© Copyright 2004-2011 Apple Computer, Inc., Mozilla Foundation, and
Opera Software ASA.
I think that should read, © Copyright 2004-2012.
Hi Ian
Regarding this:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/the-xhtml-syntax.html#the-xhtml-syntax
Can you please change syntax to variant. XHTML is not a syntax or a
serialization.
Thanks
Dean
Hello Lachlan
Regarding this:
Dean Edridge wrote:
HTML5 (not so democratic or balanced) author guidelines: Lachlan Hunt ...
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
This is the second time you have attacked me by calling me not so
democratic or balanced,
Sorry, but this is not true. The not so democratic
inline: image/png___
Pkg-evolution-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-evolution-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-evolution-maintainers
asked for - Dean Edridge wrote:
Can you please read the reasons I have given for my objections and if
you feel the need to respond to me please cc the archive as when I
have dealt with these sorts of issues privately in the past I have
been ignored.
Dean Edridge wrote:
I strongly disagree
shouldn't or
can't be changed. ;-)
--
Dean Edridge
Bonjour Karl!
# # [03:31] karl
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2009Jan/0122.html
# # [03:31] pimpbot Title: Re: Misleading title for XHTML 1.x mime
type document - take three from Dean Edridge on 2009-01-30
(public-xht...@w3.org from January 2009) (at lists.w3.org)
# # [03
] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2009Jan/0122.html
Thanks
--
Dean Edridge
.
Anything that I think needs changing on the spec I send to public-html
or www-archive.
--
Dean Edridge
/feedback he'll change the spec accordingly.
--
Dean Edridge
guess.
--
Dean Edridge
Julian Reschke wrote:
But volume of comments can be an indicator of whether something has
consensus or not.
[...]
... that clearly is not stable, nor has consensus, and also could
*easily* be specified separately.
Consensus among whom?
--
Dean Edridge
Julian Reschke wrote:
Dean Edridge wrote:
So the people in the HTML WG are the only ones contributing to HTML5
then?
Not necessarily.
But if the W3C HTML WG can't decide about what's in an W3C spec and
what's not, why do we have it in the first place?
HTML5 is a joint project between
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:52:12 +0100, Dean Edridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have nothing at all against Mike being pro-active and putting
some thing together and publishing it, it's only the fact that it's
been published at, and endorsed by the W3C that bothers me
Dan Connolly wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 01:16 +1300, Dean Edridge wrote:
Some brief comments on the IRC logs located at:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/f2f/2008-10/
This relates to the face to face meetings in France Oct 2008
Well, it relates to all sorts of things; email threads
work
Ian Hickson wrote:
Having said all that, I think your e-mail would be fine, if you do want
to send it.
Thanks, I've sent it through. :)
--
Dean Edridge
@
public-html-author-guide@
Thanks
--
Dean Edridge
Ian Hickson wrote:
If you are indeed willing to take on editing responsibilities, there are a
number of features I would like to take out of HTML5 and move into their
own spec. Would you be willing to take the timers chapter and edit that?
That is, the section defining setTimeout() and so
Click OK and you're done.
Now you can validate pages that contain CSS3 just by going to the
developer tool bar and selecting Tools = Validate CSS.
[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60
Cheers,
Dean Edridge
James Graham wrote:
Dean Edridge wrote:
It's unfortunate that I'm forced to bring this up in public, but
since I have already expressed my concerns regarding this group
privately with: Ian Hickson, Anne van Kesteren, Lachlan Hunt, Mike
Smith, Chris Wilson and Dan Connolly
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:25:27 +0100, Dean Edridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
There is no the one syntax
But there could be .. *if* there's not already.
In XHTML you want to be allowed to write markup like this:
h:html xmlns:h=http
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:24:19 +0100, Dean Edridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In XHTML you want to be allowed to write markup like this:
h:html xmlns:h=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en
...
For obvious reasons this doesn't work in HTML.
I never said
options in the
future, but that's just my opinion :)
Thanks,
Hope that helps,
--
Dean Edridge
http://www.zealmedia.co.nz/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" grou
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Dean Edridge wrote:
Perhaps you should suggest to the XHTML 2 working group (private, not
open to the public)
Actually the XHTML2 working group is as open as the HTML working group.
Anyone can join.
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/32107
>> but then I get an error saying:
>>
>> 'python' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
>> operable program or batch file.
>> C:\django\testproject>
>>
>> Any help appreciated
>> Thanks, Dean
>>
Thanks a lot Ahik. Tha
Personally, I find 16px text far too large for comfortable reading.
That's fine.
Using firefox? go to:
tools - options - content - Default font: size 14 or even smaller if
it suits you.
--
Dean Edridge
http://www.zealmedia.co.nz
that this is possible.
note: I think the code suggested was originally from: Gunlaug Sørtun
http://www.gunlaug.no
--
Dean Edridge
http://www.zealmedia.co.nz/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http
Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
Wouldn't all those heading sizes would look fairly similar, especially
102%?
Dean Edridge wrote:
Assuming that viewers of your site have not changed the settings on
their software to suit their eyesight or their general preferences is
wrong.
By giving users: body
and has
zero support for XHTML. Hopefully IE8 will support XHTML, but don't hold
your breath.
Dean Edridge
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
David Dorward wrote:
On 10 Aug 2007, at 08:53, Dean Edridge wrote:
But it's not supposed to work in ie5, 6 or 7. It's a XHTML document.
But why? I can't see anything that could not be expressed in HTML in
that document.
Internet Explorer is rubbish
Its improving.
does not support Web
), therefore causing more problems than if you had just left all
the styling in the CSS to begin with. So the long and the short of it
IMO is to just use CSS and rely on the user-agent to show the page the
best it can in the absence of CSS.
regards,
-- Dean Edridge
Benjamin West wrote:
On 3/16/07, Dean Edridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, the chance of someone not being able to access the CSS for
a web
page is I'm guessing, pretty slim.
img style=height: 50px; width: 50px; / Why is accessing CSS a
problem?
-Ben West
I never said
at all, and we might as well just
shove the css into the same html file anyway.
Gareth
On 16 Mar 2007, at 20:27, Benjamin West wrote:
On 3/16/07, Dean Edridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, the chance of someone not being able to access the CSS for
a web
page is I'm guessing, pretty slim
On 12 Mar 2007, at 20:19, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
Case:
td a href=1.htmxyz/a/td
td a href=2.htmxyz-xyz-xyz/a/td
is perfectly valid from some abstract semantic machine
point of view but for human these two cells are not
equal. At least hit area is different. And visual perception too.
All you
34 matches
Mail list logo
