+1 here from the updated diff
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 20:33, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> Reviewed updated diff. +1
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 12:41, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:33 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:26:06PM -0400,
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 00:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ppc9-02 is in a odd state. Guests are running ok, but the host itself is
> hanging any ansible runs against it. :( Usually this is a sign of some
> stuck hardware.
>
> I've disabled the builders on it and once builds finish on them I would
>
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 17:43, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Currently several countries are getting routed to proxies which are timing
> out for them. This should 'fix' some though I expect we will need to break
> this out further per continental region.
>
> diff --git
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 11:18, Timothée Floure
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Took a bit more time than expected due to other and more local
> priorities on my side. The basic structure is there and usable, and
> indexing seemed work quite well before CommunityShift (hence yacy) went
> down.
>
> * Main
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 17:43, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:59:10PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does one need to request anything other than client secrets through an
> infrastructure Pagure issue to be able to test application authentication
> with
> >
>
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 14:43, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This morning as I was trying to build a new distgit-bugzilla-sync build in
> staging, I ran into the issue that the build never started.
> It seems it was related to openshift not being able to resolve
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 20:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 08:14:08PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > I believe this is not frozen but in doubt I'm still asking it :)
> >
> > I would like to deploy a new build of distgit-bugzilla-sync (running
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 00:18, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Per ticket 8847, moving this cron job to 10pm will let it run and finish
> before the larger
> and longer cron script runs to update the docs site. This will prevent
> overlap and get
> updates out a day sooner in some cases.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 20:24, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
snip
> >
> > Possibly, but it would mean it would need secrets to unlock the vault
> > and we don't use valut for anything else currently. ;(
>
> That almost applies to loopabull as well ;-)
> (Well we do use it, but not much)
>
> > I
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 01:08, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 06:50:40PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > The sysadmin-analysis group is used on data-analysis01 for people to log
> in
> > and work there. Because everyone in that group was in an existing group,
> I
> > forgot
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 14:22, Leonardo Rossetti wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:07 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I wanted to start a discussion and possibly some work around automating
>> the manual tasks involved in the relea
Hi all,
I wanted to start a discussion and possibly some work around automating the
manual tasks involved in the release engineering work.
In particular I have in mind the following tasks :
- processing the unretire package tickets.
- processing the requests for a new package or a new branch.
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 22:43, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 03:01:35PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > I have a few items in my backlog that I'd like to discuss priorities
> with you,
> > so here is the unsorted list, let me know how you would
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 13:43, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> May name is mark, I have just started as a software engineer at redhat, I
> have worked as a DevOps for 3 years previously and am familiar with tooling
> such as ansible and scripting languages such as python and bash.
>
Welcome
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 15:28, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 03:16:29PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> >Should we use the same prioritization category that we have for
> tickets ?
> >(low-gain, medium-gain, high-gain, low-trouble, medium-trouble,
&
Should we use the same prioritization category that we have for tickets ?
(low-gain, medium-gain, high-gain, low-trouble, medium-trouble,
high-trouble). That might give use a nice way to focus on 1 or 2 things :-)
Thoughts ?
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 15:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> Good
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 22:03, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 15:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:08:25PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> > The following patch should do a minimal removal of the elections app
>> from
>> > ansible inventory so
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 19:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have been playing a little bit around with the koji-ansible collection
> > and created a Proof of Concept playbook that creates the
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 16:38, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:03:59PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> >On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 14:33, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1]
> pin...@pingoured.fr>
> >wrote:
> >
> > Good Morning,
>
Hi all,
I have been playing a little bit around with the koji-ansible collection
and created a Proof of Concept playbook that creates the main tags for a
release in koji (staging).
I have installed the collection on batcave01 running the following
```
ansible-galaxy collection install
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 14:33, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> While working on https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8035 to
> help
> Kevin I ended up adding the following commit to the proxies and running the
> proxy playbook for it:
>
> commit
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 23:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 05:12:53PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Kevin and I found all the mac addresses for the mgmt boxes and are
> putting
> > them onto dhcp so when they show up in new location.. they should come up
> > without
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:13, Michal Konecny wrote:
> Went through the list and added my 2c to them.
>
> Michal
>
> On 07/04/2020 14:42, Clement Verna wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Let's look at 5 tickets and rate them using the following categories :
> * low-trouble
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 13:42, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:58 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones
>
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 13:15, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:57:27AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > >> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> > You need to edit the update and remove these builds. You can cli
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:53:38AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > I agree, if this would not happen then everything would just blow up.
>
> Wouldn't the lower NVR builds simply be ignored?
