[videoblogging] Re: Tilzy.tv Launch!
good idea. nicely done :) Doron Golan http://dvblog.org/ -- Hi Videobloggers, We just launched Tilzy.tv http://www.tilzy.tv , a guide to entertainment on the web that includes editorial overviews and short preview clips from websites with amassed entertainment content. Our goal is to raise awareness of the content available online, and to push traffic to entertainment websitesÂ…many of your vlogs/shows are featured. We will make every attempt to contact every listed vlog/show individually, but in case we have difficulty reaching anyone, we thought a group post might counter possible confusion. Here's a quick rundown of Tilzy.TV http://www.tilzy.tv Â… We hope you like Tilzy.TV. We're pumped to be a part of this community. Joshua Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jamison Tilsner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[videoblogging] Labourvision - New Labour get a videoblog
Here in the UK, we already have WebCameron (http://www.webcameron.org.uk), the Conservative leader David Cameron's attempt to woo voters with videos on Conservative policy narrated from his kitchen (Ecover bottles in full view). Now New Labour have joined the trend. They just launched Labourvision, to enable you to hear unmediated, fresh, first-hand, what it is we are about (See yesterday's Guardian article - http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,2054070,00.html). Unmediated! They must have worked hard to pull that one off! Go here http://www.youtube.com/labourvision for labourvision in its full low-production-value/background-noise-included glory. I wonder how much though went into choosing the officey looking corner (people can empathise with offices) that it was filmed in. Cynical. Moi. beth xxx
[videoblogging] Re: Timelapse software?
Without any other parameters, I'd say to capture your video then bring it into Final Cut and change the speed on it so the video's the length you want it. The new speed clip will automatically skip frames, then you EXPORT - USING QUICKTIME CONVERSION - IMAGE SEQUENCE - then set the format and the frames per second. I don't know why you would want to save every Nth individual frame to a new _video_ file, but if what you meant was a still from the video, that's the way to do it. -- Bill C. http://BillCammack.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to take a 12 hour video with my Xacti and then run it through a utility that will save every Nth frame to a new video file. Anyone know of any such software? I see Windv does it... but as it captures from a MiniDV device. I want to use a utility on digital media. Thanks, Mike http://vlog.MikeMoon.net
Re: [videoblogging] Labourvision - New Labour get a videoblog
Thanks for the tip, Beth. Hope you don't mind too terribly much, but I quoted your analysis of Blair's set design. http://newteevee.com/2007/04/12/party-vloggers-in-the-uk/ Also, had a little fun with it. :) JW On 4/12/07, beth_tilston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here in the UK, we already have WebCameron (http://www.webcameron.org.uk), the Conservative leader David Cameron's attempt to woo voters with videos on Conservative policy narrated from his kitchen (Ecover bottles in full view). Now New Labour have joined the trend. They just launched Labourvision, to enable you to hear unmediated, fresh, first-hand, what it is we are about (See yesterday's Guardian article - http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,2054070,00.html). Unmediated! They must have worked hard to pull that one off! Go here http://www.youtube.com/labourvision for labourvision in its full low-production-value/background-noise-included glory. I wonder how much though went into choosing the officey looking corner (people can empathise with offices) that it was filmed in. Cynical. Moi. beth xxx [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Josh Wolf Provides Context to his Kevin Sites Interview
here: http://vergenewmedia.com/2007/04/12/josh-wolf-the-blogger-code-of-ethics-and-the-title-of-journalist/ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
[videoblogging] Re: filesize of HD footage
Forgot to say that the Apple examples are a case of using a rather high bitrate to make sure the footage looks real nice. You could encoder at same resolutions that they have, but use a lower bitrate, and get much smaller files than theirs. Then theres differences between codecs, might get away with lower bitrates using DivX or WMV for example, or the other way round, I gave up spending all my time being a codec nerd a while back so I cant bring myself to do my own comparison anymore. WMV gets a fair bit of praise in the HD department, but h264 and divx both look rather good to me too. Anyway I will shutup now as you may not even have been asking about that side of the equation. Cheers Steve Elbows --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.apple.com/quicktime/guide/hd/
[videoblogging] Cinema Without Show Business
