Hi,
> I didn’t see the issues with NOTICE, the wrong header on the file or the
> unexpected binary files on your dev list but may have missed it.
Sorry ignore that, wrong release.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
> Agreed, these were called out in our dev@ vote
I didn’t see the issues with NOTICE, the wrong header on the file or the
unexpected binary files on your dev list but may have missed it.
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To
Agreed, these were called out in our dev@ vote
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0f291fd923bd0217da1935811b4276699aac28715c1936d713e99002%40%3Cdev.age.apache.org%3E
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 4:03 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding) but only because of WIP disclaimer. Normally I
Hi,
+1 but only due to work in progress disclaimer. There are serval minor issues
that need to be fixed.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- disclaimer exists
- license is missing information on a file [6]
- NOTICE is not correct. As mentioned on a previous release
Hi,
+1 (binding) but only because of WIP disclaimer. Normally I would vote -1 due
to compiled code in the source release [1]
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes exist
- disclaimer exists
- LICENSE is missing [2][3]
- contains unexpected binary file [1]
- A large number of
Hi,
> the ./web component is in the release but I don't see its dependencies
> (even as MIT licensed) listed?
Dependancies don’t need to be mentioned in the LICENSE file if they don’t end
up in the source release.
Kind Regards,
Justin
+1
Carrying over my vote from PPMC.
--
Nikita Ivanov
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:34 AM Aaron Radzinski wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating)
> version 0.9.0. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural
> language interface to any
Similar questions from me
- incubating in name
- signature and hash fine
- DISCLAIMER is fine
- No unexpected binary files
- LICENSE and NOTICE
the ./web component is in the release but I don't see its dependencies
(even as MIT licensed) listed?
Is anything bundled in there?
- these source
Hello all,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating)
version 0.9.0. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural
language interface to any application.
The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) version
Dear Apache Community,
This is a call for releasing Apache AGE (Incubating) 0.5.0.
To learn more about Apache AGE (Incubating), please see http://age.apache.org
*
Apache AGE (incubating) community has voted and approved the
+1 (binding)
----
??:
"general"
I tried to run rat (version 0.9, 0.10, 0.11, 0.12, 0.13) via the command
line:
java -jar apache-rat-0.13.jar -d shenyu-admin
All the results are:
AL./src/test/java/org/apache/shenyu/admin/utils/ThreadLocalUtilTest.java
The results marked ThreadLocalUtilTest.java AL(Apache License headers),
We are not using any of the polyfills except for the one that is mandatory
(zone.js) which is part of the angular framework.
The angular framework is not part of the source tar. The zone.js file is also
not part of the source tar.
The polyfills.ts file just defines that it will be imported when
Hi,
> The base settings are code generated. The software that generates these base
> setting is angular. It shows up as a MIT license [1].
> The file content after the generation is part of the created project which
> then gets customised.
You might want to double check that. A quick glance
> On 30 Jul 2021, at 18:22, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> [3] is a settings file. The comments should have been cleaned up when the
>> settings were customised.
>
> Presumably the file (and it comments) are copyright to someone and under some
> license? Do you know who/what that is?
>
Hi,
> [3] is a settings file. The comments should have been cleaned up when the
> settings were customised.
Presumably the file (and it comments) are copyright to someone and under some
license? Do you know who/what that is?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> This file contains some very simple test cases, we assume that they are not
> from another project, but just added a wrong license header. We are trying
> to contact the contributor who contribute this file to make things clear.
> Before he/she respond, we'd like to remove this file to
[1] was added as part of jira YUNIKORN-505.
[2] was added as part of jira YUNIKORN-427.
Both are apache files: jiras have been logged to add the headers.
[3] is a settings file. The comments should have been cleaned up when the
settings were customised.
I have filed a jira for the cleanup. The
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your help.
> This file [1] has an incorrect header and may be from another project.
Where sis this code come from?
This file contains some very simple test cases, we assume that they are not
from another project, but just added a wrong license header. We are trying
to
+1 (nobinding)
Good luck,
Saisai Shao 于2021年7月29日周四 上午10:06写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Saisai
>
> Willem Jiang 于2021年7月29日周四 上午7:59写道：
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Willem Jiang
> >
> > Twitter: willemjiang
> > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:12 PM 俊平堵 wrote:
> > >
> > >
Hi,
Look like I hit send too soon there:
"Sorry but it -1 binding form me. LICENSE is missing 3rd party license
information”
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
Hi,
-1 (binding) for header and licensing issues
There also seems to be an issue with the directories dlpack, dmlc, mshadow
ands nnvm under the include directory in the tar file?
I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE has issues
- NOTICE seems OK
- A lot of files have
22 matches
Mail list logo
