RE: [IMail Forum] Blank e-mails

2005-05-27 Thread Neil Olson
We are experiencing the EXACT same thing that Ryan just mentioned since Jan/Feb. Exact same header info, just happens to be a very bad situation when your CIO is on the receiving end. It is hard to tell him that the fix to the problem is logging in through the web interface. Neil Olson IT

[IMail Forum] Webmail Forwarding

2005-05-27 Thread Kyle Fisher
I have a problem with a few users forwarding in Webmail. I sent a test message very small no attachment and you can read it fine, but when you click forward the message is blank, but you can create a new message and it works fine. Kyle Imail 8.20 HF2 Classic Templates

RE: [IMail Forum] Blank e-mails

2005-05-27 Thread Travis Rabe
What happens if you stop inserting the trailer from declude? T _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Olson Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 7:52 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blank e-mails We are experiencing the

RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Forwarding

2005-05-27 Thread Travis Rabe
Check the user preferences. There is an option about how to include the message when forwarding. Travis From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Fisher Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 8:09 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum]

RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Forwarding

2005-05-27 Thread Kyle Fisher
Everything looks correct. Forward editing is set to Edit Original message, Forward Attachments is include attachments. I fixed it. The good old delete the account and re-add it. Thanks Kyle From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent:

RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Forwarding

2005-05-27 Thread Daniel Donnelly
Actually the option is in 'Forward Editing' and when set to 'Edit original...', it includes the message and when set to 'Don't edit...', it does not include the message. Daniel Donnelly -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Travis

[IMail Forum] ICS file seen as virus?

2005-05-27 Thread Matthew Hanna
Hi All! I was recently trying to set up a session with webex.com and I kept getting message from IMail saying the confirmation email webex.com sent me had a virus. I checked with the webex people and the tech support said that it was because the email included an ICS file which is some sort

RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Forwarding

2005-05-27 Thread Travis Rabe
Another thing to look for down the road. Check your /imail/spool/web directory and remove any orphaned files older than a day or so. Later, T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Fisher Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 8:27 AM To:

RE: [IMail Forum] Blank e-mails

2005-05-27 Thread Ryan Farnsworth
I took out the trailer yesterday so I guess we will see what happens. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 10:08 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blank e-mails What

RE: [IMail Forum] ICS file seen as virus?

2005-05-27 Thread Matt Warren
I have had this exact problem on setup of a webex meeting. No resolution on my side though, I put it on the back burner. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Hanna Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 10:32 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com

[IMail Forum] Change Host Name?

2005-05-27 Thread David Delbridge
Hi all, When installing Imail 7.1 on a new server, I chose a different host name (so as not to conflict with the production mail server) and broke my Declude license. [They were kind enough to issue a replacement license.] Now, for other reasons, I'm wishing I had never changed the host

[IMail Forum] upgrading Imail server

2005-05-27 Thread ajay
Hi, I run Imail server 8.0 and would like to upgrade it to 8.2. I would like to know if anyone had any issues with the upgrade I need to be aware of. I am pretty new to this forum and if this has been discussed please someone point me to the link Regards, Ajay Kulkarni,

[IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Scott Smith
Okay, here's the scenario: I want to run IIS SMTP as a gateway for Imail. The trick is that they are both on the same server. I understand that they both need to be on different ports. I'm doing this because of a third party application I'm running. I tried configuring the IIS SMTP to

Re: [IMail Forum] Blank e-mails

2005-05-27 Thread Eric Shanbrom
This should help as we have seen the plain text trailer will break some types of encoded messages Eric S - Original Message - From: Travis Rabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 11:08 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blank e-mails What

Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I want to run IIS SMTP as a gateway for Imail. Inbound AND outbound? Yep, that can be done. The trick is that they are both on the same server. I understand that they both need to be on different ports. True indeed. I'm doing this because of a third party application I'm running.

Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Darin Cox
You need to run either IIS SMTP or IMail on a different port. You can't have two SMTP services running on the same IP/port combo. My guess is you would want to run IIS SMTP on port 25 and IMail on a different port. Darin. - Original Message - From: Scott Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Return-Path vs. Reply-To

2005-05-27 Thread Dale McDiarmid
Very nice. Thank you, I appreciate your help. Thx, D. At 02:16 PM 5/26/2005, you wrote: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.htmlRFChttp://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html 2822 seems to say both are optional, but I'm not clear on the differences, so I have two questions... The

Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Scott Smith
Okay, I understand how to set the IIS SMTP to forward incoming mail to [127.0.0.1], however how do I get it to send to port 26 instead of port 25? The MS help doesn't help. Scott Smith Network Administrator 248.489.1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Westside Detroit Reprographics An ARC Company

Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Scott Smith
I've already had them both running together for almost two years now. However, I've never need them to talk to each other until now. I guess the trouble I'm running into is that I don't know how to get IIS SMTP to forward mail to a port other than 25 (I can see where I need to enter the IP

Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Okay, I understand how to set the IIS SMTP to forward incoming mail to [127.0.0.1], however how do I get it to send to port 26 instead of port 25? The MS help doesn't help. Virtual Server Properties-Delivery-Outbound Connection. Yes, this outbound port applies to that entire virtual

Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Darin Cox
Interesting. You can specify it in Exchange SMTP, but I can't find any info on doing it with IIS. Is it a viable option to run IIS on a different port and IMail on port 25? Darin. - Original Message - From: Scott Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday,

Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Scott Smith
Yes, IIS SMTP can be run on a different port than Imail - I've had IIS SMTP running on port 26 for quite a while now. I just can't figure out how to get IIS SMTP to forward to localhost on a port different from 25. Scott Smith Network Administrator 248.489.1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Westside

Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Yes, IIS SMTP can be run on a different port than Imail - I've had IIS SMTP running on port 26 for quite a while now. I just can't figure out how to get IIS SMTP to forward to localhost on a port different from 25. Darin was wondering if you could _switch_ the ports. But you don't need to

Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread MIS Dept
I am not familiar with IIS SMTP configuration, but maybe I am right about that Scott's problem is how to configure IIS SMTP Server service as an SMTP Gateway?? Because he doesn't seem to find the option for outbound SMTP port. Maybe the service is not even configured as a gateway but a plain

Re[3]: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Maybe the service is not even configured as a gateway but a plain vanilla SMTP server? There is no difference between the two. It is simply a matter of configuring which remote domains are permitted for unauthenticated relay, and how to get to them, as with any MTA. just trying

Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP gateway

2005-05-27 Thread Darin Cox
Oh, so you're not running either IIS SMTP or IMail on port 25? In any case, Sandy already pointed out that there is a setting to configure the outbound port. Darin. - Original Message - From: Scott Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005

[IMail Forum] Web Server Imail Server two different physical servers

2005-05-27 Thread list
Hi All, I've been running iMail, IIS, DNS all on the same box for some time now. I'd like to move out to task specific servers. I've just started a separate webserver for IIS. Currently iMail DNS are on the same box but I will be separating them next week. My question is now that our IIS

Re: [IMail Forum] Web Server Imail Server two different physical servers

2005-05-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
For example http://www.example.com:8383 just gives an error and times out. What is the work around for this issue? What entry can I put in DNS so it knows anything requesting port 8383 go to the Imail server. DNS does not support port numbers, by definition. You can set up a

Re: [IMail Forum] Web Server Imail Server two different physical servers

2005-05-27 Thread Rod Dorman
On Friday, May 27, 2005, 18:33:38, list wrote: I've been running iMail, IIS, DNS all on the same box for some time now. I'd like to move out to task specific servers. I've just started a separate webserver for IIS. Currently iMail DNS are on the same box but I will be separating them next

[IMail Forum] New hardware firewall - are my settings OK?

2005-05-27 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I just put our imail server behind a hardware firewall - Firebox. (previously was only using a software firewall on the server) The imail server only has an internal IP now. The firebox is forwarding smtp pop to it. This is working fine. The old imail external IP is now an alias on the firebox. I

Re: [IMail Forum] Web Server Imail Server two different physical servers

2005-05-27 Thread list
Thanks Sandy, is this possible with multiple domain names? -jon - Original Message - From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: list IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 6:48 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Web Server Imail Server two different physical servers

Re: [IMail Forum] Web Server Imail Server two different physical servers

2005-05-27 Thread David Gregg
I've been running iMail, IIS, DNS all on the same box for some time now. I'd like to move out to task specific servers. I've just started a separate webserver for IIS. Currently iMail DNS are on the same box but I will be separating them next week. My question is now that our IIS domains

Re: [IMail Forum] New hardware firewall - are my settings OK?

2005-05-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I realized though that I should probably change DNS for my mail server to the real external IP of the firebox. DNS MX - DNS A - IP that's world-reachable. How else could you get mail? Is there anything else I need to do or am I ok...RFC compliant and all? Go to www.dnsreports.com

Re: [IMail Forum] Web Server Imail Server two different physical servers

2005-05-27 Thread Rod Dorman
On Friday, May 27, 2005, 18:48:47, Sanford Whiteman wrote: For example http://www.example.com:8383 just gives an error and times out. What is the work around for this issue? What entry can I put in DNS so it knows anything requesting port 8383 go to the Imail server. DNS does not

Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Web Server Imail Server two different physical servers

2005-05-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Not that it helps him any :-) Nope, since the days of _smtp._tcp SRV records being used in place of MX are. . . never to come? --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL