Author: wsmoak
Date: Thu Apr 20 23:04:51 2006
New Revision: 395790
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395790view=rev
Log:
Added JXR plugin for source cross-reference.
Checkstyle config added, but commented out as it causes an error.
Modified:
struts/action/trunk/pom.xml
Modified:
On 4/20/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we require these snapshot plugins in our POM somehow?
I'm fine with working with snapshots, but their download and
use should be automatic.
When the Javadoc plugin gets fixed, yes. For now, the released
versions are working (you just don't
-Original Message-
From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:23 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: [action2] Towards our first release
At JavaOne, Patrick, Jason, and I will be presenting a
session about Struts Action 2 (deceptively titled,
On 4/21/06, Phil Zoio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While mandating support for Java 5 is obviously no
option for Struts 1.x,
It's probably still too soon to do that for Action 1.3, but it would
certainly be on the table for Action 1.4 or Action 1.5.
We changed the platform from Java 1.2 to Java
Lately, we've gotten into the habit of talking about Standalone Tiles
as if it were already an Apache Struts subproject. As far as I
remember, there has never been a vote to that effect, and the only
proposal on the wiki positions Tiles as a top-level project, once it
is ready to stand on its own.
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by AndrewKuzmin:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/Shale/JsfResources
--
So you are suggesting Tiles be decoupled from Struts Action and Shale
so that it can be compiled independent of these modules? Definite +1
and this was my impression all along as well.
As for top level project, I agree that Tiles probably belongs here but
I'm not opposed. For me the main thing
On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
As for top level project, I agree that Tiles probably belongs here but
I'm not opposed. For me the main thing is that Tiles should be
decoupled from the Action framework. MyFaces Tomahawk currently
requires the full struts jar in order to
That's only because Tomahawk is using Struts Tiles instead of
Standalone Tiles, right?
right,
Shale's TilesViewHandler.java requires the following clazzes of
tile-core.jar
snip
import org.apache.tiles.ComponentContext;
import org.apache.tiles.ComponentDefinition;
import
think so too,that there is no public tiles-core.jar on any m2 repo,
IMO
-Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 4:20 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP
Right but there hasn't been a
On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
IMHO, once Standalone Tiles is ready for a release, we should migrate
the component to a top-level ASF project. When we started this
process, the original intent was to decompose Tiles here, test it in
Action and Shale, and then move it out when
+1 You guys are the experts, go for it.
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 20, 2006, at 5:11 PM, Don Brown wrote:
The confluence migration is one of the remaining issues before
Incubator graduation, and here is the plan:
1. Export the data from OpenSymphony
2. Lock the OS WW wiki down to only
+1
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 20, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Don Brown wrote:
With our JIRA instance stood up, it is time to revisit our earlier
decision to migration our Struts Bugzilla tickets to JIRA.
http://issues.apache.org/struts
I believe most of this work can be done without bothering
Copying from a separate threadcause I thought I had deleted this
thread -- doh!
After thinking about this a little more, would it make sense to test
this under our svn so that the commit msgs are sent as usual and we
can keep an eye things. The term 'subversion shelves' comes to
Ok, I'm a dumbass. That was supposed to say [shale], not 'Faces'.
Regardless, I've moved my comments back over to the thread that it
was supposed to apply to. I either need more sleep or more
coffeeI'm no good in dead mans land :)
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 20, 2006, at 2:41 PM,
On 4/21/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lately, we've gotten into the habit of talking about Standalone Tiles
as if it were already an Apache Struts subproject. As far as I
remember, there has never been a vote to that effect, and the only
proposal on the wiki positions Tiles as a
The best place would be at the base of a nomal checkout, so that it
would be next to the nightly.sh, but I didn't know how to do that.
On 4/21/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if you say this...
Should this be under 'current', so it will be at the base of the
normal
On 4/21/06, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we need to be discussing this now? I kinda feel like this should
wait until Tiles is ready to stand alone.
In another thread, Don pointed out that we need to be more forthcoming
with the project's roadmap. Right now, the Tiles roadmap is not
That's part of the magic that I love about svn...
$svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/STATUS.txt https://
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/current/
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 21, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
The best place would be at the base of a nomal checkout, so
Author: husted
Date: Fri Apr 21 09:56:18 2006
New Revision: 395947
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395947view=rev
Log:
Move STATUS under current
Added:
struts/current/STATUS.txt
- copied unchanged from r395946, struts/STATUS.txt
Removed:
struts/STATUS.txt
I'm with Ted on this - Tiles really should be standalone and out on its own, lest Struts just be an umbrella project.
It is the odd man out next to Shale and Action, and would benefit from a wider audience. Either Tiles as a TLP, Jakarta
project or Jakarta Commons would fit to me. The lack of
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
The comment on the change is:
Posting comments on behalf of Hani.
From: Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 21, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Don Brown wrote:
The lack of developer support is worrisome, though, regardless what
we do with it.
I think there's a lot of impression that Tiles is done. From what
I can tell it pretty much fulfills 80% of the
Should we just make the bare minimum changes to get Tiles
out of the sandbox or is it worth it to do major surgery?
+1
Tiles is pretty mature and I don't sense a lot of interest in
perfecting it. It would be nice to have it stand on its own
(dependency wise) but I'm not volunteering. Tiles
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39378.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36152.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36152.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36152.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by JasonCarreira:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
--
*
Who did this edit? It says by Bob Lee but one of the comments is tagged as
hani
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=26827messageID=52884#52884
Like I said in the update comment, I passed along some comments on
behalf of Hani (I also removed dups and clarified a couple).
I'm working on refactoring the list. It makes better sense to break
the issues down by category, not the person who submitted them.
Bob
On 4/21/06, Jason Carreira
Author: husted
Date: Fri Apr 21 15:16:40 2006
New Revision: 396020
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396020view=rev
Log:
Update list of PMC members, post April Status report, and update roster of
recent votes,
Modified:
struts/current/STATUS.txt
Modified: struts/current/STATUS.txt
On 4/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: husted
Date: Fri Apr 21 15:16:40 2006
New Revision: 396020
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396020view=rev
Log:
Update list of PMC members
This is actually a little premature. Recall that our new PMC nominees are
not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36152.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36152.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To help bring this flurry of ideas and directions to a head, I think we
should
have an unofficial Struts BOF at JavaOne
next month. I envision a setting conducive to discussion, design, and
planning
(good beer is a definite plus :)) with
the goal of
On 4/21/06, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To help bring this flurry of ideas and directions to a head, I think we
should
have an unofficial Struts BOF at JavaOne
next month. I envision a setting conducive to discussion, design, and
planning
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39381.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm seriously considering coming to JavaOne this year. What should I
expect as far as costs? (Conference Pass, lodging, meals, etc)
This would be my first time and since this will be totally on my
dime, any way for me to cut costs?
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:55 PM,
On 4/21/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seriously considering coming to JavaOne this year. What should I
expect as far as costs? (Conference Pass, lodging, meals, etc)
Full conference pass is pretty hefty ... $2595 before May 15, $2695
afterwards. Cheapest hotels I have
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 4/21/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seriously considering coming to JavaOne this year. What should I
expect as far as costs? (Conference Pass, lodging, meals, etc)
Full conference pass is pretty hefty ... $2595 before May 15, $2695
41 matches
Mail list logo
