how to debug the python code, 
>> unfortunately.  Most importantly, I don't see what changed - what does 
>> #34547 have to do with it?
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 11:09:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems that 
>>> #16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
>>> Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?
>>>
>>> For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many emacs 
>>> users there are.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>>
 Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842.  I 
 hope that all dependencies are in the branch.

 Martin

 On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:

> Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based 
> on the newly merged tickets.
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 
> emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
>> 
>>  issue 
>> on github :
>>
>> ```
>> It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 build. 
>> Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I can then 
>> use beta7 in the same emacs session.
>> ```
>>
>> I don't get it either...
>>
>> There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` 
>> emacs package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with 
>> Python 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...
>>
>> Any idea ?
>>
>> Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :
>>
>>> Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.
>>>
>>> This is terrible.
>>>
>>> On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs 
 interface is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.

 Thank you nevertheless !

 Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a 
 écrit :

> In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri 
> wrote:
>
>> Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?
>>
>> diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 
>> b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
>> --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
>>  """
>>  EXAMPLES::
>>  
>> -sage: fricas.__reduce__()   
>> # optional - fricas
>> +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__() 
>> # optional - fricas
>>  (, ())

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[John H Palmieri]

This was one of my guesses because that ticket could have changed global 
behavior of Sage by changing some imports — most of the tickets made more 
focused changes. Can you start with 9.8.beta6 and just apply some of the 
changes from #34547? In particular, do things work if you don't include the 
changes in all_cmdline.py?

-- 
John


On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:15:53 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

> I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed.  The problem seems to 
> be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in 
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
>  
> does not return.  There is only one python file involved, 
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py, 
> but I do not see what #34547 has to do with it.  Something about 
> lazy_import maybe?
>
> I can see that in sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output the command
>
> _emacs_sage_shell.run_cell_and_print_msg_id("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()",
>  
> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747start’, 
> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747end’)
>
> was sent to the process (using process-send-string), and after that,
>
> (sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete)
>
> never returns.  I don't know how to debug the python code, unfortunately.  
> Most importantly, I don't see what changed - what does #34547 have to do 
> with it?
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 11:09:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems that 
>> #16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
>> Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?
>>
>> For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many emacs 
>> users there are.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842.  I 
>>> hope that all dependencies are in the branch.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>>
 Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based on 
 the newly merged tickets.

 On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

> From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
> 
>  issue 
> on github :
>
> ```
> It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 build. 
> Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I can then 
> use beta7 in the same emacs session.
> ```
>
> I don't get it either...
>
> There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` 
> emacs package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with 
> Python 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...
>
> Any idea ?
>
> Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :
>
>> Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.
>>
>> This is terrible.
>>
>> On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs 
>>> interface is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>>>
>>> Thank you nevertheless !
>>>
>>> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a 
>>> écrit :
>>>
 In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
 https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.



 On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri 
 wrote:

> Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?
>
> diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 
> b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
> --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
>  """
>  EXAMPLES::
>  
> -sage: fricas.__reduce__() 
>   # optional - fricas
> +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__()   
>   # optional - fricas
>  (, ())
>  sage: f, args = _ 
>   # optional - fricas
>  sage: f(*args) 
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 
> emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
>> 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Matthias Köppe]

>From looking at that file:
https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py#L159

In 9.8.beta7:

sage: isinstance(axiom, sage.interfaces.expect.Expect)
False

On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:15:53 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

> I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed.  The problem seems to 
> be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in 
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
>  
> does not return.  There is only one python file involved, 
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py, 
> but I do not see what #34547 has to do with it.  Something about 
> lazy_import maybe?
>
> I can see that in sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output the command
>
> _emacs_sage_shell.run_cell_and_print_msg_id("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()",
>  
> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747start’, 
> ’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747end’)
>
> was sent to the process (using process-send-string), and after that,
>
> (sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete)
>
> never returns.  I don't know how to debug the python code, unfortunately.  
> Most importantly, I don't see what changed - what does #34547 have to do 
> with it?
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 11:09:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems that 
>> #16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
>> Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?
>>
>> For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many emacs 
>> users there are.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842.  I 
>>> hope that all dependencies are in the branch.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>>
 Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based on 
 the newly merged tickets.

 On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

> From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
> 
>  issue 
> on github :
>
> ```
> It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 build. 
> Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I can then 
> use beta7 in the same emacs session.
> ```
>
> I don't get it either...
>
> There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` 
> emacs package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with 
> Python 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...
>
> Any idea ?
>
> Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :
>
>> Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.
>>
>> This is terrible.
>>
>> On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs 
>>> interface is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>>>
>>> Thank you nevertheless !
>>>
>>> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a 
>>> écrit :
>>>
 In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
 https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.



 On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri 
 wrote:

> Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?
>
> diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 
> b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
> --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
>  """
>  EXAMPLES::
>  
> -sage: fricas.__reduce__() 
>   # optional - fricas
> +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__()   
>   # optional - fricas
>  (, ())
>  sage: f, args = _ 
>   # optional - fricas
>  sage: f(*args) 
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 
> emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
>> ,
>>  
>> I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous 
>> betas, as 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release]

I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed.  The problem seems to 
be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in 
https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
 
does not return.  There is only one python file involved, 
https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py, 
but I do not see what #34547 has to do with it.  Something about 
lazy_import maybe?

I can see that in sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output the command

_emacs_sage_shell.run_cell_and_print_msg_id("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()",
 
’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747start’, 
’emacs_sage_shell_msg_idb3d6f70f24e51147305a3aea036ba747end’)

was sent to the process (using process-send-string), and after that,

(sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete)

never returns.  I don't know how to debug the python code, unfortunately.  
Most importantly, I don't see what changed - what does #34547 have to do 
with it?

Martin



On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 11:09:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

> Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems that 
> #16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
> Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?
>
> For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many emacs 
> users there are.
>
> Martin
>
>
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842.  I 
>> hope that all dependencies are in the branch.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>> Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based on 
>>> the newly merged tickets.
>>>
>>> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
 
  issue 
 on github :

 ```
 It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 build. 
 Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I can then 
 use beta7 in the same emacs session.
 ```

 I don't get it either...

 There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` emacs 
 package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with Python 
 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...

 Any idea ?

 Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :

> Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.
>
> This is terrible.
>
> On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs 
>> interface is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>>
>> Thank you nevertheless !
>>
>> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a 
>> écrit :
>>
>>> In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
>>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?

 diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 
 b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
 index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
 --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
 +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
 @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
  """
  EXAMPLES::
  
 -sage: fricas.__reduce__() 
   # optional - fricas
 +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__()   
   # optional - fricas
  (, ())
  sage: f, args = _ 
   # optional - fricas
  sage: f(*args) 



 On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 
 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:

> Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
> ,
>  
> I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, 
> as 
> well as a new one, which gives three errors :
>
> charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long 
> --warn-long 259.6 
> --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
> Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
> Git branch: develop
> Git ref: 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release]

Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems that 
#16522 was already in 9.8.beta6.  However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
Not sure where to go from here.  Should I open a ticket on trac?

For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many emacs 
users there are.

Martin


On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 10:21:11 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

> Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842.  I 
> hope that all dependencies are in the branch.
>
> Martin
>
> On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based on 
>> the newly merged tickets.
>>
>> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
>>> 
>>>  issue 
>>> on github :
>>>
>>> ```
>>> It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 build. 
>>> Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I can then 
>>> use beta7 in the same emacs session.
>>> ```
>>>
>>> I don't get it either...
>>>
>>> There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` emacs 
>>> package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with Python 
>>> 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...
>>>
>>> Any idea ?
>>>
>>> Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :
>>>
 Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.

 This is terrible.

