[digitalradio] Navigator interface

2008-08-25 Thread wb4lzq
Is anyone using one? If so your comments would be appreciated. Best Kim W4OSS

Re: [digitalradio] Navigator interface

2008-08-25 Thread Simon Brown (KNS)
I have one here - I think it's excellent. Currently driving a TS-2000, also use it with the K3. Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-deluxe.com - Original Message - From: wb4lzq [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is anyone using one? If so your comments would be appreciated.

[digitalradio] Re: RAC Announces Newly Revised Canadian HF Band Plan

2008-08-25 Thread dl8le
Digital modes on 160m don't seem to be important for the RAC ... otherwise they would have recognised that - like on 40 m where it has been considered - Region I has a different assignment for digital modes which is exactly in the RAC CW DX window. Frequencies below 1810 khz, by the way, are

Re: [digitalradio] Navigator interface

2008-08-25 Thread ny2u
You ought to contact George Burns, W2SFD, ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from Schenectady. He recently purchased one and the whole purchase procedure was a disaster! From the time he ordered it to the time he finally gave up on this unit was probably 2 months or better. The best I know is that he

[digitalradio] s/n and acoustic coupling

2008-08-25 Thread jaakhohensee
In field I use PocketDigi and PDA with acoustic coupling (PDA-mic). How the acoustic coupling change the capability to decode signals below the noise floor? 73 de Jaak es1hj/qrp

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Path Simulations for PAX / HF Packet

2008-08-25 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Tony, Glad you did measures for Pax. My figures are the following: Lowest S/N : - 10 dB for PAX and - 7 dB for PAX2 It corresponds to a Gaussian noise without any ionospheric distortion (your first case). In my figures, I accept an error rate of 2 % (2 characters false for 98 characters

[digitalradio] Re: Navigator interface

2008-08-25 Thread Don Sachnoff
Interesting commentary regarding problems with the Navigator. I have had a Navigator for about 18 months. I have used it with the 756P3 and now with the 7700 and no problems what so ever. I caution that RTFM is a must and the instructions are pretty straight forward. Interestingly I helped

[digitalradio] Navigator interface

2008-08-25 Thread Don Sachnoff
Interesting commentary regarding problems with the Navigator. I have had a Navigator for about 18 months. I have used it with the 756P3 and now with the 7700 and no problems what so ever. I caution that RTFM is a must and the instructions are pretty straight forward. Interestingly I

[digitalradio] New postings on W1HKJ web site

2008-08-25 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi all From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 73 de LA5VNA Steinar - http://www.w1hkj.com/ - Fldigi, NBEMS, and fl_logbook have all be updated to newer versions on the web site. *fldigi/NBEMS* - fldigi version 3.02, now includes the entire hamlib rig control suite in the Windows executable.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Path Simulations for PAX / HF Packet

2008-08-25 Thread Tony
Patrick, Hello Tony, Glad you did measures for Pax. My pleasure; thanks for adding the mode to Multipsk! My figures are the following: Lowest S/N : - 10 dB for PAX and - 7 dB for PAX2. It corresponds to a Gaussian noise without any ionospheric distortion (your first case. Just tested PAX

[digitalradio] signalink sL+

2008-08-25 Thread matt gregory
WONDERING IF ANYBODY IS USING A SIGNALINK SL+ FOR HIGH SPEED ARQ SOFTWARE IE RFSM2400 OR ALIKE ? I'M CURIOUS OF PERFORMANCE BEFORE I CONSIDER PURCHASE MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA

Re: [digitalradio] signalink sL+

2008-08-25 Thread matt gregory
SORRY I MENT SL 1+ MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA AAR2AN 315-759-5107 HOME 315-759-1452 CELL [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNITED STATES ARMY MARS - Original Message From: matt gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 8:54:50

[digitalradio] Re: signalink sL+

2008-08-25 Thread expeditionradio
Signalink is not capable of high speed ARQ. It uses vox, and doesn't have a real PTT with RTS. Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, matt gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WONDERING IF ANYBODY IS USING A SIGNALINK SL+ FOR HIGH SPEED ARQ SOFTWARE IE RFSM2400 OR ALIKE ? I'M

Re: [digitalradio] Re: signalink sL+

2008-08-25 Thread kh6ty
Skip - Original Message - From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:19 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: signalink sL+ Signalink is not capable of high speed ARQ. It uses vox, and doesn't have a real PTT with RTS. Bonnie