[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17464317#comment-17464317
]
Calvin Kirs commented on INCUBATOR-271:
---
Thanks for your guidance, can you help me close this?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17464314#comment-17464314
]
Calvin Kirs commented on INCUBATOR-271:
---
Thank you~
> SeaTunnel Incubator project request for
Ralph>I was busy
The world is on fire with log4j, so if you have no time left for 1.x, then,
please, just let others do the maintenance.
Ralph>My recollection was me saying if I had the code in a git repo getting
it into a GitHub repo would be easy.
I do not want to dilute "svn -> git" question
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17464307#comment-17464307
]
Justin Mclean commented on INCUBATOR-271:
-
You'll need to raise an INFRA JIRA for this.
>
Calvin Kirs created INCUBATOR-271:
-
Summary: SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the GitHub
repositories moving service
Key: INCUBATOR-271
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-271
Dear all,
The Apache MXNet (incubating) community is happy to announce Apache MXNet
(incubating) version 1.9.0!
Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for both
efficiency and flexibility. It allows you to mix symbolic and imperative
programming to maximize efficiency
Hi,
Apache Arrow is receiving a donation of a Julia library [1].
Note that this is the second Julia library donation because
Apache Arrow's development process had a problem after the
first Julia library donation. See the "Description" in [1]
for details. Apache Arrow restarts Julia library
OK, thank you for the feedback.
Will open issues and also discuss threads on the mailing list for these
things.
Ralph Goers 于2021年12月23日周四 08:10写道：
>
>
> > On Dec 21, 2021, at 9:22 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang)
> wrote:
> >
> > But in my experience, first, the log4j12 bridge is not perfect. For
> >
> On Dec 22, 2021, at 12:35 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov
> wrote:
>
>
> I already asked Logging PMC to enable Git and GitHub for 1.x, and they
> rejected it:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ssbdg44gy7txzl16xxd097t7orco52g2
My recollection was me saying if I had the code in a git repo getting it
> On Dec 21, 2021, at 10:24 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov
> wrote:
>
> Matt>Nobody in the Logging PMC is blocking a release here.
>
> Matt, thanks for the reply, however, it is false :(
> I see you are positive, however, many more replies were quite negative.
>
> Ralph Goers says: "We’ve stated
> On Dec 21, 2021, at 9:22 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
>
> But in my experience, first, the log4j12 bridge is not perfect. For
> example, since hadoop is still on log4j 1.x, I need to add log4j12 bridge
> dependency if I want to run UTs based on hadoop mini cluster, and then I
> need to manually
I’m sorry, I was just directed to this thread. I don’t read my incubator emails
every day since I am not mentoring any podlings at the moment.
There seems to be some disconnect with the facts. From my viewpoint they are:
An email came in asking if it would be possible to put out a new 1.2.18
Hi Justin, Felix, and others,
I keep hearing that the bar for a committer is too high for our project.
Could you clarify what would be considered too low of a bar for a committer?
Or, if there is some document that I am not aware of that explains this, that
would be great too.
I feel that we
The Commons approach isn’t likely to work. Besides sharing several PMC members,
it already deprecated Commons Logging in favor of Log4j2 as a logging API.
—
Matt Sicker
> On Dec 22, 2021, at 12:59, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Have the initial committers for this effort been identified?
>
>> On
Have the initial committers for this effort been identified?
> On Dec 22, 2021, at 10:28 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov
> wrote:
>
> Matt>Attaching patches to Jira is exactly how v1 was developed back in the
> day. V2 did it for some time as well before migrating to git
>
> Matt, let us please refrain
Matt>Attaching patches to Jira is exactly how v1 was developed back in the
day. V2 did it for some time as well before migrating to git
Matt, let us please refrain from off-topic discussions here? (at the end of
the day, this is "Looking for a champion" thread)
If you have objections or comments
Attaching patches to Jira is exactly how v1 was developed back in the day. V2
did it for some time as well before migrating to git.
—
Matt Sicker
> On Dec 22, 2021, at 01:42, Vladimir Sitnikov
> wrote:
>
> Romain,
>
> Romain>for now the thread is looking for options which are not needed
17 matches
Mail list logo