Hi, This is something I wrote last summer and just came out this month on an academic journal called Post-Identity, edited by Nick Rombes. It was written in response to discussions here last year about ads and personal media - so it is a bit out of date! Not so much vlog theory as finding common ground for a certain kind of cinema practice. Anyway, it may be of interest to some. Would appreciate any feedback: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cinema Without Show Business: a Poetics of Vlogging by Will Luers http://tinyurl.com/2z8bb2 thanks, Will http://wwwtaylorstreetstudio.com/blog
[videoblogging] Re: Fwd: Draft Blogger's Code of Conduct
I think the point is that there is not a limited number of gatekeepers for content and activity on the net. Anyone can setup a website (blog or otherwise) with their own rules, filters and gatekeeping. If someone doesn't like that, they can create their site. A code of conduct starts to places governance rules on the net. It is work to bring central governing or government to the net. It has some of the aspects of governmental rule: reaching rules by consensus, protecting the rights of the weak. One of the next steps is enforcing the rules accepted. -- Enric -==- http://cirne.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but the internet is not unfilted now, and I am not saying that I think a code of conduct badge is the right answer and yes it can very much be a slippery slope, this whole thing reminds me a lot of the creation of the comic code authority for comics back in the 50's I won't go into great detail here but it's a fasinating story and the parrells are very interesting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], mattfeldman78 mattfeldman78@ wrote: I suppose I might have jumped the F-word (fascist) a bit early on this one--however i do still stand behind my argument that this is not a good idea and should be opposed by people interested in preserving freedom online. I think this quote from Robert Scoble says alot: I do find disquieting the social pressure to get on board with this program. Tim O'Reilly is a guy who really can affect one's career online (and off, too). I do have to admit that I feel some pressure just to get on board here and that makes me feel very uneasy. Lets keep in mind that this code is not coming from individual media makers who are expressing their individual ethics on their own sites. It's coming from a very influential man, who wants bloggers to conform to a set of rules that he has created. As more and more bloggers (and vloggers) begin to earn a living from their efforts I can see a time when advertisers will refuse to pay bloggers who do not have a mock sheriff badge on their site. It's not worth the risk to them. This will render the web as useless as traditional media. As I said earlier, we already have all the laws in place that we need to take care of these issues. Using the threats that were made to Kathy Sierra as a pretense feels very wrong to me. It's like the government demanding all of our search records from Google to find kiddy porn, or tapping our phones to fight terrorism, or unconstitutionally searching your bag in the subway. It's a slippery slope to introduce draconian codes into the last bastion of unfiltered information that we have, no matter how subtle or seemingly reasonable they may seem on the surface. I think Benjamin Franklin summed it up best: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Fight the power! website: http://nobloggerscode.pbwiki.com twitter: http://twitter.com/nobloggerscode --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Josh Wolf inthecity@ wrote: Someone please explain this to me, I am very confused about this debate. Let's look at it this way, if I as a media maker decide to make a page detailing my own code of ethic and an attached wiki to further refine and develop my own ethics through a public conversation is this in any way fascist? I don't feel it is, but if you do, please explain. Now, what if others elected to adopt my own code for their sites? What if other codes began to develop and some chose to adopt those and others remained unaffiliated. If this develops organically and without any outside or heavily weighted influence is put on taking part in any particular school of thought then such a development would actually serve to enhance the visitors experience and abilities to discern how much weight to give any particular report. Any real concerns about this being a fascist development seem to me to revolve around whether some group or company attempts to dictate their values schema on the larger mass of bloggers. At which point, I would tend to agree with your thesis that this is an assault on our first amendment freedoms. Perhaps this is already the case; I've been out of the loop for a while and am coming into this conversation without much recent background information. Josh mattfeldman78 wrote: Hi, I have taken the LIBERTY to create a wiki for those who oppose draconian measures on the internet. Please help to build this up if you feel that this is important! site: http://nobloggerscode.pbwiki.com http://nobloggerscode.pbwiki.com password: knowfascism --- In [EMAIL
[videoblogging] anyone here check out vuze.com
