Re: dnf group and dnf group list diff ?

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > no, is not my job That's cute. Whose "job" is it then? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: hotness tried to map X to an upstream project, but failed: "Could not determine backend for http://url/project/X"

Hi Jeremy, > I help maintain both the-new-hotness and Anitya. the-new-hotness > attempts to update projects in Anitya when changes occur in pkgdb > (among other things). I assume when you use "X" you don't literally > mean "X" and when you say "http://url/project/X; you don't literally > mean

hotness tried to map X to an upstream project, but failed: "Could not determine backend for http://url/project/X"

Hello, I've just received about a dozen of messages like the one mentioned in the subject, accompanied with: pkgdb_updater updated: upstream_url of X https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/X/ for a number of gdouros-X-fonts that I updated recently and whose upstream URL had

Re: SSH Key and FAS Account

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:06 PM, wrote: > Thank you, but i can with "fedpkg scratch-build --srpm filename.src.rpm" it > upload to dksoftw...@pks.fedoraproject.org and here is a build -> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17995140 Scratch builds are

Re: thunderbird 45.7.1 and packer account

Have you tried with the domain in caps, i.e. @FEDORAPROJECT.ORG? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25

Everybody has made some valid points, but as far as pushing to F25 stable goes, there may be an undetermined number of people who -unaware of this discussion and for whatever reason- already have libglvnd and relevant packages installed from testing. I'm not sure that someone who was advised in a

Re: Why does BuildRequires: kernel in Koji pull in kernel-debug-*?

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This should be fixed in the libguestfs-1.34.4-2.fc25 package, so try > that (in updates-testing currently). Thank you, I ran a few tests and left karma. Something weird about the debug kernel: On a Phenom II system,

Re: Why does BuildRequires: kernel in Koji pull in kernel-debug-*?

Besides hiding the debug kernel in GRUB, is there a way to get rid of it, without uninstalling libguestfs? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unretiring itpp

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: > Then if there is a agreement, I'll need some advice on how to proceed > next... That depends on whether you're already a member of the packagers group. If you are, go here:

Re: Unretiring itpp

It might feel like I'm splitting hairs, but please bear with me. Modify your changelog heading to one of the following formats * Sun Jan 22 2017 Theodore Papadopoulo - 4.3.1-1 * Sun Jan 22 2017 Theodore Papadopoulo - 4.3.1-1 (

Re: Bluetooth headsets vs rawhide

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * Are folks using f25 see bluetooth headsets work? > (I would imagine so or there would have been a lot more noise. Ha ha) I don't use it very often, but I have a Philips SHB5600 that works in both A2DP and HSP/HFP mode.

Re: Unretiring itpp

Almost there, still some light reading ahead: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs You need to amend your changelog entry heading to match one of the styles mentioned there, the most common being * Sun Jan 22 2017 Theodore.Papadopoulo -

Re: Unretiring itpp

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: > OK, I hope I have taken into acount of all suggestions except one (I > found nothing on %licence in %files). "If the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file,

Re: Unretiring itpp

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: > On 01/20/2017 07:50 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: [snip] >> Without looking at the repo, it sounds like packaging a git snapshot would >> be easier and better. > > Is this allowed ??? I know

Re: SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Alec Leamas <leamas.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 08/01/17 13:30, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Till Maas <opensou...@till.name> wrote: >>> >>> >>> ~/.fedora.upn (User P

Re: SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > ~/.fedora.upn (User Principal Name) > > And the problem with trying to get the FAS username from kerberos is > that it only works while the use has a valid ticket for kerberos since > MIT kerberos removes expired tickets.

Re: Quality control, does it exist? A recent update removed a keyboard layout from system.

On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 5:48 AM, Timothy Ward wrote: > […] > Keep the politics out of the way. While I mostly agree with everything else you've written, setting goals, striking balances and deciding on resource allocation is, well, politics…

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade: SOLVED

I think you might be missing Google's key: https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Regression: FileManager1 D-Bus service mix-up in F25 when multiple DEs are installed

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Though $SUBJECT says Regression, this is not a new/recent problem. Technically true, but up to F24, the only time a user would see the "wrong" file manager was when they might access the File→Open/Save dialog in Firefox

Regression: FileManager1 D-Bus service mix-up in F25 when multiple DEs are installed

