On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> 1. Suitability for dist-git and src.fedoraproject.org replacement
Can someone explain me what is the problem of pagure ?
please join to
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/2024-git-forge-evaluation/111795/20
Thanks
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 14:53 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When is Fedora 38 going EOL?
>
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html say
> s today
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-tasks.html say
> next week
>
> Which one is correct?
Bodhi
On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 17:00 -0600, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3
> >
>
> What the heck? This should have been gimp2 for the old version, not
> gi
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3
On Wed, 2024-05-08 at 20:43 +0200, Josef Řídký wrote:
> I believe once the GIMP 3.0 is out the Fedora version will follow
> almost immediately.
>
> Josef
> GIMP co-maintainer
>
> Dne po 6. 5. 2024 22:13 uživatel Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>
On Sat, 2024-05-11 at 13:19 +0100, John Pilkington via rpmfusion-users
wrote:
> On 09/05/2024 14:37, John Pilkington wrote:
> > Hi: I have F40 and kde on two boxes with nvidia cards that worked
> > well
> > with 470xx in F38 and before. A post on the fedora-kde list
> > suggested
> > switching
On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 07:53 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 04.05.2024 um 05:41 schrieb Sérgio Basto :
> >
> > Hi,
> > About this documentation [0], finally talks about rescue a
> > bootloader
> > with live images ... (but I will wrote about that i
Hi,
About this documentation [0], finally talks about rescue a bootloader
with live images ... (but I will wrote about that in another time)
I run in trouble on cloning a disk from an old computer and starting
booting on a new computer , security get the thing more complicated, I
had to disable
On Sat, 2024-01-06 at 05:31 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> smplayer is moving to Fedora
>
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256940
Hi,
smplayer was build for Fedora 39+, F38 is almost EOL so it was skipped.
and also built smplayer for EPEL 9. Fedora EPEL 8 a
On Tue, 2024-04-16 at 19:22 +, Vadim Galitsin via vbox-dev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today Oracle released VirtualBox 7.0.16, a maintenance release of
> VirtualBox 7.0 which improves stability and fixes regressions.
>
> See the change log at
>
> https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog-7.0
>
Hi,
wdune is FTBFS on F40 and FTI on F41 and I haven't time to fix it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261785
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276277
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list --
I happily announce that RPM Fusion Fedora 40 is General Available (GA).
Thank you all that make it happen .
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-users mailing list -- rpmfusion-users@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I happily announce that RPM Fusion Fedora 40 is General Available (GA).
Thank you all that make it happen .
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, 2024-04-17 at 21:51 -0500, Michel Lind wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> protobuf was recently orphaned without any announcement to this list.
>
> I've picked it up since et depends on it.
>
Update protobuf is a huge task
see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/26 ( move
from
nvidia-470xx-470.239.06 was pushed to nonfree-updates-testing
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 18:13 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
>
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6904
>
> On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 09:34 +, alexprengere--- via rpmfusion-
> users
>
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6904
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 09:34 +, alexprengere--- via rpmfusion-users
wrote:
> I am hitting the exact issue described at [1], meaning installing the
> nvidia legacy drivers from rpmfusion (470.223) fail to compile on
> Linux 6.7/6.8+.
>
>
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 10:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
>
I think is this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263180
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
>
> [+] All set and ready to build.
>
Following Fabio Valentini tip ,
One thing you *could* try is do a new side-tag and move the builds to
there .
and example of move build :
koji move-build epel8-testing-candidate epel8-build-side-52356
ImageMagick-6.9.12.44-1.el8
On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 11:46 +0200, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
a fix for nvidia 340x was posted today ,
for Fedora 40 we don't have these kmod nvidias because it fail to build
with gcc14 .
Please someone which have these graphics try fix it ASAP
Thank you
On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 14:23 +0100, John Pilkington via rpmfusion-users
wrote:
> For info:
>
> I
On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 15:15 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm revisting the topic of rpmautospec because I was doing some work
> on various packages, and it's annoying that some packages are using
> rpmautospec and others are not.
>
> All my packages have been
On Fri, 2024-03-08 at 16:19 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For mingw-* packages we (sometimes) have a separate package from the
> native package, eg. libgcrypt vs mingw-libgcrypt. Therefore two
> different packages are sometimes built with the exact same sources.
