On 07/04/2024 16:08, Michael wrote:
Cool, once your system is up to date you should be able to change your profile
and follow the rest of the instructions. I hope all goes well.
emerge --emptytree is now running well - 122 of 1534 so it has some way
to go ...
Cheers,
Wol
On 07/04/2024 15:46, Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 13:07, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 12:04:32 BST Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:48, Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:23, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:21:00 BST Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 15:46:18 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> On 07/04/2024 13:07, Michael wrote:
> > Did you emerge any packages using the new 23.0 profile, then went back to
> > the old profile to run the above command?
>
> No ...
>
> Ummm ... I have had trouble emerging other stuff that didn't
On 07/04/2024 13:07, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 12:04:32 BST Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:48, Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:23, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:21:00 BST Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 12:04:32 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> On 07/04/2024 11:48, Wols Lists wrote:
> > On 07/04/2024 11:23, Michael wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:21:00 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> >>> On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
> What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9)
On 07/04/2024 11:48, Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:23, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:21:00 BST Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:48:07 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> On 07/04/2024 11:23, Michael wrote:
> > On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:21:00 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> >> On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
> >>> What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
> >>> which the instructions
On 07/04/2024 11:23, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:21:00 BST Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge
On 07/04/2024 11:15, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:00:49 BST Wols Lists wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply the same
logic and not
On 07/04/2024 11:15, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:00:49 BST Wols Lists wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply the same
logic and not
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:21:00 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
> > What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
> > which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
> >
> > With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply the
On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply the same
logic and not let binutils emerge gcc?
Just to follow up to
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:00:49 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
> which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
>
> With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply the same
> logic and not let binutils emerge gcc?
>
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply the same
logic and not let binutils emerge gcc?
Cheers,
Wol
14 matches
Mail list logo