Subject: Self Introduction: Danie de Jager

Hi, I'm responsible for creating packages in my team and want to join the Fedora packagers in creating and maintaining packages. I believe this will improve my knowledge to create better packages. Danie This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the intended

Subject: Self Introduction: iurii Mykhalskyi

Hello everyone, My name is Iurii. I'm an embedded/Linux kernel developer and previously has some touches with open-sources community during upstream functionality into Xen Hypervisor, Linux kernel and Yocto (a little bit :) ). Now I would like to help with supporting xmonad-related packages in

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Vanessa Christopher

Welcome to the community Vanessa. On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, 8:16 pm Vanessa Christopher, wrote: > Hi, I'm Vanessa Christopher from Cameroon, an Outreachy intern with Fedora > "Extend and improve NeuroFedora's user consumable artefacts". It's really > been exciting learning new stuffs and joining the

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Vanessa Christopher

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 07:15:49PM -, Vanessa Christopher wrote: > Hi, I'm Vanessa Christopher from Cameroon, an Outreachy intern with Fedora > "Extend and improve NeuroFedora's user consumable artefacts". It's really > been exciting learning new stuffs and joining the Fedora community.

Subject: Self Introduction: Vanessa Christopher

Hi, I'm Vanessa Christopher from Cameroon, an Outreachy intern with Fedora "Extend and improve NeuroFedora's user consumable artefacts". It's really been exciting learning new stuffs and joining the Fedora community. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Micah Shennum

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:51 PM Micah Shennum wrote: > I have been using Fedora for a long time (circa 24), and have been > providing feedback to bodhi / updates-testing for a while now. I was > looking for a way to get more involved, and was surprised at how fairly > straight forward creating

Subject: Self Introduction: Micah Shennum

Hello, I have been using Fedora for a long time (circa 24), and have been providing feedback to bodhi / updates-testing for a while now. I was looking for a way to get more involved, and was surprised at how fairly straight forward creating rpm packages seems when looking into locally bumping

Re: Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

For example: F33 Change proposal: Replace Linux kernel with BSD kernel - System-Wide The main thing that needs to stand out, from what I've read here, is that it is a change proposal. The version and type are less important from a "looking at the subject quickly" perspective. No, the bi

Re: Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

oposal: Replace Linux kernel with BSD kernel - System-Wide The main thing that needs to stand out, from what I've read here, is that it is a change proposal. The version and type are less important from a "looking at the subject quickly" perspective. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senio

Re: Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

elf-explanatory. I think the idea is that most people would know what it is or would find out pretty quickly. The objective is to have sufficient information in the visible subject area of an email client to be able to identify the threads.

Re: Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

On 16/07/20 08:39 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:49:13AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 7/15/20 3:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >FCP33: Support PARSEC [Self-Contained] >FCP33: PostgreSQL 31 [Self-Contained] >FCP33: Policy for Modules in Fedora and Fedora

Re: Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:49:13AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 7/15/20 3:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >FCP33: Support PARSEC [Self-Contained] > >FCP33: PostgreSQL 31 [Self-Contained] > >FCP33: Policy for Modules in Fedora and Fedora ELN [Self-Contained] > >FCP33: Golang 1.15 [Late,

Re: Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

On 7/15/20 3:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: FCP33: Support PARSEC [Self-Contained] FCP33: PostgreSQL 31 [Self-Contained] FCP33: Policy for Modules in Fedora and Fedora ELN [Self-Contained] FCP33: Golang 1.15 [Late, System-Wide] FCP33: X.org Utility Deaggregation [Self-Contained] Yes!

Re: Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:18:51PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Ben Cotton wrote: > > As noted by Milan Crha, the existing format can result in threads that > > are hard to distinguish when the subject is truncated by the width of > > the mail client window. Screens

Re: Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

Ben Cotton wrote: > As noted by Milan Crha, the existing format can result in threads that > are hard to distinguish when the subject is truncated by the width of > the mail client window. Screens are often pretty wide these days, but > ~40 characters is still a lot to use. On th

Re: Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

format can result in threads that >> are hard to distinguish when the subject is truncated by the width of >> the mail client window. Screens are often pretty wide these days, but >> ~40 characters is still a lot to use. > >Thank you! This has definitely been a proble