The makers of the popular Azureus bittorent client have gotten some funding for their vuze.com project. http://www.vuze.com Far as I can tell it's a bittorrent based video sharing site for high def only video. No RSS whatsoever but they do have some interesting high def videos. They have a mac client available, perhaps some sort of viewer/player though I haven't tried it. Just curious if anyone has used them or even heard of them before. -Mike mefeedia.com mmeiser.com/blog [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Cinema Without Show Business
Hello Will, The URL in your signature has an error in it. You have... http://wwwtaylorstreetstudio.com/blog A dot is missing after the www. (I'm guessing) It should be... http://www.taylorstreetstudio.com/blog See ya On 4/12/07, Will Luers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, This is something I wrote last summer and just came out this month on an academic journal called Post-Identity, edited by Nick Rombes. It was written in response to discussions here last year about ads and personal media - so it is a bit out of date! Not so much vlog theory as finding common ground for a certain kind of cinema practice. Anyway, it may be of interest to some. Would appreciate any feedback: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cinema Without Show Business: a Poetics of Vlogging by Will Luers http://tinyurl.com/2z8bb2 thanks, Will http://wwwtaylorstreetstudio.com/blog -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
[videoblogging] Re: Fwd: Draft Blogger's Code of Conduct
All things eventually become goverened, it's a byproduct of life. I as a parent govern my childern, my company govern's my actions during the time that I am there, (and sometime for some even after). And so on. Goverenering happens either by group decree or outside forces, it happens and the net will be no different. It already is goverened to a degree now. Not saying I agree with that but it does happen. Regardless it will not change those who promote hate, who start flame wars, those who just want to cause chaos. Because just as surly as there is goverenance there will be those who oppose it. Again a byproduct of life. Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the point is that there is not a limited number of gatekeepers for content and activity on the net. Anyone can setup a website (blog or otherwise) with their own rules, filters and gatekeeping. If someone doesn't like that, they can create their site. A code of conduct starts to places governance rules on the net. It is work to bring central governing or government to the net. It has some of the aspects of governmental rule: reaching rules by consensus, protecting the rights of the weak. One of the next steps is enforcing the rules accepted. -- Enric -==- http://cirne.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Heath heathparks@ wrote: but the internet is not unfilted now, and I am not saying that I think a code of conduct badge is the right answer and yes it can very much be a slippery slope, this whole thing reminds me a lot of the creation of the comic code authority for comics back in the 50's I won't go into great detail here but it's a fasinating story and the parrells are very interesting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], mattfeldman78 mattfeldman78@ wrote: I suppose I might have jumped the F-word (fascist) a bit early on this one--however i do still stand behind my argument that this is not a good idea and should be opposed by people interested in preserving freedom online. I think this quote from Robert Scoble says alot: I do find disquieting the social pressure to get on board with this program. Tim O'Reilly is a guy who really can affect one's career online (and off, too). I do have to admit that I feel some pressure just to get on board here and that makes me feel very uneasy. Lets keep in mind that this code is not coming from individual media makers who are expressing their individual ethics on their own sites. It's coming from a very influential man, who wants bloggers to conform to a set of rules that he has created. As more and more bloggers (and vloggers) begin to earn a living from their efforts I can see a time when advertisers will refuse to pay bloggers who do not have a mock sheriff badge on their site. It's not worth the risk to them. This will render the web as useless as traditional media. As I said earlier, we already have all the laws in place that we need to take care of these issues. Using the threats that were made to Kathy Sierra as a pretense feels very wrong to me. It's like the government demanding all of our search records from Google to find kiddy porn, or tapping our phones to fight terrorism, or unconstitutionally searching your bag in the subway. It's a slippery slope to introduce draconian codes into the last bastion of unfiltered information that we have, no matter how subtle or seemingly reasonable they may seem on the surface. I think Benjamin Franklin summed it up best: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Fight the power! website: http://nobloggerscode.pbwiki.com twitter: http://twitter.com/nobloggerscode --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Josh Wolf