Demetre SV1UY wrote:
Hmm OK,
I hope this anti SCS thing is not going to end to being an
anti-European thing Roger. I get that feeling somehow, since SCS is
not an American company.
My dear fellow, I once owned an SCS PTC-II. Very few American hams ever
bought one--they never sold
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dear fellow, I once owned an SCS PTC-II. Very few American hams
ever
bought one--they never sold well here.
Quite the contrary, many american hams own a PTC-II modem, also there
are more PACTOR PMBOs in
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
Quite the contrary, many american hams own a PTC-II modem, also there
are more PACTOR PMBOs in USA than the rest of the World right now my
friend.
To paraphrase Bill Clinton, it depends on one's use of the word many.
In fact, a vanishingly small percentage of either
At 09:13 PM 29/12/2007, Rodger wrote:
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
Quite the contrary, many american hams own a PTC-II modem, also there
are more PACTOR PMBOs in USA than the rest of the World right now my
friend.
To paraphrase Bill Clinton, it depends on one's use of the word many.
In fact, a
I'm sorry to inform you that I USED the carrier detect feature when I
ran my packet station and had very little problem with the jamming
you are describing.
On the other hand, nothing I was sending was time sensitive therefore
setting up the connect schedules to keep trying throughout a 24 hour
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To paraphrase Bill Clinton, it depends on one's use of the word
many.
In fact, a vanishingly small percentage of either American or European
digital operators ever bought SCS modems, due to their high cost.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you'd actually read any of my posts, Demetre, you'd know that my
focus is on automatic stations without busy detectors -- no matter
what protocol they are using. In fact I recently posted here that
banning
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
So what you are talking about PACTOR 3 being the only offender is FAR
AWAY FROM THE TRUTH OM.
There is no system today that has such a DETECTOR you are dreaming
about.
My station does. A human operator.
Finally if you are so adament about such a detector why
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, a couple of points.
1. No one is defending W1AW or the other practices that involve
transmitting without listening. I happen to think that all such
practices are morally wrong and legally
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you'd actually read any of my posts, Demetre, you'd know that my
focus is on automatic stations without busy detectors -- no matter
what protocol they are using. In fact I recently posted here
I'm not sure what HF Packet BBS's you're talking about but all my
packet tnc's had a carrier detect feature and would not transmit if
one was detected. Was it perfect, heck no! But it was available AND
it was turned on.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL
Jim
as far as I know all the hardware for pactor has the same thing.
But only for other pactor signals just like what you posted about
the packet system.
John
At 09:34 PM 12/28/2007, you wrote:
I'm not sure what HF Packet BBS's you're talking about but all my
packet tnc's had a carrier detect
12 matches
Mail list logo
