Exactly that was my goal of this JIRA comment.
On 8/1/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Mike. One of the big problems with filing
feature requests in JIRA straight off is that you end up
using JIRA to have a discussion on whether the feature
is useful and how to design it.
On 8/1/06, Joseph Rozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/involved
Also, I'd go ahead and make this a more generic page rather than
restricting this to Trinidad.
It's probably true for all of the apache projects, and perhaps getting
it on the main apache wiki
On 8/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
names prior to the refactoring. I'm guessing its because the refactoring
feature of eclipse just plainly ignore comments lines.
Only if you tell it to ignore them by unchecking Update textual
matches in comments and strings during
+1 for the component. Since it's coming from Jeanne,
I'm pretty sure she's using skinning for those icons. :)
-- Adam
On 8/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I think it will be a very nice addition to Trinidad, what kind of up/down
arrows are used though? skin icons?
Now what is yours opinion about correcting the comments in the code...
clearly going throught it manually isn't possible, so what about the
possibility of having it changed sporadically when files for patches / new
features are addeds ?
yeah, right. I prefer this way too.
There are even older
Hello,
Was there any decision made concerning JSF 1.2 and Trinidad? The spec is
compatible, however generics were added to the API so some Trinidad
classes will requires some changes, the components mainly. What is the
master plan concerning it? Stay with 1.1 as long as possible? Switch to
An excellent idea - but I do worry about how it'll
turn out in practice... I think there's a lot of
dependencies, like the Agent API and (maybe)
the RequestContext API, etc. If you start pulling
those out into a skinning module, that module
will end up having a lot more than just skinning in
On 8/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I had a simple question about the milestone you want to setup. When you
are talking about the milestone what do you really means by this? As far
as what I'm understanding by this and my little knowledge on projet
development; will this
On 7/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
since the major refactoring and renaming tasks are almost done, I
think it's time to think about releasing a first milestone version.
Two things just out of my mind:
1. The release from plugins and trinidad should be
On 8/1/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joey,
A milestone at this point seems reasonable to me.
Do we have an expected time-between-milestones? For example, are we
targetting a once-monthly/bimonthly/etc. milestone, or will milestones
only come along when the
I think something like incubator-milestone-1? The code right
now is neither alpha nor production.
I am fine with that! I mentioned that only b/c there were some issues
with having NaN in the beginning; maybe can be releated to maven1
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog:
One of the key questions of that threat was, were the incubator
release should be hosted
snip
Incubator code should not be on www.apache.org/dist. Only official ASF
releases are permitted to be there. Our stuff should be under
people.apache.org/dist/incubator/${podling}.
Remember: we're not
That sounds great. I totally agree that incubator code
shouldn't go out to the real apache.org distribution site.
All that I'd like is that we have a Maven repository
that is explicitly not a snapshot repository, because
Maven treats snapshot repositories and release
repositories differently.
On 8/1/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sounds great. I totally agree that incubator code
shouldn't go out to the real apache.org distribution site.
Excatly! Glad you like it too :)
All that I'd like is that we have a Maven repository
that is explicitly not a snapshot
On 8/1/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excatly! Glad you like it too :)
Exactly ... :)
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
For example, Struts has a couple of releases in
m2-snapshot-repository. These were beta quality releases that had
some issue preventing wider distribution. I'm on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list, and no one has ever questioned our placing other-than-snapshots
in this repo.
nobody here too.
There
16 matches
Mail list logo
