Re: Upgrading Xwayland to version 24.1.0 in Fedora 40

On Wednesday, 15 May 2024 at 19:00, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:23 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:31 PM Olivier Fourdan > > > > > > > > Not directly related, but hopefully not entirely off-topic: > > > Are there plans to update the

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 23:22, Nils Philippsen wrote: [...] > Let me try to clarify: Offering both major versions is mainly to cater > for existing projects people might have. It’s hardly a maintenance > burden as long as the dependencies are still available, at some point > this might change

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 13:27, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 13 May 2024 11:49:47 +0200 > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: [...] > > Also, how did this pass review? > > > > License:LGPLv3+ > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3/blob/rawhide/f/gimp

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 12:14, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2024, 11:50 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > > On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 01:00, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sun, May 12, 2024

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 01:00, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3 > > > > What the heck? This should have been gimp2 for the old version, not > gimp3 for the new version... Also, how did this pass

Re: Self Introduction: Susan LeGendre-McGhee

Hello, Susan. On Thursday, 09 May 2024 at 20:53, Susan LeGendre-McGhee wrote: > Hey all, > > I'd like to introduce myself to the community. @bgurney reviewed and > approved my first package at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273535. As such, I'm now > looking for someone to

Re: PWG+OpenPrinting meetup 2024

On Tuesday, 07 May 2024 at 18:40, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi all, > > I've joined the mentioned meetup to see what are the changes from the last > year and proposal what to do in the future. Thanks, Zdenek. Your summaries are very useful as usual! Regards, Dominik -- Fedora

Re: Self Introduction: Jan André Reuter

Hello, Jan! On Friday, 03 May 2024 at 11:29, Jan Andre Reuter wrote: [...] > I decided to learn a bit about the packaging and open a PR to update > it to the latest release. I have still a lot to learn, but I'm eager > to learn more about the packaging and everything around it. Welcome to

GIMP 3.0 in F41?

Hi! I noticed that GIMP 3.0 is scheduled[1] for release in June. It'd be nice to have it in F41. Are there any plans to do so? Do the maintainers (Cc'd) need any help? [1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/issues/10373#timeline Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org Deep in

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

On Friday, 26 April 2024 at 15:47, Ben Beasley wrote: > Josef, > > I finished rebuilding everything in the side tag f41-build-side-88169. > Please create the Bodhi update. > > The packages cinelerra-gg and olive are RPMFusion packages, so there is > nothing to do in Fedora; any coordination you

Re: Self Introduction: Łukasz W.

Hello, Łukasz. On Sunday, 21 April 2024 at 20:37, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote: > Hi all, > > @decathorpe reviewed my first package positively at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271100 > and now I'm looking for somebody to sponsor me. My official request for > sponsorship is at

soname bump: live555 2024.03.08 coming to rawhide

Hello! Latest live555-2024.03.08 comes with an SONAME bump from 107 to 112. The only consumer seems to be vlc, which I'll rebuild in a side-tag (f41-build-side-87311) and submit together as an update. This is rawhide only. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org Deep in the human

Re: ld: error: triggering the generation of an executable stack

On Wednesday, 20 March 2024 at 01:27, Orion Poplawski wrote: > With a recent update, plplot is failing to build with: > > cd /builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/examples/fortran > && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/x16af.dir/link.txt > --verbose=1 >

Re: gloox soname bump

On Tuesday, 19 March 2024 at 09:41, David Bold wrote: > > Hi Fedorians, > > > > I intend to update gloox to 1.0.28 which comes with a soname bump. > > 0ad and uwsgi depend on gloox [0]. > > > > I have successfully rebuild both in copr [1]. > > > > I will rebuild gloox in the following side

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

Hi! On Wednesday, 21 February 2024 at 08:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: [...] > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the > appropriate package. I did run `dnf system-upgrade` and it