TL;DR: There is a conflict when a user opts to install more than one desktop environments that come with a FileManager1 (and probably any other identical) D-Bus service provider, at least when one of them is GNOME. This might be considered an oversight on upstream's part, but it causes troubles

Re: File managers compete for desktop domination in F25

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hmm, what happens if you remove ~/.config/autostart/org.kde.dolphin.desktop; > or add OnlyShowIn=KDE there ? No change. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: File managers compete for desktop domination in F25

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > I'd expect mimetype default for inode/directory to handle this, and in f24 > at least, /usr/share/applications/mimeapps.list contains: > inode/directory=org.gnome.Nautilus.desktop It is. All mimeapps lists are as they

Re: File managers compete for desktop domination in F25

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > I remember seeing something similar a while back. To figure out what the > problem is, check all kde related files under /etc/xdg/autostart, they > should all have a: "OnlyShowIn=KDE;" in there, last time for me the >

File managers compete for desktop domination in F25

Hello all, After upgrading a computer with multiple DEs to F25 from F23, folders on GNOME's desktop are managed by dolphin, which runs daemonized and cannot be killed, unless I also kill kded5 and kdeinit5. There was already a similar bug about nemo replacing nautilus on the desktop after a

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > * Drop -mtune=atom on i686: This flag was added to improve performance > on the Intel Bonnell microarchitecture. Would you happen to have a ballpark estimate of the performance cost that would incur on actual Bonnel CPUs?

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

Hello, I'm not sure I have all my facts straight -and by all means, please help straighten them out-, but I would like to address Adam's original proposals. This is more of an issue for Workstation and the spins destined for desktop use, so any possible solution needs to rely on Anaconda/Initial

Re: f24 x86_64 :: yumex-dnf SIGSEGV

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > does anyone have any idea about this? is my ram dying? If you suspect a problem with your RAM, you should try testing it with memtest86+ and something like Prime95 before filing a bug report (if there is indeed a

Re: where is /1 coming from?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Am I the only one who can't see the email body below? No you are not. After, squeezing it through base64, it reads: I had this issue of 1 in / in F24 I had upgraded from 22. Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT 4G LTE

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > 1) Are there still cases where an admin would want to use optical media > on a machine that *could* boot via USB, for legitimate reasons? (I > genuinely don't know the answer to this). So far I've had to deal

Re: duplicate package on fresh install

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Sylvia wrote: > This is maybe a silly question but... if you're architecture is, let's say > x86_64, why would anything install an i686 version of the same package? If you install a 32-bit program, it may pull in other i686 dependencies. See

Re: User Visible Terminology

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Mary Clarke wrote: > > The Modularity working group is looking to standardize terminology that users > use to interact with functionality around modules. Perhaps it would be better if someone provided some examples for the functions

Re: F24 virt-manager fails to start any VM, SELinux policy denies access

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > So even after 'dnf clean all' the -13 version that should fix this > problem is not listed as an update in either updates or > updates-testing. Is that expected? It hasn't been that long since the update left the

Re: F24 virt-manager fails to start any VM, SELinux policy denies access

It's already been dealt with, see RHBZ #1368745. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned qwtplot3d

That's a bit unfortunate, as scidavis, which uses qwtplot3d, is almost ready to be reintroduced to Fedora [1],[2]. I don't suppose there is another library that could be used as a drop-in replacement, is there? [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/scidavis/scidavis-bugs/285/ [2]

Re: Trying to collect samples of USB descriptor data

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Kopeček wrote: > > For that I need some samples of the USB descriptor data. I can generate some > samples but it's always a good idea to have real world samples. > Do you need any "exotic" devices plugged into the system and should we

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Unicode 9.0 support

Is there any point in updating fonts in rawhide to their Unicode 9.0 versions, before the change is implemented? Besides the font checking tools that do not know of Unicode 9.0 (or 8, I think), will anything important break after such an update? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

I'm guessing you are subscribed to this mailing list. Every now and then you get messages with subject lines like "Orphaned packages in rawhide". You could have seen it quite some time ago. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/219062 -- devel mailing list

Re: jwm

It was orphaned in late February. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jwm/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how to unretire package

You probably need someone to complete the review and then request the branches from the PackageDB. Given the time frame, perhaps you could file an unretirement request through the PackageDB interface without going through the review process, but I'm not sure about that. -- devel mailing list

