Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995
@yanboliang I update this PR and revert changes on `setSolver` in GLR and
LiR. Thanks for your reviewing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995
**[Test build #78607 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78607/testReport)**
for PR 17995 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995#discussion_r123931580
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifier.scala
---
@@ -81,7 +83,8 @@ private[classification]
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334#discussion_r123930251
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/CommandUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18419
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r123930006
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/MathUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18419#discussion_r123929987
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLExecution.scala ---
@@ -118,4 +125,19 @@ object SQLExecution {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334#discussion_r123929887
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/SQLTestUtils.scala ---
@@ -165,6 +167,22 @@ private[sql] trait SQLTestUtils
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
**[Test build #78606 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78606/testReport)**
for PR 17084 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
the pip packaging failing seems to be unrelated to the code... let me try
this again
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18419#discussion_r123928964
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLExecution.scala ---
@@ -118,4 +125,19 @@ object SQLExecution {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334#discussion_r123928827
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/CommandUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
**[Test build #78605 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78605/testReport)**
for PR 11994 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18368
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78596/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18368
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
**[Test build #78604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78604/testReport)**
for PR 18405 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18368
**[Test build #78596 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78596/testReport)**
for PR 18368 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78598/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
**[Test build #78598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78598/testReport)**
for PR 17084 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
**[Test build #78603 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78603/testReport)**
for PR 17758 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78597/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
**[Test build #78597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78597/testReport)**
for PR 17084 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
**[Test build #78602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78602/testReport)**
for PR 18334 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18419
**[Test build #78600 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78600/testReport)**
for PR 18419 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18418
**[Test build #78601 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78601/testReport)**
for PR 18418 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18419
cc @rdblue @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18419
[SPARK-20213][SQL][follow-up] introduce SQLExecution.ignoreNestedExecutionId
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064, to work
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18366#discussion_r123925897
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -635,20 +652,16 @@ setMethod("dayofyear",
column(jc)
})
-#' decode
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18366#discussion_r123926400
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -1503,18 +1491,12 @@ setMethod("skewness",
column(jc)
})
-#' soundex
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18418
**[Test build #78599 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78599/testReport)**
for PR 18418 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78593/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
**[Test build #78593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78593/testReport)**
for PR 18405 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18418
[SPARK-19104][SQL] Lambda variables should work when parent expression
splits generated codes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When an expression using lambda variables
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
**[Test build #78598 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78598/testReport)**
for PR 17084 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084#discussion_r123925697
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/binary/BinaryConfusionMatrix.scala
---
@@ -22,22 +22,22 @@ package
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084#discussion_r123925523
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/BinaryClassificationMetrics.scala
---
@@ -146,11 +160,13 @@ class
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451#discussion_r123925184
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2869,6 +2869,18 @@ def findSynonyms(self, word, num):
word = _convert_to_vector(word)
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451#discussion_r123925233
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2869,6 +2869,18 @@ def findSynonyms(self, word, num):
word = _convert_to_vector(word)
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451#discussion_r123925086
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Word2Vec.scala
---
@@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ class Word2VecModel private[ml] (
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451#discussion_r123925064
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Word2Vec.scala
---
@@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ class Word2VecModel private[ml] (
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084#discussion_r123925437
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/BinaryClassificationMetrics.scala
---
@@ -41,13 +41,27 @@ import
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084#discussion_r123925177
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/BinaryClassificationEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -77,12 +87,16 @@ class
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084#discussion_r123924688
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/BinaryClassificationEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -36,12 +36,18 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
**[Test build #78597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78597/testReport)**
for PR 17084 at commit
Github user heary-cao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174#discussion_r123924134
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/ShuffleExternalSorter.java ---
@@ -123,6 +126,8 @@
this.inMemSorter = new
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78592/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
**[Test build #78592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78592/testReport)**
for PR 18334 at commit
Github user heary-cao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174#discussion_r123923859
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/ShuffleExternalSorter.java ---
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@
/** The buffer size to use when
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
Sure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
an you please keep 17084 open? thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
yes, will update the PR, thanks for the ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18368
**[Test build #78596 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78596/testReport)**
for PR 18368 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18346
ping @cloud-fan any more feedback on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78595/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
**[Test build #78595 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78595/testReport)**
for PR 11994 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18368
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18235#discussion_r123922136
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -310,33 +310,28 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
**[Test build #78595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78595/testReport)**
for PR 11994 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18305
@sethah I will take a look in a few days after some backlog, thanks for
your patience.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9518
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9518
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78588/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9518
**[Test build #78588 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78588/testReport)**
for PR 9518 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995#discussion_r123921193
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifier.scala
---
@@ -81,7 +83,8 @@ private[classification]
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995#discussion_r123920923
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -313,7 +313,11 @@ class
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995#discussion_r123919667
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -128,7 +130,8 @@ private[feature] trait ChiSqSelectorParams
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995#discussion_r123919494
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/RegressionEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -48,10 +50,11 @@ final class RegressionEvaluator
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995#discussion_r123888757
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/BinaryClassificationEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -46,11 +48,10 @@ class
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995#discussion_r123920437
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Imputer.scala ---
@@ -45,7 +47,7 @@ private[feature] trait ImputerParams extends Params with
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995#discussion_r123919458
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/MulticlassClassificationEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -44,12 +46,10 @@ class
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995#discussion_r123920352
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/BinaryClassificationEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -70,6 +71,10 @@ class
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18414
@srini-daruna I think I already addressed this issue in SPARK-12552, here
is the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78594/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
**[Test build #78594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78594/testReport)**
for PR 11994 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
cc @cloud-fan I'd like to hear your opinion about this `Set` support. Can
you provide some insights?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416#discussion_r123920728
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -992,6 +1123,128 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r123918251
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/operators.sql ---
@@ -92,3 +92,8 @@ select abs(-3.13), abs('-2.19');
-- positive/negative
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r123918240
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/MathUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r123919502
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/MathUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r123919350
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/MathUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
**[Test build #78593 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78593/testReport)**
for PR 18405 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18106#discussion_r123920115
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -132,3 +133,154 @@ case class Uuid() extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
**[Test build #78594 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78594/testReport)**
for PR 11994 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18106#discussion_r123919660
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -132,3 +133,154 @@ case class Uuid() extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78590/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
**[Test build #78590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78590/testReport)**
for PR 18405 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Currently I can't think of possible issues of serializing `Set` as array.
But welcome comments to point any possible issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
