Re: Website Platform Discussion

> On Jun 22, 2017, at 9:05 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry for the delay in responding; I was on vacation.. > > "David T." writes: > >> Derek, > [snip] >> I will note that one of the problems I see with the website/wiki >> presence is

Re: Website Platform Discussion

On donderdag 22 juni 2017 18:05:40 CEST Derek Atkins wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the delay in responding; I was on vacation.. > > "David T." writes: > > Derek, > > [snip] > > > I will note that one of the problems I see with the website/wiki > > presence is precisely its

Re: Website Platform Discussion

Derek: Welcome back. And by the way, thank you for all your work on Gnucash. I benefit greatly from the work of everyone who makes this wonderful product. On 2017-06-22 09:05, Derek Atkins wrote: ...At least I suspect it's "git" that's the barrier to entry and not the fact that it's a raw

Re: Website Platform Discussion

Hi, Sorry for the delay in responding; I was on vacation.. "David T." writes: > Derek, [snip] > I will note that one of the problems I see with the website/wiki > presence is precisely its static nature. Pages and information seem to > get on the sites and never change or

Re: Website Platform Discussion

> On Jun 16, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > On vrijdag 16 juni 2017 19:25:25 CEST Adrien Monteleone wrote: >> Adrien Monteleone >> adrien.montele...@gmail.com >> 337-593-8208 >> 103 Rosalind street >> Lafayette, Louisiana >> >>> On Jun 16, 2017, at

Re: Website Platform Discussion

On vrijdag 16 juni 2017 19:25:25 CEST Adrien Monteleone wrote: > Adrien Monteleone > adrien.montele...@gmail.com > 337-593-8208 > 103 Rosalind street > Lafayette, Louisiana > > > On Jun 16, 2017, at 2:47 AM, Geert Janssens > > wrote: > > > > My (limited) experience

Re: Website Platform Discussion

I just pulled down a copy of GnuCash.org with SiteSucker. Total size is 228MB, 210MB of which are docs in various formats and translations. (ePub, etc.) There is less than 1MB of images, though I’d suppose that may change in the future. And this is uncompressed. The site itself is nill. The

Re: Website Platform Discussion

Derek, > On Jun 16, 2017, at 10:33 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > Adrien Monteleone writes: > >>> A side effect of the content being in a db rather than in git is it is no >>> longer stored in a distributed way. So it will be important to implement

Re: Website Platform Discussion

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Jon Daley wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Derek Atkins wrote: Jon Daley writes: How much data do you have that needs to be backed up? I have space that I can offer, depending on how big it is. Right now the backup volume uses 645GB:

Re: Website Platform Discussion

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Derek Atkins wrote: Jon Daley writes: How much data do you have that needs to be backed up? I have space that I can offer, depending on how big it is. Right now the backup volume uses 645GB: [root@freenas] ~# df -h

Re: Website Platform Discussion

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Adrien Monteleone wrote: On Jun 16, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Jon Daley wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Derek Atkins wrote: Code performs a nightly mysql dump, and I have a nightly backup of all my servers (including code) to a backup server with storage on

Re: Website Platform Discussion

Jon Daley writes: > On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Derek Atkins wrote: >> Code performs a nightly mysql dump, and I have a nightly backup of all >> my servers (including code) to a backup server with storage on my >> FreeNAS box. This is all completely automated. The only

Re: Website Platform Discussion

Adrien Monteleone writes: > Then I don’t suppose it’s a major issue. You’d just need a backup of > public_html (or WWW folder, whichever is used) like is probably being > done now, and a dump of whatever db is used for the cms. Since there > is already a dump of the

Re: Website Platform Discussion

Adrien Monteleone writes: >> A side effect of the content being in a db rather than in git is it is no >> longer stored in a distributed way. So it will be important to implement a >> backup plan for the data. > > The site host should provide a facility for this

Re: Website Platform Discussion

On vrijdag 16 juni 2017 18:58:35 CEST Adrien Monteleone wrote: > Then I don’t suppose it’s a major issue. You’d just need a backup of > public_html (or WWW folder, whichever is used) like is probably being done > now, and a dump of whatever db is used for the cms. Since there is already > a dump

Re: Website Platform Discussion

On vrijdag 16 juni 2017 18:58:35 CEST Adrien Monteleone wrote: > Then I don’t suppose it’s a major issue. You’d just need a backup of > public_html (or WWW folder, whichever is used) like is probably being done > now, and a dump of whatever db is used for the cms. Since there is already > a dump

Re: Website Platform Discussion

Adrien Monteleone adrien.montele...@gmail.com 337-593-8208 103 Rosalind street Lafayette, Louisiana > On Jun 16, 2017, at 2:47 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > My (limited) experience is with drupal as well. > > Regarding your first question (how to map version

Re: Website Platform Discussion

> On Jun 16, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Jon Daley wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Derek Atkins wrote: >> Code performs a nightly mysql dump, and I have a nightly backup of all >> my servers (including code) to a backup server with storage on my >> FreeNAS box. This is all

Re: Website Platform Discussion

Then I don’t suppose it’s a major issue. You’d just need a backup of public_html (or WWW folder, whichever is used) like is probably being done now, and a dump of whatever db is used for the cms. Since there is already a dump of the wiki db, it would just be an extra one of those for the cms

Re: Website Platform Discussion

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Derek Atkins wrote: Code performs a nightly mysql dump, and I have a nightly backup of all my servers (including code) to a backup server with storage on my FreeNAS box. This is all completely automated. The only thing I do not have, yet, is a an offsite backup plan to

Re: Website Platform Discussion

Hi, Geert Janssens writes: > That goes for the current wiki as well by the way. Do we have a backup in > place there ? Code performs a nightly mysql dump, and I have a nightly backup of all my servers (including code) to a backup server with storage on my FreeNAS

Re: Website Platform Discussion

> On Jun 16, 2017, at 8:30 AM, Adrien Monteleone > wrote: > >> >> On Jun 16, 2017, at 2:47 AM, Geert Janssens >> wrote: >> >> My (limited) experience is with drupal as well. >> >> Regarding your first question (how to map version

Re: Website Platform Discussion

> On Jun 16, 2017, at 2:47 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > My (limited) experience is with drupal as well. > > Regarding your first question (how to map version management on a cms driven > website): usually only the cms code, modules and themes are version

Re: Website Platform Discussion

My (limited) experience is with drupal as well. Regarding your first question (how to map version management on a cms driven website): usually only the cms code, modules and themes are version managed. The data resides in a database which is not well suited for version management. So code,

Re: Website Platform Discussion

I’ve used Drupal in the past but haven’t touched it in any meaningful way for about 5 years. From what I understand, it has been abstracted from a CMS to a framework for building a CMS. I presently develop Wordpress sites. Not sure what the present host offers, but some like SiteGround offer

Re: Website Platform Discussion

David: I love your question: > How would translations be handled in a CMS? For the case of Drupal, there are mature and capable tools for hosting multilingual content on a Drupal-based website. See e.g. I know those tools and would be happy to

Re: Website Platform Discussion

Hi all, My trajectory with site-building is somewhat similar to David's except that I ended up building less sites through CMSs and more using frameworks such as Rails, Django, and Express. But lately I've taken a few steps back and I've found Jekyll to be an excellent way to get the job done.

Website Platform Discussion

In Bug 783240, I made some suggestions about modifying the website structure to improve the new user experience. As the discussion has developed, the implications of some of the suggestions have become more substantial, and John Ralls suggested that we bring the discussion to the devel list for