Re: Compilation problem: haproxy 1.6.5 (latest) on Solaris 11

with the attachment it's better :-) On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 06:37:05AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:52:01PM -0400, Jonathan Fisher wrote: > > Nice here's the complication output: > > > > > > http://pastebin.com/iS2JKXED > > > > Now I just have

Re: Compilation problem: haproxy 1.6.5 (latest) on Solaris 11

Hi Jonathan, On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:52:01PM -0400, Jonathan Fisher wrote: > Nice here's the complication output: > > > http://pastebin.com/iS2JKXED > > Now I just have to figure out how to add openssl, zlib, and libpcre which > don't seem to be available on Oracle Solaris. Normally it

[no subject]

Hi Customer,If you can not see the description below, please click here. 如無法閱讀以下的內容，請按此.To learn more, please visit www.printing100.com. 想了解多D請到www.printing100.com 

Reset your LinkedIn password

Hi Shaoquan, To make sure you continue having the best experience possible on LinkedIn, we're regularly monitoring our site and the Internet to keep your account information safe. We've recently noticed a potential risk to your LinkedIn account coming from outside LinkedIn and we have taken

Re: Compilation problem: haproxy 1.6.5 (latest) on Solaris 11

❦ 19 mai 2016 22:09 +0200, Willy Tarreau  : > If you're interested in updating your patch for this I'll happily apply > it. Otherwise I can do it myself to learn my lesson :-) I'll let you do it yourself. :) -- Write clearly - don't be too clever. - The Elements of

Re: httpchk with: http-send-name-header & related...

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Mehdi Ahmadi wrote: > When specifying: > ``` > option httpchk > ``` > As default or specific to a back-end - other properties are not passed or > set as part of the health check request. > > For example: > - http-send-name-header > - forwardfor > Are not

Re: [PATCH] DOC: Fix typo so fetch is properly parsed by Cyril's converter

applied, thanks Nenad. willy

Re: Compilation problem: haproxy 1.6.5 (latest) on Solaris 11

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 07:33:50AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ??? 18 mai 2016 22:56 +0200, Pavlos Parissis  : > > >> Also, where is the bugtracker for haproxy? I can file a report if you > >> want to save time. > > > > As far as I know there isn't any bugtracker.

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:15:51AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: (...) > This is a backport for 1.5 of 3baab74e32ceec987e7ff3db1627b760bbac3027. Thank you Vincent. I merged the BUG/MINOR patch into 1.7 and 1.6, merged this one into 1.5 after fixing the commit ID above and adding a reference to the

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MEDIUM: init: don't use environment locale

Hi, Le 19/05/2016 03:11, Maciej Katafiasz a écrit : On 18 May 2016 at 16:18, Cyril Bonté wrote: Le 19/05/2016 00:34, Maciej Katafiasz a écrit : While potentially confusing, forcing it to C is also confusing and prevents people from actually exploiting locale should they

Re: Compilation problem: haproxy 1.6.5 (latest) on Solaris 11

❦ 19 mai 2016 09:30 -0400, Jonathan Fisher  : > Where is the git repo for haproxy? having trouble finding the official > one, all I can find is a mirror on github. On http://haproxy.org, you have the links in the main table. -- Don't comment bad code - rewrite it.

Re: Compilation problem: haproxy 1.6.5 (latest) on Solaris 11

On the http://www.haproxy.org homepage there is a link to each version’s repo. Cheers, Daniel > On 19.05.2016, at 15:30, Jonathan Fisher wrote: > > Cool, thanks! > > Where is the git repo for haproxy? having trouble finding the official

Re: Compilation problem: haproxy 1.6.5 (latest) on Solaris 11

Cool, thanks! Where is the git repo for haproxy? having trouble finding the official one, all I can find is a mirror on github. On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 18 mai 2016 22:56 +0200, Pavlos Parissis : > > >> Also, where

[PATCH] BUG/MINOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends (cont)

From: Vincent Bernat Commit 6e6158 was incomplete. There was an additional aggregate copy that may trigger a similar case in the future. --- src/cfgparse.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/cfgparse.c b/src/cfgparse.c index

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

❦ 19 mai 2016 11:23 +0200, Cyril Bonté  : >> De: "Vincent Bernat" >> for (; port <= end; port++) { >> l = (struct listener *)calloc(1, sizeof(struct >> listener)); >> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ int str2listener(char *str, struct

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

❦ 19 mai 2016 11:15 +0200, Vincent Bernat  : > This is a backport for 1.5 of > 3baab74e32ceec987e7ff3db1627b760bbac3027. Wrong commit number. This should be 6e6158. -- Keep it simple to make it faster. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

Hi Vincent, > De: "Vincent Bernat" > for (; port <= end; port++) { > l = (struct listener *)calloc(1, sizeof(struct > listener)); > @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ int str2listener(char *str, struct proxy > *curproxy, struct bind_conf *bind_conf, >

[PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

From: Vincent Bernat When compiled with GCC 6, the IP address specified for a frontend was ignored and HAProxy was listening on all addresses instead. This is caused by an incomplete copy of a "struct sockaddr_storage". With the GNU Libc, "struct sockaddr_storage" is defined

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ??? 19 mai 2016 10:54 +0200, Willy Tarreau  : > > >> >> When compiled with GCC 6, the IP address specified for a frontend was > >> >> ignored and HAProxy was listening on all addresses instead. This is > >> >> caused

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

❦ 19 mai 2016 10:54 +0200, Willy Tarreau  : >> >> When compiled with GCC 6, the IP address specified for a frontend was >> >> ignored and HAProxy was listening on all addresses instead. This is >> >> caused by an incomplete copy of a "struct sockaddr_storage". >> > >> > Patch

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:49:46AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ??? 19 mai 2016 10:46 +0200, Willy Tarreau  : > > >> When compiled with GCC 6, the IP address specified for a frontend was > >> ignored and HAProxy was listening on all addresses instead. This is > >> caused by an

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

❦ 19 mai 2016 10:46 +0200, Willy Tarreau  : >> When compiled with GCC 6, the IP address specified for a frontend was >> ignored and HAProxy was listening on all addresses instead. This is >> caused by an incomplete copy of a "struct sockaddr_storage". > > Patch applied to both

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:17:44PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > When compiled with GCC 6, the IP address specified for a frontend was > ignored and HAProxy was listening on all addresses instead. This is > caused by an incomplete copy of a "struct sockaddr_storage". (...) Patch applied to both

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

Hi Arthur, On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:06:06AM +0300, Arthur ??i??eic?? wrote: > I tried again this morning with fresh eyes so this time a was able to > discover > the horror of web interfaces [1] that make "helpful" transformations like > > for @ together with random spaces around. Wow I

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: fix listening IP address storage for frontends

Hi, În ziua de miercuri, 18 mai 2016, la 22:58:06 EEST, Cyril Bonté a scris: > Le 18/05/2016 22:52, Arthur Țițeică a écrit : > > În ziua de miercuri, 18 mai 2016, la 22:38:45 EEST, Cyril Bonté a scris: > >> It looks like you didn't recompile with USE_OPENSSL=1 > >> haproxy -vv should give some