inthecity@ wrote: Someone please explain this to me, I am very confused about this debate. Let's look at it this way, if I as a media maker decide to make a page detailing my own code of ethic and an attached wiki to further refine and develop my own ethics through a public conversation is this in any way fascist? I don't feel it is, but if you do, please explain. Now, what if others elected to adopt my own code for their sites? What if other codes began to develop and some chose to adopt those and others remained unaffiliated. If this develops organically and without any outside or heavily weighted influence is put on taking part in any particular school of thought then such a development would actually serve to enhance the visitors experience and abilities to discern how much weight to give any particular
[videoblogging] Re: Fwd: Draft Blogger's Code of Conduct
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All things eventually become goverened, it's a byproduct of life. I as a parent govern my childern, my company govern's my actions during the time that I am there, (and sometime for some even after). And so on. Goverenering happens either by group decree or outside forces, it happens and the net will be no different. It already is goverened to a degree now. Not saying I agree with that but it does happen. Regardless it will not change those who promote hate, who start flame wars, those who just want to cause chaos. Because just as surly as there is goverenance there will be those who oppose it. Again a byproduct of life. As governance is imposed those that oppose it will escalate. Have a rule of no anonymous posting except under a myriad of exception, and hackers will find ways to break that. That will lead those that govern to propose making it easier to find out who is posting. Tracking IP# centrally, new laptops with chips that allow identification, etc. If that's implemented, hackers will find a way to sabotage that. Which will require a more drastic solution to break privacy. All in the name of the good of the people. Those that govern will use those that hate as a reason for all to give up more of their freedom. -- Enric Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Enric enric@ wrote: I think the point is that there is not a limited number of gatekeepers for content and activity on the net. Anyone can setup a website (blog or otherwise) with their own rules, filters and gatekeeping. If someone doesn't like that, they can create their site. A code of conduct starts to places governance rules on the net. It is work to bring central governing or government to the net. It has some of the aspects of governmental rule: reaching rules by consensus, protecting the rights of the weak. One of the next steps is enforcing the rules accepted. -- Enric -==- http://cirne.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Heath heathparks@ wrote: but the internet is not unfilted now, and I am not saying that I think a code of conduct badge is the right answer and yes it can very much be a slippery slope, this whole thing reminds me a lot of the creation of the comic code authority for comics back in the 50's I won't go into great detail here but it's a fasinating story and the parrells are very interesting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], mattfeldman78 mattfeldman78@ wrote: I suppose I might have jumped the F-word (fascist) a bit early on this one--however i do still stand behind my argument that this is not a good idea and should be opposed by people interested in preserving freedom online. I think this quote from Robert Scoble says alot: I do find disquieting the social pressure to get on board with this program. Tim O'Reilly is a guy who really can affect one's career online (and off, too). I do have to admit that I feel some pressure just to get on board here and that makes me feel very uneasy. Lets keep in mind that this code is not coming from individual media makers who are expressing their individual ethics on their own sites. It's coming from a very influential man, who wants bloggers to conform to a set of rules that he has created. As more and more bloggers (and vloggers) begin to earn a living from their efforts I can see a time when advertisers will refuse to pay bloggers who do not have a mock sheriff badge on their site. It's not worth the risk to them. This will render the web as useless as traditional media. As I said earlier, we already have all the laws in place that we need to take care of these issues. Using the threats that were made to Kathy Sierra as a pretense feels very wrong to me. It's like the government demanding all of our search records from Google to find kiddy porn, or tapping our phones to fight terrorism, or unconstitutionally searching your bag in the subway. It's a slippery slope to introduce draconian codes into the last bastion of unfiltered information that we have, no matter how subtle or seemingly reasonable they may seem on the surface. I think Benjamin Franklin summed it up best: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Fight the power! website: http://nobloggerscode.pbwiki.com twitter: http://twitter.com/nobloggerscode --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Josh Wolf inthecity@ wrote: Someone please explain this to me, I am very confused about this debate. Let's look
