Re: The future of the PyLucene project

My excuse is I'm increasingly bad at reading email. Still using. Still encouraging. On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 9:32 PM Aric Coady wrote: > On Feb 28, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: > > Of course anyone can vote ! > > Anyone interested in this project can and should vote ! > > If no one

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.10.0-rc1

+1 On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:51 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 9.10.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 9.10.0 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.10.0-rc1/ > > PyLucene 9.10.0 is

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.7.0-rc1

+1 On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:39 PM Benjamin Trent wrote: > +1 > > I tested getting ann-benchmarks updated and it worked just fine. Was also > able to build locally and run some tests (non-exhaustive) on my M1 macbook. > > Hope everyone else has the same success! > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 3:47 

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.6.0-rc1

+1 On Mon, May 29, 2023, 4:44 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 9.6.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 9.6.0 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.6.0-rc1/ > > PyLucene 9.6.0 is built

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972790] Re: Can't connect to hotspot created on ubuntu

Also affected. Downgrading to 2.9 worked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972790 Title: Can't connect to hotspot created on ubuntu Status in wpa package in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1972790] Re: Can't connect to hotspot created on ubuntu

Also affected. Downgrading to 2.9 worked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972790 Title: Can't connect to hotspot created on ubuntu Status in wpa package in Ubuntu:

Re: [Tiff] clarification on the fix status for new CVE-2022-3570?

And thank you, Kurt. On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 4:10 PM Kurt Schwehr wrote: > Hi Ellen, > > A side note: (I'm pretty sure I've shared this in the past, but I can't > remember where) > > I use libtiff from head for Google. That way... > > - can report any troubles right away back to the

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.4.1

+1 On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, 3:50 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 9.4.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 9.4.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.4.1-rc1/ > > PyLucene 9.4.1 is built

Bug#1006009: fixed in libwebp 1.2.2-1

Yes, I made a mistake with respect to 1.2.2. Upstream's official patch is here. I am going to attempt a high urgency upload during the next houw with 1.2.2 + this patch. If that fails for any reason, NMU welcome without delay.

Bug#1006009: fixed in libwebp 1.2.2-1

Yes, I made a mistake with respect to 1.2.2. Upstream's official patch is here. I am going to attempt a high urgency upload during the next houw with 1.2.2 + this patch. If that fails for any reason, NMU welcome without delay.

Bug#1003548: transition: libwebp

libwebp 1.2.1-7 has been successfully uploaded to unstable. Anthony and Iustin, help is very strongly appreciated for the NMUs.

Bug#1003548: transition: libwebp

libwebp 1.2.1-7 has been successfully uploaded to unstable. Anthony and Iustin, help is very strongly appreciated for the NMUs.

Bug#1003548: transition: libwebp

# remove the moreinfo tag tags 1003548 - moreinfo thanks Sebastian, may we move forward with ibwebp?

Bug#1003548: transition: libwebp

# remove the moreinfo tag tags 1003548 - moreinfo thanks Sebastian, may we move forward with ibwebp?

Bug#1003548: transition: libwebp

To make it super clear, here is the updated formal request with updated Ben file. === Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello Release Team, We would like to transition libwebp to a new upstream version 1.2.1-6

Bug#1003548: transition: libwebp

To make it super clear, here is the updated formal request with updated Ben file. === Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello Release Team, We would like to transition libwebp to a new upstream version 1.2.1-6

Bug#1003548: transition: libwebp

The package has been corrected with version 1.2.1-6 which has been uploaded to experimental. Please let us know if we can proceed with the upload to unstable. Also a binNMU rebuild of reverse dependencies would be required afterwards.

Bug#1003548: transition: libwebp

The package has been corrected with version 1.2.1-6 which has been uploaded to experimental. Please let us know if we can proceed with the upload to unstable. Also a binNMU rebuild of reverse dependencies would be required afterwards.

looking for new package maintainer, libwebp

I am looking for a new maintainer for the Debian package libwebp. It's a great package, widely used, with a terrific upstream. The current version in Debian is several years old. I have just uploaded a new release to Experimental; there was a soname bump so I suspect it will be in the NEW queue

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.11.0 rc2

+1 On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:33 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The rc1 vote failed because of a bug fix in JCC that helps with detecting > the Temurin JDK - available from https://adoptium.net. > IIUC, the Temurin JDK supercedes AdoptOpenJDK. > > Please vote on PyLucene 8.11.0 rc2 instead. These

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] upcoming transition for webp package

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-02-20 07:57:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > > Jeff Breidenbach writes: > > > > > Dear Debian colleagues, > > > > > > I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] upcoming transition for webp package