 On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs 
> interface is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>
> Thank you nevertheless !
>
> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>
>> In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>> Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 
>>> b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>> index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
>>> --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>> +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
>>>  """
>>>  EXAMPLES::
>>>  
>>> -sage: fricas.__reduce__()   
>>> # optional - fricas
>>> +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__() 
>>> # optional - fricas
>>>  (, ())
>>>  sage: f, args = _   
>>> # optional - fricas
>>>  sage: f(*args) 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 
>>> emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
 Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
 ,
  
 I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, 
 as 
 well as a new one, which gives three errors :

 charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long 
 --warn-long 259.6 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
 src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
 Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
 Git branch: develop
 Git ref: 9.8.beta7
 Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
 SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
 Using 
 --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkg
 Features to be detected: 
 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
 Doctesting 1 file.
 sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
 src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py

 **
 File 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release]

Thank you for this suggestion!  I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842.  I hope 
that all dependencies are in the branch.

Martin

On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:

> Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based on 
> the newly merged tickets.
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
>> 
>>  issue 
>> on github :
>>
>> ```
>> It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 build. 
>> Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I can then 
>> use beta7 in the same emacs session.
>> ```
>>
>> I don't get it either...
>>
>> There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` emacs 
>> package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with Python 
>> 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...
>>
>> Any idea ?
>>
>> Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :
>>
>>> Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.
>>>
>>> This is terrible.
>>>
>>> On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs interface 
 is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.

 Thank you nevertheless !

 Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :

> In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?
>>
>> diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 
>> b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
>> --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
>>  """
>>  EXAMPLES::
>>  
>> -sage: fricas.__reduce__()   
>> # optional - fricas
>> +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__() 
>> # optional - fricas
>>  (, ())
>>  sage: f, args = _   
>> # optional - fricas
>>  sage: f(*args) 
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 
>> emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
>>> ,
>>>  
>>> I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, 
>>> as 
>>> well as a new one, which gives three errors :
>>>
>>> charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 
>>> 259.6 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
>>> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
>>> Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
>>> Git branch: develop
>>> Git ref: 9.8.beta7
>>> Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
>>> SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
>>> Using 
>>> --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkg
>>> Features to be detected: 
>>> 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
>>> Doctesting 1 file.
>>> sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
>>> --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
>>> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>>
>>> **
>>> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 894, in 
>>> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
>>> Failed example:
>>> fricas.__reduce__()   # 
>>> optional - fricas
>>> Exception raised:
>>>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, 
>>> in _run
>>> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>>>   File 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['tsc...@ucdavis.edu' via sage-release]

Thank you, that worked.

Best,
Travis


On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 11:28:48 AM UTC+9 matthia...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> ./configure --without-system-nauty 
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 4:30:05 PM UTC-8 tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote:
>
>> Would it be better to just remove nauty or is there a way to force Sage 
>> to build and link with its own copy of nauty?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Travis
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 6:51:45 PM UTC+9 François Bissey wrote:
>>
>>> It is indeed a known issue with nauty on debian/ubuntu. That's the first 
>>> time someone mentioned it in a while but it is definitely broken. 
>>>
>>> On 23/01/23 21:28, Antonio Rojas wrote: 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > El lunes, 23 de enero de 2023 a las 9:07:32 UTC+1, tsc...@ucdavis.edu 
>>> > escribió: 
>>> > I am getting stuck at giac, even after a make distclean (I rebuilt 
>>> > 9.8.beta6 just to confirm this is a problem with the upgrade and 
>>> almost 
>>> > certainly due to #34857). Sorry for posting the log files; I can't 
>>> seem 
>>> > to include attachments... 
>>> > 
>>> > This is an underlinking issue in your distro's nauty package. Given 
>>> that 
>>> > upstream nauty doesn't build a shared library, it must be caused by 
>>> some 
>>> > incomplete distro custom patch. Try disabling system nauty. 
>>> > 
>>> > -- 
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> > Groups "sage-release" group. 
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> > an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com 
>>> > . 
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> > 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/ce422786-79b3-4337-a94d-0e3c681cac0an%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Matthias Köppe]

./configure --without-system-nauty 

On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 4:30:05 PM UTC-8 tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote:

> Would it be better to just remove nauty or is there a way to force Sage to 
> build and link with its own copy of nauty?
>
> Thanks,
> Travis
>
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 6:51:45 PM UTC+9 François Bissey wrote:
>
>> It is indeed a known issue with nauty on debian/ubuntu. That's the first 
>> time someone mentioned it in a while but it is definitely broken. 
>>
>> On 23/01/23 21:28, Antonio Rojas wrote: 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > El lunes, 23 de enero de 2023 a las 9:07:32 UTC+1, tsc...@ucdavis.edu 
>> > escribió: 
>> > I am getting stuck at giac, even after a make distclean (I rebuilt 
>> > 9.8.beta6 just to confirm this is a problem with the upgrade and almost 
>> > certainly due to #34857). Sorry for posting the log files; I can't seem 
>> > to include attachments... 
>> > 
>> > This is an underlinking issue in your distro's nauty package. Given 
>> that 
>> > upstream nauty doesn't build a shared library, it must be caused by 
>> some 
>> > incomplete distro custom patch. Try disabling system nauty. 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> > Groups "sage-release" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> > an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com 
>> > . 
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> > 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.
>>  
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/5b9c8cd6-9d07-4487-9c42-e341eb601edfn%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Matthias Köppe]

./configure --without-system-libnauty 

On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 4:30:05 PM UTC-8 tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote:

> Would it be better to just remove nauty or is there a way to force Sage to 
> build and link with its own copy of nauty?
>
> Thanks,
> Travis
>
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 6:51:45 PM UTC+9 François Bissey wrote:
>
>> It is indeed a known issue with nauty on debian/ubuntu. That's the first 
>> time someone mentioned it in a while but it is definitely broken. 
>>
>> On 23/01/23 21:28, Antonio Rojas wrote: 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > El lunes, 23 de enero de 2023 a las 9:07:32 UTC+1, tsc...@ucdavis.edu 
>> > escribió: 
>> > I am getting stuck at giac, even after a make distclean (I rebuilt 
>> > 9.8.beta6 just to confirm this is a problem with the upgrade and almost 
>> > certainly due to #34857). Sorry for posting the log files; I can't seem 
>> > to include attachments... 
>> > 
>> > This is an underlinking issue in your distro's nauty package. Given 
>> that 
>> > upstream nauty doesn't build a shared library, it must be caused by 
>> some 
>> > incomplete distro custom patch. Try disabling system nauty. 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> > Groups "sage-release" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> > an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com 
>> > . 
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> > 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.
>>  
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/b83037ad-f662-4b06-b811-137dc4b07db4n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['tsc...@ucdavis.edu' via sage-release]

Would it be better to just remove nauty or is there a way to force Sage to 
build and link with its own copy of nauty?

Thanks,
Travis


On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 6:51:45 PM UTC+9 François Bissey wrote:

> It is indeed a known issue with nauty on debian/ubuntu. That's the first 
> time someone mentioned it in a while but it is definitely broken.
>
> On 23/01/23 21:28, Antonio Rojas wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > El lunes, 23 de enero de 2023 a las 9:07:32 UTC+1, tsc...@ucdavis.edu 
> > escribió:
> > I am getting stuck at giac, even after a make distclean (I rebuilt 
> > 9.8.beta6 just to confirm this is a problem with the upgrade and almost 
> > certainly due to #34857). Sorry for posting the log files; I can't seem 
> > to include attachments...
> > 
> > This is an underlinking issue in your distro's nauty package. Given that 
> > upstream nauty doesn't build a shared library, it must be caused by some 
> > incomplete distro custom patch. Try disabling system nauty.
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "sage-release" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> > an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com 
> > .
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer
> >.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/6bf48137-7e9a-4f99-85f0-c3b309e109ebn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[John H Palmieri]

Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based on the 
newly merged tickets.

On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 10:42:37 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
> 
>  issue 
> on github :
>
> ```
> It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 build. 
> Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I can then 
> use beta7 in the same emacs session.
> ```
>
> I don't get it either...
>
> There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` emacs 
> package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with Python 
> 3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...
>
> Any idea ?
>
> Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :
>
>> Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.
>>
>> This is terrible.
>>
>> On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs interface 
>>> is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>>>
>>> Thank you nevertheless !
>>>
>>> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>>>
 In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
 https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.



