https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Adam Porter a...@alphapapa.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@alphapapa.net
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #174 from Dotan Cohen kde-2011...@dotancohen.com ---
Yes, Till, your feedback is relevant to bug #301774. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
della rbreder...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rbreder...@web.de
--- Comment #175
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #176 from Till Schäfer till2.schae...@uni-dortmund.de ---
check if poppler is at least at version 0.20. I had the same issue with poppler
0.18.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #177 from della rbreder...@web.de ---
Ok poppler is still at version 0.18 in ubuntu 12.04.
I temporarily upgraded to okular, poppler and depedning packages from kubuntu
12.10 (in development). This seems to work.
I will create a bug-report
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #173 from Till Schäfer till2.schae...@uni-dortmund.de ---
i tried out the feature today and i like to thank you for making this change
happen! technicaliy it works flawless for me.
I would like to criticise the gui experience of this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
Version Fixed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #171 from RSB trebo...@gmx.de ---
Thank you for implementing this
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #172 from flying-sh...@web.de ---
(In reply to comment #170)
any reason why there is no checkbox “always save them into the document on
close”?
It's obviously a useful feature. Please open a new wish for it.
done! it’s bug 301774
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Patrick Fehr patrick.f...@fbc.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|patrick.f...@fbc.ch |
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #169 from flying-sh...@web.de ---
hmm… i’m ok with this behavior as long as the Do you want to save your
annotation changes or discard them? prompt allows a “yes, save them now into
the document, then close” and i’d be also ok if ctrl+s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #168 from Fabio D'Urso fabiodu...@hotmail.it ---
(In reply to comment #167)
i’m not exactly sure what that means: are annotations *mostly* saved into
the pdf, or are they never implicitly saved or what?
Short answer:
They're never
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Fabio D'Urso fabiodu...@hotmail.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabiodu...@hotmail.it
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
H.H. cyberb...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cyberb...@gmx.de
--- Comment #166 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Ilya Potapov danaiv...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danaiv...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Gregor Kappler g.kapp...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g.kapp...@gmx.net
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
mybugs.m...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mybugs.m...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Wolfgang Lorenz wl-c...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wl-c...@gmx.de
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Mario Santagiuliana fed...@marionline.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@marionline.it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #158 from RSB trebor_x gmx de 2011-11-04 15:42:46 ---
answer from Albert Astals Cid about the status of the GSOC project: The
student did not produce anything of value.
So there will no feature for storing annotations in pdf in next
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Facundo Aguilera budin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||budin...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #157 from Dotan Cohen kde-2011 08 dotancohen com 2011-10-14
16:20:44 ---
This is funny:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20193
I think that Poppler does not support some of the Okular annotations such as
highlighting.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Jean-Philippe Fleury cont...@jpfleury.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Ilia K. mail4i...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail4i...@gmail.com
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
domi...@dominikschuermann.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominik@dominikschuermann.d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
ha...@hboeck.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ha...@hboeck.de |
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #155 from Harald Nikolisin hochglanz muenchen-mail de 2011-05-08
02:23:40 ---
(In reply to comment #154)
There is a GSOC project for implementing editing/saving of pdf annotations in
okular properly (i.e. via the poppler backend, see
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Thomas Fischer fisc...@unix-ag.uni-kl.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Jonathan Verner jonathan.ver...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #152 from Samuel Cordeiro sigmadraconis gmail com 2011-05-06
01:42:46 ---
I have a question to the developers:
Would it be too hard (or a viable partial solution) to use iText as a plugin to
save/export the Okular annotations to a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #148 from Sami Liedes sliedes cc hut fi 2011-03-15 16:25:32 ---
As I see it, the the various commenters here apparently have at least three
different kinds of problems:
1) Some dislike the fact that the annotations are not standard PDF
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #143 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2011-03-14 22:17:25
---
A simple warning will fix nothing, what we need is the hability to save the
annotations in the pdf file. Now stop wasting my time.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #144 from Sami Liedes sliedes cc hut fi 2011-03-14 22:30:41 ---
How ironic. Stop wasting your time. Indeed. A warning would prevent Okular from
wasting the time of hundreds of other people. Of course everybody agrees the
ability to save
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #145 from Timmorn wo granon gmail com 2011-03-14 22:38:29 ---
If a user uses PDF annotations he expects them to be PDF standard conform. In
my eyes it would be better to have no annotations than annotations which are
not standard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Ricardo Sanz rsa...@eresmas.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsa...@eresmas.net
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
ha...@hboeck.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ha...@hboeck.de
--- Comment #130 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Rui Abreu Ferreira raf...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raf...@gmx.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #125 from Felix Möller felix derklecks de 2011-02-22 23:31:13 ---
I just made a great discovery.
http://www.mendeley.com/ is able to annotate PDFs without an issue so far.