[videoblogging] 2nd camera-person needed tomorrow
Anybody in NYC want to shoot a great band tomorrow night? Here's the band: http://urltea.com/54d Here's the place: http://www.rodeobar.com I'll buy you a dinner at the venue beforehand. They have some pretty good bbq/southwestern food. Show starts at 10, and will probably last a couple hours. -- Adam Quirk Wreck Salvage 551.208.4644 Brooklyn, NY http://wreckandsalvage.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Fwd: Draft Blogger's Code of Conduct
But life with no governance will lead to chaos. It's been proven by history time and time again. But now we are speaking in complete generalities, you can say, Those that govern will use those that hate as a reason for all to give up more of their freedom. and I could say it's because we have those who hate, who would kill, who have no regrard for humanity, it's because of them that we need to be goverened Both statements can be true, based on context and application. The world is not perfect, far from it. Does it mean we should give up and no longer try? I don't believe that, but honestly I look around and sometimes I wonder if we will still be here in a hundred years, or even fifty. How many cultures have been lost through time because of hate or fear or mother nature or God if you prefer. We continue to unearth proof that many of our advancements especially in science and math were discovered 1,000 of years ago. History, cultures, people all gone and their civilizations gone with them. Did goverance destroy them or hate? Or both? We may never know. But this I do know, very few absolutes exsist in this world and there has to be a balance. What that is, I hope we live to find out. Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Heath heathparks@ wrote: All things eventually become goverened, it's a byproduct of life. I as a parent govern my childern, my company govern's my actions during the time that I am there, (and sometime for some even after). And so on. Goverenering happens either by group decree or outside forces, it happens and the net will be no different. It already is goverened to a degree now. Not saying I agree with that but it does happen. Regardless it will not change those who promote hate, who start flame wars, those who just want to cause chaos. Because just as surly as there is goverenance there will be those who oppose it. Again a byproduct of life. As governance is imposed those that oppose it will escalate. Have a rule of no anonymous posting except under a myriad of exception, and hackers will find ways to break that. That will lead those that govern to propose making it easier to find out who is posting. Tracking IP# centrally, new laptops with chips that allow identification, etc. If that's implemented, hackers will find a way to sabotage that. Which will require a more drastic solution to break privacy. All in the name of the good of the people. Those that govern will use those that hate as a reason for all to give up more of their freedom. -- Enric Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Enric enric@ wrote: I think the point is that there is not a limited number of gatekeepers for content and activity on the net. Anyone can setup a website (blog or otherwise) with their own rules, filters and gatekeeping. If someone doesn't like that, they can create their site. A code of conduct starts to places governance rules on the net. It is work to bring central governing or government to the net. It has some of the aspects of governmental rule: reaching rules by consensus, protecting the rights of the weak. One of the next steps is enforcing the rules accepted. -- Enric -==- http://cirne.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Heath heathparks@ wrote: but the internet is not unfilted now, and I am not saying that I think a code of conduct badge is the right answer and yes it can very much be a slippery slope, this whole thing reminds me a lot of the creation of the comic code authority for comics back in the 50's I won't go into great detail here but it's a fasinating story and the parrells are very interesting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], mattfeldman78 mattfeldman78@ wrote: I suppose I might have jumped the F-word (fascist) a bit early on this one--however i do still stand behind my argument that this is not a good idea and should be opposed by people interested in preserving freedom online. I think this quote from Robert Scoble says alot: I do find disquieting the social pressure to get on board with this program. Tim O'Reilly is a guy who really can affect one's career online (and off, too). I do have to admit that I feel some pressure just to get on board here and that makes me feel very uneasy. Lets keep in mind that this code is not coming from individual media makers who are expressing their individual ethics on their own sites. It's coming from a very influential man, who wants bloggers to conform to a set of rules that he has created.
