According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to
keep js-jquery around:
nodejs-grunt-legacy-util
nodejs-load-grunt-tasks
nodejs-raw-body
Vít
[1] https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-12-02.txt
Dne 03. 12. 19 v 2:24 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> I will take
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758483
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Monday, December 2, 2019 12:39:52 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:48 AM Przemek Klosowski via devel
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 11/27/19 2:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:39:59AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> >
> >
>
On Monday, December 2, 2019 12:46:30 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> It's almost 2020, and I shouldn't have to pick and choose between
> remote access and securing user data at rest by default.
You don't have to. Data at rest would mean that your system is powered off, or
suspended to disk. You
On Monday, December 2, 2019 11:16:43 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> How often do you ssh *into* your laptop?
Every time I'm on another system without access to my NFS server, or I need my
GnuPG key when not using my laptop.
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779031
Bug ID: 1779031
Summary: perl-Email-Sender-1.300034 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-Sender
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 12:03 AM Mike Nguyen wrote:
> With Fedora 29 reaching End Of Life, this will be the final Fedora Atomic
> Host release (based on the Fedora 29 stream). Fedora Atomic Host will no
> longer receive any updates. More details can be found at
>
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 19:49 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 07:15:27PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > ocaml-bin-protorphan 2 weeks
> > ago
> > ocaml-bisect orphan 2 weeks
> >
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/12/03/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.4-20191203gitd0f04dd.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763515
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768068
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773830
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191129151030.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773830
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774785
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774785
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191129151030.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762085
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-12-03 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778302
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1744139
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3020191129151235.eb1b2d95 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768068
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3020191129151235.eb1b2d95 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774785
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191129151030.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763515
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3020191129151235.eb1b2d95 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773830
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3020191129151235.eb1b2d95 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3020191129151235.eb1b2d95 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774785
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3020191129151235.eb1b2d95 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3020191129151235.eb1b2d95 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762085
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3020191129151235.eb1b2d95 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773830
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191129151030.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
I will take nodejs-dateformat .
Do you have a list of what more packages we have to keep?
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 15:52 +0100, Raphael Groner wrote:
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes:
> …
> > As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a
> > nodejs module (a
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 19:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
> for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
> reason:
>
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 7:04 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 03. 12. 19 0:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:38:01AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> On 02. 12. 19 23:09, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:47 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at
On 03. 12. 19 0:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:38:01AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 12. 19 23:09, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:47 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:34 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
Hi folks,
In EPEL 7 we have some packages with
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:38:01AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 12. 19 23:09, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:47 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:34 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > In EPEL 7 we have some packages
Xavier Bachelot writes:
> As offered in the bug, I can help with maintaining
> perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509. My FAS username is xavierb.
> I'll reassign the EL8 branch bug to me and take care of it. I'll also
> take care of updating to the recently released 1.813 in master.
1.813 is complete on
On 02. 12. 19 23:09, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:47 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:34 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
Hi folks,
In EPEL 7 we have some packages with "python34" and "python36"
prefixes in their names. I guess this is a consequence of using the
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:39 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> 4. If based on any fscrypt implementation, exclude ~/.ssh/ from encryption
Actually this is essentially the same problem. Yes, I've ssh'd into
the real home, but everything is still encrypted, so I'd have to
unlock my home dir manually to
On 03. 12. 19 0:26, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 08:22, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Good Morning Everyone™,
we have recently spent some time refactoring, improving and fixing the script
that syncs the default assignee and CC list from dist-git to Bugzilla.
Since the
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 08:22, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone™,
>
> we have recently spent some time refactoring, improving and fixing the script
> that syncs the default assignee and CC list from dist-git to Bugzilla.
>
> Since the script was broken for some time, we felt that
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > * Should any other packager (not that maintainer) be able to request
> > new branches on that repo?
> > * Should provenpackager be able to do the same request?
>
> Since I do not give a darn about what happens to my
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:47 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:34 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > In EPEL 7 we have some packages with "python34" and "python36"
> > prefixes in their names. I guess this is a consequence of using the
> > %{python3_pkgversion} macro
This is your reminder that voting for FESCo (and other elected bodies) is
open through 23:59 UTC on Thursday, 5 December. See below for more
information.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:41 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> If you missed the Community Blog post[1], voting is now open for the
> Fedora 31 election
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> * Should any other packager (not that maintainer) be able to request
> new branches on that repo?
> * Should provenpackager be able to do the same request?
Since I do not give a darn about what happens to my packages on EPEL, I am
fine with anybody requesting EPEL branches
On 02/12/2019 14:37, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> IIUC, effectively "new branches" means "EPEL branches" since normal
> Fedora branches are all created automatically.
>
> So to rephrase this
>
> * Should someone who is not the maintainer be able to declare
> that the maintainer must
I believe the answer is "yes" ... to both.
As far as I know, there aren't any differences. Where there are
differences, we're trying to get rid of the differences.
