On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:57 AM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Coming late to this one, but I'm sure glad I looked. What an excellent
series! I especially like the little bird; what a cutie and so well captured!
Exquisite!
The earthquake shots are difficult to look at, but they documented
Hi Doug
I just noticed your reply in the archives. Thanks. I'm still not
receiving list mail at Fastmail.
It's now the middle of the night in North America so I don't anticipate
any posts for a few hours so I'll check my Fastmail account again in the
morning and follow up with Fastmail if
Hi guys,
A rare PESO from me, but couldn't resist...
http://www.pbase.com/image/140952884
My son and his partner were married on Friday last, at a very informal
ceremony at their newly-purchased house. To say they were excited is
simply understatement - hope that comes across in the photo.
Hmmm
Well this is getting odder and odder.
Just for kicks, I set up a second Fastmail account for PDML mail and,
hey presto, it received my reply to Doug. But the original Fastmail
account hasn't.
It's a mystery.
I'll follow it up in the AM. I'm going to bed now.
Cheers
Brian
I would think the most important technical issues would be
composition, holding the camera still, and lighting (as opposed to
exposure). Scavenger hunts are great ways to get them to practice.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:34 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Christine Aguila
G'day Pete
It's nice to be receiving PDML mail again.
An informal wedding is the way to go in my view. Your son and his new
wife certainly look happy.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
On
One more thing: in terms of class time, have them take some pictures
early. Introduce the ideas about composition, etc., while taking the
pictures. Many newbies are amazed at basic applications of the rule
of thirds.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I
On 1/15/2012 7:03 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 15/1/12, Don Guthrie, discombobulated, unleashed:
I could see 2 or three pictures there but frankly I think the crop you
chose tells the whole story nicely,
Don, I love you and want to give you babies.
Don't take him up on the offer Don, I'm sure
No offense, but they look like digital photos rendered with too much contrast
and a hot white point.
I find these kind of filters to be a lot of nonsense. While film types did vary
considerably, the rendering was determined largely by exposure and development.
For example, Tri-X rated at ISO
BTW, it is a nice photo, and the original rendering is the best, IMO. Still a
bit hot and contrasty, but not as over the top as some of the filtered one.
This is a tough image because the person with the darkest skin is getting the
least light. Burning in and dodging will help it much more than
More google intelligent browsing? I wish flicker thought I was
French, it keeps nagging me to update my browser. If it did it in
French it would be easier to ignore.
On 1/15/2012 10:35 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does flickr think I'm French? This is the second photo I've looked
I'm tired of telling people that I hate them.
On 1/15/2012 7:10 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
off to a slow start this year. cheers, Christine
http://aguilapaw.posterous.com/
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML
This is neat. Well chosen shutter and exposure. Ideal background.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com
To: PDML List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 4:10 PM
Subject: PAW--Week 2--Red Snowplow
off to a slow start this year. cheers,
Of course Paul is right. The film labels given are generalities and
not necessarily representational of how *you* made a particular film
work. But that's hardly the point of them either. Most people who are
using these filter never shot a roll of any of them. Even old school
film shooters (like
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Jan 15, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Additional shots from my shoot with the shy and reluctant I look
terrible in photos Marzi last week ...
Tell Marzi that in my professional opinion as a photographer she is
It's curious that two women on the list got that impression, but so
far none of the guys.
In reviewing the shot I think I see what you mean. But the kind of
perspective distortion you're suggesting happens with wide-angle
lenses used close up. This shot was taken with an 85mm equiv (the DA*
Me too, Frank. She was great fun to work with. Thanks!
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:29 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
These are wonderful, but I have to admit, my fave is still the first, playful
one you showed the other day.
She's a wonderful model; I hope you
The Garbo shot seems to be a big fave. Thank you, Christine.
Hey, you might want to consider one of these lights for tart shooting.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Christine Aguila
christ...@caguila.com wrote:
I agree with Ann about the originally posted shot. I love the 2nd one in
this
On 14/1/12, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Happy new year to you, too. I don't have any experience of classes but
I can say don't misunderestimate [8-)] the ability of children to pick
things up. For example:
http://www.mikeawilson.co.uk/temp/party/index_6.htm
And this is what came
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
Fun shooting in the dark.