 On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:

> Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?
>
> diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 
> b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
> --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
>  """
>  EXAMPLES::
>  
> -sage: fricas.__reduce__() 
>   # optional - fricas
> +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__()   
>   # optional - fricas
>  (, ())
>  sage: f, args = _ 
>   # optional - fricas
>  sage: f(*args) 
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 
> emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
>> , 
>> I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, as 
>> well as a new one, which gives three errors :
>>
>> charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 
>> 259.6 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
>> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
>> Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
>> Git branch: develop
>> Git ref: 9.8.beta7
>> Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
>> SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
>> Using 
>> --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkg
>> Features to be detected: 
>> 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
>> Doctesting 1 file.
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
>> --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
>> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> **
>> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 894, in 
>> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
>> Failed example:
>> fricas.__reduce__()   # 
>> optional - fricas
>> Exception raised:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, 
>> in _run
>> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, 
>> in compile_and_execute
>> exec(compiled, globs)
>>   File "", 
>> line 1, in 
>> fricas.__reduce__()   
>> # optional - fricas
>>   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/copyreg.py", line 76, in _reduce_ex
>>

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Matthias Köppe]

I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34932 for this

On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 1:51:45 AM UTC-8 François Bissey wrote:

> It is indeed a known issue with nauty on debian/ubuntu. That's the first 
> time someone mentioned it in a while but it is definitely broken.
>
> On 23/01/23 21:28, Antonio Rojas wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > El lunes, 23 de enero de 2023 a las 9:07:32 UTC+1, tsc...@ucdavis.edu 
> > escribió:
> > I am getting stuck at giac, even after a make distclean (I rebuilt 
> > 9.8.beta6 just to confirm this is a problem with the upgrade and almost 
> > certainly due to #34857). Sorry for posting the log files; I can't seem 
> > to include attachments...
> > 
> > This is an underlinking issue in your distro's nauty package. Given that 
> > upstream nauty doesn't build a shared library, it must be caused by some 
> > incomplete distro custom patch. Try disabling system nauty.
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "sage-release" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> > an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com 
> > .
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer
> >.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/46f2ea33-db59-4146-a168-087a7f754195n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

>From someone called mantepse in the sage-shell-mode 
 
issue 
on github :

```
It is really strange: I have a 9.8.beta7 build and a 9.8.beta6 build. 
Apparently, if I first use the beta6 one for sage-shell-mode, I can then 
use beta7 in the same emacs session.
```

I don't get it either...

There are two short Python files in the current `sahe-shell-mode` emacs 
package, which are my prime suspects for an incompatibility with Python 
3.11. Now for a strategy for debugging *this*...

Any idea ?

Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 10:48:48 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :

> Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.
>
> This is terrible.
>
> On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs interface 
>> is a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>>
>> Thank you nevertheless !
>>
>> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>>
>>> In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
>>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>>
 Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?

 diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 
 b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
 index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
 --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
 +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
 @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
  """
  EXAMPLES::
  
 -sage: fricas.__reduce__() 
   # optional - fricas
 +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__()   
   # optional - fricas
  (, ())
  sage: f, args = _ 
   # optional - fricas
  sage: f(*args) 



 On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

> Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
> , 
> I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, as 
> well as a new one, which gives three errors :
>
> charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 
> 259.6 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
> Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
> Git branch: develop
> Git ref: 9.8.beta7
> Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
> SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
> Using 
> --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkg
> Features to be detected: 
> 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
> Doctesting 1 file.
> sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
> --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> **
> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 894, in 
> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
> Failed example:
> fricas.__reduce__()   # 
> optional - fricas
> Exception raised:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, 
> in _run
> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, 
> in compile_and_execute
> exec(compiled, globs)
>   File "", 
> line 1, in 
> fricas.__reduce__()   
> # optional - fricas
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/copyreg.py", line 76, in _reduce_ex
> raise TypeError(f"cannot pickle {cls.__name__!r} object")
> TypeError: cannot pickle 'LazyImport' object
> **
> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 896, in 
> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
> 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[François Bissey]

It is indeed a known issue with nauty on debian/ubuntu. That's the first 
time someone mentioned it in a while but it is definitely broken.


On 23/01/23 21:28, Antonio Rojas wrote:



El lunes, 23 de enero de 2023 a las 9:07:32 UTC+1, tsc...@ucdavis.edu 
escribió:
I am getting stuck at giac, even after a make distclean (I rebuilt 
9.8.beta6 just to confirm this is a problem with the upgrade and almost 
certainly due to #34857). Sorry for posting the log files; I can't seem 
to include attachments...


This is an underlinking issue in your distro's nauty package. Given that 
upstream nauty doesn't build a shared library, it must be caused by some 
incomplete distro custom patch. Try disabling system nauty.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com .


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/b390333d-6af3-bc05-99ba-2784319548c2%40gmail.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release]

Emacs stopped working for me again!  I don't get it.

This is terrible.

On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:

> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs interface is 
> a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>
> Thank you nevertheless !
>
> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>
>> In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>> Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 
>>> b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>> index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
>>> --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>> +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
>>>  """
>>>  EXAMPLES::
>>>  
>>> -sage: fricas.__reduce__()   
>>> # optional - fricas
>>> +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__() 
>>> # optional - fricas
>>>  (, ())
>>>  sage: f, args = _   
>>> # optional - fricas
>>>  sage: f(*args) 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
 , 
 I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, as 
 well as a new one, which gives three errors :

 charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 
 259.6 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
 src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
 Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
 Git branch: develop
 Git ref: 9.8.beta7
 Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
 SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
 Using 
 --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkg
 Features to be detected: 
 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
 Doctesting 1 file.
 sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
 src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
 **
 File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 894, in 
 sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
 Failed example:
 fricas.__reduce__()   # 
 optional - fricas
 Exception raised:

 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in 
 _run
 self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, 
 in compile_and_execute
 exec(compiled, globs)
   File "", 
 line 1, in 
 fricas.__reduce__()   # 
 optional - fricas
   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/copyreg.py", line 76, in _reduce_ex
 raise TypeError(f"cannot pickle {cls.__name__!r} object")
 TypeError: cannot pickle 'LazyImport' object
 **
 File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 896, in 
 sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
 Failed example:
 f, args = _   # 
 optional - fricas
 Exception raised:

 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in 
 _run
 self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, 
 in compile_and_execute
 exec(compiled, globs)
   File "", 
 line 1, in 
 f, args = _   # 
 optional - fricas
 TypeError: cannot unpack non-iterable int object
 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Antonio Rojas]

El lunes, 23 de enero de 2023 a las 9:07:32 UTC+1, tsc...@ucdavis.edu 
escribió:
I am getting stuck at giac, even after a make distclean (I rebuilt 
9.8.beta6 just to confirm this is a problem with the upgrade and almost 
certainly due to #34857). Sorry for posting the log files; I can't seem to 
include attachments...

This is an underlinking issue in your distro's nauty package. Given that 
upstream nauty doesn't build a shared library, it must be caused by some 
incomplete distro custom patch. Try disabling system nauty.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dee61127-23cf-4619-bebe-ea17a6cd8817n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['tsc...@ucdavis.edu' via sage-release]

I am getting stuck at giac, even after a make distclean (I rebuilt 
9.8.beta6 just to confirm this is a problem with the upgrade and almost 
certainly due to #34857). Sorry for posting the log files; I can't seem to 
include attachments...