Example is that the automatic python dependencies weren't turned on in
epel8. That should be fixed in a few days, so you should be
Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2019-12-02, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>> On Monday, December 2, 2019 12:17:20 AM MST Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>> Sure, we just have to accept this until perl is made
>>> parallel-installable. Which may or may not happen, but if I have
>>> choice between "only one version of
I have taken sassc but will welcome anyone else willing to help co-maintain
this train wreck.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 06:16:43PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
...snip...
> Nevertheless, I'm pretty sure that a workaround for this will be made
> anyway. I think the latest version of the patchset allows exporting
> the authorized_keys content in the non-encrypted metadata for the
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 07:15:27PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> ocaml-bin-protorphan 2 weeks ago
> ocaml-bisect orphan 2 weeks ago
> ocaml-bitstring orphan 2
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 10:45 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Monday, December 2, 2019 9:48:05 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> > On 11/27/19 2:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:39:59AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >> Mabee systemd-homed
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:48 AM Przemek Klosowski via devel
wrote:
>
> On 11/27/19 2:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:39:59AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Mabee systemd-homed is in
> a position to solve this by having early enough authentication
>
On 02/12/2019 19:15, Wes Hardaker wrote:
Xavier Bachelot writes:
I've tried to get in touch with Wes Hardaker about
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 for 2 months. The bug was left untouched, even
after setting need-info flag. I've also tried to reach to him by
direct mail.
Hi, and sorry both.
I've
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 18:16 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 10:44:46AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > On Monday, December 2, 2019 9:48:05 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel
> > wrote:
> > > On 11/27/19 2:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > On
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:34 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> In EPEL 7 we have some packages with "python34" and "python36"
> prefixes in their names. I guess this is a consequence of using the
> %{python3_pkgversion} macro over time.
>
> Now that RHEL 7 has Python 3.6, and we want to
Le lundi 02 décembre 2019 à 18:16 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a
écrit :
>
> How often do you ssh *into* your laptop?
I use the same tech desktop and home server side. If it does not work
on my home server, I don’t want to see it on my desktops. I have other
things to do in life than
Hi folks,
In EPEL 7 we have some packages with "python34" and "python36"
prefixes in their names. I guess this is a consequence of using the
%{python3_pkgversion} macro over time.
Now that RHEL 7 has Python 3.6, and we want to deprecate Python 3.4 in
EPEL 7, I'm wondering about this.
If I'm
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 10:44:46AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Monday, December 2, 2019 9:48:05 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> > On 11/27/19 2:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:39:59AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >> Mabee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773105
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.07 is |perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.08
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Xavier Bachelot writes:
> I've tried to get in touch with Wes Hardaker about
> perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 for 2 months. The bug was left untouched, even
> after setting need-info flag. I've also tried to reach to him by
> direct mail.
Hi, and sorry both.
I've been swamped lately and haven't had
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778701
Wes Hardaker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
On Monday, December 2, 2019 9:48:05 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> On 11/27/19 2:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:39:59AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Mabee systemd-homed is in
> >> a position to solve this by having early enough
There used to be some differences between Fedora and EPEL packaging guidelines,
which were explained in the docs [1].
I don't find any mention in that doc to EPEL8, does that mean there aren't any
differences or that the page isn't updated for EPEL8?
Mattia
[1]
On 12/1/19 10:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I definitely want some mechanism which will tell to user that "THIS
PACKAGE IS NOT FULLY SUPPORTED."
And I think telling that to the user is absolutely unfair and against the
spirit of Fedora.
The dilemma is, how to allow the useful stuff to remain,
On 11/27/19 2:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:39:59AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Mabee systemd-homed is in
a position to solve this by having early enough authentication
capability by rescue.target time that any admin user can login?
Actually, it may.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778849
Bug ID: 1778849
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.79 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Date-Manip
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-12-02)
=
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:40 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-12-02/fesco.2019-12-02-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting
Is there a special procedure for undeading a package if the two
packages happen to use the same name but are otherwise unrelated?
virt-v2v was a Perl program that existed up to Fedora 21. It's long
dead (since 2013) and there's a new program with the same name written
from scratch which I want
Thanks a lot.
Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes:
…
As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a
nodejs module (a normal one, not modularised) which was
failing to build and which I have now fixed.
…
___
devel mailing list --
On 02/12/2019 14:04, Raphael Groner wrote:
> I don't think modularity is to blame here.
Nah. The dependent nodejs stack broke away due to move into modularity
worlds.
No, it didn't.
I'm no fan of modularity but there is no need to blame it
for things it is not responsible for.
As I
Hello everyone,
You are invited to the next Open/Public NeuroFedora team meeting at
1600UTC on Tuesday, 3rd December in #fedora-neuro on irc.freenode.net.
You can see the time in your local time zone by running this command in
a terminal:
$ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1600 next Tue'
or using the
> I don't think modularity is to blame here.