I've never seen cat bottles before.
Regards, Bob S.
Thanks for the comments, all.
Bob the bottles are only available up here as far as i have been
informed. They come out in November
Yumm as well
Dave
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA70mm, 1/250s, f/11, ISO100.
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Cool
Dave
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Playing with some holiday lights still hanging across the street:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14991952size=lg
(K-7, FA 24-90, 2sec @ f/9.5)
What I learned from this shot is that LED lights aren't
On 14/1/12, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
Walking along the Thames.
http://cottycam.posterous.com/swans-at-lechlade
Thanks to all who looked and/or replied :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
I get a real winter like feel from this one. Well framed and good snow motion
Dave
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
off to a slow start this year. cheers, Christine
http://aguilapaw.posterous.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Congratulations to the happy couple! I love BW for wedding shots.
Please make the PESOs a little less rare, Pete.
:)
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
I have the 150 and 250. The adapter from raynox is a plastic squeeze
construction. It doesn't fit nicely on 49mm filtermount (minimum is 52
mm), squeezing with force makes it fit. Best option is a metal 4943
step down ring. No idea if the 150 vignettes on 40 mm. Could try it on
a M40 this evening.
On Jan 16, 2012, at 5:47 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
http://goo.gl/hrPwz
From left to right:
- Once upon a time in the west
Very nice, the shadows add mystery. I'm not sure what the thing that looks
like a goldfish cookie on a leather thong is, I'd use my adjustment brush
and burn it
Thanks, Steve -- all good suggestions!
:)
-c
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
One more thing: in terms of class time, have them take some pictures
early. Introduce the ideas about composition, etc., while taking the
pictures. Many newbies are
Thanks, Godfrey.
Great keynote slideshow!
Toine
On 15 January 2012 21:58, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
Wonderful work, Toine!
You betcha, Snapseed and an iPhone can make amazing photographs.
I've been using Snapseed on the iPad since it came out, processing
both iPad 2 snaps
Pete,
They sure look happy. Congratulations to them.
A nice PESO by you - good catch!
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Pete McIntosh peter...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
A rare PESO from me, but couldn't resist...
http://www.pbase.com/image/140952884
My son and his partner
On Jan 16, 2012, at 7:04 AM, Toine wrote:
I have the 150 and 250. The adapter from raynox is a plastic squeeze
construction. It doesn't fit nicely on 49mm filtermount (minimum is 52
mm), squeezing with force makes it fit. Best option is a metal 4943
step down ring. No idea if the 150
And I completely agree with both Paul and Darren. As I was applying these
filters and looking for change , mostly what I saw was what Paul stated,
changes in contrast and hot spots, which I found curious. It seems to me, when
using these filters--that is, using them well--you'd still need a
Thanks, P.J, Jack, and Dave! Cheers, Christine
On Jan 16, 2012, at 6:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I'm tired of telling people that I hate them.
On 1/15/2012 7:10 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
off to a slow start this year. cheers, Christine
http://aguilapaw.posterous.com/
--
I was thinking the same thing about the tart shooting. I made another one--an
orange flavored apple tart. I didn't photograph it though. I've got two
left--I should just do a quick grab of it for the record. Cheers, Christine
On Jan 16, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
The Garbo
There's no need to try to imitate film characteristics in digital. Digital
provides much more control over gray values than film could ever achieve. Aside
from grain and how a film responds to developers, the important elements were
how sensitive its emulsion was to different colors. With
To expand this discussion a bit, there are other achromats that you
may wish to consider.
The Raynox 150 is a +4 diopter
and Raynox 250 is a +8 diopter.
Double element achromats (like the Raynox under discussion) are
superior to single element close-up lenses. Bargains can be found
(I've had good
If you were to ship both of those to me, I'd be glad to light and
shoot it for you. I'm afraid the process would be destructive though,
so there'd be nothing left to return to you. Fair trade, no? :-)
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Christine Aguila
christ...@caguila.com wrote:
I was thinking
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Cotty,
The symetry is wonderful and calming.
