On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > [...] > By using multiple SQLITE_OMIT compile-time options to leave out > features, I can get the size down to 308,189 bytes using gcc-7 -Os > -m32.
@Richard can you elaborate some more on how you make this kind of a build? I wouldn't mind if we drop some more less-used options from the default build to keep the standard size "less than half a megabyte". Also -1 for kibibyte/mebibyte wording on my part. On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Christian Schmitz <realbasicli...@monkeybreadsoftware.de> wrote: > [...] > Maybe your graph should have three lines. +1 would be nice, not major though (I think) On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:58 AM, R Smith <ryansmit...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] > Towards my point though, both Bob and Vance, would you be especially swayed > if the marketing slogan had said "under a megabyte" as opposed to "under > half a megabyte"? I think Vance already gave the answer (negative). Would it be an idea to have size slogans for both regular and embedded builds? _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