Nah. The dependent nodejs stack broke away due to move into modularity
worlds.
> 3) since the bundling policy is relaxed, everybody just bundles with
zero motivation to maintain package for somebody else.
Ack. The unbundling of js-jsquery has been
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 12:56, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
> non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
> branches.
>
> However, it never went anywhere outside of that ticket.
>
> I'd like to ask
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 12:07:22 +0100
Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to get in touch with Ian Arnell about perl-Crypt-Rijndael
> for almost 2 months. The bug was left untouched, even after setting
> need-info flag. I've also tried to reach to him by direct mail.
>
> Anyone knows how
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 01:26:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 06:17:36PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone™,
> >
> > we have recently spent some time refactoring, improving and fixing the
> > script
> > that syncs the default
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 02:31:39PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 11. 19 18:17, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone™,
>
> Morning o/
>
> > we have recently spent some time refactoring, improving and fixing the
> > script
> > that syncs the default assignee and CC list from
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 01:55:55PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
> non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
> branches.
>
> However, it never went anywhere outside of that ticket.
>
> I'd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778463
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
This seems to happen for every new package/branch these days. Usually, waiting
24 hours resolves it as I think there's a cron job that syncs everything over
to koji once a day.
--
You are receiving this
On 29. 11. 19 18:17, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Good Morning Everyone™,
Morning o/
we have recently spent some time refactoring, improving and fixing the script
that syncs the default assignee and CC list from dist-git to Bugzilla.
Will this actualy reassign the existing bugzillas or just
I know the name but it's been a long time I don't see him around. I don't
think he's working with Fedora anymore.
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 12:08, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to get in touch with Ian Arnell about perl-Crypt-Rijndael for
> almost 2 months. The bug was left
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 06:17:36PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone™,
>
> we have recently spent some time refactoring, improving and fixing the script
> that syncs the default assignee and CC list from dist-git to Bugzilla.
>
> Since the script was broken for some time,
Good Morning Everyone™,
we have recently spent some time refactoring, improving and fixing the script
that syncs the default assignee and CC list from dist-git to Bugzilla.
Since the script was broken for some time, we felt that it needs some validation
before we run it live (which will still
Good Morning Everyone™,
we have recently spent some time refactoring, improving and fixing the script
that syncs the default assignee and CC list from dist-git to Bugzilla.
Since the script was broken for some time, we felt that it needs some validation
before we run it live (which will still
Dear maintainers.
Based on the latest fail to build from source package, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (February
2020).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Yes, however maintainer of nodejs does not want to rename binaries and
> patch sources to be parallel-installable.
And that is exactly the problem.
> And today, we would block adding such "compat" package into the
> repositories.
Which is exactly how it should be.
> I
On 02. 12. 19 13:55, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hello,
3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
branches.
However, it never went anywhere outside of that ticket.
I'd like to ask people on this mailing list
No, sorry, I don't even know him.
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 12:02, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to get in touch with Matias Kreder about perl-Crypt-Rijndael
> for almost 2 months. The bug was left untouched, even after setting
> need-info flag. I've also tried to reach to him by
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 7:16 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I understand this change.
>
> Does it mean that currently, the "apt-rpm" is tool which installs RPMs
> from Fedora repositories, while the Debians "apt" will install the DEB
> packages coming from Debian?
>
> Does it means that
Hello,
3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
branches.
However, it never went anywhere outside of that ticket.
I'd like to ask people on this mailing list a few questions. Let's say
we have some
Dne 28. 11. 19 v 19:43 Raphael Groner napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> in case of my packages, jpype and pyvirtualize, I'd say to skip
> generation of documentation while js-jquery is b0rken.
>
> What's the issue about js-jquery? I tend to blame modularity due to
> nodejs-*.
I don't think modularity is to
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-12-02 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On 2019-12-02, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Monday, December 2, 2019 12:17:20 AM MST Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> Sure, we just have to accept this until perl is made
>> parallel-installable. Which may or may not happen, but if I have
>> choice between "only one version of perl and no bugzilla" or
I'm not sure I understand this change.
Does it mean that currently, the "apt-rpm" is tool which installs RPMs
from Fedora repositories, while the Debians "apt" will install the DEB
packages coming from Debian?
Does it means that previously, there was only one glibc package
installed no matter
Thanks for help Fabio.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:10 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 11:45 Tomas Korbar wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I would like to ask you a question. If upstream of your package does
>> major rewrite of it, then what is the proper process to rebase such
>> package? I'm
On Monday, December 2, 2019 12:17:20 AM MST Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Sure, we just have to accept this until perl is made
> parallel-installable. Which may or may not happen, but if I have
> choice between "only one version of perl and no bugzilla" or "two
> conflicting versions of perl and bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778463
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191201.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191202.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 16
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 360.38 KiB
Size of dropped packages
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