Re: Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

On 6/29/20 8:22 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: I will replace "Fedora Change proposal: " with " - Fedora Change proposal" As noted by Milan Crha, the existing format can result in threads that are hard to distinguish when the subject is truncated by the width of the mail cl

Heads up: changing the subject format of change proposal announcements

Just in case anyone is parsing the subject line of change proposal announcements (I really hope not, but if you are, please let me know off-list what your use case is. I'm curious), I'm going to make a change to how these are formatted. I will replace "Fedora Change proposal: " with

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Francis Gesora

Jambo Benson, Glad to be here. Thanks! On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 11:33 AM Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Francis Gesora wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am Francis, based in Nairobi, Kenya. > > I am joining as a package maintainer to assist Ankur manage xmedcon and >

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Francis Gesora

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Francis Gesora wrote: > Hi All, > > I am Francis, based in Nairobi, Kenya. > > I am joining as a package maintainer to assist Ankur manage xmedcon and deps > as i get up to speed with package maintenance. Hello/Hujambo Gesora, Awesome to have you here.

Subject: Self Introduction: Francis Gesora

Hi All, I am Francis, based in Nairobi, Kenya. I am joining as a package maintainer to assist Ankur manage xmedcon and deps as i get up to speed with package maintenance. Thanks! -- Regards, Gesora. ___ devel mailing list --

Subject: Self Introduction: Sourabh Jain

Hello All,My name is Sourabh Jain and I am new to the packaging world.I have been a Fedora consumer for almost a decade and now I am really excitedto work with the community.My primary job involves a contribution to Linux RAS (Reliability Accessibility and Serviceability)feature and I also write

Subject: Self Introduction Blaise Pabon

Hi everybody, I'm a relatively new contributor, although I have been watching from the sidelines since 1993. A few years ago (as penance for 15 years in sales) I got back into an ops position doing release management and I became a pythonista... the community is wonderful. I'm a strong advocate

[no subject]

The Fedora 29 Beta RC5 compose [1] is GO and is going to be shipped live on Tuesday, September 25, 2018. For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3]. Thank you to everyone who has and still is working on this release! [1]

[Test-Announce] (no subject)

The Fedora 29 Beta RC5 compose [1] is GO and is going to be shipped live on Tuesday, September 25, 2018. For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3]. Thank you to everyone who has and still is working on this release! [1]

[EPEL-devel] (no subject)

(This is mostly a duplicate of a post I sent to devel@. I wanted to alert epel-devel@ but didn't want to crosspost.) Following my proposal in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/EPELPythonStubPackages which met with favor from a number of folks here, I went ahead and set up four dummy

[no subject]

Hello all, On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came out today[2]. At this time the following Container Images are available in the Fedora

[no subject]

this is the working patch for the cmst.pro file: --- cmst-5be4ce6f9a733e609cfcf37492f5c025f80d36c9/cmst.pro.orig 2017-03-02 20:47:34.985348086 +0100 +++ cmst-5be4ce6f9a733e609cfcf37492f5c025f80d36c9/cmst.pro 2017-03-02 20:48:10.965692212 +0100 @@ -56,7 +56,9 @@ # desktop file

[no subject]

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: > In the spirit of the season I'm giving away packages :) > > I am not using most of these anymore, so I'd like to send them off to a > good home: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/bcl/ All the python-* >

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Romain Philibert

Hello Romain, On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 10:14 +, Romain Philibert wrote: > Hello, > > I am working at Worldline, we are using massively CentOS and EPEL. > Unfortunately somes packages installed on our serveurs are becoming > retired from EPEL. I would like to be part of the Fedora community in >

Subject: Self Introduction: Romain Philibert

Hello, I am working at Worldline, we are using massively CentOS and EPEL. Unfortunately somes packages installed on our serveurs are becoming retired from EPEL. I would like to be part of the Fedora community in order to maintain such packages. On my free time, I love playing with OpenSource,

Re: Standard, consistent subject lines for automated emails

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 01:34:12PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > A related topic is headers, which could be used for filtering. > Various systems add headers -- see examples below -- but again there's > not much consistency and the headers aren't particularly useful for > filtering. A

Re: Standard, consistent subject lines for automated emails

Am 18.01.2016 um 16:27 schrieb Matthew Miller: On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 01:34:12PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: A related topic is headers, which could be used for filtering. Various systems add headers -- see examples below -- but again there's not much consistency and the headers aren't

