Garrett, I have always wondered why the FCC allows this to happen. It
seems to me that they are violating the rules.
I have a similar question about Pactor 3. Can someone explain why it
is allowed? My impression is that it is wider than 500 Hz and isn't
that the maximum bandwidth?
Howard K5HB
Howard Brown wrote:
Garrett, I have always wondered why the FCC allows this to happen. It
seems to me that they are violating the rules.
I have a similar question about Pactor 3. Can someone explain why it
is allowed? My impression is that it is wider than 500 Hz and isn't
that the
Roger your beating a very dead horse.
In just 41 days all the wide robots will have to be in
their own sub-band.
I sure hope this anti-wide stuff will stop soon.
John, W0JAB
Keep in mind that the enforcement resources of the FCC are pretty
limited, and Pactor 3 is not all that ubiquitous.
John,
At this time there is no strict limit on digital mode width except:
97.307 Emission standards.
(f)(2)No non-phone emission shall exceed the bandwidth of a
communications quality phone emission of the same modulation type.
This refers primarily to the HF bands.
Since the exact bandwidth
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
Roger your beating a very dead horse. In just 41 days all the wide
robots will have to be in their own sub-band.
I sure hope this anti-wide stuff will stop soon.
John, W0JAB
You mean you hope that the anti-Pactor stuff will stop. But you have
completely
Points taken.
What about the times I and other have been up around
075 to 077 with KB to KB on one of the Pactor modes
and without seeing any text someone starts calling CQ
with one of the sound card modes?
I did post a message about it a while back but I feel that once
anyone saw the word
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
Points taken. What about the times I and other have been up around
075 to 077 with KB to KB on one of the Pactor modes and without
seeing any text someone starts calling CQ with one of the sound card
modes?
There is a difference.
1. In the last 5 years of
