On Sunday, March 22, 2020 10:47:54 AM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hi Daniel. List moderator here.
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 01:30:22PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> > The disappearance of my blog on Planet Fedora was apparently influenced
> > by people in Debian. The Pagure
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020, at 9:47 PM, Mark Olesen wrote:
> I'm involved in the development of OpenFOAM (www.openfoam.com), which is
> a GPL open source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software package.
>
> To improve the overall coverage, I've been generating Fedora/RedHat
> packages using
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/03/24/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.4-20200324gitf41e1d3.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50979
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 3/23/20 7:27 PM, Marty Felker wrote:
I am in Ubuntu for the moment but have a wicked fast F32 workstation. My
only "issue" is that I get asked for an unlock key when I boot when what
I want is to boot directly to the desktop. I am the only one with
physical or any other access to my
Hi folks,
It turns out that I need one more package to complete the coq stack
upgrade. Who would like to swap reviews? If you don't need a review,
ask me to help you fix a bug.
ocaml-mlmpfr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816457
Thanks!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
I am in Ubuntu for the moment but have a wicked fast F32 workstation.
My only "issue" is that I get asked for an unlock key when I boot when
what I want is to boot directly to the desktop. I am the only one with
physical or any other access to my machine. But the weird thing is
that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813602
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-9825755f88 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815667
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-81c37f8ff5
tomcat-7.0.100-2.el6
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9190462510
ckeditor-4.14.0-1.el6
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816436
Bug ID: 1816436
Summary: perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.49 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Cache-FastMmap
Keywords: FutureFeature,
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 3/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200322.n.0):
ID: 554126 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200322.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200323.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 58
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.70 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-32-20200322.n.0):
ID: 554333 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/554333
ID: 554338 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:13:05 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann'
> Mierzejewski wrote:
> > On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 12:10, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > [...]
> > > The bottom line is that these tools need to support our
> > > workflows, not try
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200322.1):
ID: 554772 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004354
Bug 1004354 depends on bug 1811604, which changed state.
Bug 1811604 Summary: root not available for 32-bit ARM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811604
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813603
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 15:33, Clement Verna
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello Clement,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 20:34, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:12 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 3:34 PM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > >>
On 23/03/2020 15:35, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 12:10, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> [...]
>> The bottom line is that these tools need to support our workflows, not
>> try to shoehorn us into a particular way of working.
>
> Just writing an e-mail about the
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:13:05 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> There are a few things that also send emails on their own.
> Sadly, bodhi still does this (even though it should not)
Actually I'm not sad about this; I find the emails from bodhi
considerably more informative than their fedmsg equivalents
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default_upload:
System load changed from 0.13 to 0.25
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/553088#downloads
Updated to 6.10.
Can I update it in F32 now?
пн, 23 мар. 2020 г. в 21:56, Vascom :
>
> I go to update bibutils in rawhide. It update lib to version 6.9.
>
> Nothing require it as BR and only kbibtex as Requires.
> So I will not rebuild any packages.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:16 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 11:04 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > I think I understand what you want to do: You want a disk partition ->
> > LUKS -> LVM PV -> LVM VG, and then /, /var, /home, swap to be XFS
> > formatted LVs.
> >
> > I'm not
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:12 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 3:34 PM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Clement,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >>
OLD: Fedora-32-20200322.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200323.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 11:04 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> I think I understand what you want to do: You want a disk partition ->
> LUKS -> LVM PV -> LVM VG, and then /, /var, /home, swap to be XFS
> formatted LVs.
>
> I'm not certain it's actually possible to do this,
OK, it is possible to do
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 3:34 PM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Clement,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production. This version should
I go to update bibutils in rawhide. It update lib to version 6.9.
Nothing require it as BR and only kbibtex as Requires.
So I will not rebuild any packages.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816303
Bug ID: 1816303
Summary: perl-DBD-Pg-3.10.5 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-Pg
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 5:03 AM Andreas Tunek wrote:
>
> I did a new install without LVM. Booting is still slow but everything works
> correctly (I did not get bug 1815787). So there is some problem with my
> hardware. For which component do you think I should create a bug?
No idea. It
I'm involved in the development of OpenFOAM (www.openfoam.com), which is
a GPL open source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software package.
To improve the overall coverage, I've been generating Fedora/RedHat
packages using copr. As I understand, the next stage would be
(co)maintaining
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 15:42 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> The dist-git is now emitting the messages via fedmsg. Whenever new upload has
> been done.
> As fedmsg is dead (long live fedora-messaging), I wonder if someone is
> actually consuming those messages? Should we
> migrate the code? Or is
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:55 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:55:49PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > > The dist-git is now emitting the messages
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:55 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:55:49PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > > The dist-git is now emitting the messages
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:55:49PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > The dist-git is now emitting the messages via fedmsg. Whenever new upload
> > > has been done.
> >
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:55:49PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > The dist-git is now emitting the messages via fedmsg. Whenever new upload
> > has been done.
> > As fedmsg is dead (long live fedora-messaging), I wonder if
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 12:10, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> [...]
> > The bottom line is that these tools need to support our workflows, not
> > try to shoehorn us into a particular way of working.
>
> Just writing an
So, checking after some days: Is there anything left for me to do about
Anaconda quick docs? I'm not entirely sure, sorry...
Best,
V+
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-03-13 at 17:37 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:55:16AM +,
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-03-23/fesco.2020-03-23-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-03-23/fesco.2020-03-23-15.00.txt
Log:
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I figured I would start a new thread instead of continuing on with the
old one.
The Jenkins instance running rpminspect has crapped itself for the
second time in less than a week and it's currently not processing the
rpminspect runs it should be.