Re: Standard, consistent subject lines for automated emails

On 16/01/16 13:34 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Here are a small collection of subject lines of emails sent automatically to me by various Fedora systems in the past few days: Subject: upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2015-850e89be8b Subject: [Fedora Update] [comment] auto-buildrequires-1.2-1

Standard, consistent subject lines for automated emails

Here are a small collection of subject lines of emails sent automatically to me by various Fedora systems in the past few days: Subject: upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2015-850e89be8b Subject: [Fedora Update] [comment] auto-buildrequires-1.2-1.fc23 Subject: rjones's libguestfs-1.33.1-2.fc24

Re: Standard, consistent subject lines for automated emails

Am 16.01.2016 um 14:34 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: Here are a small collection of subject lines of emails sent automatically to me by various Fedora systems in the past few days: Subject: upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2015-850e89be8b Subject: [Fedora Update] [comment] auto-buildrequires-1.2-1

Re: Standard, consistent subject lines for automated emails

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:34:12 + "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > Here are a small collection of subject lines of emails sent > automatically to me by various Fedora systems in the past few days: > > Subject: upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2015-8

Re: Standard, consistent subject lines for automated emails

On Sat, 2016-01-16 at 12:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:34:12 + > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Here are a small collection of subject lines of emails sent > > automatically to me by various Fedora systems i

[no subject]

Hi, My name is Martin Hagström and I have just submitted my first package review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268910 I have been using Linux for about a decade and have been a Linux Systems Administrator for the last three years. In this job I have done quite a bit of

[no subject]

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Sergio Belkin sebelk at gmail.com https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel wrote: * Hi, * * Could you tell me if anyone else is having this kind of issues: * * [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 ** [vie may 29

Re: [EPEL-devel] [EPEL] #24: make EPEL trac e-mail subject shorter

#24: make EPEL trac e-mail subject shorter --+ Reporter: till | Owner: epel-wranglers Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Package request

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Sandro Bonazzola

2015-03-02 3:34 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com: Il 27/02/2015 18:26, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade ha scritto: 2015-02-27 13:02 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com: Hi, Hello and Welcome Sandro! following [1] I'm writing for introducing myself. My name is

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Sandro Bonazzola

Il 27/02/2015 18:26, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade ha scritto: 2015-02-27 13:02 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com: Hi, Hello and Welcome Sandro! following [1] I'm writing for introducing myself. My name is Sandro Bonazzola and I'm a Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat.

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Sandro Bonazzola

2015-02-27 13:02 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com: Hi, Hello and Welcome Sandro! following [1] I'm writing for introducing myself. My name is Sandro Bonazzola and I'm a Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat. I'm leading RHEV integration team and I'm oVirt[2] project release

Subject: Self Introduction: Sandro Bonazzola

Hi, following [1] I'm writing for introducing myself. My name is Sandro Bonazzola and I'm a Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat. I'm leading RHEV integration team and I'm oVirt[2] project release manager. I'm also representing oVirt project in CentOS Virt SIG[3]. In the past I contributed to

Re: [EPEL-devel] [EPEL] #24: make EPEL trac e-mail subject shorter

#24: make EPEL trac e-mail subject shorter --+ Reporter: till | Owner: epel-wranglers Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Package request |Version

[EPEL-devel] Testing epel subject line on epel-devel

I am trying to fix it so EPEL doesn't get removed from the line. The recommended solution will break people who filter by subject line.. sorry. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

EPEL [Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux] #6: Fix subject line in mailman

#6: Fix EPEL subject line in mailman -+ Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Package request |Version: Keywords

EPEL (no subject)

Hallo, I hope i’m at the righte place. I have a questetion about EPEL. My questtion is, it is possible to use an old EPEL Version (for example EPEL 6) with a new Enterprise Linux Version (for example CentOS 7) . Thank you for your answers. Gabriel Eisele Gesendet von Windows

Re: EPEL (no subject)

On 08/21/2014 04:46 PM, Gabriel Eisele wrote: Hallo, I hope i’m at the righte place. I have a questetion about EPEL. My questtion is, it is possible to use an old EPEL Version (for example EPEL 6) with a new Enterprise Linux Version (for example CentOS 7) . Thank you for your answers.