>
> However I discovered
On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 23:34 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 18:17 -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
> > I propose we start with fully vendoring the Docker stack. As I
> > said, parts of moby-engine are already bundled, and so are podman,
> > kubernetes, cri-o,
>
On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 18:17 -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
> I propose we start with fully vendoring the Docker stack. As I said,
> parts of moby-engine are already bundled, and so are podman,
> kubernetes, cri-o,
TL DR;
yeah I was think about do that to containerd , use vendor, instead of
hell of
And in F40 ? compat-ffmpeg5 will be dropped also ?
On Sat, 2024-03-23 at 13:00 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:
> commit b9f004a649292480fd6649f0123ca275b4cad6f1
> Author: Leigh Scott
> Date: Sat Mar 23 12:00:56 2024 +
>
> No longer needed
>
> .gitignore | 2 -
>
Hi,
Some days ago I notice that shogun-data still in Fedora [1] but shogun
is retired for 4 years [2], just run `fedpkg retire DESCRIPTION` is
enough ?
Thank you,
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shogun-data
[2]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shogun
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 14:22 +0100, Allan via devel wrote:
> På Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:09:26 -0400
> "Garry T. Williams" skrev:
> > On Monday, March 18, 2024 4:46:01 PM EDT Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 16:17 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> >
On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 16:17 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 4:06:46 AM EDT Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> > Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > > I hope my report can be resolved before I am forced to use
> > > Wayland.
> >
> > You will not be forced to use Wayland.
vips-8.15.1-4.fc41
webkit2gtk4.0-2.42.5-3.fc41
webkitgtk-2.43.4-5.fc41
xine-lib-1.2.13-13.fc41
On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 01:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> new try, now with version 0.10.2
>
> side-tag: f41-build-side-85651
>
>
> On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:14 -0600, Micha
missing in Fedora and CMake wants
> to
> download them during RPM build.
> - In Fedora 41+, EmptyEpsilon actives experimental code of GLM-1.0.1;
> so, we need to bundle GLM-0.9.9.8
> - EmptyEpsilon looks running fine in Fedora 39 x86_64
>
> Do you want to try it before commit
new try, now with version 0.10.2
side-tag: f41-build-side-85651
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:14 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14 2024 at 09:38:39 PM +00:00:00, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > I found "cc1plus: out of memory allocating 603 bytes after a
> >
On Mon, 2024-03-11 at 15:11 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 04:07 Jerry James wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 10:38 AM Orion Poplawski
> > wrote:
> > > I'm starting to see this building perl-Alien-CFITSIO in F40 (not
> > > rawhide):
> > >
> > > + cd
icamerasrc
Package: jellyfin
Package: lha
Package: lxdream
Package: lxdvdrip
Package: mamory
Package: mate-applet-streamer
Package: swftools
Package: tilem
Package: x264
On Sat, 2024-03-09 at 19:31 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I lost all recent mail about this sub
I lost all recent mail about this subject and also
https://lists.rpmfusion.org/archives/list/rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org/2024/1/
F40 Mass rebuild in RPM Fusion original message is from 2024-01-25
https://www.mail-archive.com/rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org/msg27581.html
I
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 11:15 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:27 +, Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_plat
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:27 +, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> >
> > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --
> >
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 22:32 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 10:34 -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > On 3/5/24 10:06, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 7:10 AM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tu
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 21:36 +, Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> > The Fedora gstreamer maintainers regularly and actively update and
> > maintain the GST stack, I'm not sure what a message with just a
> > link
> > provides, did you have a particular query you wanted answered about
> > the release
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 10:34 -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 3/5/24 10:06, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 7:10 AM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 07:59 -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > > > On 3
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 07:59 -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 3/4/24 11:49, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We can't build webkitgtk on i686 lately.
> >
> > webkitgtk is in critical path and break rawhide composes, if fail
> > to
> >
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 03:28 +, Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> https://www.phoronix.com/news/GStreamer-1.24-Released
AFAIK Fedora can't have H264 neither H265 decoding or encoding because
these codecs are patented and have royalties and you don't have way to
get around.
The solution is to use
Hi,
We can't build webkitgtk on i686 lately.
webkitgtk is in critical path and break rawhide composes, if fail to
install [1] , so we can't soname bump jpegXL
As reported in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11775
seems that downgrade kernel from 6.7.4-200 to 6.6.14-200 fixes the
Hi,
as reported in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11775
we can't build webkitgtk on i686 which is in critical path and break
rawhide compose if is not built [1]
downgrade kernel from 6.7.4-200 to 6.6.14-200 fixes the builds on i686
[1]
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11952
--
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 08:22 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> I don't think you can revert to such an older version that way and
> still assume spotify to still work.
> Better not to support el8 for spotify, unless you can get a copr
> repository with the needed deps.
