Actually, could you express interest here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6e6a057cd0edabc3c3337b6d96bb3c3c86361e4c1ef673493659edae@%3Cdiversity.apache.org%3E
Let's consolidate a single source.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 16:11, Griselda Cuevas wrote:
> Will do - thank you!
>
> On Tue, 9 Apr
Will do - thank you!
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 15:04, Dinesh Joshi
wrote:
> Hey Griselda,
>
> Could you please add me to the list? I had expressed interest in helping
> out.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dinesh
>
> > On Apr 9, 2019, at 2:17 PM, Griselda Cuevas
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks, as I mentioned in the
Hey Griselda,
Could you please add me to the list? I had expressed interest in helping out.
Thanks,
Dinesh
> On Apr 9, 2019, at 2:17 PM, Griselda Cuevas wrote:
>
> Hi folks, as I mentioned in the diversity@ list [1], the call that I was
> proposing to kick-off the D work was cancelled.
>
>
Hi folks, as I mentioned in the diversity@ list [1], the call that I was
proposing to kick-off the D work was cancelled.
Let's please continue to work around shaping the D efforts in the
diversity@ list.
[1]
[moving comdev back to bcc]
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:06 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Apr 3, 2019, at 8:59 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:57 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >> Consider the effort along the lines of development... all development
> >> needs to be done on
> On Apr 3, 2019, at 9:26 AM, Naomi Slater wrote:
>
>
> as you are not the person driving the call, I don't think it is
> particularly important that you don't see a rationale. our concern should
> not be *how* people "should" work, but that people *can* work, and in ways
> that suit them.
I was being polite. whether or not you personally think a call is a good
idea is not important in the context of other people wanting to do a call.
and pointing that out is conducive to good community building. it is not
demeaning or dismissive. throwing your weight around on the list to
bikeshed
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 15:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Personally, I think the right course would be to take the advice
> that having a call when not specifically required to heart and to,
> instead, do all discussion, agenda setting, etc on the diversity@
> list and drop the idea of having a call
> On Apr 3, 2019, at 8:59 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:57 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Consider the effort along the lines of development... all development
>> needs to be done on list.
>
> Not all committees operate along the lines of development.
> Independent of
My last words on the subject:
> On Apr 3, 2019, at 8:46 AM, Griselda Cuevas wrote:
>
> It seems that the right course of action would be to prepare an agenda,
> distribute it in the divers...@apache.org list and gather input from folks
> who can't join.
Personally, I think the right course
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:57 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Consider the effort along the lines of development... all development
> needs to be done on list.
Not all committees operate along the lines of development.
Independent of that, we often complement lists with calls, meetups,
hackathons,
Thanks everyone, as I mentioned before my experience in the Apache Way
continues to grow, so I appreciate everyone's input and guidance, this felt
very much like a good mentorship process.
It all makes sense and I want to do this the right way.
It seems that the right course of action would be
Consider the effort along the lines of development... all development
needs to be done on list.
I think (I could be wrong) Sam's suggestion regarding a call
was to discuss options on the effort (eg: president's cmmt, etc...)
and not about the actual "details" of the ins and outs.
Discussing the
Naomi Slater wrote on 4/3/19 6:06 AM:
...snip...
>... but I am "interested in being part of the
> committee and shaping the request
> to the board"
People can now show their interest and bring their volunteer time to
work on this idea to the newly created mailing list:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 22:27, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Can I recommend instead of a call, using the newly created
> mailing list... In general, Apache tries to avoid the use of
> sync communication medium except when absolutely required.
>
> I think that esp for such a topic as D, starting the
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 4:49 AM William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> ...there was no "accepted"
> framework for async electronic meetings at the time the foundation was
> created
I often describe the Board meeting as a hybrid, with LOTS of async
preparation before the meeting followed by a fairly short
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:44 PM Griselda Cuevas
wrote:
> To the point of no calls...
>
> How does the board meet and make decisions?
That's a very fair question.
The board practice is to assemble all of the reports, suggested motions etc
days and sometimes weeks before the synchronous meeting.
To the point of no calls...
How does the board meet and make decisions?
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 5:43 PM Griselda Cuevas wrote:
> Sam suggested a call, so that's why I initiated.
>
>
> I think a call will help work out quickly a document we can socialize in
> the mailing list.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr
Sam suggested a call, so that's why I initiated.
I think a call will help work out quickly a document we can socialize in
the mailing list.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 1:27 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Can I recommend instead of a call, using the newly created
> mailing list... In general, Apache
Can I recommend instead of a call, using the newly created
mailing list... In general, Apache tries to avoid the use of
sync communication medium except when absolutely required.
I think that esp for such a topic as D, starting the effort off
using a method that inherently disenfranchises people
Hi everyone,
Following up the original thread that sparked the creation of a Diversity &
Inclusion committee in the ASF [1], I'm coordinating a call/videocall to
discuss the proposal details to the board.
*Action by April 5th, 2019 @ midnight PST*
If you're interested in being part of the
21 matches
Mail list logo