You can download it at
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #126 from Harald Nikolisin hochglanz muenchen-mail de 2011-02-23
00:20:59 ---
I respect #109 therefore only a short comment on #125 Last time I tested
mendeley it wasn't that great:
* Existing annotations were not displayed
*
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #127 from Dominic Lyons domlyons gmail com 2011-02-23 00:25:09
---
Mendeley is neither open source nor is it just a simple PDF viewer. But it
seems to be a pretty nice piece of software, although I can confirm comment
#126. So I guess
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Elias Probst m...@eliasprobst.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@eliasprobst.eu
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #122 from Dominic Lyons domlyons gmail com 2011-02-21 22:57:37
---
As not only full featured PDF viewers/editors have an annotation feature by
now but also Adobes Reader in its current version this is getting more and more
a must have.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #121 from RSB trebor_x gmx de 2011-01-26 15:31:54 ---
(In reply to comment #120)
its extreamly annoying when all notations are lost by moving a file. maybe
okular should use nepomuk to know when a file was moved. [...]
Okular seems to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Pieter De Decker pdedec...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pdedec...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #119 from RSB trebor_x gmx de 2011-01-17 03:32:35 ---
Evince already supports annotations (stored in pdf-file). Look here
http://carlosgc.linups.org/2010/Jul
There is also a note in the changelog of poppler-0.13.2
[...]
* Add support
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gnu...@gmail.com|
--
Configure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #118 from Tuukka Verho tyverho cc hut fi 2010-12-18 15:58:33 ---
(In reply to comment #117)
It seems to be so at the moment:
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Metadata/Nepomuk/FileWatchService
but let's hope someone will
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
RSB trebo...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trebo...@gmx.de
--- Comment #117 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #116 from Tuukka Verho tyverho cc hut fi 2010-12-15 22:57:36 ---
Just a thought: how about storing the annotations with Nepomuk? It wouldn't
help much with exporting but might help with problems regarding filename
changes etc. because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Albert Astals Cid tsdg...@terra.es changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsy...@qq.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Todd toddrme2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toddrme2...@gmail.com
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
hnFaaD2SAds4DsdH bugs.kde@kriewitz.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Bram Schoenmakers m...@bramschoenmakers.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|m...@bramschoenmakers.nl |
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
gmud ger...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ger...@web.de |
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #112 from Felix Möller felix derklecks de 2010-07-26 11:47:58 ---
All people looking at this bug might be interested in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168304 which is the Evince bug for
annotations.
Evince in git is now
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
flying-sh...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||flying-sh...@web.de
--- Comment #113
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #114 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2010-07-26 20:32:14
---
Any developer interested is the only thing we ever needed, there's no
difference between one month and now.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #109 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2010-05-25 01:39:14
---
Short Official answer from KPDF, Okular and Poppler maintainer:
* Stop complaining
Long Official answer from KPDF, Okular and Poppler maintainer:
* PDF handling is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnu...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #106 from Michal Svoboda kde spatium org 2010-05-22 09:17:40 ---
The situation is still the same: missing annotation editing support in
poppler.
So why are you so insistent on that particular library. Suppose poppler can't
do that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #107 from Timmorn wo granon gmail com 2010-05-22 09:20:54 ---
(In reply to comment #105)
WHATS THE HOLD UP?
The situation is still the same: missing annotation editing support in
poppler.
This is no reason for the fact that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #108 from reini rrumberger web de 2010-05-22 11:36:37 ---
(In reply to comment #106)
The situation is still the same: missing annotation editing support in
poppler.
So why are you so insistent on that particular library.
Well,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhlav...@redhat.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #99 from Michal Svoboda kde spatium org 2010-05-21 17:34:35 ---
Guys,
this feature is open for 3 YEARS and has 588 or so votes which places it into
the 50 most wanted features.
So there is an obvious question
WHATS THE HOLD UP?
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #100 from Felix Möller felix derklecks de 2010-05-21 19:31:07 ---
I would certainly welcome an official answer too. As I have been following this
report for a long time I think there are two issues. (I right now have no time
to find the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #101 from Michal Svoboda kde spatium org 2010-05-21 19:48:46 ---
I have seen those arguments too, but ...
1. libpoppler was created with the intention of a readonly library therefore
it
does not support writing back to the pdf
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #102 from Timmorn wo granon gmail com 2010-05-21 19:54:50 ---
(In reply to comment #101)
Spare time service does not imply unprofessional or lousy although the current
status quo does seem that way. It would be at least nice to see
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Luigi Toscano luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #104 from reini rrumberger web de 2010-05-21 21:33:29 ---
(In reply to comment #103)
(In reply to comment #101)
I have seen those arguments too, but ...
