Re: PUG comments-was:Re: Evaluating Photographs

2003-09-23 Thread Kathleen
I love looking at all of the PUG monthly photos, but I do not feel qualified to comment on the photos insofar as offering praise, criticism, or suggestions for improvement. What I think would work, if it would be possible, is if there were some sort of a rating system (number 1-5, 5 being the

Re: PUG comments-was:Re: Evaluating Photographs

2003-09-23 Thread frank theriault
I don't know how comfortable I feel with that. I've never liked scoring art. It's hard, for instance, to score composition, since no one seems to be able to agree if there are even rules of composition, and even those who say there are such rules admit that sometimes they have to be or can be

Re: PUG comments-was:Re: Evaluating Photographs

2003-09-23 Thread Herb Chong
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:20 AM Subject: Re: PUG comments-was:Re: Evaluating Photographs I don't know how comfortable I feel with that. I've never liked scoring art. It's hard, for instance, to score composition, since no one seems to be able to agree if there are even rules

Re: PUG comments-was:Re: Evaluating Photographs

2003-09-23 Thread Dag T
- Original Message - From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Re: PUG comments-was:Re: Evaluating Photographs The opposite could happen, though. While some people will gradually change their style to accomodate the criticisms

Re: PUG comments-was:Re: Evaluating Photographs

2003-09-23 Thread John Francis
Quite easily doable, technically. In fact it would be fairly straightforward to automate the procedure, and use dynamic HTML scripting to add sliders and a button you could click on to submit your ratings to a PUG database. But it still might not be all that good an idea. If you rate my image

PUG comments-was:Re: Evaluating Photographs

2003-09-22 Thread frank theriault
I too, miss PUG comments, but I'm in the same boat as you. My shots rarely get mentioned, except for by those who take the time to comment on ~every~ shot (and then the comments have always been good), and back when Brogden organized the little critique circle a year or more ago - again, never a

Re: PUG comments-was:Re: Evaluating Photographs

2003-09-22 Thread Eactivist
OTOH, I could be completely wrong here! Wouldn't be the first time. vbg cheers, frank Why no comments: people are busy, people are unassertive, people are afraid to criticize, people only have time to look, writing comments involves more time. Any time I've been in a group where it is

Re: PUG comments-was:Re: Evaluating Photographs

2003-09-22 Thread frank theriault
Well, yeah, That's the problem with doing it yourself, isn't it? If you do only a few (your favourites), are you insulting those who you don't comment upon? If you comment on all of them, then you have to be honest with all of them, and let's face it, the odd clunker does get in there, doesn't