There are also reports of missing rpminspect runs
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 8:10 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
> As mentioned in the RTC thread, here is the review request:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936
>
I've started the review, but I'm running into some issues in compiling the
software, as shown in the bug referenced above.
Dne 23. 03. 20 v 11:07 Lumir Balhar napsal(a):
> Hello, Fedora developers.
>
> We, members of Fedora Machine learning SIG, are looking for a ways how we can
> help you with ML and make Fedora the best
> ML platform for developers, researchers and scientists.
>
> - Do you know about any problem
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> The dist-git is now emitting the messages via fedmsg. Whenever new upload has
> been done.
> As fedmsg is dead (long live fedora-messaging), I wonder if someone is
> actually consuming those messages? Should we
> migrate the code?
tl;dr: a scriptlet has been added to the fedora-release package that
performs a _one time_ "dnf module reset eclipse" operation when
fedora-release is upgraded. The update that does this is now in bodhi [1].
This was decided in a FESCo ticket [2] to solve bugzilla #1780827 [3]
and has a "F31
The dist-git is now emitting the messages via fedmsg. Whenever new upload has
been done.
As fedmsg is dead (long live fedora-messaging), I wonder if someone is actually
consuming those messages? Should we
migrate the code? Or is it save to drop this functionality?
If I did not get any response
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 12:10, Daniel Pocock wrote:
[...]
> The bottom line is that these tools need to support our workflows, not
> try to shoehorn us into a particular way of working.
Just writing an e-mail about the issue to the Fedora devel list will not
change anything, maybe apart from
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 10:39, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello Clement,
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production. This version should
> improve the performance of updates
On 23. 03. 20 15:14, Javier Pena wrote:
Hi,
I'm having an issue trying to request a new branch on package python-fixtures.
See [1] for example.
TL;DR: I am admin on the project, because I belong to a group that is admin on the
project. However, my request for a new branch is denied based on
Hi,
I'm having an issue trying to request a new branch on package python-fixtures.
See [1] for example.
TL;DR: I am admin on the project, because I belong to a group that is admin on
the project. However, my request for a new branch is denied based on "... is
not a maintainer of the
Answering some common queries:
Users without a Fedora account can make calls to a Fedora user too, they
can go to https://freephonebox.net and type in the address, e.g.
poc...@fedrtc.org
You can also give people a URL to call you, e.g.
https://freephonebox.net/?dial=pocock%40fedrtc.org
The ROCm stack would be nice to have in Fedora. Tom Stellard started to
package parts of it but afaik the effort stalled a while ago.
I think the ROCm stack is pretty challenging because it is mostly in-house
software and not much effort was spent to make the build process
distribution-friendly.
On 22/03/2020 18:15, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 22.03.20 um 14:19 schrieb Emmanuel Seyman:
>> I feel you've proved the opposite: filing bugs alone isn't sufficient and,
>> apparently, neither is sending out periodic reminders by mail. Perhaps we
>> need to be more agressive in
Den mån 23 mars 2020 kl 06:23 skrev Chris Murphy :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:46 AM Andreas Tunek
> wrote:
> >
> > I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from
> the start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was
> some kind of bug or some devel
Il giorno dom, 22/03/2020 alle 23.04 -0600, Chris Murphy ha scritto:
> I think I understand what you want to do: You want a disk partition
> ->
> LUKS -> LVM PV -> LVM VG, and then /, /var, /home, swap to be XFS
> formatted LVs.
Yes, this is what I intend to do and it is how Anaconda has always
Le 23/03/2020 à 10:20, Clement Verna a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production.
Thanks
> This version should improve
> the performance of updates creation since the expansive task of tagging
> builds in koji has been moved to an async process using a celery workers.
> - Do you miss anything in Fedora which would make your development on ML apps
> easier? Let us know! We can fix it.
Hi Lumir!
I have something to miss for RPM packaging.
1. A recommendation of an initial package spec file from the source
archive (= Source0) by ML.
Learning data: For
Il giorno dom, 22/03/2020 alle 17.38 -0700, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:
> If I understood the original email correctly, swap is intended to be
> an LV on the encrypted VG, so it is encrypted.
Yes, swap a LV into encrypted VG
--
Dario Lesca
(inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 31 Workstation)
Notification time stamped 2020-03-23 10:24:40 UTC
From e1271d02f53d360a970aa7bec4ea7a340e2f4075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mar 23 2020 10:24:29 +
Subject: Specify all dependencies
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-Std-Fast.spec b/perl-Class-Std-Fast.spec
index
Hello, Fedora developers.
We, members of Fedora Machine learning SIG, are looking for a ways how
we can help you with ML and make Fedora the best ML platform for
developers, researchers and scientists.
- Do you know about any problem in Fedora which might be possible to
solve using machine
Hello Clement,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production. This version should improve
> the performance of updates creation since the expansive task of tagging
> builds in koji has been moved to an async process using a
Hi all,
I have just deployed Bodhi 5.2.0 in production. This version should improve
the performance of updates creation since the expansive task of tagging
builds in koji has been moved to an async process using a celery workers.
Also this version will also allow the use of side-tags to all
Hello everyone,
You are invited to attend the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting this
week on Tuesday at 1600UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode):
https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro
The channel is bridged to Telegram, so you can also join us there on the
@NeuroFedora group:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-03-23 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815682
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
Pushing this update to later Fedoras will be delayed until previous builds
become stable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815667
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-06d0a81f9f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-06d0a81f9f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815667
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815682
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815667
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-cada965801 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cada965801
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
72 matches
Mail list logo
