On May 31, 2018 12:18:51 PM EDT, Dominique Devienne <ddevie...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:44 PM Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > >> For many years, we have boasted that the size of the SQLite library >is >> "less than half a megabyte". >> > >Given where the conversation is going, let me point out that many do >not >care one bit about the lib's size :) > >I'd much rather have an SQLite with tons of features, than forego those >in >the name saving a few bytes, >to save a few bucks on the embedded chip and flash for commercial >products >that don't even pay for SQLite. > >SQLite is already amazingly small for the value it brings. And if >people >want "smaller", they can still stick >with older leaner versions of SQLite too. My $0.02... --DD >_______________________________________________ >sqlite-users mailing list >sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org >http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
I agree with this sentiment. I mostly use SQLite in PHP, where it is awkward to customize SQLite, and all but impossible to rely on features not included in the standard build when distributing to others. A more powerful default configuration would be very beneficial, and a less powerful one possibly crippling. -- J. King _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
