Hi! I'm trying to migrate a volume from a storage pool to another. I've
made it for some instance volumes with sizes up to 300GB. Now I have to
migrate an instance volume with 3.8 TB and I'm getting:
At the GUI popup:
Migrating volume failed
Resource [StoragePool:24] is unreachable: Volume
click on the public IP address from the VPC the
options are only "Details, VPN".
How can I configure ingress options, as port forwarding? For example, I
need to forward ports 80 and 443 to a specific VM in some tier.
Thank you!
Em qua., 29 de nov. de 2023 às 14:50, Jorge Luiz Corre
Hi Bryan! We are using here but in a different way, customized for our
environment and using how it is possible the features of CloudStack. In
documentation we can see support for some GPU models a little bit old
today.
We are using pci passthrough. All hosts with GPU are configured to boot
with
2024 às 16:34, Wei ZHOU
escreveu:
> Can you try the workaround described in
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8637?
>
> -Wei
>
> 在 2024年2月14日星期三，Jorge Luiz Correa 写道：
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've upgraded from 4.17.2 to 4.19.0. I'm using Ubun
Hello!
I've upgraded from 4.17.2 to 4.19.0. I'm using Ubuntu Server 22.04.3 LTS,
Java 11.0.21 (no changes with upgrade). I'm using a LDAP server to
authenticate users, with SSL.
After the upgrade users can't authenticate anymore. The errors at the end
of this message could be found in
Hi Gabriel! This is exactly what I was looking for. I couldn't find this
request in github when looking for something. Thank you for sharing.
No problem in creating through the API. So, I'll wait for the test results.
If you could share with us, I would appreciate. And thank you so much for
these
We have a lot of research centers here. Each one is a domain in CloudStack
with its administrators. I would like each domain to use as few public IPs
as possible and also use Projects to make management easier. For example,
it would be ok if each domain had one virtual router with one public IP
Just sharing some scripts used here. I hope they can help you.
Create file cloud.cfg_jammy
Change the following lines:
cloud_init_modules:
.
.
- [ssh, always]
cloud_config_modules:
.
.
- [set-passwords, always]
Download the cloud-set-guest-password-configdrive.sh script.
Create
Is there any way (global configuration, role changes, etc.) to restrict
deletion of an instance to the creator only?
For example, I have a Project with a few users. If user A creates an
instance, only user A can delete it. The goal is that one user can't delete
instances from another by mistake.
B/s (1009MB/s), 962MiB/s-962MiB/s (1009MB/s-1009MB/s),
> io=3900MiB (4089MB), run=4052-4052msec
> WRITE: bw=321MiB/s (336MB/s), 321MiB/s-321MiB/s (336MB/s-336MB/s),
> io=1300MiB (1363MB), run=4052-4052msec
>
> This is without enabling io_uring. I see I can enable it per VM using the
&g
Hi Granwille! About the READ/WRITE performance, as Levin suggested, check
the XML of virtual machines looking at disk/device section. Look for
io='io_uring'.
As stated here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4883
CloudStack can use io_uring with Qemu >= 5.0 and Libvirt >= 6.3.0.
I
Hi Christian, take a look at this thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/s0xkt1k93hfoz33qw1mhmt9333rsy1s9
Recently I've had some issues trying to use L2 networks but still in 4.17.
The trick was to define a domain admin account as the owner of the
networks, as Stephan said. And that can be made
main - the network is owned by the domain and account
> correctly.
>
> Are you sure you defined the Domain AND the right account (not user) of
> the domain?
> Did you try via API / Cloudmonkey?
>
> Best regards,
> Stephan
>
> > Jorge Luiz Correa hat am 26.05.2023
Hi all! How can I use the network offering
DefaultL2NetworkOfferingConfigDriveVlan? I would like to create a new L2
network to be used by domain TEST, with vlan id 2123. DHCP will be
external. I need to use ConfigDrive to be able to set VM hostname and
password and Vlan to define the vlan id for
Just enjoying the subject, I'm curious about what we can reach in disk
performance when using NFS primary storage. We have two infrastructures
with different purposes, one to instantiate normal VMs and other to be used
by VMs involved with scientific researches running simulations, AI
training,
the storage pool,
> consuming valuable storage resources and database inconsistencies. It is
> worth taking a look at the storage pool for these files and also
> validating the database, to see if inconsistencies were created there.