Re: Unretire surf

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich <kryz...@ispms.ru> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Alexander Ploumistos >> <alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I am a little confused by the beginning of the %install section, could &

Re: Unretire surf

Well, after almost three hours, fedora-review came through. I am a little confused by the beginning of the %install section, could you please explain the syntax of the first line? (%make_install INSTALL="install -p") -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unretire surf

It's been a little over two hours since I started fedora-review and it seems I'm hitting these two bugs: * dnf repoquery --resolve is extremely slow #1279538 * fedora-review queries too many times for same thing #1275275 I'll try to stay up until it finishes and if that takes too long, I'll let

Re: Unretire surf

Hi Neal, The link to the source rpm in rhbz seems broken. If nobody else comes forward by tonight, I'll pick up the review. Best Regards -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:59 PM, linux guy wrote: > I'm not sure this is the right venue to ask, but... could someone build the > latest version of Rygel and put it in the repos ? Currently the repos have > 0.28.2-1. I think the latest available from git is 0.29.2.

Re: New gdouros greek fonts

Upstream has added another font to the TextFonts collection, Avdira, which has some cute, "old style" -mostly Latin and Greek- glyphs. I have prepared gdouros-avdira-fonts and it's waiting for a review. As per the guidelines, I have created a wiki page:

Re: liborigin FTBFS

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I think it is also good idea to update liborigin to 2.0 (it is something > like 2 years after current fedora version) That's why there is a liborigin2. As far as I can tell, they dropped support for older

Re: liborigin FTBFS

Thanks a bunch! There was also a %patch1 -p1 missing, but I figured that before building the package. Now the package fails to build locally, but there is no problem in mock. I really need to read up more on gcc changes if I am to keep c++ packages under my care... -- devel mailing list

Re: liborigin FTBFS

I don't get it, I applied the patch, but I'm seeing pretty much the same errors in mock and koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13054384 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: liborigin FTBFS

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The problem is that the package defines a type 'function' in the > global namespace, but also puts 'using namespace std;" in the global > namespace, in a header. That causes the 'function' struct and >

liborigin FTBFS

Hello, Yesterday I was notified that liborigin failed to build in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307729 For the past couple of days I've been away on a work trip and I won't be back until the end of next week. Unless this failure messes someone else's packages, would it be

Re: Orphaning liborigin and liborigin2

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: > Upstream development is dead for years now and newer Origin > files are not covered by these releases. Would you happen to know the latest Origin version supported by liborigin? -- devel mailing list

Re: Orphaning liborigin and liborigin2

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: > liborigin: Origin 7.5 (last release 2008) > liborigin2: Origin 8.1 (last release 2010) Hmm, I have a lot of colleagues using versions 7.5 and 8.0, so I am tempted to take them. -- devel mailing list

Re: Orphaning liborigin and liborigin2

I've taken them for the time being and I'll go over the specs and sources sometime this week. Can I bug you if I have any questions? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Package review skipped and straight to repos?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > Apparently, ABRT reports crashes for packages not part of Fedora. Thanks, I'd guessed that much, but I wanted some confirmation. > A possible fix would be to look at the signing key in the RPM database > and report

Re: Package review skipped and straight to repos?

How come datagrepper lists FAF reports for the package from 2015-07-20, when it hadn't been included yet? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Package review skipped and straight to repos?

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Till Maas <opensou...@till.name> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >> How come datagrepper lists FAF reports for the package from 2015-07-20, >> when it hadn't been included yet? > > W

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > about money: with the energy costs i saved going away from P4 computers many > years ago my current one is already paied Nobody is saying that a newer computer won't save you money on the power bill. What they have

Re: Bug dnf update

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Albino B Neto wrote: > ^CTerminated. > This looks like you pressed Ctrl+C and forced the termination yourself. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Bug dnf update

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Albino B Neto wrote: > Yes. He were loading for more time. > > Well, having a slow connection to your nearest mirror is not really a bug in dnf. Try again later or specify a different mirror. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Right now at least two projects (mock and fedora-upgrade) contains and use > those keys. > So once this get into Fedora (and Epel) I can remove those keys from > fedora-upgrade and mock and use this common package. > >

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

Hello, Please forgive my ignorance, but how is this supposed to be used? I guess it's handy to keep track of all the current keys, but unlike, say rpmfusion-free-release, the keys are not placed or linked in /etc/pki/, nor are they imported in a gpg keyring. What am I missing? Also, shouldn't

Re: [Smartmontools-database] KINGSTON SHSS37A240G

Kingston has a list of SMART attributes for this series of SSDs on their website: http://media.kingston.com/support/downloads/MKP_521_Phison_SMART_attribute.pdf Evidently, ID 183 does not provide anything useful, while ID 231 provides an estimate of how much life is left in the SSD.

