Cool that Shake posted a comment to the article acknowledging the funk.

thanks,

Jeffrey J. Davis
President & COO, AGY
fon: +1.218.8332847 (21883DAVIS)
fax: +1.803.643.4085
cel: +86.158.0184.9459
[email protected] / [email protected]
jeffrey.james.davis JeffreyJDavis

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Tristan Watkins
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2010 22:23, kent williams wrote:
>>
>> I think the article makes some good points but mostly in the context
>> of the UK, where musical sub-genres are written about as though they
>> were stars in their own right.
>>
>> The Detroit attitude is, I'd hope, more eclectic, and the musicians I
>> talk to think more in terms of good or bad than this genre or that
>> genre. So I can talk with Alan Oldham about Creation Records Shoegazer
>> bands, and with Shake about Cooly G.
>
> The way I read it, he was saying that eclecticism and perpetual reinvention 
> is precisely what makes dubstep (so far) like the early days of Detroit 
> techno - that it is evolving very quickly, pulling in influences from all 
> over the shop and is difficult to pin down. I think that's a fair point. If 
> you listen to a lot of the best dubstep producers' DJ sets you'll find 
> influences from all over the last 25 years and within the various styles of 
> dubstep.
>
> Also, I think there's a misperception that it's just kids making this stuff. 
> Untold has been producing since '93 according to this RA article: 
> http://www.residentadvisor.net/feature.aspx?1105
>
> Not that I think the comparison can stretch for miles or that anyone should 
> take it out of context.
>
> Ultimately, I'm just getting a bit irritated with people making more out of 
> it than it is or of writing it off altogether. Whether it's to everyone's 
> taste is one thing but I would hope it's evident that this isn't narrow or 
> purely derivative. In my mind it's one of the more interesting things to 
> happen in a long time precisely because it's not as narrow and codified as 
> any of the previous big electronic music trends. It's almost the complete 
> opposite.
>
> Tristan

Reply via email to