[giac-1.9.0.15p0] /usr/bin/ld: 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libnauty.so: 
undefined reference to `graph_free@CLIQUER_1'
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] /usr/bin/ld: 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libnauty.so: 
undefined reference to `clique_unweighted_find_single@CLIQUER_1'
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] /usr/bin/ld: /usr/bin/ld: 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libnauty.so: 
undefined reference to `graph_new@CLIQUER_1'
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] make[7]: *** [Makefile:784: aide] Error 1
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] make[7]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] icas.o: in function `texmacs_graph_output(giac::gen 
const&, giac::gen&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >&, int, giac::context 
const*)':
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] 
/home/travis/sage-build/local/var/tmp/sage/build/giac-1.9.0.15p0/src/src/icas.cc:500:
 
warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] /usr/bin/ld: 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libnauty.so: 
undefined reference to `graph_free@CLIQUER_1'
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] /usr/bin/ld: 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libnauty.so: 
undefined reference to `clique_unweighted_find_single@CLIQUER_1'
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] /usr/bin/ld: 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libnauty.so: 
undefined reference to `graph_new@CLIQUER_1'
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] make[7]: *** [Makefile:792: icas] Error 1
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] make[6]: *** [Makefile:507: all-recursive] Error 1
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] make[5]: *** [Makefile:437: all] Error 2
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] 
**
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] Error building giac-1.9.0.15p0
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] 
**

Let me know what specific log info would be useful.

Best,
Travis

On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 10:41:04 PM UTC+9 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs interface is 
> a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>
> Thank you nevertheless !
>
> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>
>> In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>> Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 
>>> b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>> index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
>>> --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>> +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
>>>  """
>>>  EXAMPLES::
>>>  
>>> -sage: fricas.__reduce__()   
>>> # optional - fricas
>>> +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__() 
>>> # optional - fricas
>>>  (, ())
>>>  sage: f, args = _   
>>> # optional - fricas
>>>  sage: f(*args) 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
 , 
 I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, as 
 well as a new one, which gives three errors :

 charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 
 259.6 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
 src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
 Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
 Git branch: develop
 Git ref: 9.8.beta7
 Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
 SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
 Using 
 --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkg
 Features to be detected: 
 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs interface is 
a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.

Thank you nevertheless !

Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 22:58:53 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :

> In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?
>>
>> diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
>> --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
>>  """
>>  EXAMPLES::
>>  
>> -sage: fricas.__reduce__()   
>> # optional - fricas
>> +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__() 
>> # optional - fricas
>>  (, ())
>>  sage: f, args = _   
>> # optional - fricas
>>  sage: f(*args) 
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
>>> , 
>>> I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, as 
>>> well as a new one, which gives three errors :
>>>
>>> charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 
>>> 259.6 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
>>> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
>>> Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
>>> Git branch: develop
>>> Git ref: 9.8.beta7
>>> Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
>>> SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
>>> Using 
>>> --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkg
>>> Features to be detected: 
>>> 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
>>> Doctesting 1 file.
>>> sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
>>> --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
>>> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>>> **
>>> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 894, in 
>>> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
>>> Failed example:
>>> fricas.__reduce__()   # 
>>> optional - fricas
>>> Exception raised:
>>>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in 
>>> _run
>>> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
>>> compile_and_execute
>>> exec(compiled, globs)
>>>   File "", line 
>>> 1, in 
>>> fricas.__reduce__()   # 
>>> optional - fricas
>>>   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/copyreg.py", line 76, in _reduce_ex
>>> raise TypeError(f"cannot pickle {cls.__name__!r} object")
>>> TypeError: cannot pickle 'LazyImport' object
>>> **
>>> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 896, in 
>>> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
>>> Failed example:
>>> f, args = _   # 
>>> optional - fricas
>>> Exception raised:
>>>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in 
>>> _run
>>> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
>>> compile_and_execute
>>> exec(compiled, globs)
>>>   File "", line 
>>> 1, in 
>>> f, args = _   # 
>>> optional - fricas
>>> TypeError: cannot unpack non-iterable int object
>>> **
>>> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 897, in 
>>> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
>>> Failed example:
>>> f(*args)  # 
>>> optional - fricas
>>> Exception raised:
>>>
>>> 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

I checked that reverting to 9.8.beta6 (by way of make distclean ; ...) 
solved my Emacs problem. So the question seems to be “What has changed in 
the interface used by emacs ?”.
​
Le samedi 21 janvier 2023 à 10:10:38 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :

> M-x toggle-debug-on-quit
>
> (and then hit C-g often enough)
>
> I have two directories with git clones of sage.  When I discovered the 
> problem, I went back to 9.8.beta5 in the first, and then made 9.8.beta7 in 
> the other.  I then tried sage-shell-mode in the other, and it worked.  I 
> then made 9.8.beta7 also in the first, and now it works.
>
> Martin
> On Saturday, 21 January 2023 at 00:50:35 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> How did you get a backtrace ? I don't get one, just messages in the 
>> `*Messages* buffer...
>>
>> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 12:30:23 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :
>>
>>> Here is the backtrace:
>>>
>>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
>>>   accept-process-output(nil 0 1)
>>>   sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete()
>>>   sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" 
>>> :sync t :process-buffer nil :output-buffer nil :to-string t :raw nil)
>>>   sage-shell:send-command-sync("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" nil 
>>> nil t nil)
>>>   
>>> sage-shell:send-command-to-string("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()")
>>>   sage-shell:after-init-function(#)
>>>   #f(compiled-function () #)()
>>>   sage-shell:run-hook-once(sage-shell:output-filter-finished-hook)
>>>   sage-shell:output-filter(# 
>>> "┌─...")
>>>   read-event(nil t 2)
>>>   sit-for(2)
>>>   execute-extended-command(nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>>>   funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>>>   call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
>>>   command-execute(execute-extended-command)
>>>
>>> On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:26:30 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>>
 All of a sudden, emacs sage-shell-mode seems not to work any more?  The 
 last message I get is 

 Checking IPython version... Done. To disable this checking, set 
 ‘sage-shell:check-ipython-version-on-startup’ to ‘nil’.
 error in process filter: Quit [2 times]

 The last beta worked.

 Anyone else experiencing this?

 Martin
 On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:48:25 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
> ready ;)
>
> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
> 9.8.beta7
> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
> polyhedra
> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for 
> obtain_nash()
> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, 
> modules, plot, numerical
> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c 
> stuff from PATH
> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: 
> Option to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
> typing_extensions
> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
> VirtualCharacter
> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
> conversion
> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open 
> source!), rename to scip
> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to 
> GitHub and add links to the transition guide
> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking 
> functions
> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's 
> with relations.
> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to 
> order 664
> 8a0b16d93be Trac 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release]

M-x toggle-debug-on-quit

(and then hit C-g often enough)

I have two directories with git clones of sage.  When I discovered the 
problem, I went back to 9.8.beta5 in the first, and then made 9.8.beta7 in 
the other.  I then tried sage-shell-mode in the other, and it worked.  I 
then made 9.8.beta7 also in the first, and now it works.

Martin
On Saturday, 21 January 2023 at 00:50:35 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:

> How did you get a backtrace ? I don't get one, just messages in the 
> `*Messages* buffer...
>
> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 12:30:23 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :
>
>> Here is the backtrace:
>>
>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
>>   accept-process-output(nil 0 1)
>>   sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete()
>>   sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" 
>> :sync t :process-buffer nil :output-buffer nil :to-string t :raw nil)
>>   sage-shell:send-command-sync("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" nil 
>> nil t nil)
>>   sage-shell:send-command-to-string("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()")
>>   sage-shell:after-init-function(#)
>>   #f(compiled-function () #)()
>>   sage-shell:run-hook-once(sage-shell:output-filter-finished-hook)
>>   sage-shell:output-filter(# 
>> "┌─...")
>>   read-event(nil t 2)
>>   sit-for(2)
>>   execute-extended-command(nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>>   funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>>   call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
>>   command-execute(execute-extended-command)
>>
>> On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:26:30 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>>> All of a sudden, emacs sage-shell-mode seems not to work any more?  The 
>>> last message I get is 
>>>
>>> Checking IPython version... Done. To disable this checking, set 
>>> ‘sage-shell:check-ipython-version-on-startup’ to ‘nil’.
>>> error in process filter: Quit [2 times]
>>>
>>> The last beta worked.
>>>
>>> Anyone else experiencing this?
>>>
>>> Martin
>>> On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:48:25 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:
>>>
 As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
 branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
 http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html

 We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
 ready ;)

 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
 9.8.beta7
 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
 polyhedra
 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
 b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
 sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
 c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
 plot, numerical
 bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff 
 from PATH
 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: 
 Option to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
 df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
 typing_extensions
 b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
 VirtualCharacter
 dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
 conversion
 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
 bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open 
 source!), rename to scip
 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
 ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to 
 GitHub and add links to the transition guide
 acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking 
 functions
 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's 
 with relations.
 bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to 
 order 664
 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element 
 functions
 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
 b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
 top-level functions maxima_console etc.
 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of 
 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

How did you get a backtrace ? I don't get one, just messages in the 
`*Messages* buffer...

Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 12:30:23 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :

> Here is the backtrace:
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
>   accept-process-output(nil 0 1)
>   sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete()
>   sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" 
> :sync t :process-buffer nil :output-buffer nil :to-string t :raw nil)
>   sage-shell:send-command-sync("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" nil 
> nil t nil)
>   sage-shell:send-command-to-string("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()")
>   sage-shell:after-init-function(#)
>   #f(compiled-function () #)()
>   sage-shell:run-hook-once(sage-shell:output-filter-finished-hook)
>   sage-shell:output-filter(# 
> "┌─...")
>   read-event(nil t 2)
>   sit-for(2)
>   execute-extended-command(nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>   funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>   call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
>   command-execute(execute-extended-command)
>
> On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:26:30 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> All of a sudden, emacs sage-shell-mode seems not to work any more?  The 
>> last message I get is 
>>
>> Checking IPython version... Done. To disable this checking, set 
>> ‘sage-shell:check-ipython-version-on-startup’ to ‘nil’.
>> error in process filter: Quit [2 times]
>>
>> The last beta worked.
>>
>> Anyone else experiencing this?
>>
>> Martin
>> On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:48:25 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>>>
>>> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
>>> ready ;)
>>>
>>> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
>>> 9.8.beta7
>>> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
>>> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
>>> polyhedra
>>> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
>>> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
>>> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
>>> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
>>> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
>>> plot, numerical
>>> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff 
>>> from PATH
>>> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
>>> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: 
>>> Option to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
>>> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
>>> typing_extensions
>>> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
>>> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
>>> VirtualCharacter
>>> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
>>> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
>>> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
>>> conversion
>>> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
>>> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
>>> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
>>> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
>>> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open 
>>> source!), rename to scip
>>> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
>>> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to 
>>> GitHub and add links to the transition guide
>>> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking 
>>> functions
>>> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's 
>>> with relations.
>>> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to 
>>> order 664
>>> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element 
>>> functions
>>> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
>>> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
>>> top-level functions maxima_console etc.
>>> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
>>> 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of elliptic 
>>> curves
>>> 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
>>> independent from the current coloring
>>> 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11
>>> 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/
>>> 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency of scip)
>>> f84915f69d8 Trac #34726: Optional package papilo (dependency of scip)
>>> e5cf1c0d9f2 Trac #34694: Bug in ExteriorAlgebra interior product
>>> ebb9b611d02 Trac #34416: Manage pexpect logs created during 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[John H Palmieri]

In the hopes that this will fix it, I opened 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34927.



On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:46:02 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:

> Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?
>
> diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
> --- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> +++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
>  """
>  EXAMPLES::
>  
> -sage: fricas.__reduce__() 
>   # optional - fricas
> +sage: FriCAS().__reduce__()   
>   # optional - fricas
>  (, ())
>  sage: f, args = _ 
>   # optional - fricas
>  sage: f(*args) 
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
>> , 
>> I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, as 
>> well as a new one, which gives three errors :
>>
>> charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 
>> 259.6 --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
>> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
>> Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
>> Git branch: develop
>> Git ref: 9.8.beta7
>> Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
>> SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
>> Using 
>> --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkg
>> Features to be detected: 
>> 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
>> Doctesting 1 file.
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
>> --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
>> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
>> **
>> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 894, in 
>> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
>> Failed example:
>> fricas.__reduce__()   # 
>> optional - fricas
>> Exception raised:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in 
>> _run
>> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
>> compile_and_execute
>> exec(compiled, globs)
>>   File "", line 
>> 1, in 
>> fricas.__reduce__()   # 
>> optional - fricas
>>   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/copyreg.py", line 76, in _reduce_ex
>> raise TypeError(f"cannot pickle {cls.__name__!r} object")
>> TypeError: cannot pickle 'LazyImport' object
>> **
>> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 896, in 
>> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
>> Failed example:
>> f, args = _   # 
>> optional - fricas
>> Exception raised:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in 
>> _run
>> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
>> compile_and_execute
>> exec(compiled, globs)
>>   File "", line 
>> 1, in 
>> f, args = _   # 
>> optional - fricas
>> TypeError: cannot unpack non-iterable int object
>> **
>> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 897, in 
>> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
>> Failed example:
>> f(*args)  # 
>> optional - fricas
>> Exception raised:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in 
>> _run
>> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
>> compile_and_execute
>> exec(compiled, globs)
>>   File "", 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[John H Palmieri]

Does this change fix the fricas.py failure?

diff --git a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
index dc2ce71f26..ceba6f90dc 100644
--- a/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
+++ b/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ http://fricas.sourceforge.net.
 """
 EXAMPLES::
 
-sage: fricas.__reduce__() 
  # optional - fricas
+sage: FriCAS().__reduce__()   
  # optional - fricas
 (, ())
 sage: f, args = _ 
  # optional - fricas
 sage: f(*args) 



On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
> , 
> I get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, as 
> well as a new one, which gives three errors :
>
> charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
> --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
> Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
> Git branch: develop
> Git ref: 9.8.beta7
> Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
> SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
> Using 
> --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkg
> Features to be detected: 
> 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
> Doctesting 1 file.
> sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
> --random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
> src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
> **
> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 894, in 
> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
> Failed example:
> fricas.__reduce__()   # 
> optional - fricas
> Exception raised:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in 
> _run
> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
> compile_and_execute
> exec(compiled, globs)
>   File "", line 
> 1, in 
> fricas.__reduce__()   # 
> optional - fricas
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/copyreg.py", line 76, in _reduce_ex
> raise TypeError(f"cannot pickle {cls.__name__!r} object")
> TypeError: cannot pickle 'LazyImport' object
> **
> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 896, in 
> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
> Failed example:
> f, args = _   # 
> optional - fricas
> Exception raised:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in 
> _run
> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
> compile_and_execute
> exec(compiled, globs)
>   File "", line 
> 1, in 
> f, args = _   # 
> optional - fricas
> TypeError: cannot unpack non-iterable int object
> **
> File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 897, in 
> sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
> Failed example:
> f(*args)  # 
> optional - fricas
> Exception raised:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in 
> _run
> self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
>   File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
> compile_and_execute
> exec(compiled, globs)
>   File "", line 
> 1, in 
> f(*args)  # 
> optional - fricas
> NameError: name 'f' is not defined
> **
> 1 item had failures:
>3 of   4 in 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