>
The merging a side tag is not considering NVRs
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 23:38, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> I guess it should be a fixed in bodhi. But for now you can remove the
> builds that it's complaining about in the update.
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3991
Answered in the ticket, but I think Bodhi is behaving correctly
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 14:57, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5
> >
> > This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday
> > morning which has been in pending for 2 days. (As it's Rawhide it's
>
Hi all,
Let's look at 5 tickets and rate them using the following categories :
* low-trouble, medium-trouble, high-trouble
* low-gain, medium-gain, high-gain
#8729 Do we want to have a copy of translate.fp.o backups? -
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8729
Trouble : ?
Gain : ?
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 08:58, Timothée Floure
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > How does the indexing works ?
>
> You point Yacy to a domain or list of URLs
> (https://fnux.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ in this case), and it takes care of
> everything. There is also an advanced crawler panel in the UI allowing
> you
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 09:18, Timothée Floure
wrote:
> * Yacy (there might be others to test) running on communityshift:
> http://yacysearchserver-pkgs-playground.apps.os.fedorainfracloud.org
> * It's indexed against the 20 first PDC packages:
> https://fnux.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/
>
> * Example
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 22:33, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 21:58 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
>
> [evolution is still crashing. sigh. such is life. apologies for
> formatting, again]
>
> > > So yeah, let's discount the releng folks first, because rele
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 20:49, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 11:52 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
> [up front: apologies for any weird formatting in this email, Evolution
> is crashing on me like crazy while I try to edit it, so I'm sending it
> from Roundcube which I don't
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 23:20, Timothée Floure
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jumping in since I saw this at the top of the web list archive. This
> service is very convenient and I think it would be fairly painful for
> the community to see it disappear. Since we do not have the capacity to
> develop +
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 14:40, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 08:16, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:49:41AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
>> >There is also an historical taste to write in house applications
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 14:16, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:49:41AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> >There is also an historical taste to write in house applications for
> >things that don't really seems critical to the Fedora Project, for
> ex
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 09:47, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 3/31/20 8:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I understand there are practical resource considerations and so on
> > here, but I still think this merits more high level and serious
> > consideration. At the very least, if we have somehow
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 09:34, Julen Landa Alustiza
wrote:
>
>
> 20/4/1 08:42(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 22:41, Robbie Harwood > <mailto:rharw...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Clement Ver
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 22:41, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Clement Verna writes:
>
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> Clement Verna wrote:
> >>
> >> As for Pagure itself, I think this is where we fundamentally
> >> disagree. I think it behooves us to own
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 20:04, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 13:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:44:35AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > I'm sorry, but I have to agree with Kevin and Michael here to a
> > > significant extent. Running our own
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 14:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:10 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> > I just want to give a bit of insight from someone who is working day to
> day on Fedora's infrastructure, since I believe that might help give a bit
> more
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 13:46, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 31. 03. 20 13:09, Clement Verna wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 11:41, Miro Hrončok > <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 31. 03. 20 10:36, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> > > I res
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 11:41, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 31. 03. 20 10:36, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> > I respect that there is disagreement but Gitlab is the choice we are
> making.
>
> I always try to assume good intentions, but this is very hard now. I
> understand
> this statement as follows:
>
>
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 22:55, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:40:13PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:26 PM Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:59:07PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 14:00, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 28. 03. 20 v 1:09 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > Hey, any news on this? I guess the problem is as always time.
> >
> > How far along is it? Could we run a demo/dev version in communishift?
>
> Yes. Time :(
> I have this as huge debt. I will
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 15:33, Clement Verna
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello Clement,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna
>> wrote:
>> >
&
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 15:33, Clement Verna
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello Clement,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna
>> wrote:
>> >
&
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 20:34, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:12 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 3:34 PM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39,
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello Clement,
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production. This version s
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello Clement,
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production. This version s
Hi all,
I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production. This version should improve
the performance of updates creation since the expansive task of tagging
builds in koji has been moved to an async process using a celery workers.
Also this version will also allow the use of side-tags to all
Hi all,
I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production. This version should improve
the performance of updates creation since the expansive task of tagging
builds in koji has been moved to an async process using a celery workers.
Also this version will also allow the use of side-tags to all
Hi all,
Let's look at 5 tickets and rate them using the following categories :
* low-trouble, medium-trouble, high-trouble
* low-gain, medium-gain, high-gain
#6441 Monitoring the worker's queue of pagure -
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6441
Trouble : ?
Gain : ?