[videoblogging] Need a database guru to help me setup PHP for a wordpress blog
Hi folks, I know I'm just a grumpy old guy that likes to control everything, but I would like to set up my own wordpress blog - on my own site. I really like workpress, but if I have to pay for a site in order to control the css - then I would rather roll my own. BUT I don't have the chops to set up a database, and when I read the instructions that they have on the wordpress forum, it doesn't translate into my old grey head. Anybody out there that could walk me through it? I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Milt Lee
Re: [videoblogging] 2nd camera-person needed tomorrow
damn, I wish I could -I'm part of the Hedwig show at IFC, but anytime you need an additional camera guy, I'll be sure to try and be there! -brian (taxiplasm) On 4/12/07, Adam Quirk, Wreck Salvage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anybody in NYC want to shoot a great band tomorrow night? Here's the band: http://urltea.com/54d Here's the place: http://www.rodeobar.com I'll buy you a dinner at the venue beforehand. They have some pretty good bbq/southwestern food. Show starts at 10, and will probably last a couple hours. -- Adam Quirk Wreck Salvage 551.208.4644 Brooklyn, NY http://wreckandsalvage.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Brian Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 210-683-6027 taxiplasm.net [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Need a database guru to help me setup PHP for a wordpress blog
Oh, and if you are that person, would you just email me directly? Thanks! milt at realrez dot com
Re: [videoblogging] Need a database guru to help me setup PHP for a wordpress blog
hi milt a lot depends on what kind of hosting setup you have. pardon me if i am stating the obvious. for example, at places like dreamhost and bluehost things are very simple. my sql is already installed and installing wordpress is just one or two steps. both are menu options in the control panels. the first step is to create a database which amounts to specifying a name for it, a user and a password. the second step is to select the wordpress install and that usually asks you for the name, user and password for the database you just created and a few questions about things like what folder or subdomain do you want to put the blog in. it also asks for yet another user and pass, this time for the blog admin. if your hosting does not have these menu options or something similar, then you will need to do a command line install. questions? do you have a control panel that allows one click word press installs like i just described? if not, do you already have mysql installed? also, sometimes you need to request command line or shell access. do you have that setup yet? that is, can you log in to your server and get a command line prompt. if that is the case, then we need to get into details. we can take the discussion offline if that is the case. regards, markus On Apr 12, 2007, at 8:33 PM, Milt Lee wrote: Hi folks, I know I'm just a grumpy old guy that likes to control everything, but I would like to set up my own wordpress blog - on my own site. I really like workpress, but if I have to pay for a site in order to control the css - then I would rather roll my own. BUT I don't have the chops to set up a database, and when I read the instructions that they have on the wordpress forum, it doesn't translate into my old grey head. Anybody out there that could walk me through it? I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Milt Lee -- http://SpinXpress.com/Markus_Sandy http://Ourmedia.org/Markus_Sandy [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] GALACTICAST launches a new sponsorship level: GOD EMPEROR
That's right, folks. For only $20,000 you can become GOD EMPEROR of GALACTICAST... with all the benefits of a Producer (linked credit in shownotes, full screen ad credit in our videos) but for AN ENTIRE YEAR! Will it work? Who knows... If it does work, the world will be a beautiful place. Yours, Rudy and Casey --- http://galacticast.com/
[videoblogging] Our Apple TV Settings
Time to share... For those interested parties... you don't have to export from Movie to Apple TV. With these settings, you can get a file %50 of the size you would get with the default settings. Just click on Movie to QuickTime Movie in QuickTime Pro and enter the settings in this screenshot: http://www.flickr.com/photos/caseymckinnon/433249448/ If you're using 4:3 instead of 16:9, put the dimensions as 640x480 instead of 640x360. Lots of love, Rudy and Casey --- http://galacticast.com
