Interesting. You were just talking about IRC and #wikipedia-en-help and not
using research, and now you have seem to given up.
From,
Emily
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
The chat system mentioned by Quiddity may actually decrease the number of
helpees in
Sorry if my previous email seemed a little harsh or confused.
I don't think a chatroom is non-confusing enough. One other way
helpees often fail hard is that they confuse messages sent to other
helpees as being directed at them. They don't realize it's a public
chatroom. We would need a system
Research about the chatroom concept, not so much about IRC alone. We can't
practically run research projects about every change. Chatrooms would be a
major change and be resource intensive to start, so research makes sense
before starting this implementation.
Pine
Pine
On Aug 13, 2014 7:15 AM,
We might be able to create one on one chats somehow on IRC or with
chatrooms. The concept makes sense.
Pine
On Aug 13, 2014 11:11 AM, Emily Monroe emilymonro...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if my previous email seemed a little harsh or confused.
I don't think a chatroom is non-confusing enough.
Thanks for finding that page. I don't know how much that kind of chat
system would help our editor numbers but it's worth discussing. Any
comments from the Growth and EE teams?
Pine
On Aug 12, 2014 8:10 PM, quiddity pandiculat...@gmail.com wrote:
The pro and cons of web-chat, and some technical
I don't think you realize how little helpers there actually are. A lot of
responses, as is, go unanswered. We don't need increased participation in
#wikipedia-en-help, unless it's increased participation from helpers and
not helpees.
From,
Emily
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Pine W
The chat system mentioned by Quiddity may actually decrease the number of
helpees in IRC by encouraging them to use the dedicated messaging system
which we hope will appeal to experienced users who will choose to join the
category-based chatrooms. Or the chatrooms may fail hard. Research data