Re: Introduction

Hello, Patrice! On Monday, 19 February 2024 at 13:55, Patrice Peterson via devel wrote: > Hello to all and sundry! > > I've been a Fedora user for close to ten years but I've never been involved > with the project itself, aside from reporting a few bugs here and there. > Been using Linux for ~20

Re: Introduction

On Wednesday, 07 February 2024 at 15:31, Luis Correia wrote: > The package already exists, under RPM Fusion free (most updated is a beta > version) > > I'll at least keep it up to date with new releases We know it exists. Neal is saying you should move it from RPM Fusion to Fedora. As far as I

Re: FYI: AFL++ now builds a GCC plugin

On Tuesday, 06 February 2024 at 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113035034 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262539 > > The new AFL++ (American Fuzzy Lop, a fuzzing tool) in Rawhide appears > to be building a GCC plugin,

Re: Retirement of sundials2 seqan seqan2 wise2

Hi! On Saturday, 03 February 2024 at 22:01, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Hi all. > > Following packages will be retired in Rawhide branch: [...] > wise2 (unmaintained by upstream, no longer needed in Fedora), > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wise2 Can you drop my name from Bugzilla

Re: Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20240116.0 coming to F40/Rawhide

Hello, Ben. On Sunday, 28 January 2024 at 19:43, Ben Beasley wrote: > In one week, 2024-02-04, or slightly later, I plan to update abseil-cpp from > 20230802.1 to 20230116.0 (Abseil LTS branch, Jan 2024)[1] in side tags for Correct me if I'm wrong, but this looks like a downgrade: $

Re: Self Introduction: Jacek Migacz

Hello, Jacek! On Friday, 26 January 2024 at 20:46, Jacek Migacz wrote: > Dear Community! > > My name is Jacek Migacz; a software engineer from Poland. > I'm currently maintaining curl and emacs on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. > I am eager to learn from the collective wisdom of the community and >

Re: HEADSUP boost and tbb rebuilds starting in a side tag

On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 17:59, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > On 20/01/2024 16:07, Jerry James wrote: > > > Upstream has this in src/tbb/CMakeLists.txt: > > > > if (CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8) > > set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb) > > else() > > set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb32) > > endif() > > > >

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Pytorch Release (Self-Contained)

On Friday, 12 January 2024 at 20:46, Tim Flink wrote: [...] > We're still working on AMD GPU support via ROCm - hopefully that will > be for F41. Is there a place where one can track progress and assist? I've got an AMD GPU and would be happy to help test things. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora

[EPEL-devel] Re: VLC via EPEL vs via RPMFUSION

Hello, Leon. On Monday, 08 January 2024 at 17:18, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: > Hi all, > > it seems that VLC is in EPEL9 now. Looks like some license changes > allows packaging some multimedia stuff now. I noticed also the > new epel-cisco-openh264 repo. > > Unfortunately, I'm not

Re: intent to hand over or orphan several scientific packages and their build requirements

On Wednesday, 27 December 2023 at 23:26, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hello! > I intend to hand over primary maintainership of the following packages > or orphan them if nobody steps up: > arpack > chemtool > cp2k > elpa > inchi > python-colorspac

Re: intent to hand over or orphan several scientific packages and their build requirements

ut @scitech_sig as the default bugzilla assignee for EPEL. Can you change the default assignee for Fedora to yourself? It looks like it didn't get reset after transferring the project to you. > On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 11:26 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > chemtool &

Re: utf8cpp update to 4.0.5

On Thursday, 23 November 2023 at 17:44, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Dear all, > I am in the process of updating utf8cpp (a header only package) > from 3.2.5 to 4.0.2 in rawhide. No rebuilds are necessary immediately, Upstream released 4.0.5 in the meantime, so rebased. &g

intent to hand over or orphan several scientific packages and their build requirements

Hello! I intend to hand over primary maintainership of the following packages or orphan them if nobody steps up: arpack chemtool cp2k elpa inchi python-colorspacious python-fypp python-GridDataFormats python-gsd python-kaitaistruct python-mmtf python-mrcfile python-Pympler tachyon wxmacmolplt

