On Sunday 13 January 2008 08:15:45 pm John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
The anti-automatic and anti-everything-that-is-not-PSK31
hams have a very hard time understanding what the rest are doing.
Some of us are just ant-Bully In The Neighborhood.
You simply refuse to recognize that some modes are a
For me, the proven offenders can be ATTENDED stations.
The past week I was linked to a Winlink station on 40 meters when
somebody started calling on top of us.
I turned on my linear, and he kept on calling. Three options to be
heard: my correspondent,
me, and me and my half gallon linear.
Jose Amador wrote:
For me, the proven offenders can be ATTENDED stations.
Indeed, Jose, this is always possible. Who among us has not on some
erroneous occasion transmitted without listening long ENOUGH, and
instead unintentionally QRMed an innocent QSO? But VERY few of us would
ever do
This is getting ridiculous! It takes me nearly 10 seconds to say
This is AA5J Is the frequency in use?
expeditionradio wrote:
This is simply childish backlash directed at me personally because I
opposed the Digital Stone Age Petition. It really has nothing at all
to do with HFLINK or ALE. It will go away.
Bonnie KQ6XA
Actually, what is childish is the never-ending assertion by Winlink
Exactly... they *just* don't get it frown
Bill KA8VIT
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:22:37 -0500
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink
Look at it this way - NO transmissions without
Skip wrote:
except in designated beacon areas or the
automatic subbands ( where it is presumed by the FCC to occur, since
unattended stations do not, and cannot, listen first for any other
activity
within range of the unattended station).
All the ALE data activity is in the automatic
All the ALE data activity is in the automatic subbands unless the
stations manually QSY off frequency under operator control.
So what's the concern?
As long as it always stays in the automatic subbands, there should be no
concern. In fact, ALE is a valuable resource, IMHO.
Skip KH6TY
At 08:14 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
Twice in the last seven days
I have had QSOs disrupted by a Pactor Winlink station firing up on top
of my QSO. Fortunately, both times I turned the power way up (from
about 40 watts to 200 watts) and we were able to work through it.
Roger - how do you know
At 08:05 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
This is getting ridiculous! It takes me nearly 10 seconds to say
This is AA5J Is the frequency in use?
In what mode?
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
At 08:14 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
Twice in the last seven days I have had QSOs disrupted by a Pactor
Winlink station firing up on top of my QSO. Fortunately, both times
I turned the power way up (from about 40 watts to 200 watts) and we
were able to work
Sorry about the bandwidth.
Stop the madness! how?
Programmers love changing programs.
As always flames to me, respectful and clean posts to the reflector.
73 ES CUL
==
Mr. John R. Klim II
N3KHK
ARRL LM-0008416263, AMSAT LM-2187, QRPARCI
Comments in line
Your problem, John, is that you are unable to stick to an argument of
the issues. Instead, everything becomes personal with you as evidenced
by the above ad hominem remarks. Disappointing.
Wrong again Roger.
I do pactor as well as RTTY and Amtor.
I can copy each of them
At 07:29 PM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
John, do you really characterize the innovation that's been driving the
development of new digital modes as madness? Do you really think that the
explosion of soundcard digital mode users is the problem.
No I don't Dave.
But I do feel that some have come to
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war
Dave AA6YQ wrote:
No one is beating on Pactor. The objects of mass disgust are
unattended stations that transmit without listening, thereby QRMing
other stations. Many of these happen to use Pactor III, but that's
(Elaine) Gibbons
WA6UBE / AAR9JA
http://www.qrz.com/wa6ube
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill McLaughlin
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 4:42 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Trouble at mill RTTY contesters
16 matches
Mail list logo