Re: bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > You may want to read the last messages from me in this short thread: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-August/thread.html#213311 I had already starred your messages in that thread :)

Re: bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

Is RHBZ linked to FMN? I've been trying to set up a filter for all the bugs that concern me, but I can't get any example messages, even when I just select the "All RHBZ activity" rule. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

I've reset email settings to the defaults (two rules, "A particular user's packages (any acl)" and "A particular user "), made sure that my email address is still there and I've got a "This message delivery mechanism is currently active" message. Meanwhile my packages have gone from pending to

bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

Hello, For the last couple of days I have been submitting updates (with fedpkg) for some of my packages in all the branches. Currently they all appear as pending in bodhi and I have not received any messages about them, even for the ones that got positive karma. The wiki reads for the pending

Re: bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Almost all notifications from bodhi (with the exception currently of > adding comments on updates) is sent via FMN (the Fedora notification > service): https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/ > > It sounds like you have

Re: Short intro & request for orphaned package adoption

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Pete V wrote: > Hi all my name is Pete V. > As a long time Linux user, I feel the time has come to step up and > contribute big time. Welcome aboard! > were do I assign these to myself, in BZ? There's some light reading ahead,

Re: dnf: Error: RPM package source (jpilot-1.8.2-2.fc22.src) will not installed

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Luigi Votta wrote: > Output of dnf search jpilot: > > jpilot.i686 : pilot desktop software > Repo : @System > > jpilot.src : pilot desktop software > Repo : fedora-source > > jpilot-backup.i686 : Enhanced backup plugin for

Re: IoT server thought

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Les Howell wrote: > Could a group be formed to somehow create some kind of server node, say > with Raspberry PI or similar hardware to support a dual network, > internal and external users and local control as a third branch that > might

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

I tested https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Alpha_RC2/Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-23_Alpha.iso on a dual Athlon MP system and it boots fine to anaconda. A little bit later I discovered

Re: file triggers for updating fontconfig cache in rawhide

Does this mean that we need to modify spec files for font packages? ___ fonts mailing list fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/

Re: file triggers for updating fontconfig cache in rawhide

Does this mean that we need to modify spec files for font packages? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: file triggers for updating fontconfig cache in rawhide

OK, thanks, I hadn't realized it was all done through the %_font_pkg macro. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: file triggers for updating fontconfig cache in rawhide

OK, thanks, I hadn't realized it was all done through the %_font_pkg macro. ___ fonts mailing list fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Firefox addon signing

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Thanks for the info. Actually is there any reason why Fedora packager would need to modify the original extension? That depends on the extension and its particulars. For example, adblock plus has an extortion-like

Re: Firefox addon signing

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Can we ship addons which are already signed by Mozilla? Or does Fedora packager modify them somehow? It seems that even when the source is an xpi file, rpm treats it like any other source package and its contents can

Re: Firefox addon signing

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: We have no real practical way to do this other than package up the addon and build it as a -unsigned package, then making a separate package that has the precompiled binary and signed by mozilla and put into the add on

Re: Firefox addon signing

Their FAQ is constantly updated: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing#FAQ I'm not sure if there is a valid practical reason to refuse submitting the addons that we ship to their signing service or if it is against our policies; at least mozilla-https-everywhere has been signed.

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

There is also an issue with elements that are loaded asynchronously - they take longer to appear or it might take a bit of scrolling up and down until they are rendered (with the older nVidia card). -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: I see the same flickering on NVIDIA hardware. Intel seems to be fine. Which model? Is it using one of the older driver series? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: It's GeForce GTX 750 with nvidia binary drivers. So you are not on the legacy drivers. Could the problem be hardware-dependent? The graphics adapter of the laptop I tested is one generation ahead of yours and there is no

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: - Install Firefox 40 on Fedora 22,23,Rawhide (you'd need Gtk3 build) - go to about:config, click to any key and add a new one, boolean type. The new key name is layers.use-image-offscreen-surfaces and set it to true.

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: RPM MPI Requires Provides

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote: So the issues I pointed out in my previous mail (conerning MPI_PYTHON_SITEARCH and MPI_FORTRAN_MOD_DIR) above have been resolved. A batch of F24 rebuilts has been done by Zbyszek, hitting some build failures along the

Re: Help needed: F23 32-bit kernel issue

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: First, it would be good to isolate it to the first kernel that doesn't work. That narrows down the range of commits to look at for the bug. So we are looking for boot problems somewhere between 4.1 and 4.2? Can this

Re: Updates push status - 20150725

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: No. We continue to work on it. Thanks for the information, I thought I had done something wrong in the submission process. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updates push status - 20150725

Has the issue been resolved? I have pushed three new packages to f22 and f21 updates-testing, but they have yet to appear in my usual local mirrors. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Problem with multiple monitors

OK, first things first. This is a quick but relatively comprehensive overview of ttys, vts etc.: https://mostlylinux.wordpress.com/troubleshooting/ttysessions/ In my rhbz post, I wrote that when your system is set to boot into graphical mode, when you kill the wayland server (or gdm I suppose),

Re: Problem with multiple monitors

I can't tell you anything about your first problem, but the second one sounds similar to this one (last paragraph): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225629#c0 Have you tried switching VTs to the one hosting the previous session? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: updates-testing: multilib broken for days now

And I got this today: Error: Transaction check error: file /usr/share/doc/polkit/NEWS from install of polkit-0.113-2.fc22.x86_64 conflicts with file from package polkit-0.112-7.fc21.1.i686 file /usr/share/doc/polkit/README from install of polkit-0.113-2.fc22.x86_64 conflicts with file from

Re: FESCO Elections - June 2015 - Results

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Haïkel hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Another possibility is that people didn't find any candidate to their taste. I suggest adding a None option too. Though it won't change results, it will give us metrics to measure that. I'd say that a vote of 0 next to

Context menu icons in Gnome 3.16

Hi, I'm messing with an old gtk+ program, that I think it's dead upstream and I'm trying to see if I can resurrect it. Among other issues, it should add some entries to nautilus' context menus (which it does) but I can't get their icons to show. Then I noticed that I'm missing all of my context

Re: DKIM Issues with repo-font-audit

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: You can pass those upstream, it does not necessarily use the same tools as us. Fedora tests often catch things upstream is not aware of (mostly, fontconfig coverage or you-only-need-two-more-glyphs to fulfill xx

Fwd: Issues with repo-font-audit

I sent this to the font mailing list a couple of nights ago, but perhaps I should have CCd devel as well: -- Forwarded message -- From: Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com Date: Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:24 AM Subject: Issues with repo-font-audit To: fo

Re: Rapid release for security updates

We don't need to complicate things, whenever such critical updates come along, the maintainers can post a message here and in the users ml or even in the forum (somewhere it will be immediately visible). A template for a message detailing the bodhi-karma process, with links to the relevant page

Outdated link

Hello, I was going over my account page in FAS and I noticed that in the Yubikey page https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/yubikey/ the link to the user guide is dead. The current guide resides at https://www.yubico.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/YubiKeyManual_v3.4.pdf but I suspect it might

Re: Naming packages when upstream uses dashes in the release version

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: It depends on the meaning of the upstream's `-1'. Basically, I would interpret it as yet another version level, i.e. as `3.80.1'. If the upstream tends to release `3.80.1-1', I'd interpret `3.80-1' as `3.80.0.1'. So, what

Re: Naming packages when upstream uses dashes in the release version

So basically, one could end up using foo-3.80-1.1.20150506.rpm, foo-3.80-1_1.20150506.rpm or just foo-3.80-1_1.rpm, or did I missunderstand something about the use of underscores? Should this case be added to the wiki page? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Naming packages when upstream uses dashes in the release version

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: The upstream obviously doesn not differentiate between `upstream release' and `Debian package'. Unfortunately, no. Does the upstream bundle `debian' directory with patches in the tar archive? Are these patches applied

Naming packages when upstream uses dashes in the release version

Hello, I have been working on a driver package from a hardware vendor and besides some patches in the code, I am trying to bring the supplied (messy) spec file close to our guidelines. (While most of the stuff in the package relies on open source libraries and projects, there are some files

<    1   2   3   4   5   >