How did you get the swans to pose?
By pretending to throw bread crumbs to them. The swans are so
accustomed to seeing the arm motion people make when throwing them
food that they assume anyone making such motions is trying to feed
From: Brian Walters
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and after about 8 hours I received all of
the day's mail in one hit.
It's a bit odd, especially as my fastmail
From: Christine Aguila
Hi Everyone: The link below provides one example of the 18 different
*film types filters* in the Nik Silver Efex Pro 2 software. The name
of the film type is below the frame. These are straight filter
conversions with no tweaking at all. The first shot is the original
On 1/16/2012 09:07, Bruce Walker wrote:
It's curious that two women on the list got that impression, but so
far none of the guys.
Its called vanity :-)
In reviewing the shot I think I see what you mean. But the kind of
perspective distortion you're suggesting happens with wide-angle
lenses
After two weeks of image submissions we haven't got a lot of material
but what we do have is really first rate. We're on the way to
surpassing all previous annuals if this trend continues. I can say
without exaggeration that every photographer to submit so far has sent
at least one stunner.
That
Hmm... either the vignetting is a bit heavy, or California winter light is
really dark around the edges.
One might back off on the vignetting a bit, and increase the contrast in the
center, where things look a bit washed out to me.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message
Dave,
Those would be great bottles for Zeller Schwartzkatz - a tasty German
white wine.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:58 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
Fun shooting in the dark.
I've
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56:17PM +1100, Brian Walters wrote:
Hmmm
Well this is getting odder and odder.
Just for kicks, I set up a second Fastmail account for PDML mail and,
hey presto, it received my reply to Doug. But the original Fastmail
account hasn't.
It's a mystery.
I'll
John Brian,
I've encountered some problems of a different sort with my pdml account.
The pdml email comes to my gmail account and I somehow turned on 'Rich
formatting.'
(I suspect the Virgin America Airlines promo email did it.)
I kept on sending photo comments but never getting any replies.
I
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
After two weeks of image submissions we haven't got a lot of material
but what we do have is really first rate. We're on the way to
surpassing all previous annuals if this trend continues. I can say
without
Hi Mark,
The submission page says to embed the correct ICC profile, but it doesn't
specify an ICC profile. What is your preference?
Best,
Paul
On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
After two weeks of image submissions we haven't got a lot of material
but what we do have is
Purchased my first Rolleicord this morning, a model V (mainly because
I thought it was too cheap).
Whilst Googling around I came across this interesting video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8lWLEtC8wY
Some of the comments are a fun read, also.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hi Mark,
The submission page says to embed the correct ICC profile, but it doesn't
specify an ICC profile. What is your preference?
Whatever ICC profile is used in the image you're uploading. It's going
to get converted into sRGB in the end but I run an completely
Thank you, sir.
On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hi Mark,
The submission page says to embed the correct ICC profile, but it doesn't
specify an ICC profile. What is your preference?
Whatever ICC profile is used in the image you're uploading. It's
Rick,
Thanks for commenting.
You comment negatively on the vignetting for nearly every photo I
post. I understand you don't like it. It isn't necessary to repeat the
same message every single time. I receive about two hundred comments
for almost every photo I post here and to other forums. Of
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
Cotty,
The symetry is wonderful and calming.
How did you get the swans to pose?
By pretending to throw bread crumbs to them. The swans are so
accustomed to seeing the arm motion people make when
Umm... No, Godfrey. I just checked my sent folder--the last time I
criticized your vignetting was in June. The two comments on your photos before
that I actually =complimented= it.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com
Mark,
It is wonderful that you're doing this again!
What's the deadline?
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 12:43 PM
Subject: PDML Photo
Rick Womer wrote:
Mark,
It is wonderful that you're doing this again!
What's the deadline?
Feb 29.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Whew.
