--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Once, I had a clash with a british net controller, which I regarded
as
fascist instantly, imposing a limit of 5 K per piece of mail sent
to
the british network. It happened that one of my users had sent a
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
Once, I had a clash with a british net controller, which I regarded
as
fascist instantly, imposing a limit of 5 K per piece of mail sent
to
the british network. It happened
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I used the Packet network for many years, only as an operator and
'interested party'. I did talk to some sysops, and most were people
who
wanted the network to work. However, there were some who I suspected
: [digitalradio] Re: HF BBS systems
It seems like the need for speed has become a goal unto itself
with little
advantage to the broad majority who have to live with the wide
bandwidths
that higher speeds require. I'm curious as to why the need for speed is
driving some folks when it comes to amateur
Hi Rick,
Well, I had a go at Pactor and could not make it work, between the
SCS PTC-IIex and the SCS PTC-Pro I have here. The radios were the
problem, they would kerchunk away here and go nowhere, so I gave up
on it. I guess the radios were not suited to the switching times
required for
You bring up a good point and this is a good time to bring it up. The
definition of the Amateur Service in the US (and I think the ITU's is
the same) indicates the service is for radiocommunications between
duly authorized persons interested in radio technique solely with a
personal aim
