>>Also it's not material that >> you can listen to in different environments necessarily, like on a walkman >> in the tram/bus. > > >I disagree...
Well maybe some do - I find it easy to listen to progressive trance when I work as it doesn't distract me though I don't dig it at all. But many wouldn't be able to hack it. That's why I used the qualifier "necessarily" - I specialise in qualifying words. >I state that this is the utter beauty of it!! Why have an identifiable >artist? Well there is good anonymous and less alluring anonymous - like boy bands and blonde pop singers could fall in the latter category. I mean 'anonymous' as in instantly forgettable and emphemeral which is fine, everything has its place, even Spice and Britney, etc, which is at the opposite end of the spectrum. Also, the fact that its raw and so undefined allows so much more >room for the listener to project out onto, the Jaguar and other melodic >tracks are, of coarse, amazing in there own right, Actually, I never used the word 'melodic' and that isn't necessary for a good track - it could be the groove or the texture or an effect or something of that nature. I just don't think that Swedish stuff endures on that level. It's all good. I have some of those guys' stuff too. I like Cari and Adam's housier work on Svek - some of which is now available on CD, by the way.