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-02-20 07:57:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > > Jeff Breidenbach writes: > > > > > Dear Debian colleagues, > > > > > > I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] upcoming transition for webp package

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-02-20 07:57:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > > Jeff Breidenbach writes: > > > > > Dear Debian colleagues, > > > > > > I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] upcoming transition for webp package

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-02-20 07:57:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > > Jeff Breidenbach writes: > > > > > Dear Debian colleagues, > > > > > > I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct

Bug#914315: libwebp-dev: New versions fix disclosed heap use-after-free

Maintainer is "less active" but still in good contact with upstream. I was going to package the latest version several months ago, but there was a soname bump and transitions were not allowed due to Debian's release cycle. Happy to work with anyone on updating webp.

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.9.0

+1

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

+1 On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 6:35 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.8.1-rc1/ > > PyLucene 8.8.1 is built

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

+1 On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 6:35 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.8.1-rc1/ > > PyLucene 8.8.1 is built

[Pkg-phototools-devel] upcoming transition for webp package

Dear Debian colleagues, I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct dependency in libwebp6. I'm planning to transition it to libweb8. Although I am not expecting any compatibility trouble, previous transitions have not always gone smoothly. So I'm sending this email as a heads up,

upcoming transition for webp package

Dear Debian colleagues, I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct dependency in libwebp6. I'm planning to transition it to libweb8. Although I am not expecting any compatibility trouble, previous transitions have not always gone smoothly. So I'm sending this email as a heads up,

upcoming transition for webp package

Dear Debian colleagues, I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct dependency in libwebp6. I'm planning to transition it to libweb8. Although I am not expecting any compatibility trouble, previous transitions have not always gone smoothly. So I'm sending this email as a heads up,

upcoming transition for webp package

Dear Debian colleagues, I'm writing because you maintain a package with a direct dependency in libwebp6. I'm planning to transition it to libweb8. Although I am not expecting any compatibility trouble, previous transitions have not always gone smoothly. So I'm sending this email as a heads up,

Re: Pylucene patch

+1

Bug#949638: tesseract: uses -march=native

BCC: Stefan Weil since I don't know if he wants his email posted in bugs.debian.org Regarding: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949638 Thank you, Peter. 1. The URL for the patch is 404. 2. There may be some subtlety with -march=native, specifically related to detection of

Bug#949638: tesseract: uses -march=native

BCC: Stefan Weil since I don't know if he wants his email posted in bugs.debian.org Regarding: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949638 Thank you, Peter. 1. The URL for the patch is 404. 2. There may be some subtlety with -march=native, specifically related to detection of

Accepted leptonlib 1.79.0-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 19:02:45 + Source: leptonlib Architecture: source Version: 1.79.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach Closes: 942062 Changes: leptonlib (1.79.0

Bug#942062: liblept5: Please add Multi-Arch support

leptonica-progs also?

[Bug 1720717] Re: Add multiarch metadata to tessaract lib/dev

Hi Derek, I'm not totally up to speed on the Multi-Arch thing. Is this just changing a field in the control file? What's the benefit? Any downside? I saw a similar bug on Debian's bugtracker, that didn't make sense to me. Happy to be educated.

[Bug 1816304] Re: Several issues due to version 4 beta while the final 4.0.0 has been released

This is done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1816304 Title: Several issues due to version 4 beta while the final 4.0.0 has been released To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1777388] Re: Openalpr segfault in libtesseract provided in Bionic

Tesseract is updated - so done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777388 Title: Openalpr segfault in libtesseract provided in Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1802334] Re: update tesseract-ocr to 4.0.0 stable

This is done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802334 Title: update tesseract-ocr to 4.0.0 stable To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Accepted leptonlib 1.78.0-2 (source amd64) into unstable

Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach Description: leptonica-progs - sample programs for Leptonica image processing library liblept5 - image processing library libleptonica-dev - image processing library Closes: 926313 Changes: leptonlib (1.78.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.1.1 (rc2)

+1 On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 5:17 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 8.1.1 (rc2) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 8.1.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.1.1-rc2/ > > PyLucene 8.1.1 is built

Accepted leptonlib 1.78.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable

Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach Description: leptonica-progs - sample programs for Leptonica image processing library liblept5 - image processing library libleptonica-dev - image processing library Changes: leptonlib (1.78.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream

Re: [Gossip] Partial match search

>What type of partial match search is supported on mail-archive? Here's the short and long explanation of search syntax. https://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html#search https://www.mail-archive.com/searching.html ___ Gossip mailing list

Bug#913951: tesseract-ocr: Legacy engine not directly usable because of missing files

Hi Janusz, Tesseract 4 uses tesseract-ocr-deu and tesseract-ocr-script-frak. Tesseract 3 uses tesseract-ocr-deu-frak I am worried about confusing users. If we include both sets of language data in Debian, there will a huge number of choices, and some users might feel overwhelmed. However,

Re: [tesseract-ocr] How to overlay hocr output on original scanned pdf.