Re: Self Introduction: Rafel Amer

Welcome to Fedora, Rafel! On Sunday, 10 December 2023 at 22:17, Rafel Amer Ramon wrote: >Hi, >my name is Rafel Amer and I'm professor at the Technical University of >Catalonia [1]https:/www.upc.edu. I teach Maths >and I use sagemath for my classes. After the sagemath package is >

Re: Help packaging PyTorch dependencies for Fedora

On Friday, 08 December 2023 at 16:34, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Friday, December 8, 2023 12:41:59 AM EST Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: > > Congratulations for the PyTorch package! > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-torch > > > > I hope someone will announce this great achievement to the

Re: Fedora Review Service and setting the AutomationTriaged keyword

On Saturday, 09 December 2023 at 19:32, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Hello, > a year ago I announced > > and > launched the Fedora Review Service >

Re: troff noise when grepping man page?

On Thursday, 30 November 2023 at 01:13, Chris Murphy wrote: > $ man 5 btrfs | grep enospc >enospc_debug, noenospc_debug > troff::870: warning: cannot select font 'C' > troff::888: warning: cannot select font 'C' > troff::905: warning: cannot select font 'C' > troff::924: warning: cannot

utf8cpp update to 4.0.2

Dear all, I am in the process of updating utf8cpp (a header only package) from 3.2.5 to 4.0.2 in rawhide. No rebuilds are necessary immediately, but I did rebuild all consumers in COPR[1]. Here are the results: Dependent packages: $ fedrq whatrequires --src --formatter name utf8cpp-devel

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

Hello, Carlos. On Sunday, 19 November 2023 at 15:20, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: > Hi all, > I have been in the process of becoming a co-maintainer of *libcap*. But I > still need the sponsorship part of it. Hoping it is resolved before the 6 > weeks mark. I got the non-responsive issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Linker Error on Security Issues (System-Wide)

On Thursday, 16 November 2023 at 09:43, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > > Does the `--no-warn-rwx-segments` disable erroring out on both loadable > > rwx segments and tls rwx segments? > > Yes. > > At the time I wrote the feature I did consider having separate options > for the two tests,

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Linker Error on Security Issues (System-Wide)

Hi, On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 12:07, Aoife Moloney wrote: [...] > == Summary == > Change the system linker (ld.bfd) so that by default it will generate > an error message and fail if it is asked to create an executable > binary that contains one or more known security issues. These issues >

Re: Mysterious weak dependencies on qadwaitadecorations-qt5/qt6

On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 10:49, Jan Grulich wrote: > Hi, > > This is specified in the QAdwaitaDecorations package itself. > > See > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qadwaitadecorations/blob/rawhide/f/qadwaitadecorations.spec#_31 > . Thanks, I forgot about Supplements. Regards,

Mysterious weak dependencies on qadwaitadecorations-qt5/qt6

Hello! I'm having hard time figuring out which package brought in the weak dependencies in my morning update: ... Installing weak dependencies: qadwaitadecorations-qt5 x86_64 0.1.1-1.fc38 updates 55 k qadwaitadecorations-qt6 x86_64 0.1.1-1.fc38 updates 62 k After the update completed, rpm says

Re: shotcut compilation fails with "error: ‘hasPro’ was not declared in this scope"

On Sunday, 24 September 2023 at 11:11, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > shotcut compilation [1] fails with "error: ‘hasPro’ was not declared in this > scope" message [...] > In file included from /usr/include/qt6/QtGui/QTextCharFormat:1, > from >

Re: libtommath minor soname bump

On Thursday, 07 September 2023 at 22:40, František Šumšal wrote: [...] > Both abipkgdiff and rpmsodiff seem to be happy, i.e. there were no > added/changed/removed symbols between 1.2.0 and 1.2.1, so the bump > should be safe. Excellent, this means the version update should be transparent to any

