Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/26/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality. The release plan is available on the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I went through every open bug ticket last night, and out of them all, there only a handful outstanding, and none that are serious; again, why I think this is a beta release. Perhaps we need a better definition of quality, because to me, beta means

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/28/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I went through every open bug ticket last night, and out of them all, there only a handful outstanding, and none that are serious; again, why I think this is a beta release. I added a Struts

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread James Mitchell
+1 Beta -- Me too! -- James Mitchell On May 3, 2006, at 8:06 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: On 4/26/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality. The release plan

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 4/26/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality. The release plan is available on the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132 the Struts

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I supposed to use JIRA for SAF1 as well? Could not find the link to JIRA on wiki page. Oops, should have clicked the link for outstanding bugs :-) Still, not very clear how to get to JIRA.

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. The struts-cookbook-1.3.2 application allows to take a look at the Java source code of examples. The links refer to source.jsp?src=/WEB-INF/src/java/examples/simple/xxx.java, while the actual source code is located under

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 5/3/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. The struts-cookbook-1.3.2 application allows to take a look at the Java source code of examples. The links refer to source.jsp?src=/WEB-INF/src/java/examples/simple/xxx.java, while the

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/3/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. The struts-cookbook-1.3.2 application allows to take a look at the Java source code of examples. The links refer to

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My issue is titled: struts-cookbook-1.3.2: invalid path to source Java files in samples. Tried to search for cookbook in summary and description, nothing found. Tried to search for struts-cookbook-1.3.2, found my issue. The Text Search

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Strike that. JIRA search works fine. Before or after I changed the summary text on your issue? :) There's a new snapshot available if you want to get a head start on issues for 1.3.3 this weekend:

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 5/3/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Strike that. JIRA search works fine. Before or after I changed the summary text on your issue? :) After. Aha! I noticed that something was different ;-) Then maybe the search did not work

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-02 Thread Wendy Smoak
Sorry for the delay. I finally got 1.3.2 into test today. +1 Beta -- Wendy On 4/26/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality. The release plan is available

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-02 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/28/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are things like references to Bugzilla. Do you remember where? I searched across struts-action and only found bugzilla links on the old release notes pages. The Struts Faces index page had a typo and wasn't building, so the old version

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-04-28 Thread James Mitchell
Should we move the ToDo items from the bottom of StrutsMavenMaintenance wiki page to subtasks of a JIRA ticket? If so, we could also add the tasks you mentioned below. I'd like to help, but I'm not 100% sure about what all we want done, in what order, and by whom. Having things spread out

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-04-28 Thread Don Brown
I went through every open bug ticket last night, and out of them all, there only a handful outstanding, and none that are serious; again, why I think this is a beta release. Perhaps we need a better definition of quality, because to me, beta means there are some minor issues, but the code

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-04-28 Thread Don Brown
James Mitchell wrote: Should we move the ToDo items from the bottom of StrutsMavenMaintenance wiki page to subtasks of a JIRA ticket? Absolutely! We have an infrastructure component in the Action 1 project just for these types of issues. JIRA helps by collecting what needs to be done, any

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-04-28 Thread Ted Husted
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I went through every open bug ticket last night, and out of them all, there only a handful outstanding, and none that are serious; again, why I think this is a beta release. I added a Struts Action 1 filter to list all the open bugs against SAF1,

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-04-28 Thread Don Brown
Ted Husted wrote: On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I went through every open bug ticket last night, and out of them all, there only a handful outstanding, and none that are serious; again, why I think this is a beta release. I added a Struts Action 1 filter to list all the open

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-04-28 Thread Ted Husted
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That makes sense, especially since we don't have an RC quality option. I wonder if we should add it, because there should be a way to indicate the code is pretty complete, stable, and free of major bugs, but at the same time, it isn't GA and is

[VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-04-26 Thread Don Brown
The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality. The release plan is available on the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132 http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102 the

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-04-26 Thread Don Brown
Stupid HTML email editor... ignore that shale stuff :) Don Brown wrote: The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality. The release plan is available on the wiki:

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-04-26 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 4/26/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stupid HTML email editor... ignore that shale stuff :) Rats ... thought that was a very enjoyable Freudian slip :-). Craig /me is downloading the 1.3.2 build ... Don Brown wrote: The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-04-26 Thread Don Brown
See? The projects are working together already! :) Don Craig McClanahan wrote: On 4/26/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stupid HTML email editor... ignore that shale stuff :) Rats ... thought that was a very enjoyable Freudian slip :-). Craig /me is downloading the 1.3.2