Tesseract produces searchable PDF directly. If you really want to use HOCR as an intermediate format, you can but you will need external software. There are a couple of "hocr2pdf" programs floating around and "OCRMyPDF" does an admirable job tying things together. That said, going direct should

[Gossip] The Mail Archive transitioning away from a small business

Dear Friends, The Mail Archive has been running for 20 years. It started as hobby and grew into a small business 14 years ago. We have now come full circle. The business will end on December 31, 2018 and the service will revert to a hobby. What happened? Well, traffic has steadily declined for

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 7.4.0 (rc1)

+1 On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, 11:27 PM Marc Jeurissen wrote: > +1 > > > > Met vriendelijke groeten, > Marc Jeurissen > > [image: cid:image001.png@01D3F728.E95A0620] > > Bibliotheek UAntwerpen > Stadscampus – Ve35.303 > Venusstraat 35 – 2000 Antwerpen > marc.jeuris...@uantwerpen.be > T +32 3 265 49

Bug#904433: tesseract-ocr: please mark as Multi-Arch: foreign

> tesseract-ocr package provides arch-independent service (cli) The command line interface (cli) application 'tesseract' in the tesseract-ocr package is written in C++. It is not architecture independent. Therefore I don't think it should be marked as Multi-Arch: foreign.

test

test

Accepted jhove 1.20.1-4 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:47:35 -0700 Source: jhove Binary: jhove Architecture: source all Version: 1.20.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach Description: jhove

Re: request for help: jhove

Thank you very, very much. https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/jhove

Accepted jhove 1.20.1-3 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:18:42 -0700 Source: jhove Binary: jhove Architecture: source all Version: 1.20.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach Description: jhove

Re: pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

> JCC monkeypatches as needed. I don't think monkey patching worked on Ubuntu 18.04, for any version of JCC that I tried. When running make, I ran into errors discussing how JCC was not built with shared support. > Does Lucene 4 even build and run with Java 11 ? No idea. I halted my efforts

Re: pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

I'd previously been using 4.9.0. Making a huge jump in release numbers is scary. Will it invalidate existing indexes? Has the Lucene API changed a lot? Will I be forced to migrate to python 3? That said, I was desperate and tried all the official releases (4.10.1, 6.2.0, 6.4.1, 6.5.0). It just so

Re: pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

Hi Andi, I am happy to report that I just got 4.10.1 working, using some extreme measures. Whew. Will give a clearer report after getting some sleep. Jeff

Re: pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

And for what it is worth, python-setuptools claims to be version 39.0.1. I've probably spent about 10 to 12 hours trying to get something to work. It is not clear to me if it needs patching to not.

Re: pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

To be a little more specific, here's what happens with version 4.9.0 which I've had good luck with in the past. The system contains the following shared libraries. /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so It looks

pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

I'm having all sorts of trouble getting PyLucene to run on Ubuntu 18.04, which has openjdk-8, openjdk-11, python 2.7.15. Has anyone had success, and if so, with which version of pylucene? Thanks, Jeff

Re: request for help: jhove

I've tried and can't figure out how to make this package either build at the current release, or update to latest release. This is one last desperate call for help. >jhove 1.6+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-05-14 > >It is affected by these RC bugs: >895761: jhove: FTBFS

Bug#898439: leptonlib: CVE-2018-7442

Believed fixed in Debian package 1.76.0-1 Status of various vulnerabilities, as per upstream: * CVE-2018-7442: potential injection attack because '/' is allowed in gplot rootdir. Functions using this command have been disabled by default in the

Accepted leptonlib 1.76.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 12:47:10 -0700 Source: leptonlib Binary: libleptonica-dev liblept5 leptonica-progs Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.76.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.