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: PDML Photo Annual - Week 2
Rick Womer wrote:
Mark,
It is wonderful that you're
And now for something completely different: I can't find the Upload
button! Oh wait Firefox shows it correctly
Toine
On 16 January 2012 18:43, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
After two weeks of image submissions we haven't got a lot of material
but what we do have is really
My mistake. I thought it was you ... I'll have to go back and find who
on PDML is always harping on vignetting. ;-)
(Not that it really matters, of course!)
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Umm... No, Godfrey. I just checked my sent folder--the last time
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012, at 12:55 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56:17PM +1100, Brian Walters wrote:
Hmmm
Well this is getting odder and odder.
Just for kicks, I set up a second Fastmail account for PDML mail and,
hey presto, it received my reply to Doug. But the
On 16/1/12, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
How did you get the swans to pose?
By pretending to throw bread crumbs to them. The swans are so
accustomed to seeing the arm motion people make when throwing them
food that they assume anyone making such motions is trying to feed
them. By
Young Egret this AM at the reserve.
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=626
K-5, DA 55~300(300mm), f/8 1/8000, ISO 800
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Nice light. And I like the way the ripples in the water are casting strips of
light across his feathers. Well done.
Paul
On Jan 16, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Young Egret this AM at the reserve.
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=626
K-5, DA 55~300(300mm),
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 2:23 PM
Subject: PESO: Blowing Bobbles
Young Egret this AM at the reserve.
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=626
K-5, DA
Thanks, Paul. Also, thanks for not correcting the bobbled spelling of bubbles.
;)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Blowing Bobbles
Nice
Yes, what Paul said and especially about the reflections. Gorgeous.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Nice light. And I like the way the ripples in the water are casting strips of
light across his feathers. Well done.
Paul
On Jan 16, 2012, at
Uncannily symmetrical. I see conspiracy theories forming around this
shot already. Don't pyramid shapes symbolize the Illuminati or
something?
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Walking along the Thames.
http://cottycam.posterous.com/swans-at-lechlade
--
I'm sad to say that I did not take near enough pictures in 2011 to
stumble upon anything I'd submit to the annual.
This really does put me in mind of the old saying that nobody on their
death bed ever said I wish I spent more time at work.
Cory
On 1/16/2012 12:43 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hmm... either the vignetting is a bit heavy, or California winter light is
really dark around the edges.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
No problem. Just whip out tomorrow, take a stunner or two, then edit
the EXIF date.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Cory Waters cbwat...@bellsouth.net wrote:
I'm sad to say that I did not take near enough pictures in 2011 to stumble
upon anything I'd submit to the annual.
This really does put
Nice capture of the Young Egret and like the timing of it.
Photo Captures by Jeffery
http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Jack
Davis
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012
Thanks, Jeff!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Jeffery Johnson jefferytjohn...@bellsouth.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: PESO: Blowing Bobbles
Nice capture of the Young Egret and like the timing of it.
As long as he takes it tomorrow he doesnt have to change the date :-)
only if he took his winner in earl 2010 or before
Cory , are you reading???
a
On 1/16/2012 18:56, Bruce Walker wrote:
No problem. Just whip out tomorrow, take a stunner or two, then edit
the EXIF date.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012
Appreciated, Bruce. The ripple shadows are why I decided to post it
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Blowing Bobbles
Yes, what Paul said and
This weekend I finally downloaded Photoshop CS5 and installed it (I've
been making do with CS4 up till now). I also bumped up the RAM in my PC
from 6 gigs to 16. Anticipating blazing fast performance, I scanned some
6x7 negs and started processing them. The images themselves take up
between
The images themselves take up between 550 to 650 megabytes on the
disk... great freaking jehovah and all the buddhist saints, that
constitutes serious cruelty to anything less than a building-sized
NASA mainframe.
But... to address your question: My intuition says that your best
bang-for-the-buck
Ditto what Tim says. Measure twice; spend bucks once.
But Mark, are you attempting to resolve individual atoms in that 6x7
neg? I've scanned in 8x10 prints at a decent rez and they were nowhere
near that file size.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
The images
On 1/16/2012 8:25 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
The images themselves take up between 550 to 650 megabytes on the
disk... great freaking jehovah and all the buddhist saints, that
constitutes serious cruelty to anything less than a building-sized
NASA mainframe.
