Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
**[Test build #71971 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71971/testReport)**
for PR 16691 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700
**[Test build #71976 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71976/testReport)**
for PR 16700 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16630
This test just resists to start. Could someone help? Many thanks!
@srowen @jkbradley @MLnick @yanboliang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700
[SPARK-19359][SQL]clear useless path after rename a partition with
upper-case by HiveExternalCatalog
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Hive metastore is not case
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
**[Test build #71975 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71975/testReport)**
for PR 16699 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71974/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
**[Test build #71974 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71974/testReport)**
for PR 16699 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71970/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
**[Test build #71970 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71970/testReport)**
for PR 16688 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
**[Test build #71974 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71974/testReport)**
for PR 16699 at commit
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
[SPARK-18710] Add offset in GLM
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add support for offset in GLM. This is useful for at least two reasons:
1. Account for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16698
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71968/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16698
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16698
**[Test build #71968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71968/testReport)**
for PR 16698 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71967/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
**[Test build #71967 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71967/testReport)**
for PR 16680 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71966/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
**[Test build #71966 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71966/testReport)**
for PR 16680 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
Thanks! Merging to master/2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user titicaca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689#discussion_r97714703
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1138,6 +1138,9 @@ setMethod("collect",
if (!is.null(PRIMITIVE_TYPES[[colType]]) && colType !=
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #71973 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71973/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #71972 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71972/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r97712511
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -90,25 +95,100 @@ trait BaseLimitExec extends UnaryExecNode with
Github user titicaca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689#discussion_r97712469
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1138,6 +1138,9 @@ setMethod("collect",
if (!is.null(PRIMITIVE_TYPES[[colType]]) && colType !=
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
Sure, let me quickly go over the changes. Will merge it after that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16582#discussion_r97710897
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -274,25 +277,28 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16685
@ilganeli Regarding the support of **UPDATE**, your idea is pretty good.
Please submit a separate PR and improve the document. I will review it.
Regarding the support of **UPSERT**, we
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r97710485
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -90,25 +95,100 @@ trait BaseLimitExec extends UnaryExecNode with
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r97710405
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -90,25 +95,100 @@ trait BaseLimitExec extends UnaryExecNode with
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r97710396
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -90,25 +95,100 @@ trait BaseLimitExec extends UnaryExecNode with
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16465#discussion_r97710172
--- Diff: dev/pip-sanity-check.py ---
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
from __future__ import print_function
from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
+from
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
**[Test build #71971 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71971/testReport)**
for PR 16691 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
**[Test build #71970 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71970/testReport)**
for PR 16688 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16688
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
LGTM except two minor comments in the error messages.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693#discussion_r97709404
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/CreateHiveTableAsSelectCommand.scala
---
@@ -44,40 +44,6 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693#discussion_r97709347
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/CreateHiveTableAsSelectCommand.scala
---
@@ -44,40 +44,6 @@ case class
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16582#discussion_r97709181
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -274,25 +277,28 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71964/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
**[Test build #71964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71964/testReport)**
for PR 16696 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16465
Holden, https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/dev/merge_spark_pr.py
works well for merging to master and back port to any branch :) unless there is
conflict then it would be easier with a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71963/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
**[Test build #71963 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71963/testReport)**
for PR 16696 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693#discussion_r97708445
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/CreateHiveTableAsSelectCommand.scala
---
@@ -89,12 +55,30 @@ case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
@cloud-fan, could you please take a look? I tried to not change the current
behaviour and logics at my best but just re-locate them here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
**[Test build #71969 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71969/testReport)**
for PR 16689 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71969/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308#discussion_r97708190
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DateFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -475,6 +1164,45 @@ class DateFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16668
@shivaram how about we merge this to master & branch-2.1? then I can based
off of this to Dataset/DataFrame API in Scala as @cloud-fan suggests - it would
be easier than porting the little
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16698
**[Test build #71968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71968/testReport)**
for PR 16698 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
**[Test build #71969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71969/testReport)**
for PR 16689 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16572
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71960/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16572
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16698
Nitpicking though, I think it helps for some users. Could someone check
this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Jenkins, ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16698
[CORE][DOCS] Update a help message for --files in spark-submit
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to update a help message for `--files` in spark-submit because
it
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16572
**[Test build #71960 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71960/testReport)**
for PR 16572 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689#discussion_r97707703
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1138,6 +1138,9 @@ setMethod("collect",
if (!is.null(PRIMITIVE_TYPES[[colType]]) && colType
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
great! @shivaram could you get Jenkins to test this fix please? I don't
seem to have the power to command it :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16582#discussion_r97706756
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -274,25 +277,28 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
**[Test build #71967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71967/testReport)**
for PR 16680 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680#discussion_r97706016
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -39,22 +37,76 @@ private[csv] object
Github user samkum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387
Nope, I didn't tested it in isolation.
-Sameer.
On Jan 24, 2017 10:09 PM, "Marcelo Vanzin" wrote:
> No the question is whether you tested without
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16478
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16478
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71958/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #71965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71965/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16478
**[Test build #71958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71958/testReport)**
for PR 16478 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
**[Test build #71966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71966/testReport)**
for PR 16680 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693#discussion_r97705600
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/DataStreamReader.scala
---
@@ -116,6 +117,11 @@ final class DataStreamReader
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71955/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693#discussion_r97705570
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/DataStreamWriter.scala
---
@@ -221,6 +222,11 @@ final class DataStreamWriter[T]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user CodingCat opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
[SPARK-19358][CORE] LiveListenerBus shall log the event name when dropping
them due to a fully filled queue
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some dropped event will
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #71955 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71955/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71959/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #71959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71959/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user xwu0226 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16685
@ilganeli Thanks for replying to my comments! Please correct me if I am
wrong. My understanding of your assumption is that the target table does not
have or maintain any unique constraints. Mostly
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16654
@srowen I agree that metric should be irrelevant to details of the
algorithms. AUC is irrelevant to algorithms, it is just relevant to the
dataset: In spark-ml, scikit-learn, or any other
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71952/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16605
**[Test build #71952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71952/testReport)**
for PR 16605 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
Working on the test failure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user titicaca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Sorry for the late reply. I figured out that the tests failed because if a
vector is with only NAs, the type is logical, therefore we cannot cast the type
in that case. I have updated the codes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71956/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16691
**[Test build #71956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71956/testReport)**
for PR 16691 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
**[Test build #71964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71964/testReport)**
for PR 16696 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16695
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71962/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16695
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 457 matches
Mail list logo