Bug#849094: liblept5: Broken on s390x (+ other big endian archs)

Tesseract in Debian just added a build time smoke test AND Stefan fixed the big-endian problem. Should be live tomorrow in Sid. Assuming that works well, Graham should be able to re-activate the disabled OCRMyPDF tests. Note that this is Debian only; Ubuntu 18.04 is out the door so no longer

Re: request for help: jhove

I'd love to actually update to the most recent upstream. The build system switched from ant to maven, and I am completely unfamiliar with it. First, I got a fatal error about not finding org.sonatype.oss:oss-parent:pom, so I tried deleting that section of the pom.xml. Then the build can't find

Re: request for help: jhove

I'd love to actually update to the most recent upstream. The build system switched from ant to maven, and I am completely unfamiliar with it. First, I got a fatal error about not finding org.sonatype.oss:oss-parent:pom, so I tried deleting that section of the pom.xml. Then the build can't find

request for help: jhove

I'm the Debian package maintainer for jhove, which is an image validator and really useful for libraries and other cultural heritage institutions. It is about to get kicked out due to bug #895761. The right thing to do is update the jhove to the current upstream version. However, I haven't

Bug#849094: liblept5: Broken on s390x (+ other big endian archs)

Given the date, it sounds like we have an emergency situation. I'm really stuck here. My only known access to a big endian is an emulator with Wheezy. http://create.stephan-brumme.com/big-endian/ That's good enough for checking suspicious parts of Leptonica. I tried and found nothing. But

Accepted leptonlib 1.75.3-4 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 22:40:05 +0200 Source: leptonlib Binary: libleptonica-dev liblept5 leptonica-progs Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.75.3-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.

Bug#895761: jhove: FTBFS with java 9

I think the right thing is to update to the latest jhove release (1.20) but looks like the build system has changed dramatically. Would love to get a little help from someone who works with Java packages on a more regular basis.

Bug#895761: jhove: FTBFS with java 9

I think the right thing is to update to the latest jhove release (1.20) but looks like the build system has changed dramatically. Would love to get a little help from someone who works with Java packages on a more regular basis.

Bug#895864: leptonlib: needs config.guess/sub update for riscv64

Okay, uploading now. Thanks for all the help! On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo < manuel.montez...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2018-04-23 23:22 GMT+02:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo > : > > > > This additionally runs the tests, > > can be

Bug#895864: leptonlib: needs config.guess/sub update for riscv64

Is it sufficient to put Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 11.0.0) in debian/control and 11 in debian/compat ?

Bug#895761: jhove: FTBFS with java 9

Taking a look

Bug#895761: jhove: FTBFS with java 9

Taking a look

Accepted leptonlib 1.75.3-3 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 12:04:13 -0800 Source: leptonlib Binary: libleptonica-dev liblept5 leptonica-progs Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.75.3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.

Bug#885704: liblept5 negatively plays with paths in /tmp when opening TIFFs

It is possible that older versions are not vulnerable. $ sudo apt-get install leptonica-progs $ TMPDIR=/var/tmp fileinfo /tmp/foo.jpg Error in fopenReadStream: file not found Error in pixReadHeader: image file not found Error in writeImageFileInfo: failure to read header of /tmp/foo.jpg $

Accepted libwebp 0.6.1-2 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 12:51:06 -0800 Source: libwebp Binary: libwebp-dev libwebp6 libwebpmux3 libwebpdemux2 webp Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.6.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach &l

Accepted tesseract 4.00~git2219-40f43111-1.2 (source amd64 all) into unstable

Maintainer: Alexander Pozdnyakov <alm...@mail.ru> Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.org> Description: libtesseract-dev - Development files for the tesseract command line OCR tool libtesseract4 - Tesseract OCR library tesseract-ocr - Tesseract command line OCR tool tesse

Accepted tesseract-lang 4.00~git24-0e00fe6-1.2 (source all) into unstable

hanged-By: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.org> Description: tesseract-ocr-afr - tesseract-ocr language files for Afrikaans tesseract-ocr-amh - tesseract-ocr language files for Amharic tesseract-ocr-ara - tesseract-ocr language files for Arabic tesseract-ocr-asm - tesseract-ocr language files

Re: upload leptonlib

>Was upstream's position also to remove those binaries? Yes. >Upstream was unable to provide a patch? Yes. Upstream decided that it was not worth the time to make a patch. Leptonica is a large image processing library. It also contains source code for many (over 200) example programs that use

Re: upload leptonlib

>So these files should be also removed from the package in wheezy and jessie? Yes.

Accepted tesseract 4.00~git2207-766b7bd6-3.1 (source amd64 all) into unstable

Maintainer: Alexander Pozdnyakov <alm...@mail.ru> Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.org> Description: libtesseract-dev - Development files for the tesseract command line OCR tool libtesseract4 - Tesseract OCR library tesseract-ocr - Tesseract command line OCR tool tesse

Re: Wheezy update of leptonlib?

There a multiple email threads about leptonlib. I'll be as responsive as I can to them, but LTS team should take the lead.

Accepted tesseract-lang 4.00~git22-b2832c5-1.1 (source all) into unstable

hanged-By: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.org> Description: tesseract-ocr-afr - tesseract-ocr language files for Afrikaans tesseract-ocr-amh - tesseract-ocr language files for Amharic tesseract-ocr-ara - tesseract-ocr language files for Arabic tesseract-ocr-asm - tesseract-ocr language files

Re: upload leptonlib

These binaries were removed in #830660. >$ strings /usr/bin/printsplitimage | grep ^/tmp/ >/tmp/split >$ strings /usr/bin/splitimage2pdf | grep ^/tmp/ >/tmp/junk_split_image.ps prune_unsafe_binaries.diff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Bug#885704: liblept5 negatively plays with paths in /tmp when opening TIFFs

This is the patch I used for Leptonica 1.74. It should work fine for earlier versions. Upstream used a different approach for addressing the problem in version 1.75. do-not-mess-with-paths.diff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: upload leptonlib

The remaining hardcoded /tmp filenames are believed to be in test and debug code paths.

Accepted libwebp 0.6.1-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:17:57 -0800 Source: libwebp Binary: libwebp-dev libwebp6 libwebpmux3 libwebpdemux2 webp Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.6.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach &l

Bug#849094: emulator

I've been running a PowerPC emulator to track down a different bug. Not so hard. But it is not fast. Anything specific (and small) that we want to test for this bug? http://create.stephan-brumme.com/big-endian/

Accepted leptonlib 1.75.3-2 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:26:11 -0800 Source: leptonlib Binary: libleptonica-dev liblept5 leptonica-progs Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.75.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.

Bug#890548: Stack buffer overflows

This is just about strings, right? So something like this will fix the problem and resolve this bug? Or am I missing something? char buf[L_BUF_SIZE]; - fscanf(fp, "Rootname: %s\n", buf); + fscanf(fp, "Rootname: %L_BUF_SIZE_MINUS_ONEs%\n", buf);

Bug#890548: Stack buffer overflows

This is just about strings, right? So something like this will fix the problem and resolve this bug? Or am I missing something? char buf[L_BUF_SIZE]; - fscanf(fp, "Rootname: %s\n", buf); + fscanf(fp, "Rootname: %L_BUF_SIZE_MINUS_ONEs%\n", buf);

Accepted leptonlib 1.75.3-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:36:53 -0800 Source: leptonlib Binary: libleptonica-dev liblept5 leptonica-progs Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.75.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.

Accepted tesseract 4.00~git2188-cdc35338-5 (source amd64 all) into unstable

Maintainer: Alexander Pozdnyakov <alm...@mail.ru> Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.org> Description: libtesseract-dev - Development files for the tesseract command line OCR tool libtesseract4 - Tesseract OCR library tesseract-ocr - Tesseract command line OCR tool tesseract-ocr-all

Accepted tesseract-lang 4.00~git15-45ed289-6 (source all) into unstable

hanged-By: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.org> Description: tesseract-ocr-afr - tesseract-ocr language files for Afrikaans tesseract-ocr-amh - tesseract-ocr language files for Amharic tesseract-ocr-ara - tesseract-ocr language files for Arabic tesseract-ocr-asm - tesseract-ocr language files

Bug#889590: tesseract-ocr-aze has circular Depends on tesseract-ocr-aze-cyrl

Hi Bill, Thanks for the bug report. This is a little tricky, because if you only install one of the Azerbaijan language packages, the user will see error messages. I guess we just don't have a mechanism in Debian for "if you install one, you need the other as well". That's unfortunate because it

Bug#889610: tesseract-ocr-srp-latn: uninstallable in sid: Depends: tesseract-srp (>= 3.99) which is unknown

Thanks will fix ASAP. On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: tesseract-ocr-srp-latn > Version: 4.00~git15-45ed289-5 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your

Bug#889610: tesseract-ocr-srp-latn: uninstallable in sid: Depends: tesseract-srp (>= 3.99) which is unknown

Thanks will fix ASAP. On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: tesseract-ocr-srp-latn > Version: 4.00~git15-45ed289-5 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your

Accepted tesseract-lang 4.00~git15-45ed289-5 (source all) into unstable

-script-taml tesseract-ocr-script-telu tesseract-ocr-script-thaa tesseract-ocr-script-thai tesseract-ocr-script-tibt tesseract-ocr-script-viet Architecture: source all Version: 4.00~git15-45ed289-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach <j...@debian.org> Changed-By

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >