Maybe use DXKeeper from Dave AA6YQ? I know there are interfaces in DM780,
sure-ish that they exist in MultiPSK.
One idea I have thought about is for programs such as DXKeeper, DM780 etc.
to run UDP servers which allow other programs to send new QSO's for logging.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
-
Re UDP servers, we established the Amateur Radio Software
Development group a year ago to work out the details of this and
other shared mechanisms, but it died from lack of interest.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arswd/
Remember?
I'll stick with DDE interfaces for now; they aren't elegant,
UI Design is something I am not very good at but am very interested in. Here's
an excellent article I came across this morning, well worth reading, it will
take you just one minute.
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/01/31/10-principles-of-effective-web-design/
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
The deadline for receiving logs from the 1/1/08 JT65A Crawl has now
passed. I will publish the results within the next few days.
--
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)
The deadline for receiving logs from the 1/1/08 Olivia contest has now
passed. I will publish the results within the next few days.
--
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)
I go between MultiPSK and DM780. What is the best/easiest way to
create a combined/common log?
Multipsk seemlessly logs to DX Keeper . DM780 easily exports to DX
Keeper.
Courtesy WA7BNB ( http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/weeklycont.php )
Mexico RTTY International Contest: 1800Z, Feb 2 to 1759Z, Feb 3
Mode: RTTY Only
Bands: 80, 40, 20, 15, 10m
Classes:Single Op Single Radio
Single Op Two Radio
Max operating hours:
BTW - I have a fine NTPClient class in C++ in case anyone is interested, I
use this when calibrating soundcards and also to keep my computer clock
updated every 15 minutes.
You would have to modify it yourself as it uses a few DM780 calls but the
intelligence you need is in place.
Simon
An advantage of UDP is that the logger could be on another platform /
computer. Although there's network DDE I have never tried it and don't want
to try it to be honest.
Also I would say that UDP is easy in all languages, DDE is a tad complex in
C++.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original
Paul, I believe message #26409 answered your question?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/26409
Pardon me if I'm wrong, as it was just a quick glance.
Frank, K2NCC
Thank you Frank. I did miss that. It tells me the configuration file
will not be overwritten which implies
Thank you for that information, Dimitry,
When I read over the MIL-STD/FED-STD/STANAG standards, I could not
understand how these slower modes would work all that well by the
multi-repeating approach. They repeat multiple times, even if you do not
need the repeat (sort of a non automatic ARQ)
Dave, over five years ago now, I pushed for using a standard DDE interface
for all PSK31 programs so anybody could use his favorite logging probgram
with his favorite PSK31 program, and developers did not have to keep
reinventing the wheel. It also found little interest. :-(
I'd still like to
Hi Phil,
My take is that there is more similarity than difference. Most of the
multimode digital programs will support the most commonly used modes.
All other modes are very rarely used and can quickly fall into disfavor.
Consider the primarily used sound card modes, PSK31, MFSK16, and some
I would certainly agree to that. I am not a new user of digital or logging
software, having used several over the past decade, but every time I attempt
to go to Multipsk, I am put off by just too much on the screen at one time.
A tabbing system would certainly be one better way. I particularly
--- John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of, I (and others) sure wish when writing
RTTY
software you developers would add or force a CR/LF
after 70 charters.
I really don't think the glass operators would
notice or mind.
And us using paper would notice the most since we
Speaking of, I (and others) sure wish when writing RTTY
software you developers would add or force a CR/LF
after 70 charters.
I really don't think the glass operators would notice or mind.
And us using paper would notice the most since we
would not get the pile up at the end of a line.
ARRL
One possibility is for modem developers to no provide a UI. Instead provide
a HTTP or other network interface that can be accessed using web protocols.
The UI is then developed by someone else and hosted in a web browser.
Before I retired my work was with such a system used to monitor corporate
Simon, I disagree that you are not very good at GUI design. One of the
reasons I prefer HRD and DM780 to other software is the beautiful and
intuitive GUI. Keep up the good work!
KCÃPTOLes
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
UI Design is something I
Hi
Well it did happen - the Motorola 56002 EVM could be programmed
to work as MANY different modems --- please try this link
http://det.bi.ehu.es/~jtpjatae/ham.html
also if you Google mt63+evm 56002 you should get plenty of
reading
I used one - and still have it - from late 1998
There was
Hello John and Ralph,
If it did not get a space, it would force the end of line sequence after 72
charcters.
In Multipsk (and perhaps in other soft) this option exists (button 1 CR/LF/72
char.). It permits to communicate with old RTTY mechanical machine. But this
option is OFF by default (you
--- Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello John and Ralph,
If it did not get a space, it would force the end
of line sequence after 72 charcters.
In Multipsk (and perhaps in other soft) this option
exists (button 1 CR/LF/72 char.). It permits to
communicate with old RTTY
dmitry_d2d wrote:
1. A few words about OFDM and serial tone modem.
Let's find out how the fight between ISI and Doppler shift
takes place in these systems. OFDM uses the great number of low
speed channels so the symbol duration increases. While the
duration of ISI is much smaller than symbol
On Friday 01 February 2008 04:34:57 am Simon Brown wrote:
UI Design is something I am not very good at
That must have hurt.
I mean poking your tongue into your cheek that hard must have hurt.
You have masterful UI design skills.
--
Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart
-- Forwarded message --
From: Facility 406 DM09 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Feb 1, 2008 10:55 PM
Subject: [UDXF] 5366.5 KHz
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the digital station on 5366.5 KHz? It appears to cycle through
several different modes.
Kurt
Hi Howard
The RFSM mail server can send email - originated by any outstation
which can connect to the Mail Server by radio - onto any internet mail address
Any mail coming from an internet mail address and addressed to the
servers email address in the To line and then addressed to the
callsign
US ssb stations now readable on 7183 lsb at 0600 utc W5RG BOB
s8/9 A lift in conditions maybe heralds things to come
SF=71 A=19 K=5 and SSN is 19
Les VK2DSG
26 matches
Mail list logo