Apart from the  Emacs issye alteady reported 
, I 
get the three permanent failures I reported for the previous betas, as well 
as a new one, which gives three errors :

charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
--random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
Running doctests with ID 2023-01-20-20-50-00-ee865d6d.
Git branch: develop
Git ref: 9.8.beta7
Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and 
SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
Using 
--optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,msolve,palettable,pint,pip,saclib,sage,sage_spkg
Features to be detected: 
4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,cvxopt,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_cubic_hecke,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.misc.cython,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
--random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
**
File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 894, in 
sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
Failed example:
fricas.__reduce__()   # 
optional - fricas
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in _run
self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
  File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
compile_and_execute
exec(compiled, globs)
  File "", line 1, 
in 
fricas.__reduce__()   # 
optional - fricas
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/copyreg.py", line 76, in _reduce_ex
raise TypeError(f"cannot pickle {cls.__name__!r} object")
TypeError: cannot pickle 'LazyImport' object
**
File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 896, in 
sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
Failed example:
f, args = _   # 
optional - fricas
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in _run
self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
  File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
compile_and_execute
exec(compiled, globs)
  File "", line 1, 
in 
f, args = _   # 
optional - fricas
TypeError: cannot unpack non-iterable int object
**
File "src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py", line 897, in 
sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
Failed example:
f(*args)  # 
optional - fricas
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 695, in _run
self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
  File "/usr/local/sage-9/src/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1093, in 
compile_and_execute
exec(compiled, globs)
  File "", line 1, 
in 
f(*args)  # 
optional - fricas
NameError: name 'f' is not defined
**
1 item had failures:
   3 of   4 in sage.interfaces.fricas.FriCAS.__reduce__
[277 tests, 3 failures, 42.89 s]
--
sage -t --long --warn-long 259.6 
--random-seed=41414648133166628206443904124754495105 
src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py  # 3 doctests failed
--
Total time for all tests: 48.0 seconds
cpu time: 4.2 seconds
cumulative wall time: 42.9 seconds
Features detected for doctesting: 

HTH,
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2023 à 00:48:25 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
> ready ;)
>
> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
> 9.8.beta7
> 272c557d1f3 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Dima Pasechnik]

as the package/build system is being updated, it's hard to escape `make
distclean`

Perhaps `make sagelib-clean sagelib-uninstall` will do in this case - but
perhaps it's some other python module guilty here.


On Fri, 20 Jan 2023, 20:30 Emmanuel Charpentier, <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What exactly did you do to "recompile sage" ?
>
> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 16:50:00 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :
>
>> I'm sorry, recompiling sage fixed the emacs problem.  I have no idea what
>> happened.
>>
>> On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:30:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the backtrace:
>>>
>>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
>>>   accept-process-output(nil 0 1)
>>>   sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete()
>>>   sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()"
>>> :sync t :process-buffer nil :output-buffer nil :to-string t :raw nil)
>>>   sage-shell:send-command-sync("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" nil
>>> nil t nil)
>>>
>>> sage-shell:send-command-to-string("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()")
>>>   sage-shell:after-init-function(#)
>>>   #f(compiled-function () #)()
>>>   sage-shell:run-hook-once(sage-shell:output-filter-finished-hook)
>>>   sage-shell:output-filter(#
>>> "┌─...")
>>>   read-event(nil t 2)
>>>   sit-for(2)
>>>   execute-extended-command(nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>>>   funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>>>   call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
>>>   command-execute(execute-extended-command)
>>>
>>> On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:26:30 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>>
 All of a sudden, emacs sage-shell-mode seems not to work any more?  The
 last message I get is

 Checking IPython version... Done. To disable this checking, set
 ‘sage-shell:check-ipython-version-on-startup’ to ‘nil’.
 error in process filter: Quit [2 times]

 The last beta worked.

 Anyone else experiencing this?

 Martin
 On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:48:25 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets
> ready ;)
>
> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to
> 9.8.beta7
> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of
> polyhedra
> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy,
> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for
> obtain_nash()
> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics,
> modules, plot, numerical
> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c
> stuff from PATH
> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint:
> Option to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of
> typing_extensions
> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's
> VirtualCharacter
> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string
> conversion
> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open
> source!), rename to scip
> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to
> GitHub and add links to the transition guide
> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking
> functions
> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's
> with relations.
> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to
> order 664
> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element
> functions
> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore
> top-level functions maxima_console etc.
> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

What exactly did you do to "recompile sage" ?

Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 16:50:00 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :

> I'm sorry, recompiling sage fixed the emacs problem.  I have no idea what 
> happened.
>
> On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:30:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> Here is the backtrace:
>>
>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
>>   accept-process-output(nil 0 1)
>>   sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete()
>>   sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" 
>> :sync t :process-buffer nil :output-buffer nil :to-string t :raw nil)
>>   sage-shell:send-command-sync("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" nil 
>> nil t nil)
>>   sage-shell:send-command-to-string("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()")
>>   sage-shell:after-init-function(#)
>>   #f(compiled-function () #)()
>>   sage-shell:run-hook-once(sage-shell:output-filter-finished-hook)
>>   sage-shell:output-filter(# 
>> "┌─...")
>>   read-event(nil t 2)
>>   sit-for(2)
>>   execute-extended-command(nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>>   funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>>   call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
>>   command-execute(execute-extended-command)
>>
>> On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:26:30 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>>
>>> All of a sudden, emacs sage-shell-mode seems not to work any more?  The 
>>> last message I get is 
>>>
>>> Checking IPython version... Done. To disable this checking, set 
>>> ‘sage-shell:check-ipython-version-on-startup’ to ‘nil’.
>>> error in process filter: Quit [2 times]
>>>
>>> The last beta worked.
>>>
>>> Anyone else experiencing this?
>>>
>>> Martin
>>> On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:48:25 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:
>>>
 As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
 branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
 http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html

 We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
 ready ;)

 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
 9.8.beta7
 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
 polyhedra
 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
 b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
 sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
 c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
 plot, numerical
 bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff 
 from PATH
 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: 
 Option to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
 df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
 typing_extensions
 b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
 VirtualCharacter
 dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
 conversion
 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
 bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open 
 source!), rename to scip
 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
 ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to 
 GitHub and add links to the transition guide
 acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking 
 functions
 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's 
 with relations.
 bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to 
 order 664
 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element 
 functions
 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
 b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
 top-level functions maxima_console etc.
 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of 
 elliptic curves
 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
 independent from the current coloring
 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11
 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/
 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

I've got the same (extremely annoying) problem. I've opened an issue 
 on  sage-shell-mode 
Github page.

Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 12:30:23 UTC+1, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit :

> Here is the backtrace:
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
>   accept-process-output(nil 0 1)
>   sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete()
>   sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" 
> :sync t :process-buffer nil :output-buffer nil :to-string t :raw nil)
>   sage-shell:send-command-sync("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" nil 
> nil t nil)
>   sage-shell:send-command-to-string("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()")
>   sage-shell:after-init-function(#)
>   #f(compiled-function () #)()
>   sage-shell:run-hook-once(sage-shell:output-filter-finished-hook)
>   sage-shell:output-filter(# 
> "┌─...")
>   read-event(nil t 2)
>   sit-for(2)
>   execute-extended-command(nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>   funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>   call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
>   command-execute(execute-extended-command)
>
> On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:26:30 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> All of a sudden, emacs sage-shell-mode seems not to work any more?  The 
>> last message I get is 
>>
>> Checking IPython version... Done. To disable this checking, set 
>> ‘sage-shell:check-ipython-version-on-startup’ to ‘nil’.
>> error in process filter: Quit [2 times]
>>
>> The last beta worked.
>>
>> Anyone else experiencing this?
>>
>> Martin
>> On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:48:25 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>>>
>>> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
>>> ready ;)
>>>
>>> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
>>> 9.8.beta7
>>> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
>>> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
>>> polyhedra
>>> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
>>> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
>>> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
>>> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
>>> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
>>> plot, numerical
>>> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff 
>>> from PATH
>>> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
>>> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: 
>>> Option to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
>>> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
>>> typing_extensions
>>> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
>>> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
>>> VirtualCharacter
>>> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
>>> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
>>> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
>>> conversion
>>> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
>>> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
>>> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
>>> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
>>> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open 
>>> source!), rename to scip
>>> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
>>> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to 
>>> GitHub and add links to the transition guide
>>> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking 
>>> functions
>>> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's 
>>> with relations.
>>> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to 
>>> order 664
>>> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element 
>>> functions
>>> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
>>> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
>>> top-level functions maxima_console etc.
>>> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
>>> 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of elliptic 
>>> curves
>>> 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
>>> independent from the current coloring
>>> 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11
>>> 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/
>>> 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency of scip)
>>> f84915f69d8 Trac #34726: Optional package papilo (dependency of scip)
>>> e5cf1c0d9f2 Trac #34694: Bug in ExteriorAlgebra interior 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release]

I'm sorry, recompiling sage fixed the emacs problem.  I have no idea what 
happened.