Re: EPEL (no subject)

On 21 August 2014 08:46, Gabriel Eisele gabrieleis...@hotmail.de wrote: Hallo, I hope i’m at the righte place. I have a questetion about EPEL. My questtion is, it is possible to use an old EPEL Version (for example EPEL 6) with a new Enterprise Linux Version (for example CentOS 7) . The

[no subject]

-- Saludos! Javier Hernández Santiago Ing. Electrónica y Comunicaciones Universidad de Guadalajara Cel. 3313 6018 75 ___ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

On 24 Apr 2013 01:22, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On 22/04/13 10:55 AM, Rave it wrote: Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 + schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org: For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout having more infomation what the

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 17:48 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:55:02 +0200 Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de wrote: Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 + schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org: For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:55:02 +0200 Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de wrote: Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 + schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org: For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 16:05 +0200 schrieb Richard Marko: More feedback is welcome. 1. Announce changes like this one in advance on devel-announce. 2. Provide some documentation about FAF. What do these bugs mean to developers and package maintainers. hat are we supposed

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

On 04/23/2013 05:27 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 16:05 +0200 schrieb Richard Marko: More feedback is welcome. 1. Announce changes like this one in advance on devel-announce. I will. 2. Provide some documentation about FAF. What do these bugs mean to

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

On 22/04/13 10:55 AM, Rave it wrote: Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 + schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org: For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout having more infomation what the user did if abrt would trigered. Maybe thy played arround without

Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

Seems like someone turned on a bot this morning. Just a heads up.. these have [faf] in the subject line and seem to be filing bugs on old components (for me at least). Looks like it's just starting to make the rounds. Who owns this? Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote: Seems like someone turned on a bot this morning. Just a heads up.. these have [faf] in the subject line and seem to be filing bugs on old components (for me at least). Looks like it's just starting to make the rounds. Who

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

On 04/22/2013 02:24 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: Seems like someone turned on a bot this morning. Just a heads up.. these have [faf] in the subject line and seem to be filing bugs on old components (for me at least). Looks like it's just starting to make the rounds. Who owns this? Dan Yes, we did

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

On 04/22/2013 06:24 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: Seems like someone turned on a bot this morning. Just a heads up.. these have [faf] in the subject line and seem to be filing bugs on old components (for me at least). Looks like it's just starting to make the rounds. Who owns this? Dan I also find

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com wrote: Yes, we did that and started filing bugs for everything that seemed worth (even old stuff). After initial sync between bugzilla and faf server it won't create as much tickets for old components as it does now which is

Re: Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 + schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org: For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout having more infomation what the user did if abrt would trigered. Maybe thy played arround without knowledge about the programm and did wrong

Re: Receiving bugs from Crash Catcher with [faf] in the subject line

On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:55:02 +0200 Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de wrote: Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 + schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org: For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout having more infomation what the user did if abrt would trigered.

[389-devel] (no subject)

-- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Subject: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2012-09-19)

On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 23:22 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Do we no longer email the feature / bug tracker owners before discussions that affect their features or bugs? I don't think we ever did that, at least I don't remember that. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've

Re: Subject: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2012-09-19)

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:18:07AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 23:22 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Do we no longer email the feature / bug tracker owners before discussions that affect their features or bugs? I don't think we ever did that, at least I don't remember

Subject: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2012-09-19)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic 932 F18 Features - progress at Feature

Re: Subject: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2012-09-19)

Do we no longer email the feature / bug tracker owners before discussions that affect their features or bugs? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual

Subject: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2012-09-12)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic 932 F18 Features - progress at Feature

Re: Subject: Re: Mate-Desktop

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future

Re: Subject: Re: Mate-Desktop

Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future endeavors. -- rex No mercy, no thanks. Why do you Mr. Rex Dieter as

Subject: Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2012-08-20)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #888 F18 Feature: UEFI Secure Boot -

Subject: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2012-08-13)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #NNN Title of ticket Nothing I'm aware of

[no subject]

Hi, I'm a long time user and first time contributor to Fedora. I think it's about time I started giving back! Currently, I work as an engineer for Eucalyptus Systems and I write code in bash, python, perl, and C++. I've submitted my first package review which you can view here:

Subject: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2012-06-11)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = = New business = #topic #857 F18 Feature:

Subject: Schedule for monday's FESCo Meeting (2012-04-23)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #829 New proven packagers request:

[no subject]

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 2:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #699 Proposal to remove the

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:40:20 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:13:08PM +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote: tor 2011-10-13 klockan 12:32 -0600 skrev Kevin Fenzi: Currently there's not a way to do this, but there really should be.