Well, that is just the size that a 6x7 frame
On 1/16/2012 8:52 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Ditto what Tim says. Measure twice; spend bucks once.
But Mark, are you attempting to resolve individual atoms in that 6x7
neg? I've scanned in 8x10 prints at a decent rez and they were nowhere
near that file size.
I just want to see every blade of
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012, at 07:52 PM, Mark C wrote:
This weekend I finally downloaded Photoshop CS5 and installed it (I've
been making do with CS4 up till now). I also bumped up the RAM in my PC
from 6 gigs to 16. Anticipating blazing fast performance, I scanned some
6x7 negs and started
A new installment on Real Canadians Wearing Real Hats. Scroll down to
see today's photo:
http://realcanadianhats.blogspot.com/2012/01/blog-post.html
Hope you enjoy as much as I did shooting. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
Love that! What a great look, very well recorded by you.
Paul
On Jan 16, 2012, at 10:20 PM, frank theriault wrote:
A new installment on Real Canadians Wearing Real Hats. Scroll down to
see today's photo:
http://realcanadianhats.blogspot.com/2012/01/blog-post.html
Hope you enjoy as much
Thank you, Godfrey and Bruce for your responses!
Godfrey, - let me double check: what is the source of the information
you described in the second paragraph:
did you read it/got it from a LR developer, or did you conclude it
based on your own experience/logical sense... ?
The reason I am asking
Adding to Christine's info:
Buy.com has it the K-5 body new for $999 with free shipping and no sales tax.
More correctly, a third party selling through buy.com (Prodigital2000).
They have a 94% satisfaction rating as of right now.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Love it!
You have captured the joy and fun of the day.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Pete McIntosh peter...@gmail.com
Sent: January 16, 2012 1/16/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - to the altar, girl!
Hi guys,
A rare PESO from me, but couldn't
Terrific photo, Jack!
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
Sent: January 16, 2012 1/16/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Blowing Bubbles
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss
On 16/01/2012 15:57, Cotty wrote:
On 14/1/12, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Happy new year to you, too. I don't have any experience of classes but
I can say don't misunderestimate [8-)] the ability of children to pick
things up. For example:
On 1/01/2012 7:57 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Noticed a Pentax K5 Firmware thread on dp this AM, but didn't have a chance
to open it. I don't find it now.
Anyone?
Jack
Just checked Jan's link to the UK web site again. Version 1.12 is now
officially available.
Regards,
Pete Mac in Melbourne
Jack,
That's very nice.
I especially like the dark background.
It really makes the bird stand out.
Did you get any good shots with the beak out of the water?
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Young Egret this AM at the reserve.
Looks to be available here in the States, too.
http://pentaximaging.com/support/download-details/443
-p
On 1/16/2012 11:05 PM, Pete McIntosh wrote:
On 1/01/2012 7:57 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Noticed a Pentax K5 Firmware thread on dp this AM, but didn't have a
chance to open it. I don't find it
G'day all
Just browsing my PPG account and I see a notification which states:
For a limited time only, Photo Gallery users will be able to update
images uploaded before the new redesign to a higher resolution. More
info to come shortly!
This is good news because those early images look
What I wrote was information from one of the engineers on the LR team.
Working in LR is most definitely NOT the same as working in Photoshop.
Lightroom is a parametric editor, Photoshop is a pixel editor.
Entirely different operations.
But I suggest you experiment and see what happens for
On 1/16/2012 7:20 PM, frank theriault wrote:
A new installment on Real Canadians Wearing Real Hats. Scroll down to
see today's photo:
http://realcanadianhats.blogspot.com/2012/01/blog-post.html
Hope you enjoy as much as I did shooting. Comments welcome.
Greaqt shot. I love the
On 1/16/2012 11:05 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Purchased my first Rolleicord this morning, a model V (mainly because
I thought it was too cheap).
Whilst Googling around I came across this interesting video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8lWLEtC8wY
Some of the comments are a fun read, also.
94 matches
Mail list logo