On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:30:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

> Here is the backtrace:
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
>   accept-process-output(nil 0 1)
>   sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete()
>   sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" 
> :sync t :process-buffer nil :output-buffer nil :to-string t :raw nil)
>   sage-shell:send-command-sync("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" nil 
> nil t nil)
>   sage-shell:send-command-to-string("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()")
>   sage-shell:after-init-function(#)
>   #f(compiled-function () #)()
>   sage-shell:run-hook-once(sage-shell:output-filter-finished-hook)
>   sage-shell:output-filter(# 
> "┌─...")
>   read-event(nil t 2)
>   sit-for(2)
>   execute-extended-command(nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>   funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
>   call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
>   command-execute(execute-extended-command)
>
> On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:26:30 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> All of a sudden, emacs sage-shell-mode seems not to work any more?  The 
>> last message I get is 
>>
>> Checking IPython version... Done. To disable this checking, set 
>> ‘sage-shell:check-ipython-version-on-startup’ to ‘nil’.
>> error in process filter: Quit [2 times]
>>
>> The last beta worked.
>>
>> Anyone else experiencing this?
>>
>> Martin
>> On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:48:25 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>>>
>>> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
>>> ready ;)
>>>
>>> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
>>> 9.8.beta7
>>> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
>>> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
>>> polyhedra
>>> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
>>> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
>>> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
>>> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
>>> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
>>> plot, numerical
>>> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff 
>>> from PATH
>>> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
>>> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: 
>>> Option to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
>>> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
>>> typing_extensions
>>> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
>>> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
>>> VirtualCharacter
>>> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
>>> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
>>> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
>>> conversion
>>> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
>>> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
>>> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
>>> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
>>> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open 
>>> source!), rename to scip
>>> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
>>> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to 
>>> GitHub and add links to the transition guide
>>> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking 
>>> functions
>>> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's 
>>> with relations.
>>> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to 
>>> order 664
>>> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element 
>>> functions
>>> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
>>> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
>>> top-level functions maxima_console etc.
>>> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
>>> 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of elliptic 
>>> curves
>>> 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
>>> independent from the current coloring
>>> 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11
>>> 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/
>>> 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency of scip)
>>> f84915f69d8 Trac #34726: Optional package papilo (dependency of scip)
>>> e5cf1c0d9f2 Trac #34694: Bug in ExteriorAlgebra interior product
>>> ebb9b611d02 Trac #34416: Manage pexpect logs created during doctesting

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release]

Here is the backtrace:

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
  accept-process-output(nil 0 1)
  sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete()
  sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" 
:sync t :process-buffer nil :output-buffer nil :to-string t :raw nil)
  sage-shell:send-command-sync("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()" nil 
nil t nil)
  sage-shell:send-command-to-string("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()")
  sage-shell:after-init-function(#)
  #f(compiled-function () #)()
  sage-shell:run-hook-once(sage-shell:output-filter-finished-hook)
  sage-shell:output-filter(# 
"┌─...")
  read-event(nil t 2)
  sit-for(2)
  execute-extended-command(nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
  funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "run-sage" "run-sa")
  call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
  command-execute(execute-extended-command)

On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:26:30 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

> All of a sudden, emacs sage-shell-mode seems not to work any more?  The 
> last message I get is 
>
> Checking IPython version... Done. To disable this checking, set 
> ‘sage-shell:check-ipython-version-on-startup’ to ‘nil’.
> error in process filter: Quit [2 times]
>
> The last beta worked.
>
> Anyone else experiencing this?
>
> Martin
> On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:48:25 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:
>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>>
>> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
>> ready ;)
>>
>> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
>> 9.8.beta7
>> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
>> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
>> polyhedra
>> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
>> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
>> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
>> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
>> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
>> plot, numerical
>> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff 
>> from PATH
>> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
>> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: Option 
>> to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
>> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
>> typing_extensions
>> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
>> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
>> VirtualCharacter
>> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
>> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
>> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
>> conversion
>> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
>> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
>> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
>> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
>> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open source!), 
>> rename to scip
>> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
>> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to GitHub 
>> and add links to the transition guide
>> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking 
>> functions
>> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's 
>> with relations.
>> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to 
>> order 664
>> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element functions
>> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
>> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
>> top-level functions maxima_console etc.
>> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
>> 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of elliptic 
>> curves
>> 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
>> independent from the current coloring
>> 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11
>> 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/
>> 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency of scip)
>> f84915f69d8 Trac #34726: Optional package papilo (dependency of scip)
>> e5cf1c0d9f2 Trac #34694: Bug in ExteriorAlgebra interior product
>> ebb9b611d02 Trac #34416: Manage pexpect logs created during doctesting
>> 962177a2da1 Trac #33907: interfaces/expect.py random test failure
>> 66409243991 Trac #16522: lazy_import doesn't resolve properly when 
>> indirectly imported
>> 2114066f877 (tag: 9.8.beta6) Updated SageMath version to 9.8.beta6
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

['axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release]

All of a sudden, emacs sage-shell-mode seems not to work any more?  The 
last message I get is 

Checking IPython version... Done. To disable this checking, set 
‘sage-shell:check-ipython-version-on-startup’ to ‘nil’.
error in process filter: Quit [2 times]

The last beta worked.

Anyone else experiencing this?

Martin
On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:48:25 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
> ready ;)
>
> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
> 9.8.beta7
> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
> polyhedra
> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
> plot, numerical
> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff 
> from PATH
> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: Option 
> to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
> typing_extensions
> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
> VirtualCharacter
> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
> conversion
> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open source!), 
> rename to scip
> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to GitHub 
> and add links to the transition guide
> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking functions
> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's with 
> relations.
> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to order 
> 664
> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element functions
> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
> top-level functions maxima_console etc.
> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
> 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of elliptic 
> curves
> 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
> independent from the current coloring
> 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11
> 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/
> 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency of scip)
> f84915f69d8 Trac #34726: Optional package papilo (dependency of scip)
> e5cf1c0d9f2 Trac #34694: Bug in ExteriorAlgebra interior product
> ebb9b611d02 Trac #34416: Manage pexpect logs created during doctesting
> 962177a2da1 Trac #33907: interfaces/expect.py random test failure
> 66409243991 Trac #16522: lazy_import doesn't resolve properly when 
> indirectly imported
> 2114066f877 (tag: 9.8.beta6) Updated SageMath version to 9.8.beta6
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/36ff44c9-b520-46fb-bd1a-dbc6f953e1a5n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Enrique Artal]

I tried in another computer with the system package (3.11.1) and it worked 
but in both cases only after make distclean.
I lost the logs but sagelib complained about setup.
Snappy fails in both cases.

El jueves, 19 de enero de 2023 a las 12:04:24 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik 
escribió:

> What's wrong with Fedora's 37 Python3? (3.11.0, right?)
> What error do you see in config.log - which tells, hopefully, why it
> does not want system's python3 ?
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:43 AM Enrique Artal  wrote:
> >
> > In Fedora 37 I needed to `make distclean` and use the sage package for 
> python3 and not the system one. The optional package snappy does not 
> compile. Anyway, thanks for the new version. Best, Enrique.
> >
> > El jueves, 19 de enero de 2023 a las 0:48:25 UTC+1, Volker Braun 
> escribió:
> >>
> >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
> >>
> >> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
> ready ;)
> >>
> >> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
> 9.8.beta7
> >> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
> >> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
> polyhedra
> >> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
> >> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
> >> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
> >> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
> plot, numerical
> >> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff 
> from PATH
> >> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
> >> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: 
> Option to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
> >> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
> typing_extensions
> >> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
> >> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
> VirtualCharacter
> >> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
> >> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
> >> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
> conversion
> >> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
> >> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
> >> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
> >> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
> >> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open 
> source!), rename to scip
> >> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
> >> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to 
> GitHub and add links to the transition guide
> >> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking 
> functions
> >> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's 
> with relations.
> >> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to 
> order 664
> >> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element 
> functions
> >> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
> >> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
> top-level functions maxima_console etc.
> >> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
> >> 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of 
> elliptic curves
> >> 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
> independent from the current coloring
> >> 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11
> >> 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/
> >> 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency of scip)
> >> f84915f69d8 Trac #34726: Optional package papilo (dependency of scip)
> >> e5cf1c0d9f2 Trac #34694: Bug in ExteriorAlgebra interior product
> >> ebb9b611d02 Trac #34416: Manage pexpect logs created during doctesting
> >> 962177a2da1 Trac #33907: interfaces/expect.py random test failure
> >> 66409243991 Trac #16522: lazy_import doesn't resolve properly when 
> indirectly imported
> >> 2114066f877 (tag: 9.8.beta6) Updated SageMath version to 9.8.beta6
> >>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "sage-release" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/02b48e4a-95c4-4a17-adb1-b8140e83053dn%40googlegroups.com
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Dima Pasechnik]

What's wrong with Fedora's 37 Python3? (3.11.0, right?)
What error do you see in config.log - which tells, hopefully, why it
does not want system's python3 ?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:43 AM Enrique Artal  wrote:
>
> In Fedora 37 I needed to `make distclean` and use the sage package for 
> python3 and not the system one. The optional package snappy does not compile. 
> Anyway, thanks for the new version. Best, Enrique.
>
> El jueves, 19 de enero de 2023 a las 0:48:25 UTC+1, Volker Braun escribió:
>>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>>
>> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets ready 
>> ;)
>>
>> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
>> 9.8.beta7
>> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
>> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of polyhedra
>> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
>> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
>> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
>> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
>> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
>> plot, numerical
>> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff from 
>> PATH
>> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
>> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: Option to 
>> return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
>> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
>> typing_extensions
>> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
>> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
>> VirtualCharacter
>> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
>> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
>> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
>> conversion
>> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
>> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
>> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
>> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
>> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open source!), 
>> rename to scip
>> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
>> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to GitHub 
>> and add links to the transition guide
>> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking functions
>> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's with 
>> relations.
>> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to order 
>> 664
>> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element functions
>> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
>> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
>> top-level functions maxima_console etc.
>> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
>> 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of elliptic 
>> curves
>> 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
>> independent from the current coloring
>> 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11
>> 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/
>> 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency of scip)
>> f84915f69d8 Trac #34726: Optional package papilo (dependency of scip)
>> e5cf1c0d9f2 Trac #34694: Bug in ExteriorAlgebra interior product
>> ebb9b611d02 Trac #34416: Manage pexpect logs created during doctesting
>> 962177a2da1 Trac #33907: interfaces/expect.py random test failure
>> 66409243991 Trac #16522: lazy_import doesn't resolve properly when 
>> indirectly imported
>> 2114066f877 (tag: 9.8.beta6) Updated SageMath version to 9.8.beta6
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/02b48e4a-95c4-4a17-adb1-b8140e83053dn%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq1RTdkBRJVOkZVv%2BZ99FKmv9-W%3DN1SX%3DU5R%3DE%3Dc7eksDg%40mail.gmail.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

[Enrique Artal]

In Fedora 37 I needed to `make distclean` and use the sage package for 
python3 and not the system one. The optional package snappy does not 
compile. Anyway, thanks for the new version. Best, Enrique. 

El jueves, 19 de enero de 2023 a las 0:48:25 UTC+1, Volker Braun escribió:

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> We should probably gear up for a 9.8 release soon, so get your tickets 
> ready ;)
>
> 047281e0287 (trac/develop, tag: 9.8.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 
> 9.8.beta7
> 272c557d1f3 Trac #31668: Run TestSuite on polynomial rings
> 6f8fb9ba3ef Trac #22067: generating function of integral points of 
> polyhedra
> 5544a33b815 Trac #21003: Add package pyscipopt, add MIP backend
> b0422b2536b Trac #34838: setuptools_scm, contourpy, 
> sphinxcontrib_websupport, typing_extensions: Add missing dependencies
> 30d58156a46 Trac #34717: Check the presence of lrsnash for obtain_nash()
> c7299453922 Trac #34891: fixing some E502 in tensor, dynamics, modules, 
> plot, numerical
> bc832cb3578 Trac #34889: Installation guide: On WSL, clear /mnt/c stuff 
> from PATH
> 3570a9a63bd Trac #34881: allow to remove no constraints
> 0ceb1032430 Trac #34878: MixedIntegerLinearProgram.add_constraint: Option 
> to return row indices, fix handling of empty constraints
> df74efb66d2 Trac #34859: sagelib: Remove unnecessary import of 
> typing_extensions
> b6a76d7a848 Trac #34857: bump giac's GIAC_MIN_VERSION to 1.9
> 6a8155e6e5d Trac #34854: molien_series() should not use GAP's 
> VirtualCharacter
> dddf3ca0b08 Trac #34853: sage-env: Fix misconfiguration of pip
> 6f631021ac4 Trac #34847: modernize some for loops in cython files
> 9ffabc7f3e1 Trac #34844: removal of some unused imports about string 
> conversion
> 4b50bc2af27 Trac #34843: pep8 cleanup in ore_polynomial_element.pyx
> bdd14cec19b Trac #34837: fix E502 in some pyx files
> 172ad73ae38 Trac #34836: fix E271 and E272 in rings/ and schemes/
> 3d861266040 Trac #34749: Packages dsdp, scip_sdp
> 64d232b5bfd Trac #31329: Update scipoptsuite to 8.0.2 (now open source!), 
> rename to scip
> 2dcafb3ac57 Trac #34839: Support tox 4
> ad68f15d97f Trac #34648: Developer's guide: warn the transition to GitHub 
> and add links to the transition guide
> acebbc1a9e8 Trac #34824: do not include parent in hash of parking functions
> 9a7b6310dde Trac #34818: Error when defining differentials over GCA's with 
> relations.
> bb63c582122 Trac #34807: Add Construction of Hadamard matrices up to order 
> 664
> 8a0b16d93be Trac #34804: Deprecate sage.interfaces is_...Element functions
> 80f8f950e95 Trac #34793: clean 3 files inside modular
> b0cc282500e Trac #34547: Interfaces: use more lazy imports, restore 
> top-level functions maxima_console etc.
> 5905da7ebfc Trac #33915: inseparable elliptic-curve isogenies
> 98b22ebdcf7 Trac #32826: scalar-multiplication endomorphisms of elliptic 
> curves
> 4f11a750df9 Trac #8744: Improve add_edge in BipartiteGraph to make it 
> independent from the current coloring
> 08aa2f8edaa Trac #33842: Upgrade python to 3.11
> 75bedf95960 Trac #34783: various details in combinat/
> 33fa8715bd5 Trac #34742: Optional package soplex (dependency of scip)
> f84915f69d8 Trac #34726: Optional package papilo (dependency of scip)
> e5cf1c0d9f2 Trac #34694: Bug in ExteriorAlgebra interior product
> ebb9b611d02 Trac #34416: Manage pexpect logs created during doctesting
> 962177a2da1 Trac #33907: interfaces/expect.py random test failure
> 66409243991 Trac #16522: lazy_import doesn't resolve properly when 
> indirectly imported
> 2114066f877 (tag: 9.8.beta6) Updated SageMath version to 9.8.beta6
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/02b48e4a-95c4-4a17-adb1-b8140e83053dn%40googlegroups.com.