1. libpoppler was created with the intention of a readonly library
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #105 from Pino Toscano pino kde org 2010-05-21 22:13:45 ---
WHATS THE HOLD UP?
The situation is still the same: missing annotation editing support in poppler.
I would certainly welcome an official answer too.
Like the ones that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #94 from Ravi Arora ra ravi rav gmail com 2010-03-25 14:48:16 ---
I checked the software PDF-XCHANGE viewer. It allows to save annotations, later
selectively delete them too, means annotations are not saved as hardcoded but
separately.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #93 from Ravi Arora ra ravi rav gmail com 2010-03-25 14:44:40 ---
I checked the software PDF-XCHANGE viewer. It allows to save annotations, later
selectively delete them too, means annotations are not saved as hardcoded but
separately.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #96 from Ravi Arora ra ravi rav gmail com 2010-03-25 19:07:48 ---
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pdf#Annotating_PDFs] has something to say.
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDF/A] this article says that annotations are
there to be in the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #97 from Timmorn wo granon gmail com 2010-03-25 19:41:04 ---
You misunderstood me. I only said, that it would be better to have no
annotations than annotations like they are realized in the moment! Because in
the moment the annotations
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #98 from Ravi Arora ra ravi rav gmail com 2010-03-25 19:59:29 ---
However there are annotations added by other software to the PDF files that are
read by Okular. So Okular supports both allows its users to do only one?
Ok here is what
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Peter Lewis pe...@muddygoat.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pe...@muddygoat.org
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Rubens de Souza Matos Júnior rubens.ma...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Ravi Arora ra.ravi@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ra.ravi@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xja...@fi.muni.cz
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Michal Svoboda k...@spatium.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@spatium.org
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Dominic Lyons domly...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||domly...@gmail.com
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Josef Spillner spill...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spill...@kde.org
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #85 from Josef Spillner spillner kde org 2009-11-02 23:16:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=38042)
-- (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=38042)
Annotations for mere human beings
This script transforms annotations in .xml into .html
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Timmorn wo.gra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wo.gra...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #82 from Jake otakuj462 gmail com 2009-07-29 18:18:47 ---
@Harald: As an alternative to dual-booting, I've found that Foxit PDF Reader
works great under Wine. I just wrote some instructions on how to set it up
under Ubuntu:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #78 from Patrick Fehr patrick fehr fbc ch 2009-05-30 17:51:04 ---
Most important for me: How can I print the exported document archive .okular
without losing the annotations? Because I lose them...
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #79 from Patrick Fehr patrick fehr fbc ch 2009-05-30 17:59:45 ---
(In reply to comment #78)
I mean text-highlights.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #80 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-05-31 02:17:54 ---
This bug is still open, so you should not expect that everything discussed is
implemented.
For the current state, you might like to review
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
reini rrumber...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rrumber...@web.de
--
Configure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Pino Toscano p...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kde-bugtracker-dp8...@mstie
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Jake otakuj...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||otakuj...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #75 from Jake otakuj462 gmail com 2009-03-07 21:23:18 ---
(In reply to comment #74)
Sorry, my bad, I didn't read closely enough, and I see now that poppler doesn't
support writing back into open PDF files. I stand by what I said about
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Thomas Thym unget...@mevin.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||unget...@mevin.net
---
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Corentin Barbu corentin barbu gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Nicholas Tung gatoatigrado gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gatoatigr...@gmail.com
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #68 from Nicholas Tung gatoatigrado gmail com 2009-01-04
20:22:31 ---
(In reply to comment #67)
(In reply to comment #66)
Unfortunately the MIME types don't seem to be registering successfully. The
file is recognized as zip even if
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #69 from Pino Toscano pino kde org 2009-01-04 21:03:17 ---
(In reply to comment #68)
(In reply to comment #67)
(In reply to comment #66)
Unfortunately the MIME types don't seem to be registering successfully.
The
file is
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #70 from Nicholas Tung gatoatigrado gmail com 2009-01-04
21:39:44 ---
(In reply to comment #69)
another point is whether okular should be so sensitive to mime types.
typically, file formats have data stream identifiers which don't
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #71 from Pino Toscano pino kde org 2009-01-04 22:07:33 ---
(In reply to comment #70)
(In reply to comment #69)
another point is whether okular should be so sensitive to mime types.
typically, file formats have data stream
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #63 from Stefan Endrullis stefan endrullis de 2008-12-10
10:55:17 ---
@Martin Rehn
Such things have already been discussed in the comments above, see
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614#c3
The problem is that the current
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
