I understand it. And we changed dpkg to
never delete the symlinks when no package ships the /bin directory anymore so it
also shouldn't be a problem if all packages that used to ship /bin etc/ are
upgraded before base-files is upgraded.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
t is in direct contradiction with a standard is definitely
non-compliant. Whether it works or not is not relevant for that.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:14:20 +0100
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common
Architecture: source
Version: 4.0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian SOGo Maintainers
Changed-By: Jeroen Dekkers
Description:
sogo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:35:43 +0100
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 4.0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian SOGo Maintainers
Changed-By: Jeroen Dekkers
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 22:30:40 +0100
Source: sbjson
Binary: libsbjson2.3 libsbjson-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian SOGo Maintainers
Changed-By: Jeroen Dekkers
ocode by default is in my opinion
in direct conflict with that users are our priority and that "we will
provide an integrated system of high-quality materials", but that's
probably a slightly different subject because it is not required to be
on the installation medium.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
comes pre-installed doesn't mean it is free. And
if it is also impossible to replace the software you also can't update
it with a free version so the user has even less freedom than when you
can replace the software with something else.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
es, so
disabling it by default seems to be just privacy theater to me.
(I.e. it's a inconvenient measure that gives a feeling that Debian
does something for privacy but in practice doesn't really do much to
achieve that, similar to security theater)
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
sed on file extension using the foxhole rules
for clamav (http://sanesecurity.com/foxhole-databases/). And clamav
can probably also be used to automatically clean the bug archive of
such messages.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 15:15:55 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 3.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers <jer...@dekkers.ch>
Changed-By: Jeroen Dekker
same way as mailman 2 then it
should do same as mailman 2 and recommend "default-mta |
mail-transport-agent" and should not suggest or recommend postfix.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
doesn't mean it is perfect and we should
never change anything again. It is still a good idea to look how
things can be done better. And the way people administrate systems
also change, nowadays it is for example a lot more common to put
configuration in a configuration management system compared to 15
years ago.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
needs
to be fixed? Do we then get forks of libraries that have only 30 lines
of code, everybody has to update their dependencies to get the fixed
version, etc.? That is also overhead you wouldn't have with a standard
library maintained by a group of developers.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
At Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:11:48 -0400,
Marvin Renich wrote:
>
> * Jeroen Dekkers <jer...@dekkers.ch> [150924 07:23]:
> > At Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:53:11 -0400,
> > Marvin Renich wrote:
> > > I think it should be documented in the developers reference that if you
let the user know that something went wrong. Just
printing an error message isn't enough, because the user might not see
that (for example when multiple packages are installed/upgraded and a
later package asks some questions using dialog or when using
unattended-upgrades).
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
quot; and "apt-get --reinstall install cron"? Because until they do they
also won't get any automatic security updates...
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
y if we're talking
about javascript?
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
a „tcpdump -i eth0” is the right
command.
I think people who know how to use tcpdump will also be able to type
in ip addr to look up the device name they want to dump.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:23:21 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg sogo-openchange
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2.17a-1
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 01:19:32 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.17-1
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
At Sun, 05 Apr 2015 22:12:02 +0200,
David Douard wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Douard david.dou...@logilab.fr
* Package name: libnacl
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Thomas S Hatch tha...@saltstack.com
* URL :
such as grub.
Regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87384lbgmc.wl%jer...@dekkers.ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:42:55 +0100
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.14-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:42:41 +0100
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg sogo-openchange
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2.14-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 15:20:57 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg sogo-openchange
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2.9+git20141017-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer
seem to have any problem with
that.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87wq83lt6p.wl%jer...@dekkers.ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:53:51 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:45:20 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg sogo-openchange
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2.9+git20141009-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 21:24:51 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed
At Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:51:56 +0200,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Brian May (2014-09-23 08:02:22)
On 29 July 2014 19:04, Jeroen Dekkers [1]jer...@dekkers.ch wrote:
As far as I can see this is a bug in the apache2 packaging. The httpd
virtual package should be provided
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:35:52 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
with the necessary files:
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/stateless.html
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/878un6mx6o.wl%jer
At Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:17:43 -0700,
tony mancill wrote:
I contacted the upstream author (on the cc: - hi Frank), and his concern
with the passphraseless key trigger mechanism is precisely that you
don't have a passphrase. The key is unprotected and subject to
theft/unauthorized use. This
a proxying
server such as apache or nginx (similar to for example php-fpm).
So as far as I can see, the correct dependency should be:
Depends: libapache2-mod-wsgi | httpd-wsgi, apache2 | httpd
So it also possible to run other webservers.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
whether
the apache2-data packages is available? Detecting that the purge
happens after the upgrade can probably be done by checking which
package owns the configuration files.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:33:46 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed
/certificates or need to
fake DNSSEC. For HTTPS it would need to have a certificate for
people.debian.org that the client trusts.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
At Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:26:38 +0200,
Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 12 juillet 2014 23:08 +0100, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com :
And I've got to ask: for the couple of trivial examples that Frederick
pointed out - why on earth do these even exist as libraries instead of
being inlined
it is
dual-licensed.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87vbr1y2va.wl%jer...@dekkers.ch
a
transitional package in jessie it might be a better candidate. Then
you would have to move it again in the jessie package, but I'm afraid
there aren't any easy solutions.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 14:17:08 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 14:20:53 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg sogo-openchange
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 21:12:12 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg sogo-openchange
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
At Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:20:24 +0200,
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
You have not yet explained why apt pinning is not enough.
Simply because apt is not the only way to install packages.
Don't synaptic and/or whatever honor these pins too?
I have no idea about synaptic, but there’s e.g.
At Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:13:31 +0100,
Wookey wrote:
+++ Lars Wirzenius [2014-07-01 18:34 +0100]:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:23:01PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
You get a choice of 'prevent-systemd' which stops it running as init
but allows the -shim and libpam packages so that logind and the like
At Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:35:39 +0200,
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 10:30 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
The buildd-related software (and most people when doing manual builds
with cowbuilder) uses “apt-get source foo” to download the file, fully
assuming that apt-get
At Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:36:16 +0200,
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
That being said, sometimes you just need the binary equivalent of an
uncompressible Lorem Ipsum text (dd if=/dev/urandom), but IMHO the kernel
could (and should) provide a device for that.
If you just want to overwrite something with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 21:34:11 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 01:47:37 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg sogo-openchange
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
are working hard to get systemd working right in Debian
feel when reading such statements.
And while we as Debian can't do much about upstream maintainers not
being nice, we can at least try to set a good example by being nice
ourself...
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
not only
dislike systemd, but also it's maintainers.
Why are you blaming the systemd maintainers for decisions made by the
GNOME maintainers about GNOME?
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
and mere facts aren't copyrightable.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87lhu6ao0k.wl%jer...@dekkers.ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 00:09:03 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg sogo-openchange
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2.3-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
:
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/w/wget/wget_1.15-1_copyright
Jeroen Dekkers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87lhupb47v.wl%jer
the javascript
libraries are already packaged in Debian, then it isn't possible that
something bad sneaks in our packages. So why repack the upstream
tarball?
I don't really see any value in repacking every upstream tarball that
has a minified copy of jQuery.
Kind regards,
Jeroen Dekkers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 19:31:49 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:43:45 +0100
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 17:40:18 +0100
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 23:15:41 +0100
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.1.1b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 20:07:08 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.0.7-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:32:13 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 20:18:06 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 02:04:16 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.0.5a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:08:45 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:47:43 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:19:26 +0100
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.0.4b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:53:29 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.16-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:55:17 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.3.16-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:09:28 +0200
Source: sbjson
Binary: libsbjson2.3 libsbjson-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.3.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen Dekkers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:28:31 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.3.15a-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:08:07 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.15-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:05:37 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.15-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:46:35 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 19:17:40 +0200
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common sogo-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.3.15a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 15:18:17 +0200
Source: sbjson
Binary: libsbjson2.3 libsbjson-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen Dekkers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 15:39:17 +0200
Source: sope
Binary: libsope1 libsope-dev libsope1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
Changed-By: Jeroen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
* Package name: sbjson
Version : 2.3.2
Upstream Author : Stig Brautaset
* URL : http://stig.github.com/json-framework/
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Objective-C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch
* Package name: sope
Version : 1.3.14
Upstream Author : Inverse inc.
* URL : http://www.sogo.nu
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Objective-C
Description : SKYRiX Object
a few hours.
This would be what, package no 6, for switching laptop network config?
*t
This one does probably something different than the others. Somebody
is willing to put time in it and I don't see that there is a problem
wit that.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
s/refused/discouraged/ and I would agree. Isn't the goal of Debian
providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
software anymore? IMHO
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Isn't the goal of Debian
providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
software anymore?
No, no, nonono, no, no, no.
4. Our Priorities are Our Users and Free
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
some time
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:46:12AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
Oh, and 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel
Wonderful news! Does this mean that we can expect the
'whine-the-linux-kernel-packages-should-all-have-linux-in-the-name
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:38:13PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
But does that mean they can posts question about problems with that
non-free software which are not related to Debian at all (the only
relation is that the user runs
, how do ... in dselect, etc.).
Actual my point was that you should ask vmware for the patch, we can't
provide it because it's non-free software.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:49:49AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:37:31AM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
It's your own fault. You choosed to run non-free software, now you get
the consequences. Debian
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:37:31AM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
It's your own fault. You choosed to run non-free software, now you get
the consequences. Debian doesn't support vmware, so go somewhere else
with your vmware
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:09:39AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
hello
we sould stop this and start after woody again...
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 08:17:46PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:55:17PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
Sorry, diffs are simply silly! Use rsync
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:10:20AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
And yes, I think vmware is a waste of processing power and
bandwith. Those posts also waste my time.
Filtering them out would save you more time, bandwidth and processing
power than
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:31:35AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
Do you really think it's a waste of
bandwidth and processing power to let the vmware users discuss a
problem caused by a change in _Debian_?
First of all
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:46:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
That isn't my biggest concern.
Apparently. This implies, of course, that the additional bandwidth due
to those messages isn't the real problem.
I never claimed that. I was asked if I
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:34:35PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
First of all this isn't a Debian-specific change but a change in
glibc. Second vmware isn't Debian. Third Debian goes about free
software, vmware isn't
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
It's your own fault. You choosed to run non-free software, now you get
the consequences. Debian doesn't support vmware, so go somewhere else
with your vmware problems. (Debian does support plex86 and bochs, BTW)
As this might
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:21:49PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:29:14PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:31:35AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
First of all this isn't a Debian
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:13:25PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I agreed with the social contract, but I think it should be
changed. Some parts are just wrong, other things are confusing.
That certainly looks like a contradiction to me. How do
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:53:59PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:25:47PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
It's your own fault. You choosed to run non-free software, now you get
the consequences
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:20:38PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:25:47PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
This problem is very common for non-free software. If you want to
avoid such problems, you could try one of the free alternatives in
Debian, plex86 and bochs. Those
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:11:59PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:45:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:21:49PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:29:14PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
Vmware isn't even in Debian
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:16:07PM +0100, Stephen Stafford wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:25:47PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
It's your own fault. You choosed to run non-free software, now you get
the consequences. Debian
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:30:12PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
By knowing the date it was written and what they actually meant
instead of what they actually have written down. (For example, they
meant non-free but they wrote commercial
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