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Callum Lerwick s...@haxxed.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:55:59PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: Its the only right way to do it. As a general rule, a private ssh key should NEVER be

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:43 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: There are people that use their keys for more than one machine. You people make it sound like it is so easy to change keys. It is *NOT* PERIOD. Well if fedora infrastructure asked us to use gpg keys for ssh auth, and we all

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone made any serious use of gpg subkeys as ssh auth? I've been playing with it a little but havent fully made the jump yet. I've looked a little at monkeysphere this morning and it looks interesting. It'd be nice if

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote: I've looked a little at monkeysphere this morning and it looks interesting.  It'd be nice if at least the FI folks could publish the host keys for the Fedora systems using monkeysphere.  I plan on giving monkeysphere a good

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

tor 2011-10-13 klockan 12:32 -0600 skrev Kevin Fenzi: Currently there's not a way to do this, but there really should be. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2977 Not even uploading an empty key file? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:13:08PM +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote: tor 2011-10-13 klockan 12:32 -0600 skrev Kevin Fenzi: Currently there's not a way to do this, but there really should be. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2977 t Not even uploading an empty key

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On 10/12/2011 07:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: QA: Q: I never uploaded a ssh key to the Fedora Account System, nor am I in a group that needs one, do I still have to upload a new one? A: No. If you don't have a ssh public key uploaded or desire to do so, you can just change your password.

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote: Length beats out larger character set, which is nicely illustrated by the XKCD cartoon http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/password_strength.png Be careful, that xkcd strip glosses over how that phrase was actually

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Sure. However, if you have multiple keys with multiple passphrases, then it's extra work to compromise each key. Not true at all. If I keep my key(s) in a single location (a secure machine at my home), then either all keys in

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:59:31PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: 2) We've found PRIVATE keys on our servers By all means educate these users with a large clue-stick. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog:

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On 10/12/11 19:53, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:45 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: I have no problem with changing the password, but leave my ssh keys alone, unless there is a real reason to ask people to change them. Reading between the lines of recent attacks, it seems likely

Re: VerifyHostKeyDNS, was Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com writes: And if this malicious DNS administrator controls the caching nameserver you're using for DNS queries, he can present you ANY data even 'valid' fake DNSSEC data. This is not generally true. Resolver libraries can (and should, IMHO) verify DNSSEC themselves.

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:18:20PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:13:11 +0200 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote: OK, but then you should not penalize also the people who keep their SSH private keys only on safe private computers. We're sorry if it's causing you

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

Hi, Sure, ssh keys are much harder to compromise than passwords, but _assuming a compromise has happened_ the consequences of using a single key for everything are just as bad as using a single password for everything. One ssh key per project doesn't make sense at all to me. They all

Re: VerifyHostKeyDNS, was Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 10:29 +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote: Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com writes: And if this malicious DNS administrator controls the caching nameserver you're using for DNS queries, he can present you ANY data even 'valid' fake DNSSEC data. This is not generally true.

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

Hi, What can we do there? We can't separate out those with good practices and those without. For starters block ssh keys found @ fedorapeople.org ? cheers, Gerd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On 10/12/2011 09:59 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Henrik Nordström wrote: ons 2011-10-12 klockan 13:04 -0500 skrev Mike McGrath: Lots of people use and share keys across different projects. There is no security issue in sharing kes across different projects, other than that

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 10:59 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 10/12/2011 09:59 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Henrik Nordström wrote: ons 2011-10-12 klockan 13:04 -0500 skrev Mike McGrath: Lots of people use and share keys across different projects. There is no security

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On 10/13/2011 11:13 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote: On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 10:59 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 10/12/2011 09:59 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Henrik Nordström wrote: ons 2011-10-12 klockan 13:04 -0500 skrev Mike McGrath: Lots of people use and share keys across

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

On 10/13/2011 09:45 AM, Callum Lerwick wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote: Length beats out larger character set, which is nicely illustrated by the XKCD cartoon http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/password_strength.png Be careful, that xkcd

  1   2   >