>
> Best regards,
> Bryan
> On 26/04/2023 16:24, Jorge
Anyone had problems when migrating "big" volumes between different pools? I
have 3 storage pools. The overprovisioning factor was configured with 2.0
(default) and pool2 got full. So, I've configured factor as 1.0 and then
had to move some volumes from pool2 to pool3.
CS 4.17.2.0, Ubuntu 22.04
n.
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
>
> On 04/10/2022 09:39, Jorge Luiz Correa wrote:
> > Looking at documentation I can't find a way to dedicate a host or cluster
> > to a project.
> >
> > Is there some way to do that today?
> >
> &
Looking at documentation I can't find a way to dedicate a host or cluster
to a project.
Is there some way to do that today?
Cloudstack intends to make it possible some day?
Each project creates an account and we can dedicate hosts and clusters to
accounts. So, it looks like to be the same
Hi! I'm having some problems related to the creation of a new service
offering. I need to create one using the "Custom constrained" option to
limit CPUs and memory. But, when "Custom constrained" is selected "CPU (in
MHz)" is required.
(1) The first problem is that "CPU (in MHz)" has nothing to
Same here, exactly the same problem with volumes.
I've looked in github source for the SQL query that generates the
aggregated registries to try to understand but I couldn't find.
:/
Appreciate any help too.
Em ter., 26 de jul. de 2022 17:31, Matheus Fontes
escreveu:
> Hi,
> Is anyone having
Hi all!
In documentation I can see:
cloudmonkey link domaintoldap domainid=12345678-90ab-cdef-fedc-ba0987654321\
accounttype=2\
ldapdomain="ou=people,dc=cloudstack,dc=apache,dc=org"\
type=OU
So, for each member of
Hi! I've set up some servers with Ubuntu 22.04 LTS: 2 management servers, 2
databases, 2 secondary storage and 4 processor nodes.
In my tests I've used the repository from focal:
http://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu focal 4.16
As cloudstack packages do not require a lot of dependencies, the
Just to confirm the incompatibility. When Zone was enabled, the CS manager
started to try to launch some system VMs like s--VM and v--VM. At
hypervisors, all attempts were failing because the libvirtd didn't accept a
vnc_password bigger than 8 chars.
libvirtd[44140]: unsupported
Hi!
I'm testing CS with Ubuntu 22.04 LTS that uses libvirt 8.0.0-1ubuntu6
(using CS repository from focal 20.04). After all the installation process,
when the manager tries to start some system VMs (like SSVM), the hypervisor
hosts can't do that. In the agent logs I can see:
2022-04-08
be you are looking at the
> wrong figures. When you try to create more resources than the total account
> limit, do they still get created? If so, please log a bug at
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/new/choose
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:22 PM Jorge Luiz Correa
> w
see usage information for all the
accounts, including those linked to LDAP groups.
Tks!
On 2021/11/22 19:21:32 Jorge Luiz Correa wrote:
> When we have an account UserA with a user UserA inside it, we can see and
> control usage limits configuring the UserA "account".
>
>
When we have an account UserA with a user UserA inside it, we can see and
control usage limits configuring the UserA "account".
I'm testing the link accounttoldap feature.
cmk -p ad...@www.hpc link accounttoldap account='DomainAdmins'
accounttype=2
Same difficulty here. The way it worked was defining the truststore
globally. Just after that I defined the ldap configuration inside a domain.
Using API:
cmk -p user@myprofile update configuration name='ldap.truststore'
value='/etc/cloudstack/management/cloud.jks'
cmk -p user@myprofile update
Hi! In my tests I couldn't use posixGroups, even changing the
ldap.group.object configuration. The query is always in the format:
(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(uid=userone)(|(memberOf=cn=groupaccount1,ou=groups,dc=domain)))
Looking for the memberOf attribute in the user entity is the problem.
Hi! This is just my first post here and I'm looking for some help to
understand more about LDAP use. I'm using CloudStack 4.15.2.0 and an
OpenLDAP server. I need to configure autosync to map an account to a LDAP
group. My LDAP uses as group entity the posixGroup type.
Could CloudStack use groups
31 matches
Mail list logo