Re: libtommath minor soname bump

On Thursday, 07 September 2023 at 11:13, František Šumšal wrote: > Hello, > > I plan to bump libtommath to 1.2.1 in Rawhide, which bumps the respective > shared library to libtommath.so.1.2.1. According to repoquery all > dependencies depend only on libtommath.1, so no rebuild should be

Re: PDC replacement proposal

On Tuesday, 05 September 2023 at 01:05, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 22:26 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Monday, 04 September 2023 at 17:37, Adam Williamson wrote: > > [...] > > > BTW, the email seems kind of weird. The

Re: PDC replacement proposal

On Monday, 04 September 2023 at 17:37, Adam Williamson wrote: [...] > BTW, the email seems kind of weird. There are lots of places where it > seems like it's referring to external information - "as demonstrated > here", "Previously, we followed this process to update it, but now we > have

Orphaned pseudo

Hi! I decided to orphan the pseudo[1] package. I packaged it to address some issues I had with fakeroot but I don't use either anymore. Upstream is active, so the package could use an update. There's one bug open[2]. The package is co-maintained by Igor, but he doesn't seem to be very active. Cc'd

Re: lzma-sdk and undefined references

On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 06:39, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 6:30 AM Julian Sikorski wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > now that lzma-sdk in Fedora rawhide is no longer ancient, I tried using > > it with mame. Unfortunately, I got a number of undefined references when

Re: Self Introduction: Adam Piasecki

Cześć, Adam! On Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 15:48, Adam Piasecki wrote: [...] > Here's to many fruitful discussions! Welcome to Fedora! It was an excellent opportunity to meet you in person at Flock. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org There should be a science of

rpmbuild 7z source archive extraction fails due to rpm regression

Hi! In case you're wondering why rpmbuild can't build your package if it has a .7z tarball in it anymore, it's a regression since rpm switched to cmake as build system and the new build script sets the 7z extractor binary to /usr/bin/7zip instead of /usr/bin/7za like the autotools one did. More

Re: Self Introduction: Julio Faracco

Hello, Julio! On Monday, 07 August 2023 at 17:01, Julio Faracco wrote: > Hello all, > > My name is Julio Faracco and I have been contributing to open-source > software for a long time in several manners. You can see my name in > some contributions like libvirt, qemu, packagekit, etc. Btw, I love

Re: How to: correctly use sysusers.d?

On Saturday, 05 August 2023 at 22:56, Fabio Valentini wrote: [...] > Any help would be appreciated. I think you need a combination of sysusers.d and tmpfiles.d. One example would be the minidlna package I moved over from RPM Fusion recently:

Re: RFC authselect: mdns or mdns-minimal

On Tuesday, 01 August 2023 at 12:16, Petr Menšík wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > With Avahi upstream maintainer hat on, I would say it still makes sense to > have separate mdns*_minimal and mdns? modules. I would say mdns > (non-minimal) should be rarely needed, because by default it should be used > just

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired this week

On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 12:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching. > > 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libplacebo

On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 20:47, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2023-07-28 at 11:00 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > libplacebo was just bumped from libplacebo.so.264 to libplacebo.so.292. > > This broke ffmpeg and mpv: > > > > $ dnf repoquer

Unannounced soname bump: libplacebo

libplacebo was just bumped from libplacebo.so.264 to libplacebo.so.292. This broke ffmpeg and mpv: $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide 'libplacebo.so.264()(64bit)' libavfilter-free-0:6.0-9.fc39.x86_64 libplacebo-devel-0:5.264.1-2.fc39.x86_64

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Enable fwupd-refresh.timer by default on IoT, CoreOS & Server Editions (Self-Contained)

On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 21:11, Björn Persson wrote: > Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 26/07/2023 11:04, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > You could, for example, buy a supported Logitech > > > Receiver > > > > I don't recommend

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Enable fwupd-refresh.timer by default on IoT, CoreOS & Server Editions (Self-Contained)

On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 10:49, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 26/07/2023 10:32, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Those devices which do support fwupd have a large enough market share > > that it is justifiable to enable it, even if there are many machines > > which can't support it. > >