>
It works, I tested first .
On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 19:19 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Petr Pisar wrote on 2024/02/29 18:35:
> > V Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:02:32AM +0100, Jos de Kloe napsal(a):
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > while doing koji builds for the latest eccodes version 2.34.1 I
> > > ran in to an
> > > issue that is
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 09:47 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > >
> > > # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
> > > ...
> > > No match for group package "multican"
> > > ...
> > >
> > > WTH?
> >
>
On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 12:57 -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 08:04, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> >
> > > No. This is one
On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 09:17 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:04 AM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 20:14 +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 7:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 16:28 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 15:32 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I've seeing:
> >
> > INFO:anaconda.modules.payloads.payload.dnf.transaction_progress:Ins
> > talled:
> > glibc-common-2.39.9000-
> > 1.fc41.x86_64 1708040026
> >
On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 20:14 +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 7:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin
> > >
> >
> > One additional item to
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 23:45 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 4:25 PM Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
> >
>
> (snip)
>
> >
> > I see this somehow connected to the discussion about signing keys
> > that
> > we had recently. A radical solution would be: branch rawhide, not
> >
On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 14:01 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Orion Poplawski:
>
> > It seems that numpy is defining a uint32_t type as long unsigned
> > int
> > on i686, while glibc(?) is defining it as unsigned int. Now what
> > puzzles me a little is that on i686 aren't these both 4-byte
> >
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 15:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 13:38 +, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> > Why branched config pointed to rolling config?
> > # ls -ln | grep fedora-40
> > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-aarch64.cfg ->
> &
Hi,
I happily announce that RPMFusion f40 branch is ready to use
if you find any problem, please let us know.
Happy hacking,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-users mailing list -- rpmfusion-users@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
I happily announce that RPMFusion f40 branch is ready to use
if you find any problem, please let us know.
Happy hacking,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 12:57 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> I checked the build log for
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113473592 but
> unfortunately I don't actually see any error message. I searched for
> "error:" (indicating a compiler error) and I also searched
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:41 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 2:53 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:28 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon ,
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 13:38 +, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> Why branched config pointed to rolling config?
> # ls -ln | grep fedora-40
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-aarch64.cfg ->
> fedora-rawhide-aarch64.cfg
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 23 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-i386.cfg ->
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:28 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon , the goal
> is
> finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
> have any objection that prevent to proceeding.
>
As we already h
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 16:53 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:23 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to bring to your attention that Fedora would benefit with
> > update of exiv2 [1] and protobuf [2] but these packag
Hi,
I'd like to bring to your attention that Fedora would benefit with
update of exiv2 [1] and protobuf [2] but these packages have lots of
dependencies and the update of the dependent packages is not trivial .
tips, ideas and opinions ? to do these soname updates
thank you
[1]
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
have any objection that prevent to proceeding.
Best regards,
[1]
dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo={rpmfusion-{non,}free-,}rawhide
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:21 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Friday, 9 February 2024 11:53:01 CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > so you agree that are giving the overhead to us (the people who
> > want
> > keep X11 as it is )
>
> Yes!!! OF COURSE!
>
> If you
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 22:04 -0500, Steve Cossette wrote:
> I
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:51 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > &g
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> > > We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_
> > >
Hi,
Can someone approve
https://salsa.debian.org/umlaeute/aubio/-/merge_requests/1 ? and build
it ?
How approves works ?
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/performous is marked for autoremoval on
13 March due to aubio: #1061736
Thank you,
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 16:06 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Bast
On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_ it.
you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately , when
many people , members of Fedora on devel mailing list, express that
they want have X11 , in fact we have
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 17:56 +0100, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today I found out an interesting difference between Koji and COPR.
> autowrap package has this in its specfile:
>
> Requires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-Cython%{?_isa}
>
> Which is incorrect for noarch package but hold on.
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:30 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:48 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > >
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1].
> > Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't
> > touch
> > th
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
> > finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me kno
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
> finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
> have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
>
mass rebuild started on s
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 03:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It's extremely obvious that people want to use it. You replied to
> > someone who did and denigrated their opinion. Frankly, I'm
> > disappointed in your response as well as the tone of you and Kevin.
>
> I
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list --
, repo = f40-free
Package: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia, repo = f40-nonfree
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 12:37 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 09:46 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > As the m
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 14:42 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > Fedora still ships the previous release, server 1.20.x
>
> So should we not upgrade that to the latest upstream release (Xorg
> 21.0)?