#6801 run
-gain=medium-gain=medium-trouble=low-trouble=0_status=
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 14:47, Clement Verna wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the first email with trying to better prioritize our backlog of
> ticket ( https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues ).
>
> So let's look at 5 tic
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 02:45, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 17:00 +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
> > > #7935 Nightlies (Rawhide and Branched) not imported to PDC -
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7935
> > This is too much trouble for low gain, we should direct
+1
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 20:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We have been having the cluster fall over for still unknown reasons,
> but this patch should at least help prevent them:
>
> first we increase the net_ticktime parameter from it's default of 60 to
> 120.
> rabbitmq sends 4 'ticks' to other
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 07:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two updates [1, 2] for which I got email notifications yesterday:
> > This update's test gating status has been changed to 'greenwave_failed'.
>
It means that Greenwave failed to answer to the request sent by
+1 too
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 17:00, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 at 05:17, Adrian Reber wrote:
>
>> Looks correct from my point of view, for both scripts we are now doing:
>>
>> 1. sync everything besides repodata
>> 2. sync everything including (or only) repodata
Hi all,
This is the first email with trying to better prioritize our backlog of
ticket ( https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues ).
So let's look at 5 tickets and rate them using the following categories :
* low-trouble, medium-trouble, high-trouble
* low-gain, medium-gain, high-gain
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:42:12PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Last week during our weekly meeting we have discuss trying to better
> > prioritize our work and tickets. In order to do that we ar
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 17:10, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Current pungi configs are using kickstarts from master branch, instead
> they should use f32 branch.
>
> This should be fixed by:
>
> https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/812
>
> Look at the last change which is this FBR is totally
+1
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 01:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We have been getting complaints from copr users that they are hitting
> out of date cloudfront cached data when they are doing builds.
> We are syncing not all that often currently, and sometimes if a updates
> push or rawhide compose
Hi all,
Last week during our weekly meeting we have discuss trying to better
prioritize our work and tickets. In order to do that we are going to try to
use a "yummy vs trouble" [1] index and use a prioritization matrix [0] to
order our work.
Yummy representing the added value or benefit of a
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 22:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> And our lazyness and indecision pays off!
>
> The autovac is finally done and load should be back to normal.
>
Should we lower down the autovacuum max age ? so that next times it runs it
does not take that long ?
>
> I am going to re-enable
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 18:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 08:17:38AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > I'm fine with 1 or 2, but think we should definitely *not* do 3 unless
> > a) we know quite precisely how long it will take and b) that is
> > substantially faster than the
Hi all,
An XSS vulnerability was reported against Bodhi, I have patched the staging
and production instances [0][1] until I get the fix upstream and deploy a
new release.
[0] -
https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=9b1336960b307a2a81d6232f0ce40f40dfb0f83a
[1] -
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 16:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 08:50:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:43:16AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 07:50:05PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:14, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Despite earlier concerns, this does in fact appear to all be working fine.
>
Yes requesting and building in the side tag should work just fine.
>
> There are now F32 builds going through for all OCaml packages in a
> side tag, and when
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 12:03, Rick Elrod wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:31 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 06:53, Rick Elrod wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd like to apply the following which does:
> >> -
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 06:53, Rick Elrod wrote:
> I'd like to apply the following which does:
> - Adds a script I wrote for reading a timestamp from a file on disk
> and alerting if the timestamp within it is NOT within a particular
> delta to now.
> - Applies this to sundries01 and uses it to
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 09:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:27 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > FMN (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications) is currently one of
> the main blocking point for dropping fedmsg in fa
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 09:17, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 08:26 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > FMN (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications) is currently one of
> the
> > main blocking point for dropping fedmsg in favou
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 09:17, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 08:26 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > FMN (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications) is currently one of
> the
> > main blocking point for dropping fedmsg in favou
Hi all,
FMN (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications) is currently one of the
main blocking point for dropping fedmsg in favour of fedora-messaging.
FMN is quite important to the community and the composition of Fedora
because it gives emails and notifications on commits, composes, builds
Hi all,
FMN (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications) is currently one of the
main blocking point for dropping fedmsg in favour of fedora-messaging.
FMN is quite important to the community and the composition of Fedora
because it gives emails and notifications on commits, composes, builds
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 17:07, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Will anybody be able to explain to me the current state of the
> containers & containerization in Fedora, please?
>
Hi Michal,
As you mention in the points below the current state of building containers
in Fedora needs a lot of
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020, 14:11 Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 05:00:44PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > In an effort to try to spread knowledge on how to do things in the Fedora
> > Infrastructure, let's try to use a How To git repo [0].