Re: Rawhide update gating: mass rebuild issues

Hi, Adam! On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 19:31, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Just wanted to drop a note for anyone who noticed their > Rawhide updates stuck in gating for an unusually long time > yesterday/today. Thanks for the write-up. It shows how much hard work is being done in the

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Enable fwupd-refresh.timer by default on IoT, CoreOS & Server Editions (Self-Contained)

On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 06:23, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > Am 23.07.23 um 00:39 schrieb Neal Gompa: > > Actually, why wouldn't this be used everywhere? > > Because fwupd only works on a small set of machines? Define small. :) It works, for example, on any machine that has a Logitech Unifying/

Re: Several questionable packages installed on fresh system

On Thursday, 13 July 2023 at 14:42, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 13. 07. 23 v 14:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 10. 07. 23 v 10:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > > exiv2 > > > > > So this is pulled in by exiv2-libs: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/blob/rawhide/f/exiv2.spec#_53-58 > >

Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)

On Friday, 07 July 2023 at 04:16, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 09:40:59 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: > > It needs to be off by default. See KDE’s telemetry policy > > Again, if it's off by default then the data will be garbage. There is > no point in doing opt-in

Re: Several questionable packages installed on fresh system

On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 11:00, Olivier Fourdan wrote: [...] > Can't comment on all the packages you listed, but the C preprocessor > (CPP) is indeed required by xrdb (that's an option in xrdb, see "-cpp" > in man xrdb) and xrdb itself is required by GDM: >

Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)

On Friday, 07 July 2023 at 23:15, Michael Catanzaro wrote: [...] > The local collection is a bit of a hole, but I like your suggestion to > put a short time limit on that. Perhaps we can collect for something > like one hour locally, then delete if the user has not consented to > upload before

Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)

On Saturday, 08 July 2023 at 19:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 01:06:01PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 06/07/2023 18:10, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > but the conversation about each change > > > will take place on Fedora Discussion at > > >

Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)

On Friday, 07 July 2023 at 23:45, Björn Persson wrote: > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > The problem is if users are expected to answer, they are going to > > probably answer No and it's effectively the same as an opt-in. But if > > we have a default value, users will be inclined to leave the

Re: F39 Change Proposal: LibuserDeprecation (System Wide)

On Monday, 26 June 2023 at 03:16, James Ralston wrote: [...] > To remove a user from a group: > > lgroupmod -m someuser somegroup [...] > But groupmod has no ability to remove a user from a group. [...] > For shadow-utils 4.10 or later, usermod has a new -r option, so it is > possible to

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 12:37, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 30/06/2023 10:01, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > As it is, you're forcing the above maintainers to > > scramble to fix their packages at the beginning of summer holiday > > season. >

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Vitaly, On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 07:42, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > The side tag has been merged: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4e8e736635 > > FTBFS (final): > > arbor (not related to fmt, some tests failed on s390x) > CuraEngine > bout++ > cachelib > dolphin-emu

Re: F38 updates stuck in pending

On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 08:23, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > If anyone reading this email has special powers to get some of the > week old F38 updates unstuck from pending, please click the magic > button.  > > An example of such an update: >

Re: UW-IMAP

Hello, David. On Thursday, 29 June 2023 at 14:57, David Both wrote: > I have noticed that uw-imap is no longer in the Fedora repo and that the > last was F33. I like it far better than the other options because it is > the IMAP server that best "does one things and does it well." It also >

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Wednesday, 28 June 2023 at 08:32, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 23/05/2023 12:22, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: > > I will use my proven-packager rights to rebuild all dependent packages > > in a separate side tag next week. > > Koji is now broken in this side tag (f39-build-side-69392): > >

Re: CentOS Stream, RHEL, and Fedora [was Re: What is Fedora?]