I'm working on one pull request
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 01:34 -0600, Jonathan Bennett via devel wrote:
> Hey folks, outside observer, and long-time Fedora user weighing in
> with
> some thoughts. First off, I've been hyped to see Fedora lead the way
> with finally making a real move to Wayland, and retire X11. And now
> I'm
>
On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 15:31 +0100, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 01.02.24 um 14:18 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
>
>
> > The problem is not KDE SIG not support X11, the problem is KDE SIG
> > want
> > drop X11 and force user to use wayland .
>
>
> Looking f
t have helped. What I'm trying to say basically is, I get that for
> some legacy nvidia users the Wayland experience may not be optimal.
> But will it ever be? Does that mean we can never drop x11? Will
> anyone ever update those legacy nvidia drivers? Could they be?
>
> Le
On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 09:57 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 1/30/24 08:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:38:51AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > 3) Fedora has a long-standing and well-communicated stance that
> > > we are
> > > a Wayland distribution first
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 16:33 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2024-01-29 16:00, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_rawhide_is_allowed_to_lag_temporarily
> >
> > you may do a new build with lowe
Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
and I'm very upset
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 15:43 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> nirik ran a script that checks for versioning issues in Rawhide
> today,
> and it found several:
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11922#comment-893797
>
> Some of these followed a pattern, so I figured a reminder was in
> order.
> In
On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 15:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ben Beasley
> wrote:
> > Blender already excludes i686:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender/blob/8088da10c20e53ab0e1dd5de6fd3a2344bd288aa/f/blender.spec#_207
> >
> > So does prusa-slicer:
> >
Hi,
Unfortunately, I pushed the commit to rawhide when I just wanted just
it to my fork first and make one PR.
Anyway, lxc was ready to go and also lxc is a leaf package so the
impact should be small (otherwise it would have already reverted it).
So I triggered the build but if there is any
Hi,
MLT failed to build [2] with [1] , what do you suggest ?
Best regards,
[1]
builddir/build/BUILD/mlt-7.22.0/src/modules/gdk/pixops.c: In function
‘scale_line_22_yuv’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/mlt-7.22.0/src/modules/gdk/pixops.c:188:1:
internal compiler error: in backward_pass, at
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 17:38 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> lmms thm
I fixed the build , I base it on opensuse packages
https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP6/lmms?linkrev=base=9
> lxc hguemar,
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 09:46 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> As the mass rebuild is currently occurring in fedora we'd better wait
> for it's publication , also there are probably some pending ABI
> update
> in fedora side waiting for the mass rebuilt to
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 05:05 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:01 AM Miroslav Suchý
> wrote:
> >
> > Dne 24. 01. 24 v 10:51 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
> > >
> > > All other milestones remain the same at this time and the
> > > published schedule[4] has been updated to reflect
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 15:50 +0530, Samyak Jain wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora Linux f40 schedule [1] we started a mass rebuild on
> 2024-01-17 for Fedora f40 but due to various reasons such as dnf
> issues, and other side-tags not getting merged we had to stop it.
> But we finally managed to
I prefer handle https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2362 and
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1929
since I don't use it but I found many people that use _without (wrongly)
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 09:13 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > You got mass rebuild script here [1] in massrebuildsinfo.py [2] you
> > may
> > define what packages you are going to rebuild , in line 93 of
> > ma
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 00:21 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:10, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them
> > > in
> > > the
we can use : rpmbuild --without check
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/316#issuecomment-1899391222
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 14:50 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Given the problems we had with font packages not being rebuilt in the
> last mass rebuild, can we ensure that the mass rebuild script uses
> "git push --no-verify" instead of plain "git push"?
>
> See:
> -
On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 14:01 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The f40-build-side-81394 side-tag contains new
> gcc, annobin, libtool and redhat-rpm-config for f40, meant to be
> tagged into rawhide shortly before the mass rebuild.
>
> If there is anything you'd like to rebuild against it
On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 00:52 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On 10/01/2024, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > -- Forwarded message -
> > Från: Luna Jernberg
> > Date: ons 10 jan. 2024 kl 03:02
> > Subject: Virtualbox for Linux 6.7
> > To: , ,
> > , Luna Jernberg
> >
> >
> >
> > Hey!
> >
it is an known bug , you need an old koji client , I use centos 7 vm
or apply this [1] on /usr/lib/python3.11/site-
packages/koji_cli/commands.py
[1]
https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/3889#request_diff
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 10:13 +, Martin Gansser via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
>
smplayer is moving to Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256940
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
1 - 100 of 3737 matches
Mail list logo