>
> Would it be pos
Hi all,
In an effort to try to spread knowledge on how to do things in the Fedora
Infrastructure, let's try to use a How To git repo [0].
The goal is to add there files with the description on How to complete a
certain task. For example I have added a file for How to delete a virtual
instance
Hi all,
I have made a small change to the compose-tracker [0] tool, which is a
fedora-messaging consumer creating tickets in this repo [1] for every
composes that does not complete successfully.
In each ticket you now have access to the time it took for the compose to
run, in addition with the
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 21:50, Richard Fearn wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 17:03, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Thats... much more harsh than I would agree with. I still use it and
> > find some of its information helpfull.
>
> Sadly it does seem to have got a lot worse recently... I noticed last
>
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 20:55, Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 04/02/20 10:29, Miroslav Suchý ha scritto:
> >
> > People are asking for this for years. No one ever had time to do this.
> This make you most competent guy :) Just do it.
> >
> Well, I only have
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 18:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 11:38, Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:18, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> >>
>
> >> these heroics related to pagure?
>
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:56, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 15:56 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza <
> jla...@fedoraproject.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > (snip)
> > >
> > &g
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:18, Julen Landa Alustiza
wrote:
>
>
> 2020(e)ko urtarrilaren 29(a) 15:56:08 (CET)-(e)an, Clement Verna <
> cve...@fedoraproject.org>-(e)k hau idatzi zuen:
> >On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
> >
> >wrote:
>
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:18, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:56:08PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
> > wrote:
> >
> > (snip)
> >
> > 20/1/29 14:49(e
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
wrote:
> (snip)
>
> 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > To me that's the all point of this
> > process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need and then look at
> > the different opt
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 11:36, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 00:08, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 22:06 Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 20:58, Leigh Griffin
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This thread is serving as a source of requirements (although
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 15:37, Ernestas Kulik wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 09:12 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 9:08 AM Ernestas Kulik
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 05:00 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > > > And then there's the issue that we are not upstream and
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 12:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 01. 20 12:19, Neal Gompa wrote:>> We do need a better
> discoverability and
> visibility in the generic
> >> development community. But it is a solvable task: we can create a
> >> read-only mirror of our code on every common platform out
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 11:02, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:05 AM Peter Robinson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 4:59 AM Dan Čermák
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Felix Schwarz writes:
> > >
> > > > Am 21.01.20 um 21:48 schrieb Guido Aulisi:
> > > >> I totally agree with
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 22:32, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:04 pm, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > And any discussion of GitHub isn't going to involve self-hosted, it's
> > going to involve GitHub.com, which means we're talking about losing
> > more of our independence as a
I have applied and deployed this patch.
You should be all set now.
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 14:40, Adam Samalik wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:44 PM Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>> Considering we have CoreOS documentation. I'd like to be able to
>> see the build processes to know when/if they
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020, 18:21 Nicolas Mailhot via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Le mardi 07 janvier 2020 à 17:14 +0100, Iñaki Ucar a écrit :
> >
> > I'm far from having a satisfactory response to that, but I see two
> > fronts here. First, marketing. How does Ubuntu managed to be
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 22:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> As some of you may know, we have been having issues with koji and bodhi
> over the holidays. :( koji would sometimes not tag builds or error them
> with odd error messages and bodhi wasn't pushing updates.
>
> I'm happy to report that the
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019, 09:23 Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Hi guys,
> can someone please tell me what's going on?
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b55ed79892
>
> Thanks!
>
Hi the infra is experiencing some issue [0] which I think is the root cause
of this problem.
Long
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 21:21, Merlin Mathesius wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I've noticed that submitting an EPEL 8 Modular update in bodhi grumbles
> that it "Failed to talk to Greenwave." For example,
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-MODULAR-2019-b3f2d3b5ff
> .
>
> It has been
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 21:49 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 09. 12. 19 18:38, Adam Miller wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:15 AM Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 09. 12. 19 18:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >>> I had a short email conversation with Adam and he doesn't have time to
> maintain
> >>>
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 17:45, Martin Gansser
wrote:
> I mean this field [1]
>
> [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/bohdi/bohdi.png
Hi Martin,
A new version of Bodhi was deployed yesterday. Can you clean your browser
cache and reload the page ?
And let us know if that helps :-)
Hi all,
If you would like to help in solving some of the warnings reported by the
ansible-review tool, there are a few steps on how to run the tool and get
the report in this ticket
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8157#comment-611372
You can send your patch to this list for review
101 - 200 of 430 matches
Mail list logo