On Sunday, 25 June 2023 at 02:44, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 6:09 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > >> > >> Josh Boyer wrote: > >> > Agree with Matthew fully here. We've been working rather hard > >> > internally to adjust the development

Re: Koji builders cannot build Wine Mono

On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 09:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hello, Michael. > > On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 07:21, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was attempting to push a Wine Mono update today but ran into a problem > > with all

Re: SIG proposal: Multimedia SIG

On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 00:01, JT wrote: > In the original post, I took private to mean its own dedicated list... > not that it'd be hidden from view from everyone. IMHO everything with > Fedora should be in the open. Bugs should be reported upstream, so I > dont see why there would need to

Re: Koji builders cannot build Wine Mono

Hello, Michael. On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 07:21, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hi, > > I was attempting to push a Wine Mono update today but ran into a problem > with all versions of Fedora when building in Koji. > > The Wine Mono update successfully compiles on my local system using "fedpkg >

SIG proposal: Multimedia SIG

Hello! With the growing number of multimedia packages in Fedora, mostly owing to the introduction of ffmpeg package and Legal permission to enable and ship many popular codecs, I think we've reached the critical mass of packages and maintainers that warrants the creation of a Multimedia SIG. I

Re: LibreOffice packages

On Wednesday, 07 June 2023 at 08:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 6/6/23 18:07, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > In general, I do like having software available as flatpaks, > > especially if it's not available from Fedora repositories. > > However, there's also the question of *trust* - do I trust the

Re: libftdi: Failure to create output directory (aarch64 only)

On Tuesday, 06 June 2023 at 10:55, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:50:09 +0200 > Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:53:59 -0500 > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > > I just saw this[1] on the packager dashboard: > > > > > > error: Could not create output directory > > >

Re: LibreOffice packages

On Saturday, 03 June 2023 at 14:42, Michael Catanzaro wrote: [...] > My $0.02: maintaining complex desktop applications as part of the operating > system requires significant effort and produces low value for users when you > can easily install that app from Flathub instead. (It *especially*

Re: Old stalled bodhi updates

On Wednesday, 31 May 2023 at 09:08, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 30/05/23 22:15, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f563346d4d is > > similar, but this time it was ejected from its push *to stable* (not to > > testing), again allegedly for

Re: Self Introduction

Hello, Philipp! On Monday, 22 May 2023 at 12:24, Philipp Stanner wrote: > Hi Fedora Folks! > > As I am going to do some RPM packaging in the future (for my employer > and probably also a bit in private) I wanted to introduce me briefly. > I'm Philipp, based in southern Germany and have been an

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

On Tuesday, 25 April 2023 at 12:30, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Dominik Mierzejewski: > > > You don't have threaded replies, either. And quoting the post you're > > replying to is entirely non-intuitive. It took me a while to discover > > that you have to click on the "speech bubble" icon inside

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

On Friday, 21 April 2023 at 20:17, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 11:00 -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 04:55:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > > I agree there's a huge lack of netiquette in Fedora's mailing lists, > > > with wholesale

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

On Monday, 17 April 2023 at 17:53, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > I want to thank you all for the feedback. > > Everything was already mentioned in the discussion so I am not going > to dig into details again. Just a quick summary for anyone who wants > TL;DR for this thread: > > - I am not going to

Unannounced API break in babl

Hello! The latest babl-0.1.102 update in rawhide [1] introduces an unannounced API break. It no longer ships babl.pc and included babl-0.1.pc instead, which means any application trying to detect it using pkg-config will fail. This causes, for example, gimp to FTBFS: ... configure:24501: checking

Re: A question about custom MIME types

On Wednesday, 05 April 2023 at 11:41, Sébastien Le Roux wrote: [...] > Now comes my question: some of these files seem to be configuration > files, that the 'update-mime-database' simply updates, so I am not > confident in saying that these should be installed by my RPM, it might > just be better

Re: New machine - no virtual terminals

On Wednesday, 22 March 2023 at 17:12, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 3/22/23 11:23 AM, stan via devel wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:14:44 -0400 > > "Steven A. Falco" wrote: > > > > > I think I'm finally getting somewhere with this problem. > > > > > > My motherboard has a built-in VGA

