Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19115
Please create a new pr against master branch and close this one. If the
issue doesn't exist in master branch, then consider backporting that fix to 2.2
branch.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931#discussion_r136746833
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExpandExec.scala ---
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ case class ExpandExec(
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
Sure, current behavior is hive behavior.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
Please hold it. It means it is a behavior change. Let me consider it more.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116
[SPARK-21903][BUILD] Upgrade scalastyle to 1.0.0.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1.0.0 fixes an issue with import order, explicit type for public methods,
line
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086#discussion_r136745765
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -569,46 +569,51 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086#discussion_r136747159
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -418,6 +439,42 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
> use db2;
> alter table db1.t2 rename to t1;
After this PR, it is renamed to `db2.t1`, right?
Before this PR, it is renamed to `db1.t1`, right?
---
If your project is set
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902
@WeichenXu123 No, I only cache the DataFrame. And the RDD-Version is
[here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902/commits/8daffc9007c65f04e005ffe5dcfbeca634480465).
I use the same
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81370/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931#discussion_r136746468
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SortExec.scala ---
@@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ case class SortExec(
""".stripMargin.trim
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
**[Test build #81370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81370/testReport)**
for PR 19086 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086#discussion_r136747432
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -569,46 +569,51 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902
hmm... that's interesting. So I found performance gap between dataframe
codegen aggregation and the simple RDD aggregation. I will discuss with SQL
team for this later. Thanks!
---
If your
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
yes, correct
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
@zhengruifeng `KMeans` regarded as a bugfix(SPARK-21799) because the
double-cache issue is introduced in 2.2 and cause perf regression.
Other algos also have the same issue, but the issue
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19113
How about the other popular open source projects? Do you know whether which
projects are using Univocity 2.5?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19113
Any performance measure from 2.2 to 2.5?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116
**[Test build #81371 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81371/testReport)**
for PR 19116 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116
cc @srowen and @vanzin, could you take a look please when you have some
time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116#discussion_r136745412
--- Diff: scalastyle-config.xml ---
@@ -268,10 +268,7 @@ This file is divided into 3 sections:
-
-^Override$
-
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116#discussion_r136745559
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -163,14 +163,15 @@ object SparkBuild extends PomBuild {
val configUrlV =
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086#discussion_r136745597
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -569,46 +569,51 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116#discussion_r136745459
--- Diff: project/plugins.sbt ---
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@ addSbtPlugin("com.typesafe.sbteclipse" %
"sbteclipse-plugin" % "5.1.0")
// sbt 1.0.0 support:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
**[Test build #81372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81372/testReport)**
for PR 17014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
**[Test build #81372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81372/testReport)**
for PR 17014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81372/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17924
@dongjoon-hyun I have a question: does this orc data sources reader support
a table contains multiple file format
for example:
table/
day=2017-09-01 RCFile
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
**[Test build #81357 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81357/testReport)**
for PR 18865 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81357/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
**[Test build #81360 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81360/testReport)**
for PR 18865 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
**[Test build #81359 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81359/testReport)**
for PR 18869 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
**[Test build #81362 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81362/testReport)**
for PR 18869 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81359/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865#discussion_r136709025
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -114,6 +114,17 @@ class JsonFileFormat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
**[Test build #81353 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81353/testReport)**
for PR 18865 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81353/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Could you also add negative test cases for map?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
@gatorsmile and @cloud-fan, do you guys prefer throwing an exception or
printing a log? I think I like logging one more conservatively.
BTW, I am sorry for raising this issue late now.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17924
Hi, I didn't try that, but that's not a concept of Spark data source table.
Please don't expect that. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17924
BTW, the latest version is maintained in #17980.
Recently, Spark Vector format is changed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086#discussion_r136719337
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -502,17 +502,16 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
**[Test build #81361 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81361/testReport)**
for PR 19086 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r136719383
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +113,53 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0")
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r136719561
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/TrainValidationSplit.scala ---
@@ -87,37 +91,63 @@ class TrainValidationSplit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r136719485
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +113,53 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0")
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
**[Test build #81353 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81353/testReport)**
for PR 18865 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865#discussion_r136708996
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -114,6 +114,17 @@ class JsonFileFormat
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869#discussion_r136709446
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/PredicateSuite.scala
---
@@ -151,29 +151,63 @@ class PredicateSuite extends
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
@gatorsmile As I said in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869#discussion_r136706025, we already
have tests in `ExpressionTypeCheckingSuite` to check the predicates don't
support map type. Do
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19018
ouch. I think this is because
```
# Test unseen labels
data <- data.frame(clicked = base::sample(c(0, 1), 10, replace = TRUE),
someString = base::sample(c("this", "that"), 10,
Github user demoonism commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19109#discussion_r136709158
--- Diff: docs/index.md ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ source, visit [Building Spark](building-spark.html).
Spark runs on both Windows and UNIX-like
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869#discussion_r136709144
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/PredicateSuite.scala
---
@@ -151,29 +151,63 @@ class PredicateSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81349/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
**[Test build #81352 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81352/testReport)**
for PR 19110 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81352/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
After looking the change, found another two points we should address.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19111
[SPARK-21801][SPARKR][TEST][WIP] set random seed for predictable test
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
set.seed() before running tests
## How was this patch
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
**[Test build #81349 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81349/testReport)**
for PR 18869 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
**[Test build #81348 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81348/testReport)**
for PR 18869 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81348/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
**[Test build #81354 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81354/testReport)**
for PR 19082 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19018
#19111
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19111
**[Test build #81355 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81355/testReport)**
for PR 19111 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19109#discussion_r136711660
--- Diff: docs/index.md ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ source, visit [Building Spark](building-spark.html).
Spark runs on both Windows and UNIX-like
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
**[Test build #81354 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81354/testReport)**
for PR 19082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81354/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
@viirya @rednaxelafx @kiszk okay, could you check again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jmchung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865#discussion_r136715367
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -113,6 +113,18 @@ class JsonFileFormat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #81358 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81358/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81356/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931#discussion_r136710824
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala
---
@@ -149,14 +149,146 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931#discussion_r136710234
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala
---
@@ -149,14 +149,146 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931#discussion_r136711099
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SortExec.scala ---
@@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ case class SortExec(
""".stripMargin.trim
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931#discussion_r136710928
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala
---
@@ -149,14 +149,146 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
**[Test build #81356 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81356/testReport)**
for PR 18869 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105
I am hitting a network issue. Will update JIRA tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Resolved conflict introduced by other code commits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #81358 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81358/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81358/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
**[Test build #81359 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81359/testReport)**
for PR 18869 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81351/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
**[Test build #81351 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81351/testReport)**
for PR 19082 at commit
1 - 100 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