Re: Status of AVIF support in Fedora

Hi, Sandro. On Sunday, 19 March 2023 at 13:14, Sandro wrote: [...] > Dominik, since you picked up the RPMFusion package, which conflicts > with the new Fedora package, could you bring me up to speed what needs > (is planned to) happen with the RPMFusion package? For now, the Fedora package has a

Re: Status of AVIF support in Fedora

On Saturday, 18 March 2023 at 08:40, Leigh Scott wrote: > I have orphaned libheif at rpmfusion as I have no desire to manage > another split package. > > https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/libheif/ Thanks for the link. Picked up. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

Hi, Bob! On Thursday, 16 March 2023 at 07:34, Bob Mauchin wrote: > I'm here just very busy with work and being tired, I ll try to work on > stuff this weekend. It's a relief knowing you're okay. I have one bug in particular I'd like to draw your attention to:

Re: Strange RPM "recognition of file" error in f38 and f39 build

On Thursday, 09 February 2023 at 14:02, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi, > > Building Thunderbird for f38 and f39 now bails out with an RPM build > error > > Recognition of file > "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/thunderbird-102.7.2-1.fc39.aarch64/usr/lib64/thunderbird/libxul.so" > failed: mode 100755 ,

Re: [Scitech] openmpi 5.0.0 drops 32-bit support

On Friday, 03 February 2023 at 05:20, Orion Poplawski wrote: > As a heads up - openmpi 5.0.0 drops support for 32-bit builds [1]. I'm not > sure how far away it is from release - we're on rc10 at the moment. [...] > Personally I've been planning on dropping 32-bit support in a buch of > packages

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired next week

On Thursday, 02 February 2023 at 03:53, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:45 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. > > > tpm2-tss-engine mzavalavz > > I can fix this (up-lift to the current

Re: Unannounced .so version bump in gtest 1.13.0

On Tuesday, 31 January 2023 at 16:29, Ben Beasley wrote: > I finished checking for fallout from the gtest 1.13.0 update in Rawhide. > The following packages built with GCC 13 but FTBFS with gtest-0.13.0 and > have NOT been patched yet: [...] > gstreamermm

Re: updating cmark to 0.30

On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 06:16, Jens Petersen wrote: > Thanks for this feedback. > > Not sure what happened :-( but I am rebuilding them now (mkvtoolnix was > expected). Feel free to fix mkvtoolnix using the upstream patch I mentioned. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org

Re: FYI: boot issues with kernel 6.1.5+

On Sunday, 15 January 2023 at 23:07, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 15.01.23 um 22:35 schrieb Marius Schwarz: > > Hi, > > > > on Asrock 550B / Ryzen 5600X kernel 6.1.5 - 6.2.0 alpha are not booting, > > not even complaining about the irq vector bug in the firmware anymore, > > which happens extrem

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Monday, 05 December 2022 at 12:36, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Thursday, 12 January 2023 at 18:42, Susi Lehtola wrote: > On 12/5/22 13:36, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > > that the package should be retired, please

Re: Automation of Fedora SCM requests

On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 at 17:13, Michal Konecny wrote: > Hi everyone, > > all the remaining issues were solved and the bot is now processing > tickets as it should. I will watch the SCM request repository for next > few days to see if everything is working as it should. > Thanks for your

Re: Adding a Package to DNF (BeEF)

Hello, Josh. On Thursday, 12 January 2023 at 06:34, josh crew wrote: > Hi there, I want to ask about adding a package to DNF, if it would be > accepted, how i may go about doing/helping with it. To make a package available for installation with dnf from package repositories provided by Fedora,

Re: F38 proposal: Ruby 3.2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wednesday, 04 January 2023 at 13:20, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Just to let everybody know, Ruby 3.2 has landed in Rawhide [1]. The binary > packages have been rebuilt, but there might be other compatibility issue. > > From top of my head, I know that sdformat will be FTBFS: >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >